TSTP Solution File: SWV128+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWV128+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:15:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 1.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 56 ( 14 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 24 ( 7 avg)
% Number of connectives : 51 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 35 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 14 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thruster_inuse_0001,conjecture,
( ( t_defuse = use
& tvar_defuse = use
& ! [X14,X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X14,minus(m_measvars,n1))
& leq(X18,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
=> a_select3(rho_defuse,X14,X18) = use )
& ! [X4,X20] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(n0,X20)
& leq(X4,n7)
& leq(X20,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
=> a_select3(tr_defuse,X4,X20) = use )
& ! [X21] :
( ( leq(n0,X21)
& leq(X21,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
=> a_select2(xinit_defuse,X21) = use )
& ! [X22] :
( ( leq(n0,X22)
& leq(X22,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
=> a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X22) = use )
& ! [X28,X29] :
( ( leq(n0,X28)
& leq(n0,X29)
& leq(X28,minus(m_measvars,n1))
& leq(X29,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
=> a_select3(z_defuse,X28,X29) = use ) )
=> true ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',thruster_inuse_0001) ).
fof(ttrue,axiom,
true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',ttrue) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
( epred1_0
<=> ( t_defuse = use
& tvar_defuse = use
& ! [X14,X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X14,minus(m_measvars,n1))
& leq(X18,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
=> a_select3(rho_defuse,X14,X18) = use )
& ! [X4,X20] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(n0,X20)
& leq(X4,n7)
& leq(X20,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
=> a_select3(tr_defuse,X4,X20) = use )
& ! [X21] :
( ( leq(n0,X21)
& leq(X21,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
=> a_select2(xinit_defuse,X21) = use )
& ! [X22] :
( ( leq(n0,X22)
& leq(X22,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
=> a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X22) = use )
& ! [X28,X29] :
( ( leq(n0,X28)
& leq(n0,X29)
& leq(X28,minus(m_measvars,n1))
& leq(X29,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
=> a_select3(z_defuse,X28,X29) = use ) ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( epred1_0
=> true ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thruster_inuse_0001]),c_0_2]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( epred1_0
& ~ true ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ttrue]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SWV128+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.36 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 18:34:01 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.26/1.44 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/1.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.26/1.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.26/1.44
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof found!
% 0.26/1.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/1.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object total steps : 8
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object clause steps : 3
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object initial clauses used : 2
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 0.26/1.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.26/1.44 # Parsed axioms : 92
% 0.26/1.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 23
% 0.26/1.44 # Initial clauses : 80
% 0.26/1.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.26/1.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 78
% 0.26/1.44 # Processed clauses : 2
% 0.26/1.44 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 1
% 0.26/1.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.26/1.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.26/1.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 76
% 0.26/1.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 144
% 0.26/1.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.26/1.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4038
% 0.26/1.44
% 0.26/1.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/1.44 # User time : 0.016 s
% 0.26/1.44 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.26/1.44 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.26/1.44 # Maximum resident set size: 2956 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------