TSTP Solution File: SWV114+1 by ePrincess---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem : SWV114+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:50:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 24.76s 7.12s
% Output : Proof 71.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV114+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 18:07:53 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.56/0.59 ____ _
% 0.56/0.59 ___ / __ \_____(_)___ ________ __________
% 0.56/0.59 / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.56/0.59 / __/ ____/ / / / / / / /__/ __(__ |__ )
% 0.56/0.59 \___/_/ /_/ /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/
% 0.56/0.59
% 0.56/0.59 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.56/0.60 (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.56/0.60
% 0.56/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.56/0.60 (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.56/0.60 (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.56/0.60 Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.56/0.60 Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.56/0.60
% 0.56/0.60 For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.56/0.60
% 0.56/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.72/0.65 Prover 0: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 2.26/1.10 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 4.02/1.61 Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.29/1.65 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.73/5.94 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 20.27/6.08 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 21.29/6.27 Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 21.29/6.28 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 24.76/7.12 Prover 1: proved (1177ms)
% 24.76/7.12 Prover 0: stopped
% 24.76/7.12
% 24.76/7.12 No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 24.76/7.12 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 24.76/7.12
% 24.76/7.12 Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 68.40/29.85 found it (size 2104)
% 68.40/29.85
% 68.40/29.85 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 68.40/29.85 Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification:
% 68.40/29.85 | (0) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : ? [v4] : ? [v5] : ? [v6] : ? [v7] : ? [v8] : ? [v9] : ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ( ~ (def = use) & minus(n6, n1) = v1 & minus(n999, n1) = v0 & minus(n3, n1) = v2 & minus(n0, n1) = v3 & succ(n5) = n6 & succ(n4) = n5 & succ(n3) = n4 & succ(n2) = n3 & succ(n1) = n2 & succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0 & succ(n0) = n1 & leq(pv5, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, pv5) = 0 & gt(n6, n5) = 0 & gt(n6, n4) = 0 & gt(n6, n3) = 0 & gt(n6, n2) = 0 & gt(n6, n1) = 0 & gt(n6, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n6, n0) = 0 & gt(n999, n6) = 0 & gt(n999, n5) = 0 & gt(n999, n4) = 0 & gt(n999, n3) = 0 & gt(n999, n2) = 0 & gt(n999, n1) = 0 & gt(n999, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n999, n0) = 0 & gt(n5, n4) = 0 & gt(n5, n3) = 0 & gt(n5, n2) = 0 & gt(n5, n1) = 0 & gt(n5, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n5, n0) = 0 & gt(n4, n3) = 0 & gt(n4, n2) = 0 & gt(n4, n1) = 0 & gt(n4, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n4, n0) = 0 & gt(n3, n2) = 0 & gt(n3, n1) = 0 & gt(n3, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n3, n0) = 0 & gt(n2, n1) = 0 & gt(n2, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n2, n0) = 0 & gt(n1, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n1, n0) = 0 & gt(n0, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & true & ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : ! [v18] : ! [v19] : ! [v20] : ! [v21] : ! [v22] : ! [v23] : ! [v24] : ! [v25] : ! [v26] : ! [v27] : ! [v28] : ! [v29] : ! [v30] : ! [v31] : ! [v32] : ! [v33] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v26, v27) = v28) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v19, v23) = v24) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v18, v24) = v25) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v17, v20) = v21) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v16, v21) = v22) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v15, v28) = v29) | ~ (tptp_madd(v22, v25) = v26) | ~ (tptp_madd(v14, v29) = v30) | ~ (trans(v18) = v23) | ~ (trans(v16) = v20) | ~ (trans(v15) = v27) | ~ (a_select3(v30, v31, v32) = v33) | ? [v34] : ? [v35] : ? [v36] : ? [v37] : ? [v38] : ? [v39] : ? [v40] : ? [v41] : ((v39 = 0 & v38 = 0 & v37 = 0 & v36 = 0 & ~ (v41 = v40) & a_select3(v19, v35, v34) = v41 & a_select3(v19, v34, v35) = v40 & leq(v35, v12) = 0 & leq(v34, v12) = 0 & leq(n0, v35) = 0 & leq(n0, v34) = 0) | (v39 = 0 & v38 = 0 & v37 = 0 & v36 = 0 & ~ (v41 = v40) & a_select3(v17, v35, v34) = v41 & a_select3(v17, v34, v35) = v40 & leq(v35, v13) = 0 & leq(v34, v13) = 0 & leq(n0, v35) = 0 & leq(n0, v34) = 0) | (v39 = 0 & v38 = 0 & v37 = 0 & v36 = 0 & ~ (v41 = v40) & a_select3(v14, v35, v34) = v41 & a_select3(v14, v34, v35) = v40 & leq(v35, v12) = 0 & leq(v34, v12) = 0 & leq(n0, v35) = 0 & leq(n0, v34) = 0) | (a_select3(v30, v32, v31) = v38 & leq(v32, v12) = v37 & leq(v31, v12) = v35 & leq(n0, v32) = v36 & leq(n0, v31) = v34 & ( ~ (v37 = 0) | ~ (v36 = 0) | ~ (v35 = 0) | ~ (v34 = 0) | v38 = v33)))) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : ! [v18] : ! [v19] : ! [v20] : ! [v21] : ! [v22] : (v22 = v18 | ~ (tptp_const_array2(v19, v20, v18) = v21) | ~ (a_select3(v21, v12, v15) = v22) | ~ (dim(v16, v17) = v20) | ~ (dim(v13, v14) = v19) | ? [v23] : ? [v24] : ? [v25] : ? [v26] : (leq(v16, v15) = v25 & leq(v15, v17) = v26 & leq(v13, v12) = v23 & leq(v12, v14) = v24 & ( ~ (v26 = 0) | ~ (v25 = 0) | ~ (v24 = 0) | ~ (v23 = 0)))) & ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : ! [v18] : ! [v19] : ! [v20] : ! [v21] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v15, v16) = v17) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v14, v17) = v18) | ~ (trans(v14) = v16) | ~ (a_select3(v18, v19, v20) = v21) | ? [v22] : ? [v23] : ? [v24] : ? [v25] : ? [v26] : ? [v27] : ? [v28] : ? [v29] : ((v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 & v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 & ~ (v29 = v28) & a_select3(v15, v23, v22) = v29 & a_select3(v15, v22, v23) = v28 & leq(v23, v13) = 0 & leq(v22, v13) = 0 & leq(n0, v23) = 0 & leq(n0, v22) = 0) | (a_select3(v18, v20, v19) = v26 & leq(v20, v12) = v25 & leq(v19, v12) = v23 & leq(n0, v20) = v24 & leq(n0, v19) = v22 & ( ~ (v25 = 0) | ~ (v24 = 0) | ~ (v23 = 0) | ~ (v22 = 0) | v26 = v21)))) & ? [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : ! [v18] : ! [v19] : ! [v20] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v14, v15) = v16) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v13, v16) = v17) | ~ (trans(v13) = v15) | ~ (a_select3(v17, v18, v19) = v20) | ? [v21] : ? [v22] : ? [v23] : ? [v24] : ? [v25] : ? [v26] : ? [v27] : ? [v28] : ((v26 = 0 & v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 & v23 = 0 & ~ (v28 = v27) & a_select3(v14, v22, v21) = v28 & a_select3(v14, v21, v22) = v27 & leq(v22, v12) = 0 & leq(v21, v12) = 0 & leq(n0, v22) = 0 & leq(n0, v21) = 0) | (a_select3(v17, v19, v18) = v25 & leq(v19, v12) = v24 & leq(v18, v12) = v22 & leq(n0, v19) = v23 & leq(n0, v18) = v21 & ( ~ (v24 = 0) | ~ (v23 = 0) | ~ (v22 = 0) | ~ (v21 = 0) | v25 = v20)))) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : ! [v18] : ! [v19] : (v19 = v17 | ~ (tptp_update3(v16, v14, v15, v17) = v18) | ~ (a_select3(v18, v12, v13) = v19) | ? [v20] : ? [v21] : ? [v22] : ? [v23] : ? [v24] : ? [v25] : ? [v26] : ((v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 & v23 = 0 & v22 = 0 & ~ (v26 = v17) & a_select3(v16, v20, v21) = v26 & leq(v21, v15) = 0 & leq(v20, v14) = 0 & leq(n0, v21) = 0 & leq(n0, v20) = 0) | (leq(v13, v15) = v23 & leq(v12, v14) = v21 & leq(n0, v13) = v22 & leq(n0, v12) = v20 & ( ~ (v23 = 0) | ~ (v22 = 0) | ~ (v21 = 0) | ~ (v20 = 0))))) & ? [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : ! [v18] : ! [v19] : (v19 = v12 | v15 = v13 | ~ (tptp_update3(v16, v13, v14, v17) = v18) | ~ (a_select3(v18, v15, v14) = v19) | ? [v20] : ( ~ (v20 = v12) & a_select3(v16, v15, v14) = v20)) & ? [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : ! [v18] : ! [v19] : ( ~ (tptp_update3(v13, v16, v16, v17) = v18) | ~ (a_select3(v18, v14, v15) = v19) | ? [v20] : ? [v21] : ? [v22] : ? [v23] : ? [v24] : ? [v25] : ? [v26] : ? [v27] : ((v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 & v23 = 0 & v22 = 0 & ~ (v27 = v26) & a_select3(v13, v21, v20) = v27 & a_select3(v13, v20, v21) = v26 & leq(v21, v12) = 0 & leq(v20, v12) = 0 & leq(n0, v21) = 0 & leq(n0, v20) = 0) | (a_select3(v18, v15, v14) = v26 & leq(v16, v12) = v25 & leq(v15, v12) = v23 & leq(v14, v12) = v21 & leq(n0, v16) = v24 & leq(n0, v15) = v22 & leq(n0, v14) = v20 & ( ~ (v25 = 0) | ~ (v24 = 0) | ~ (v23 = 0) | ~ (v22 = 0) | ~ (v21 = 0) | ~ (v20 = 0) | v26 = v19)))) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : ! [v18] : (v18 = v15 | ~ (dim(v13, v14) = v16) | ~ (tptp_const_array1(v16, v15) = v17) | ~ (a_select2(v17, v12) = v18) | ? [v19] : ? [v20] : (leq(v13, v12) = v19 & leq(v12, v14) = v20 & ( ~ (v20 = 0) | ~ (v19 = 0)))) & ? [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : ! [v18] : (v18 = v12 | v14 = v13 | ~ (tptp_update2(v15, v13, v16) = v17) | ~ (a_select2(v17, v14) = v18) | ? [v19] : ( ~ (v19 = v12) & a_select2(v15, v14) = v19)) & ? [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : ! [v18] : ( ~ (tptp_msub(v13, v14) = v15) | ~ (a_select3(v15, v16, v17) = v18) | ? [v19] : ? [v20] : ? [v21] : ? [v22] : ? [v23] : ? [v24] : ? [v25] : ? [v26] : ((v24 = 0 & v23 = 0 & v22 = 0 & v21 = 0 & ~ (v26 = v25) & a_select3(v14, v20, v19) = v26 & a_select3(v14, v19, v20) = v25 & leq(v20, v12) = 0 & leq(v19, v12) = 0 & leq(n0, v20) = 0 & leq(n0, v19) = 0) | (v24 = 0 & v23 = 0 & v22 = 0 & v21 = 0 & ~ (v26 = v25) & a_select3(v13, v20, v19) = v26 & a_select3(v13, v19, v20) = v25 & leq(v20, v12) = 0 & leq(v19, v12) = 0 & leq(n0, v20) = 0 & leq(n0, v19) = 0) | (a_select3(v15, v17, v16) = v23 & leq(v17, v12) = v22 & leq(v16, v12) = v20 & leq(n0, v17) = v21 & leq(n0, v16) = v19 & ( ~ (v22 = 0) | ~ (v21 = 0) | ~ (v20 = 0) | ~ (v19 = 0) | v23 = v18)))) & ? [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : ! [v18] : ( ~ (tptp_madd(v13, v14) = v15) | ~ (a_select3(v15, v16, v17) = v18) | ? [v19] : ? [v20] : ? [v21] : ? [v22] : ? [v23] : ? [v24] : ? [v25] : ? [v26] : ((v24 = 0 & v23 = 0 & v22 = 0 & v21 = 0 & ~ (v26 = v25) & a_select3(v14, v20, v19) = v26 & a_select3(v14, v19, v20) = v25 & leq(v20, v12) = 0 & leq(v19, v12) = 0 & leq(n0, v20) = 0 & leq(n0, v19) = 0) | (v24 = 0 & v23 = 0 & v22 = 0 & v21 = 0 & ~ (v26 = v25) & a_select3(v13, v20, v19) = v26 & a_select3(v13, v19, v20) = v25 & leq(v20, v12) = 0 & leq(v19, v12) = 0 & leq(n0, v20) = 0 & leq(n0, v19) = 0) | (a_select3(v15, v17, v16) = v23 & leq(v17, v12) = v22 & leq(v16, v12) = v20 & leq(n0, v17) = v21 & leq(n0, v16) = v19 & ( ~ (v22 = 0) | ~ (v21 = 0) | ~ (v20 = 0) | ~ (v19 = 0) | v23 = v18)))) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : (v17 = v15 | ~ (tptp_update2(v14, v13, v15) = v16) | ~ (a_select2(v16, v12) = v17) | ? [v18] : ? [v19] : ? [v20] : ? [v21] : ((v20 = 0 & v19 = 0 & ~ (v21 = v15) & a_select2(v14, v18) = v21 & leq(v18, v13) = 0 & leq(n0, v18) = 0) | (leq(v12, v13) = v19 & leq(n0, v12) = v18 & ( ~ (v19 = 0) | ~ (v18 = 0))))) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : (v17 = v15 | ~ (tptp_update3(v12, v13, v14, v15) = v16) | ~ (a_select3(v16, v13, v14) = v17)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (tptp_update3(v17, v16, v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (tptp_update3(v17, v16, v15, v14) = v12)) & ? [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : ( ~ (inv(v13) = v14) | ~ (a_select3(v14, v15, v16) = v17) | ? [v18] : ? [v19] : ? [v20] : ? [v21] : ? [v22] : ? [v23] : ? [v24] : ? [v25] : ((v23 = 0 & v22 = 0 & v21 = 0 & v20 = 0 & ~ (v25 = v24) & a_select3(v13, v19, v18) = v25 & a_select3(v13, v18, v19) = v24 & leq(v19, v12) = 0 & leq(v18, v12) = 0 & leq(n0, v19) = 0 & leq(n0, v18) = 0) | (a_select3(v14, v16, v15) = v22 & leq(v16, v12) = v21 & leq(v15, v12) = v19 & leq(n0, v16) = v20 & leq(n0, v15) = v18 & ( ~ (v21 = 0) | ~ (v20 = 0) | ~ (v19 = 0) | ~ (v18 = 0) | v22 = v17)))) & ? [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : ( ~ (trans(v13) = v14) | ~ (a_select3(v14, v15, v16) = v17) | ? [v18] : ? [v19] : ? [v20] : ? [v21] : ? [v22] : ? [v23] : ? [v24] : ? [v25] : ((v23 = 0 & v22 = 0 & v21 = 0 & v20 = 0 & ~ (v25 = v24) & a_select3(v13, v19, v18) = v25 & a_select3(v13, v18, v19) = v24 & leq(v19, v12) = 0 & leq(v18, v12) = 0 & leq(n0, v19) = 0 & leq(n0, v18) = 0) | (a_select3(v14, v16, v15) = v22 & leq(v16, v12) = v21 & leq(v15, v12) = v19 & leq(n0, v16) = v20 & leq(n0, v15) = v18 & ( ~ (v21 = 0) | ~ (v20 = 0) | ~ (v19 = 0) | ~ (v18 = 0) | v22 = v17)))) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : (v16 = v14 | ~ (tptp_update2(v12, v13, v14) = v15) | ~ (a_select2(v15, v13) = v16)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : (v16 = 0 | ~ (succ(v13) = v15) | ~ (succ(v12) = v14) | ~ (leq(v14, v15) = v16) | ? [v17] : ( ~ (v17 = 0) & leq(v12, v13) = v17)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (tptp_update2(v16, v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (tptp_update2(v16, v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (sum(v16, v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (sum(v16, v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (tptp_const_array2(v16, v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (tptp_const_array2(v16, v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (a_select3(v16, v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (a_select3(v16, v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v13, v12) = v14) | ~ (leq(v14, v12) = v15) | ? [v16] : ( ~ (v16 = 0) & leq(n0, v12) = v16)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | ~ (succ(v13) = v14) | ~ (leq(v12, v14) = v15) | ? [v16] : ( ~ (v16 = 0) & leq(v12, v13) = v16)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | ~ (succ(v13) = v14) | ~ (gt(v14, v12) = v15) | ? [v16] : ( ~ (v16 = 0) & leq(v12, v13) = v16)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | ~ (pred(v13) = v14) | ~ (leq(v12, v14) = v15) | ? [v16] : ( ~ (v16 = 0) & gt(v13, v12) = v16)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | ~ (leq(v12, v14) = v15) | ~ (leq(v12, v13) = 0) | ? [v16] : ( ~ (v16 = 0) & leq(v13, v14) = v16)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | ~ (gt(v12, v14) = v15) | ~ (gt(v12, v13) = 0) | ? [v16] : ( ~ (v16 = 0) & gt(v13, v14) = v16)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (minus(v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (minus(v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (plus(v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (plus(v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (tptp_mmul(v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (tptp_msub(v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (tptp_msub(v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (tptp_madd(v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (tptp_madd(v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (dim(v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (dim(v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (tptp_const_array1(v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (tptp_const_array1(v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (a_select2(v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (a_select2(v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (geq(v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (geq(v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (lt(v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (lt(v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (leq(v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (leq(v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (gt(v15, v14) = v13) | ~ (gt(v15, v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ( ~ (succ(v13) = v15) | ~ (succ(v12) = v14) | ~ (leq(v14, v15) = 0) | leq(v12, v13) = 0) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = v12 | ~ (gt(v13, v12) = v14) | ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & leq(v12, v13) = v15)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = v12 | ~ (gt(v12, v13) = v14) | gt(v13, v12) = 0) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | ~ (succ(v12) = v13) | ~ (gt(v13, v12) = v14)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | ~ (geq(v12, v13) = v14) | ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & leq(v13, v12) = v15)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | ~ (lt(v12, v13) = v14) | ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & gt(v13, v12) = v15)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (inv(v14) = v13) | ~ (inv(v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (trans(v14) = v13) | ~ (trans(v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (succ(v14) = v13) | ~ (succ(v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : (v13 = v12 | ~ (pred(v14) = v13) | ~ (pred(v14) = v12)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ( ~ (minus(v12, v13) = v14) | ~ (leq(v14, v12) = 0) | leq(n0, v13) = 0) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ( ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v13, v12) = v14) | ? [v15] : ? [v16] : (leq(n0, v14) = v16 & leq(n0, v12) = v15 & ( ~ (v15 = 0) | v16 = 0))) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ( ~ (succ(v13) = v14) | ~ (gt(v14, v12) = 0) | leq(v12, v13) = 0) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ( ~ (succ(v12) = v14) | ~ (leq(v14, v13) = 0) | gt(v13, v12) = 0) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ( ~ (pred(v13) = v14) | ~ (leq(v12, v14) = 0) | gt(v13, v12) = 0) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : (v13 = tptp_float_0_0 | ~ (sum(n0, tptp_minus_1, v12) = v13)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : (v13 = n0 | ~ (sum(n0, tptp_minus_1, v12) = v13)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 | ~ (leq(v12, v12) = v13)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (minus(v12, n1) = v13) | pred(v12) = v13) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (plus(v12, n5) = v13) | ? [v14] : ? [v15] : ? [v16] : ? [v17] : (succ(v17) = v13 & succ(v16) = v17 & succ(v15) = v16 & succ(v14) = v15 & succ(v12) = v14)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (plus(v12, n4) = v13) | ? [v14] : ? [v15] : ? [v16] : (succ(v16) = v13 & succ(v15) = v16 & succ(v14) = v15 & succ(v12) = v14)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (plus(v12, n3) = v13) | ? [v14] : ? [v15] : (succ(v15) = v13 & succ(v14) = v15 & succ(v12) = v14)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (plus(v12, n2) = v13) | ? [v14] : (succ(v14) = v13 & succ(v12) = v14)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (plus(v12, n1) = v13) | succ(v12) = v13) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (plus(n5, v12) = v13) | ? [v14] : ? [v15] : ? [v16] : ? [v17] : (succ(v17) = v13 & succ(v16) = v17 & succ(v15) = v16 & succ(v14) = v15 & succ(v12) = v14)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (plus(n4, v12) = v13) | ? [v14] : ? [v15] : ? [v16] : (succ(v16) = v13 & succ(v15) = v16 & succ(v14) = v15 & succ(v12) = v14)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (plus(n3, v12) = v13) | ? [v14] : ? [v15] : (succ(v15) = v13 & succ(v14) = v15 & succ(v12) = v14)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (plus(n2, v12) = v13) | ? [v14] : (succ(v14) = v13 & succ(v12) = v14)) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (plus(n1, v12) = v13) | succ(v12) = v13) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (succ(v12) = v13) | pred(v13) = v12) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (pred(v12) = v13) | succ(v13) = v12) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (geq(v12, v13) = 0) | leq(v13, v12) = 0) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (lt(v12, v13) = 0) | gt(v13, v12) = 0) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (leq(v13, v2) = 0) | ~ (leq(v12, v2) = 0) | ? [v14] : ? [v15] : ? [v16] : ? [v17] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, v13, v12) = v17 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, v12, v13) = v16 & leq(n0, v13) = v15 & leq(n0, v12) = v14 & ( ~ (v15 = 0) | ~ (v14 = 0) | v17 = v16))) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (leq(v13, v1) = 0) | ~ (leq(v12, v1) = 0) | ? [v14] : ? [v15] : ? [v16] : ? [v17] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, v13, v12) = v17 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, v12, v13) = v16 & leq(n0, v13) = v15 & leq(n0, v12) = v14 & ( ~ (v15 = 0) | ~ (v14 = 0) | v17 = v16))) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (leq(v13, v1) = 0) | ~ (leq(v12, v1) = 0) | ? [v14] : ? [v15] : ? [v16] : ? [v17] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, v13, v12) = v17 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, v12, v13) = v16 & leq(n0, v13) = v15 & leq(n0, v12) = v14 & ( ~ (v15 = 0) | ~ (v14 = 0) | v17 = v16))) & ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ( ~ (gt(v13, v12) = 0) | leq(v12, v13) = 0) & ! [v12] : (v12 = n6 | v12 = n5 | v12 = n4 | v12 = n3 | v12 = n2 | v12 = n1 | v12 = n0 | ~ (leq(v12, n6) = 0) | ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & leq(n0, v12) = v13)) & ! [v12] : (v12 = n5 | v12 = n4 | v12 = n3 | v12 = n2 | v12 = n1 | v12 = n0 | ~ (leq(v12, n5) = 0) | ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & leq(n0, v12) = v13)) & ! [v12] : (v12 = n4 | v12 = n3 | v12 = n2 | v12 = n1 | v12 = n0 | ~ (leq(v12, n4) = 0) | ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & leq(n0, v12) = v13)) & ! [v12] : (v12 = n3 | v12 = n2 | v12 = n1 | v12 = n0 | ~ (leq(v12, n3) = 0) | ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & leq(n0, v12) = v13)) & ! [v12] : (v12 = n2 | v12 = n1 | v12 = n0 | ~ (leq(v12, n2) = 0) | ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & leq(n0, v12) = v13)) & ! [v12] : (v12 = n1 | v12 = n0 | ~ (leq(v12, n1) = 0) | ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & leq(n0, v12) = v13)) & ! [v12] : (v12 = n0 | ~ (leq(n0, v12) = 0) | ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & leq(v12, n0) = v13)) & ! [v12] : ~ (gt(v12, v12) = 0) & ((v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 & v7 = 0 & v6 = 0 & ~ (v11 = v10) & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, v5, v4) = v11 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, v4, v5) = v10 & leq(v5, v1) = 0 & leq(v4, v1) = 0 & leq(n0, v5) = 0 & leq(n0, v4) = 0) | (v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 & v7 = 0 & v6 = 0 & ~ (v11 = v10) & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, v5, v4) = v11 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, v4, v5) = v10 & leq(v5, v2) = 0 & leq(v4, v2) = 0 & leq(n0, v5) = 0 & leq(n0, v4) = 0) | (v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 & v7 = 0 & v6 = 0 & ~ (v11 = v10) & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, v5, v4) = v11 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, v4, v5) = v10 & leq(v5, v1) = 0 & leq(v4, v1) = 0 & leq(n0, v5) = 0 & leq(n0, v4) = 0) | (v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 & v6 = 0 & v5 = 0 & ~ (v11 = v10) & a_select3(id_ds1_filter, v7, v4) = v11 & a_select3(id_ds1_filter, v4, v7) = v10 & leq(v7, v1) = 0 & leq(v4, v3) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0 & leq(n0, v4) = 0)))
% 68.71/29.94 | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_10_10, all_0_11_11 yields:
% 68.71/29.94 | (1) ~ (def = use) & minus(n6, n1) = all_0_10_10 & minus(n999, n1) = all_0_11_11 & minus(n3, n1) = all_0_9_9 & minus(n0, n1) = all_0_8_8 & succ(n5) = n6 & succ(n4) = n5 & succ(n3) = n4 & succ(n2) = n3 & succ(n1) = n2 & succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0 & succ(n0) = n1 & leq(pv5, all_0_11_11) = 0 & leq(n0, pv5) = 0 & gt(n6, n5) = 0 & gt(n6, n4) = 0 & gt(n6, n3) = 0 & gt(n6, n2) = 0 & gt(n6, n1) = 0 & gt(n6, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n6, n0) = 0 & gt(n999, n6) = 0 & gt(n999, n5) = 0 & gt(n999, n4) = 0 & gt(n999, n3) = 0 & gt(n999, n2) = 0 & gt(n999, n1) = 0 & gt(n999, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n999, n0) = 0 & gt(n5, n4) = 0 & gt(n5, n3) = 0 & gt(n5, n2) = 0 & gt(n5, n1) = 0 & gt(n5, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n5, n0) = 0 & gt(n4, n3) = 0 & gt(n4, n2) = 0 & gt(n4, n1) = 0 & gt(n4, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n4, n0) = 0 & gt(n3, n2) = 0 & gt(n3, n1) = 0 & gt(n3, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n3, n0) = 0 & gt(n2, n1) = 0 & gt(n2, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n2, n0) = 0 & gt(n1, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n1, n0) = 0 & gt(n0, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & true & ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ! [v7] : ! [v8] : ! [v9] : ! [v10] : ! [v11] : ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : ! [v18] : ! [v19] : ! [v20] : ! [v21] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v14, v15) = v16) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v7, v11) = v12) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v6, v12) = v13) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v5, v8) = v9) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v4, v9) = v10) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v3, v16) = v17) | ~ (tptp_madd(v10, v13) = v14) | ~ (tptp_madd(v2, v17) = v18) | ~ (trans(v6) = v11) | ~ (trans(v4) = v8) | ~ (trans(v3) = v15) | ~ (a_select3(v18, v19, v20) = v21) | ? [v22] : ? [v23] : ? [v24] : ? [v25] : ? [v26] : ? [v27] : ? [v28] : ? [v29] : ((v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 & v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 & ~ (v29 = v28) & a_select3(v7, v23, v22) = v29 & a_select3(v7, v22, v23) = v28 & leq(v23, v0) = 0 & leq(v22, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v23) = 0 & leq(n0, v22) = 0) | (v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 & v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 & ~ (v29 = v28) & a_select3(v5, v23, v22) = v29 & a_select3(v5, v22, v23) = v28 & leq(v23, v1) = 0 & leq(v22, v1) = 0 & leq(n0, v23) = 0 & leq(n0, v22) = 0) | (v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 & v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 & ~ (v29 = v28) & a_select3(v2, v23, v22) = v29 & a_select3(v2, v22, v23) = v28 & leq(v23, v0) = 0 & leq(v22, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v23) = 0 & leq(n0, v22) = 0) | (a_select3(v18, v20, v19) = v26 & leq(v20, v0) = v25 & leq(v19, v0) = v23 & leq(n0, v20) = v24 & leq(n0, v19) = v22 & ( ~ (v25 = 0) | ~ (v24 = 0) | ~ (v23 = 0) | ~ (v22 = 0) | v26 = v21)))) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ! [v7] : ! [v8] : ! [v9] : ! [v10] : (v10 = v6 | ~ (tptp_const_array2(v7, v8, v6) = v9) | ~ (a_select3(v9, v0, v3) = v10) | ~ (dim(v4, v5) = v8) | ~ (dim(v1, v2) = v7) | ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ? [v14] : (leq(v4, v3) = v13 & leq(v3, v5) = v14 & leq(v1, v0) = v11 & leq(v0, v2) = v12 & ( ~ (v14 = 0) | ~ (v13 = 0) | ~ (v12 = 0) | ~ (v11 = 0)))) & ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ! [v7] : ! [v8] : ! [v9] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v3, v4) = v5) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v2, v5) = v6) | ~ (trans(v2) = v4) | ~ (a_select3(v6, v7, v8) = v9) | ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ? [v14] : ? [v15] : ? [v16] : ? [v17] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & ~ (v17 = v16) & a_select3(v3, v11, v10) = v17 & a_select3(v3, v10, v11) = v16 & leq(v11, v1) = 0 & leq(v10, v1) = 0 & leq(n0, v11) = 0 & leq(n0, v10) = 0) | (a_select3(v6, v8, v7) = v14 & leq(v8, v0) = v13 & leq(v7, v0) = v11 & leq(n0, v8) = v12 & leq(n0, v7) = v10 & ( ~ (v13 = 0) | ~ (v12 = 0) | ~ (v11 = 0) | ~ (v10 = 0) | v14 = v9)))) & ? [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ! [v7] : ! [v8] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v2, v3) = v4) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v1, v4) = v5) | ~ (trans(v1) = v3) | ~ (a_select3(v5, v6, v7) = v8) | ? [v9] : ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ? [v14] : ? [v15] : ? [v16] : ((v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & ~ (v16 = v15) & a_select3(v2, v10, v9) = v16 & a_select3(v2, v9, v10) = v15 & leq(v10, v0) = 0 & leq(v9, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v10) = 0 & leq(n0, v9) = 0) | (a_select3(v5, v7, v6) = v13 & leq(v7, v0) = v12 & leq(v6, v0) = v10 & leq(n0, v7) = v11 & leq(n0, v6) = v9 & ( ~ (v12 = 0) | ~ (v11 = 0) | ~ (v10 = 0) | ~ (v9 = 0) | v13 = v8)))) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ! [v7] : (v7 = v5 | ~ (tptp_update3(v4, v2, v3, v5) = v6) | ~ (a_select3(v6, v0, v1) = v7) | ? [v8] : ? [v9] : ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ? [v14] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & ~ (v14 = v5) & a_select3(v4, v8, v9) = v14 & leq(v9, v3) = 0 & leq(v8, v2) = 0 & leq(n0, v9) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0) | (leq(v1, v3) = v11 & leq(v0, v2) = v9 & leq(n0, v1) = v10 & leq(n0, v0) = v8 & ( ~ (v11 = 0) | ~ (v10 = 0) | ~ (v9 = 0) | ~ (v8 = 0))))) & ? [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ! [v7] : (v7 = v0 | v3 = v1 | ~ (tptp_update3(v4, v1, v2, v5) = v6) | ~ (a_select3(v6, v3, v2) = v7) | ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = v0) & a_select3(v4, v3, v2) = v8)) & ? [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ! [v7] : ( ~ (tptp_update3(v1, v4, v4, v5) = v6) | ~ (a_select3(v6, v2, v3) = v7) | ? [v8] : ? [v9] : ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ? [v14] : ? [v15] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & ~ (v15 = v14) & a_select3(v1, v9, v8) = v15 & a_select3(v1, v8, v9) = v14 & leq(v9, v0) = 0 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v9) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0) | (a_select3(v6, v3, v2) = v14 & leq(v4, v0) = v13 & leq(v3, v0) = v11 & leq(v2, v0) = v9 & leq(n0, v4) = v12 & leq(n0, v3) = v10 & leq(n0, v2) = v8 & ( ~ (v13 = 0) | ~ (v12 = 0) | ~ (v11 = 0) | ~ (v10 = 0) | ~ (v9 = 0) | ~ (v8 = 0) | v14 = v7)))) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : (v6 = v3 | ~ (dim(v1, v2) = v4) | ~ (tptp_const_array1(v4, v3) = v5) | ~ (a_select2(v5, v0) = v6) | ? [v7] : ? [v8] : (leq(v1, v0) = v7 & leq(v0, v2) = v8 & ( ~ (v8 = 0) | ~ (v7 = 0)))) & ? [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : (v6 = v0 | v2 = v1 | ~ (tptp_update2(v3, v1, v4) = v5) | ~ (a_select2(v5, v2) = v6) | ? [v7] : ( ~ (v7 = v0) & a_select2(v3, v2) = v7)) & ? [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ( ~ (tptp_msub(v1, v2) = v3) | ~ (a_select3(v3, v4, v5) = v6) | ? [v7] : ? [v8] : ? [v9] : ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ? [v14] : ((v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & ~ (v14 = v13) & a_select3(v2, v8, v7) = v14 & a_select3(v2, v7, v8) = v13 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & ~ (v14 = v13) & a_select3(v1, v8, v7) = v14 & a_select3(v1, v7, v8) = v13 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0) | (a_select3(v3, v5, v4) = v11 & leq(v5, v0) = v10 & leq(v4, v0) = v8 & leq(n0, v5) = v9 & leq(n0, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v10 = 0) | ~ (v9 = 0) | ~ (v8 = 0) | ~ (v7 = 0) | v11 = v6)))) & ? [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ( ~ (tptp_madd(v1, v2) = v3) | ~ (a_select3(v3, v4, v5) = v6) | ? [v7] : ? [v8] : ? [v9] : ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ? [v14] : ((v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & ~ (v14 = v13) & a_select3(v2, v8, v7) = v14 & a_select3(v2, v7, v8) = v13 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & ~ (v14 = v13) & a_select3(v1, v8, v7) = v14 & a_select3(v1, v7, v8) = v13 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0) | (a_select3(v3, v5, v4) = v11 & leq(v5, v0) = v10 & leq(v4, v0) = v8 & leq(n0, v5) = v9 & leq(n0, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v10 = 0) | ~ (v9 = 0) | ~ (v8 = 0) | ~ (v7 = 0) | v11 = v6)))) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : (v5 = v3 | ~ (tptp_update2(v2, v1, v3) = v4) | ~ (a_select2(v4, v0) = v5) | ? [v6] : ? [v7] : ? [v8] : ? [v9] : ((v8 = 0 & v7 = 0 & ~ (v9 = v3) & a_select2(v2, v6) = v9 & leq(v6, v1) = 0 & leq(n0, v6) = 0) | (leq(v0, v1) = v7 & leq(n0, v0) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) | ~ (v6 = 0))))) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : (v5 = v3 | ~ (tptp_update3(v0, v1, v2, v3) = v4) | ~ (a_select3(v4, v1, v2) = v5)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tptp_update3(v5, v4, v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (tptp_update3(v5, v4, v3, v2) = v0)) & ? [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ( ~ (inv(v1) = v2) | ~ (a_select3(v2, v3, v4) = v5) | ? [v6] : ? [v7] : ? [v8] : ? [v9] : ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ((v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 & ~ (v13 = v12) & a_select3(v1, v7, v6) = v13 & a_select3(v1, v6, v7) = v12 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(v6, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0 & leq(n0, v6) = 0) | (a_select3(v2, v4, v3) = v10 & leq(v4, v0) = v9 & leq(v3, v0) = v7 & leq(n0, v4) = v8 & leq(n0, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v9 = 0) | ~ (v8 = 0) | ~ (v7 = 0) | ~ (v6 = 0) | v10 = v5)))) & ? [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ( ~ (trans(v1) = v2) | ~ (a_select3(v2, v3, v4) = v5) | ? [v6] : ? [v7] : ? [v8] : ? [v9] : ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ((v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 & ~ (v13 = v12) & a_select3(v1, v7, v6) = v13 & a_select3(v1, v6, v7) = v12 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(v6, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0 & leq(n0, v6) = 0) | (a_select3(v2, v4, v3) = v10 & leq(v4, v0) = v9 & leq(v3, v0) = v7 & leq(n0, v4) = v8 & leq(n0, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v9 = 0) | ~ (v8 = 0) | ~ (v7 = 0) | ~ (v6 = 0) | v10 = v5)))) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : (v4 = v2 | ~ (tptp_update2(v0, v1, v2) = v3) | ~ (a_select2(v3, v1) = v4)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | ~ (succ(v1) = v3) | ~ (succ(v0) = v2) | ~ (leq(v2, v3) = v4) | ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v5)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tptp_update2(v4, v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (tptp_update2(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (sum(v4, v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (sum(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tptp_const_array2(v4, v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (tptp_const_array2(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (a_select3(v4, v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (a_select3(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v1, v0) = v2) | ~ (leq(v2, v0) = v3) | ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v4)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (succ(v1) = v2) | ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) | ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v4)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (succ(v1) = v2) | ~ (gt(v2, v0) = v3) | ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v4)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (pred(v1) = v2) | ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) | ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & gt(v1, v0) = v4)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) | ~ (leq(v0, v1) = 0) | ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v1, v2) = v4)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (gt(v0, v2) = v3) | ~ (gt(v0, v1) = 0) | ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & gt(v1, v2) = v4)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (minus(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (minus(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (plus(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (plus(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tptp_mmul(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tptp_msub(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (tptp_msub(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tptp_madd(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (tptp_madd(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (dim(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (dim(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tptp_const_array1(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (tptp_const_array1(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (a_select2(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (a_select2(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (geq(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (geq(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (lt(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (lt(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (gt(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (gt(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ( ~ (succ(v1) = v3) | ~ (succ(v0) = v2) | ~ (leq(v2, v3) = 0) | leq(v0, v1) = 0) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 | ~ (gt(v1, v0) = v2) | ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v3)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 | ~ (gt(v0, v1) = v2) | gt(v1, v0) = 0) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | ~ (succ(v0) = v1) | ~ (gt(v1, v0) = v2)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | ~ (geq(v0, v1) = v2) | ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & leq(v1, v0) = v3)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | ~ (lt(v0, v1) = v2) | ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & gt(v1, v0) = v3)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (inv(v2) = v1) | ~ (inv(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (trans(v2) = v1) | ~ (trans(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (succ(v2) = v1) | ~ (succ(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (pred(v2) = v1) | ~ (pred(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (minus(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ (leq(v2, v0) = 0) | leq(n0, v1) = 0) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v1, v0) = v2) | ? [v3] : ? [v4] : (leq(n0, v2) = v4 & leq(n0, v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0))) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (succ(v1) = v2) | ~ (gt(v2, v0) = 0) | leq(v0, v1) = 0) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (succ(v0) = v2) | ~ (leq(v2, v1) = 0) | gt(v1, v0) = 0) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (pred(v1) = v2) | ~ (leq(v0, v2) = 0) | gt(v1, v0) = 0) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : (v1 = tptp_float_0_0 | ~ (sum(n0, tptp_minus_1, v0) = v1)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : (v1 = n0 | ~ (sum(n0, tptp_minus_1, v0) = v1)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (leq(v0, v0) = v1)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (minus(v0, n1) = v1) | pred(v0) = v1) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n5) = v1) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : ? [v4] : ? [v5] : (succ(v5) = v1 & succ(v4) = v5 & succ(v3) = v4 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n4) = v1) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : ? [v4] : (succ(v4) = v1 & succ(v3) = v4 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n3) = v1) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (succ(v3) = v1 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n2) = v1) | ? [v2] : (succ(v2) = v1 & succ(v0) = v2)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n1) = v1) | succ(v0) = v1) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n5, v0) = v1) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : ? [v4] : ? [v5] : (succ(v5) = v1 & succ(v4) = v5 & succ(v3) = v4 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n4, v0) = v1) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : ? [v4] : (succ(v4) = v1 & succ(v3) = v4 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n3, v0) = v1) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (succ(v3) = v1 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n2, v0) = v1) | ? [v2] : (succ(v2) = v1 & succ(v0) = v2)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n1, v0) = v1) | succ(v0) = v1) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (succ(v0) = v1) | pred(v1) = v0) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (pred(v0) = v1) | succ(v1) = v0) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (geq(v0, v1) = 0) | leq(v1, v0) = 0) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (lt(v0, v1) = 0) | gt(v1, v0) = 0) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (leq(v1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ~ (leq(v0, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : ? [v4] : ? [v5] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, v1, v0) = v5 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, v0, v1) = v4 & leq(n0, v1) = v3 & leq(n0, v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | ~ (v2 = 0) | v5 = v4))) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (leq(v1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(v0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : ? [v4] : ? [v5] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, v1, v0) = v5 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, v0, v1) = v4 & leq(n0, v1) = v3 & leq(n0, v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | ~ (v2 = 0) | v5 = v4))) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (leq(v1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(v0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : ? [v4] : ? [v5] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, v1, v0) = v5 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, v0, v1) = v4 & leq(n0, v1) = v3 & leq(n0, v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | ~ (v2 = 0) | v5 = v4))) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (gt(v1, v0) = 0) | leq(v0, v1) = 0) & ! [v0] : (v0 = n6 | v0 = n5 | v0 = n4 | v0 = n3 | v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 | ~ (leq(v0, n6) = 0) | ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1)) & ! [v0] : (v0 = n5 | v0 = n4 | v0 = n3 | v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 | ~ (leq(v0, n5) = 0) | ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1)) & ! [v0] : (v0 = n4 | v0 = n3 | v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 | ~ (leq(v0, n4) = 0) | ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1)) & ! [v0] : (v0 = n3 | v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 | ~ (leq(v0, n3) = 0) | ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1)) & ! [v0] : (v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 | ~ (leq(v0, n2) = 0) | ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1)) & ! [v0] : (v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 | ~ (leq(v0, n1) = 0) | ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1)) & ! [v0] : (v0 = n0 | ~ (leq(n0, v0) = 0) | ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(v0, n0) = v1)) & ! [v0] : ~ (gt(v0, v0) = 0) & ((all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & all_0_6_6 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(id_ds1_filter, all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(id_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_4_4, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_4_4) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0))
% 69.12/29.97 |
