TSTP Solution File: SWV121+1 by Duper---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SWV121+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:58:07 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.50s 3.71s
% Output   : Proof 3.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SWV121+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 03:30:52 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.50/3.71  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/3.71  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/3.71  Clause #50 (by assumption #[]): Eq true True
% 3.50/3.71  Clause #52 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.50/3.71    (Not
% 3.50/3.71      (And
% 3.50/3.71          (And
% 3.50/3.71            (∀ (A B : Iota),
% 3.50/3.71              And (And (And (leq n0 A) (leq n0 B)) (leq A (minus n6 n1))) (leq B (minus n6 n1)) →
% 3.50/3.71                Eq (a_select3 q_ds1_filter A B) (a_select3 q_ds1_filter B A))
% 3.50/3.71            (∀ (C D : Iota),
% 3.50/3.71              And (And (And (leq n0 C) (leq n0 D)) (leq C (minus n3 n1))) (leq D (minus n3 n1)) →
% 3.50/3.71                Eq (a_select3 r_ds1_filter C D) (a_select3 r_ds1_filter D C)))
% 3.50/3.71          (∀ (E F : Iota),
% 3.50/3.71            And (And (And (leq n0 E) (leq n0 F)) (leq E (minus n6 n1))) (leq F (minus n6 n1)) →
% 3.50/3.71              Eq (a_select3 pminus_ds1_filter E F) (a_select3 pminus_ds1_filter F E)) →
% 3.50/3.71        true))
% 3.50/3.71    True
% 3.50/3.71  Clause #94 (by clausification #[52]): Eq
% 3.50/3.71    (And
% 3.50/3.71        (And
% 3.50/3.71          (∀ (A B : Iota),
% 3.50/3.71            And (And (And (leq n0 A) (leq n0 B)) (leq A (minus n6 n1))) (leq B (minus n6 n1)) →
% 3.50/3.71              Eq (a_select3 q_ds1_filter A B) (a_select3 q_ds1_filter B A))
% 3.50/3.71          (∀ (C D : Iota),
% 3.50/3.71            And (And (And (leq n0 C) (leq n0 D)) (leq C (minus n3 n1))) (leq D (minus n3 n1)) →
% 3.50/3.71              Eq (a_select3 r_ds1_filter C D) (a_select3 r_ds1_filter D C)))
% 3.50/3.71        (∀ (E F : Iota),
% 3.50/3.71          And (And (And (leq n0 E) (leq n0 F)) (leq E (minus n6 n1))) (leq F (minus n6 n1)) →
% 3.50/3.71            Eq (a_select3 pminus_ds1_filter E F) (a_select3 pminus_ds1_filter F E)) →
% 3.50/3.71      true)
% 3.50/3.71    False
% 3.50/3.71  Clause #96 (by clausification #[94]): Eq true False
% 3.50/3.71  Clause #106 (by superposition #[96, 50]): Eq False True
% 3.50/3.71  Clause #127 (by clausification #[106]): False
% 3.50/3.71  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------