TSTP Solution File: SWV126+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : SWV126+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:55:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.85s 0.62s
% Output : Refutation 1.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 5 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f412,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f298]) ).
fof(f298,plain,
init != init,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f90]) ).
fof(f90,plain,
init != init,
inference(flattening,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
init != init,
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f53,conjecture,
init = init,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thruster_init_0001) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWV126+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 19:03:41 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.58 % (19197)ott+10_1:1_kws=precedence:tgt=ground:i=482:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/482Mi)
% 0.20/0.58 % (19190)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:i=59:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/59Mi)
% 0.20/0.59 % (19179)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.59 % (19181)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.20/0.59 % (19181)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.20/0.59 % (19181)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.59 % (19181)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.59 % (19181)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.59 % (19181)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.20/0.59 % (19181)Termination phase: Naming
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 % (19181)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.20/0.59 % (19181)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.59 % (19181)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.20/0.59 % (19181)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.59 % (19181)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 % (19189)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.20/0.60 % (19198)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=500:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/500Mi)
% 0.20/0.60 % (19185)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.20/0.60 % (19183)ott+2_1:1_fsr=off:gsp=on:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.20/0.60 % (19182)ott-1_1:6_av=off:cond=on:fsr=off:nwc=3.0:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.60 % (19184)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.20/0.60 % (19173)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 0.20/0.60 % (19178)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/48Mi)
% 0.20/0.60 % (19195)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.20/0.60 % (19182)First to succeed.
% 1.85/0.61 % (19196)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 1.85/0.61 % (19174)ott+10_1:32_abs=on:br=off:urr=ec_only:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 1.85/0.62 % (19177)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.85/0.62 % (19189)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.85/0.62 % (19176)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.85/0.62 % (19175)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 1.85/0.62 % (19182)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.85/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.85/0.62 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 1.85/0.62 % (19182)------------------------------
% 1.85/0.62 % (19182)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.85/0.62 % (19182)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.85/0.62 % (19182)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.85/0.62
% 1.85/0.62 % (19182)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 1.85/0.62 % (19182)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 1.85/0.62 % (19182)Instructions burned: 10 (million)
% 1.85/0.62 % (19182)------------------------------
% 1.85/0.62 % (19182)------------------------------
% 1.85/0.62 % (19172)Success in time 0.266 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------