% 69.12/29.97 | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 69.12/29.97 | (2) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : (v1 = tptp_float_0_0 | ~ (sum(n0, tptp_minus_1, v0) = v1))
% 69.12/29.97 | (3) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (geq(v0, v1) = 0) | leq(v1, v0) = 0)
% 69.12/29.98 | (4) ! [v0] : (v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 | ~ (leq(v0, n1) = 0) | ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1))
% 69.12/29.98 | (5) gt(n6, n2) = 0
% 69.12/29.98 | (6) gt(n2, n0) = 0
% 69.12/29.98 | (7) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | ~ (lt(v0, v1) = v2) | ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & gt(v1, v0) = v3))
% 69.12/29.98 | (8) true
% 69.12/29.98 | (9) gt(n5, n2) = 0
% 69.12/29.98 | (10) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (lt(v0, v1) = 0) | gt(v1, v0) = 0)
% 69.12/29.98 | (11) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 | ~ (gt(v1, v0) = v2) | ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v3))
% 69.12/29.98 | (12) gt(n3, n0) = 0
% 69.12/29.98 | (13) succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0
% 69.12/29.98 | (14) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (geq(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (geq(v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.12/29.98 | (15) gt(n5, n0) = 0
% 69.12/29.98 | (16) ! [v0] : (v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 | ~ (leq(v0, n2) = 0) | ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1))
% 69.12/29.98 | (17) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ! [v7] : ! [v8] : ! [v9] : ! [v10] : (v10 = v6 | ~ (tptp_const_array2(v7, v8, v6) = v9) | ~ (a_select3(v9, v0, v3) = v10) | ~ (dim(v4, v5) = v8) | ~ (dim(v1, v2) = v7) | ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ? [v14] : (leq(v4, v3) = v13 & leq(v3, v5) = v14 & leq(v1, v0) = v11 & leq(v0, v2) = v12 & ( ~ (v14 = 0) | ~ (v13 = 0) | ~ (v12 = 0) | ~ (v11 = 0))))
% 69.12/29.98 | (18) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (pred(v0) = v1) | succ(v1) = v0)
% 69.12/29.98 | (19) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (succ(v0) = v1) | pred(v1) = v0)
% 69.12/29.98 | (20) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (lt(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (lt(v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/29.98 | (21) gt(n5, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 69.20/29.98 | (22) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n3) = v1) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (succ(v3) = v1 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2))
% 69.20/29.98 | (23) gt(n1, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 69.20/29.98 | (24) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ! [v7] : ! [v8] : ! [v9] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v3, v4) = v5) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v2, v5) = v6) | ~ (trans(v2) = v4) | ~ (a_select3(v6, v7, v8) = v9) | ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ? [v14] : ? [v15] : ? [v16] : ? [v17] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & ~ (v17 = v16) & a_select3(v3, v11, v10) = v17 & a_select3(v3, v10, v11) = v16 & leq(v11, v1) = 0 & leq(v10, v1) = 0 & leq(n0, v11) = 0 & leq(n0, v10) = 0) | (a_select3(v6, v8, v7) = v14 & leq(v8, v0) = v13 & leq(v7, v0) = v11 & leq(n0, v8) = v12 & leq(n0, v7) = v10 & ( ~ (v13 = 0) | ~ (v12 = 0) | ~ (v11 = 0) | ~ (v10 = 0) | v14 = v9))))
% 69.20/29.98 | (25) ! [v0] : (v0 = n6 | v0 = n5 | v0 = n4 | v0 = n3 | v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 | ~ (leq(v0, n6) = 0) | ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1))
% 69.20/29.98 | (26) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (gt(v1, v0) = 0) | leq(v0, v1) = 0)
% 69.20/29.98 | (27) gt(n3, n1) = 0
% 69.20/29.98 | (28) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n4) = v1) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : ? [v4] : (succ(v4) = v1 & succ(v3) = v4 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2))
% 69.20/29.98 | (29) succ(n1) = n2
% 69.20/29.98 | (30) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (trans(v2) = v1) | ~ (trans(v2) = v0))
% 69.20/29.98 | (31) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | ~ (succ(v0) = v1) | ~ (gt(v1, v0) = v2))
% 69.20/29.98 | (32) ? [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ( ~ (tptp_msub(v1, v2) = v3) | ~ (a_select3(v3, v4, v5) = v6) | ? [v7] : ? [v8] : ? [v9] : ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ? [v14] : ((v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & ~ (v14 = v13) & a_select3(v2, v8, v7) = v14 & a_select3(v2, v7, v8) = v13 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & ~ (v14 = v13) & a_select3(v1, v8, v7) = v14 & a_select3(v1, v7, v8) = v13 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0) | (a_select3(v3, v5, v4) = v11 & leq(v5, v0) = v10 & leq(v4, v0) = v8 & leq(n0, v5) = v9 & leq(n0, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v10 = 0) | ~ (v9 = 0) | ~ (v8 = 0) | ~ (v7 = 0) | v11 = v6))))
% 69.20/29.98 | (33) gt(n999, n2) = 0
% 69.20/29.98 | (34) ! [v0] : (v0 = n4 | v0 = n3 | v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 | ~ (leq(v0, n4) = 0) | ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1))
% 69.20/29.98 | (35) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : (v5 = v3 | ~ (tptp_update3(v0, v1, v2, v3) = v4) | ~ (a_select3(v4, v1, v2) = v5))
% 69.20/29.99 | (36) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (succ(v1) = v2) | ~ (gt(v2, v0) = v3) | ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v4))
% 69.20/29.99 | (37) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : (v4 = v2 | ~ (tptp_update2(v0, v1, v2) = v3) | ~ (a_select2(v3, v1) = v4))
% 69.20/29.99 | (38) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : (v5 = v3 | ~ (tptp_update2(v2, v1, v3) = v4) | ~ (a_select2(v4, v0) = v5) | ? [v6] : ? [v7] : ? [v8] : ? [v9] : ((v8 = 0 & v7 = 0 & ~ (v9 = v3) & a_select2(v2, v6) = v9 & leq(v6, v1) = 0 & leq(n0, v6) = 0) | (leq(v0, v1) = v7 & leq(n0, v0) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) | ~ (v6 = 0)))))
% 69.20/29.99 | (39) minus(n6, n1) = all_0_10_10
% 69.20/29.99 | (40) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (pred(v1) = v2) | ~ (leq(v0, v2) = 0) | gt(v1, v0) = 0)
% 69.20/29.99 | (41) gt(n999, n5) = 0
% 69.20/29.99 | (42) succ(n4) = n5
% 69.20/29.99 | (43) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tptp_update3(v5, v4, v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (tptp_update3(v5, v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/29.99 | (44) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : (v1 = n0 | ~ (sum(n0, tptp_minus_1, v0) = v1))
% 69.20/29.99 | (45) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n2, v0) = v1) | ? [v2] : (succ(v2) = v1 & succ(v0) = v2))
% 69.20/29.99 | (46) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 | ~ (gt(v0, v1) = v2) | gt(v1, v0) = 0)
% 69.20/29.99 | (47) gt(n999, n3) = 0
% 69.20/29.99 | (48) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/29.99 | (49) gt(n999, n1) = 0
% 69.20/29.99 | (50) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n2) = v1) | ? [v2] : (succ(v2) = v1 & succ(v0) = v2))
