TSTP Solution File: SWV121+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV121+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:43:29 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 40 ( 6 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 23 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn; 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(quaternion_ds1_symm_0014,conjecture,
( ( ! [X14,X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X14,minus(n6,n1))
& leq(X18,minus(n6,n1)) )
=> a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X14,X18) = a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X18,X14) )
& ! [X4,X20] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(n0,X20)
& leq(X4,minus(n3,n1))
& leq(X20,minus(n3,n1)) )
=> a_select3(r_ds1_filter,X4,X20) = a_select3(r_ds1_filter,X20,X4) )
& ! [X21,X22] :
( ( leq(n0,X21)
& leq(n0,X22)
& leq(X21,minus(n6,n1))
& leq(X22,minus(n6,n1)) )
=> a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter,X21,X22) = a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter,X22,X21) ) )
=> true ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Uno83Pp6FV/E---3.1_5982.p',quaternion_ds1_symm_0014) ).
fof(ttrue,axiom,
true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Uno83Pp6FV/E---3.1_5982.p',ttrue) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
( epred1_0
<=> ( ! [X14,X18] :
( ( leq(n0,X14)
& leq(n0,X18)
& leq(X14,minus(n6,n1))
& leq(X18,minus(n6,n1)) )
=> a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X14,X18) = a_select3(q_ds1_filter,X18,X14) )
& ! [X4,X20] :
( ( leq(n0,X4)
& leq(n0,X20)
& leq(X4,minus(n3,n1))
& leq(X20,minus(n3,n1)) )
=> a_select3(r_ds1_filter,X4,X20) = a_select3(r_ds1_filter,X20,X4) )
& ! [X21,X22] :
( ( leq(n0,X21)
& leq(n0,X22)
& leq(X21,minus(n6,n1))
& leq(X22,minus(n6,n1)) )
=> a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter,X21,X22) = a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter,X22,X21) ) ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( epred1_0
=> true ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[quaternion_ds1_symm_0014]),c_0_2]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( epred1_0
& ~ true ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ttrue]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV121+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:31:14 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Uno83Pp6FV/E---3.1_5982.p
% 0.17/0.45 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # new_bool_1 with pid 6072 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.17/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.45 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 100s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 6074 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.45 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 100s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.45
% 0.17/0.45 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.45 # Parsed axioms : 94
% 0.17/0.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 23
% 0.17/0.45 # Initial clauses : 78
% 0.17/0.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 78
% 0.17/0.45 # Processed clauses : 2
% 0.17/0.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 1
% 0.17/0.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.17/0.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.17/0.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 76
% 0.17/0.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 144
% 0.17/0.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3658
% 0.17/0.45
% 0.17/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.45 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.45 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 2076 pages
% 0.17/0.45
% 0.17/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.45 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.45 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1800 pages
% 0.17/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------