TSTP Solution File: SWV128+1 by PyRes---1.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.3
% Problem : SWV128+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:15:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.36s 0.60s
% Output : Refutation 0.36s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07 % Problem : SWV128+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.06/0.26 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.26 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.26 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.26 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.26 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.06/0.26 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 18:17:22 EDT 2022
% 0.06/0.26 % CPUTime :
% 0.36/0.60 # Version: 1.3
% 0.36/0.60 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.36/0.60 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.36/0.60 fof(thruster_inuse_0001,conjecture,(((((((t_defuse=use&tvar_defuse=use)&(![A]:(![B]:((((leq(n0,A)&leq(n0,B))&leq(A,minus(m_measvars,n1)))&leq(B,minus(n_steps,n1)))=>a_select3(rho_defuse,A,B)=use))))&(![C]:(![D]:((((leq(n0,C)&leq(n0,D))&leq(C,n7))&leq(D,minus(n_steps,n1)))=>a_select3(tr_defuse,C,D)=use))))&(![E]:((leq(n0,E)&leq(E,minus(n_statevars,n1)))=>a_select2(xinit_defuse,E)=use)))&(![F]:((leq(n0,F)&leq(F,minus(n_statevars,n1)))=>a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,F)=use)))&(![G]:(![H]:((((leq(n0,G)&leq(n0,H))&leq(G,minus(m_measvars,n1)))&leq(H,minus(n_steps,n1)))=>a_select3(z_defuse,G,H)=use))))=>true),input).
% 0.36/0.60 fof(c73,negated_conjecture,(~(((((((t_defuse=use&tvar_defuse=use)&(![A]:(![B]:((((leq(n0,A)&leq(n0,B))&leq(A,minus(m_measvars,n1)))&leq(B,minus(n_steps,n1)))=>a_select3(rho_defuse,A,B)=use))))&(![C]:(![D]:((((leq(n0,C)&leq(n0,D))&leq(C,n7))&leq(D,minus(n_steps,n1)))=>a_select3(tr_defuse,C,D)=use))))&(![E]:((leq(n0,E)&leq(E,minus(n_statevars,n1)))=>a_select2(xinit_defuse,E)=use)))&(![F]:((leq(n0,F)&leq(F,minus(n_statevars,n1)))=>a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,F)=use)))&(![G]:(![H]:((((leq(n0,G)&leq(n0,H))&leq(G,minus(m_measvars,n1)))&leq(H,minus(n_steps,n1)))=>a_select3(z_defuse,G,H)=use))))=>true)),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[thruster_inuse_0001])).
% 0.36/0.60 fof(c74,negated_conjecture,(((((((t_defuse=use&tvar_defuse=use)&(![A]:(![B]:((((~leq(n0,A)|~leq(n0,B))|~leq(A,minus(m_measvars,n1)))|~leq(B,minus(n_steps,n1)))|a_select3(rho_defuse,A,B)=use))))&(![C]:(![D]:((((~leq(n0,C)|~leq(n0,D))|~leq(C,n7))|~leq(D,minus(n_steps,n1)))|a_select3(tr_defuse,C,D)=use))))&(![E]:((~leq(n0,E)|~leq(E,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(xinit_defuse,E)=use)))&(![F]:((~leq(n0,F)|~leq(F,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,F)=use)))&(![G]:(![H]:((((~leq(n0,G)|~leq(n0,H))|~leq(G,minus(m_measvars,n1)))|~leq(H,minus(n_steps,n1)))|a_select3(z_defuse,G,H)=use))))&~true),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c73])).
% 0.36/0.60 fof(c76,negated_conjecture,(![X8]:(![X9]:(![X10]:(![X11]:(![X12]:(![X13]:(![X14]:(![X15]:(((((((t_defuse=use&tvar_defuse=use)&((((~leq(n0,X8)|~leq(n0,X9))|~leq(X8,minus(m_measvars,n1)))|~leq(X9,minus(n_steps,n1)))|a_select3(rho_defuse,X8,X9)=use))&((((~leq(n0,X10)|~leq(n0,X11))|~leq(X10,n7))|~leq(X11,minus(n_steps,n1)))|a_select3(tr_defuse,X10,X11)=use))&((~leq(n0,X12)|~leq(X12,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(xinit_defuse,X12)=use))&((~leq(n0,X13)|~leq(X13,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X13)=use))&((((~leq(n0,X14)|~leq(n0,X15))|~leq(X14,minus(m_measvars,n1)))|~leq(X15,minus(n_steps,n1)))|a_select3(z_defuse,X14,X15)=use))&~true))))))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c75,negated_conjecture,(((((((t_defuse=use&tvar_defuse=use)&(![X8]:(![X9]:((((~leq(n0,X8)|~leq(n0,X9))|~leq(X8,minus(m_measvars,n1)))|~leq(X9,minus(n_steps,n1)))|a_select3(rho_defuse,X8,X9)=use))))&(![X10]:(![X11]:((((~leq(n0,X10)|~leq(n0,X11))|~leq(X10,n7))|~leq(X11,minus(n_steps,n1)))|a_select3(tr_defuse,X10,X11)=use))))&(![X12]:((~leq(n0,X12)|~leq(X12,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(xinit_defuse,X12)=use)))&(![X13]:((~leq(n0,X13)|~leq(X13,minus(n_statevars,n1)))|a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X13)=use)))&(![X14]:(![X15]:((((~leq(n0,X14)|~leq(n0,X15))|~leq(X14,minus(m_measvars,n1)))|~leq(X15,minus(n_steps,n1)))|a_select3(z_defuse,X14,X15)=use))))&~true),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c74])).])).
% 0.36/0.60 cnf(c84,negated_conjecture,~true,inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c76])).
% 0.36/0.60 fof(ttrue,axiom,true,input).
% 0.36/0.60 cnf(c86,axiom,true,inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[ttrue])).
% 0.36/0.60 cnf(c471,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c86, c84])).
% 0.36/0.60 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.36/0.60
% 0.36/0.60 # Initial clauses : 327
% 0.36/0.60 # Processed clauses : 2
% 0.36/0.60 # Factors computed : 0
% 0.36/0.60 # Resolvents computed: 1
% 0.36/0.60 # Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.36/0.60 # Forward subsumed : 0
% 0.36/0.60 # Backward subsumed : 0
% 0.36/0.60 # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.36/0.60 # User time : 0.318 s
% 0.36/0.60 # System time : 0.014 s
% 0.36/0.60 # Total time : 0.332 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------