% 69.20/29.99 | (51) gt(n0, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 69.20/29.99 | (52) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) | ~ (leq(v0, v1) = 0) | ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v1, v2) = v4))
% 69.20/29.99 | (53) minus(n3, n1) = all_0_9_9
% 69.20/29.99 | (54) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tptp_const_array2(v4, v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (tptp_const_array2(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/29.99 | (55) succ(n5) = n6
% 69.20/29.99 | (56) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tptp_const_array1(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (tptp_const_array1(v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/29.99 | (57) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (inv(v2) = v1) | ~ (inv(v2) = v0))
% 69.20/29.99 | (58) gt(n6, n3) = 0
% 69.20/29.99 | (59) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ! [v7] : (v7 = v5 | ~ (tptp_update3(v4, v2, v3, v5) = v6) | ~ (a_select3(v6, v0, v1) = v7) | ? [v8] : ? [v9] : ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ? [v14] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & ~ (v14 = v5) & a_select3(v4, v8, v9) = v14 & leq(v9, v3) = 0 & leq(v8, v2) = 0 & leq(n0, v9) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0) | (leq(v1, v3) = v11 & leq(v0, v2) = v9 & leq(n0, v1) = v10 & leq(n0, v0) = v8 & ( ~ (v11 = 0) | ~ (v10 = 0) | ~ (v9 = 0) | ~ (v8 = 0)))))
% 69.20/29.99 | (60) gt(n6, n1) = 0
% 69.20/29.99 | (61) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (pred(v1) = v2) | ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) | ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & gt(v1, v0) = v4))
% 69.20/29.99 | (62) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (succ(v2) = v1) | ~ (succ(v2) = v0))
% 69.20/29.99 | (63) gt(n6, n5) = 0
% 69.20/29.99 | (64) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (a_select3(v4, v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (a_select3(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/29.99 | (65) gt(n4, n1) = 0
% 69.20/29.99 | (66) succ(n2) = n3
% 69.20/29.99 | (67) ! [v0] : (v0 = n3 | v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 | ~ (leq(v0, n3) = 0) | ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1))
% 69.20/29.99 | (68) ! [v0] : ~ (gt(v0, v0) = 0)
% 69.20/29.99 | (69) ? [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ! [v7] : ( ~ (tptp_update3(v1, v4, v4, v5) = v6) | ~ (a_select3(v6, v2, v3) = v7) | ? [v8] : ? [v9] : ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ? [v14] : ? [v15] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & ~ (v15 = v14) & a_select3(v1, v9, v8) = v15 & a_select3(v1, v8, v9) = v14 & leq(v9, v0) = 0 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v9) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0) | (a_select3(v6, v3, v2) = v14 & leq(v4, v0) = v13 & leq(v3, v0) = v11 & leq(v2, v0) = v9 & leq(n0, v4) = v12 & leq(n0, v3) = v10 & leq(n0, v2) = v8 & ( ~ (v13 = 0) | ~ (v12 = 0) | ~ (v11 = 0) | ~ (v10 = 0) | ~ (v9 = 0) | ~ (v8 = 0) | v14 = v7))))
% 69.20/30.00 | (70) gt(n3, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 69.20/30.00 | (71) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (leq(v1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ~ (leq(v0, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : ? [v4] : ? [v5] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, v1, v0) = v5 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, v0, v1) = v4 & leq(n0, v1) = v3 & leq(n0, v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | ~ (v2 = 0) | v5 = v4)))
% 69.20/30.00 | (72) gt(n5, n1) = 0
% 69.20/30.00 | (73) (all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & all_0_6_6 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(id_ds1_filter, all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(id_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_4_4, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_4_4) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0)
% 69.20/30.00 | (74) gt(n3, n2) = 0
% 69.20/30.00 | (75) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n1, v0) = v1) | succ(v0) = v1)
% 69.20/30.00 | (76) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tptp_madd(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (tptp_madd(v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/30.00 | (77) succ(n0) = n1
% 69.20/30.00 | (78) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (sum(v4, v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (sum(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/30.00 | (79) minus(n0, n1) = all_0_8_8
% 69.20/30.00 | (80) gt(n4, n0) = 0
% 69.20/30.00 | (81) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (leq(v0, v0) = v1))
% 69.20/30.00 | (82) gt(n5, n3) = 0
% 69.20/30.00 | (83) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (succ(v1) = v2) | ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) | ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v4))
% 69.20/30.00 | (84) ? [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ( ~ (inv(v1) = v2) | ~ (a_select3(v2, v3, v4) = v5) | ? [v6] : ? [v7] : ? [v8] : ? [v9] : ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ((v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 & ~ (v13 = v12) & a_select3(v1, v7, v6) = v13 & a_select3(v1, v6, v7) = v12 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(v6, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0 & leq(n0, v6) = 0) | (a_select3(v2, v4, v3) = v10 & leq(v4, v0) = v9 & leq(v3, v0) = v7 & leq(n0, v4) = v8 & leq(n0, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v9 = 0) | ~ (v8 = 0) | ~ (v7 = 0) | ~ (v6 = 0) | v10 = v5))))
% 69.20/30.00 | (85) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n1) = v1) | succ(v0) = v1)
% 69.20/30.00 | (86) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ! [v7] : ! [v8] : ! [v9] : ! [v10] : ! [v11] : ! [v12] : ! [v13] : ! [v14] : ! [v15] : ! [v16] : ! [v17] : ! [v18] : ! [v19] : ! [v20] : ! [v21] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v14, v15) = v16) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v7, v11) = v12) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v6, v12) = v13) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v5, v8) = v9) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v4, v9) = v10) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v3, v16) = v17) | ~ (tptp_madd(v10, v13) = v14) | ~ (tptp_madd(v2, v17) = v18) | ~ (trans(v6) = v11) | ~ (trans(v4) = v8) | ~ (trans(v3) = v15) | ~ (a_select3(v18, v19, v20) = v21) | ? [v22] : ? [v23] : ? [v24] : ? [v25] : ? [v26] : ? [v27] : ? [v28] : ? [v29] : ((v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 & v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 & ~ (v29 = v28) & a_select3(v7, v23, v22) = v29 & a_select3(v7, v22, v23) = v28 & leq(v23, v0) = 0 & leq(v22, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v23) = 0 & leq(n0, v22) = 0) | (v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 & v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 & ~ (v29 = v28) & a_select3(v5, v23, v22) = v29 & a_select3(v5, v22, v23) = v28 & leq(v23, v1) = 0 & leq(v22, v1) = 0 & leq(n0, v23) = 0 & leq(n0, v22) = 0) | (v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 & v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 & ~ (v29 = v28) & a_select3(v2, v23, v22) = v29 & a_select3(v2, v22, v23) = v28 & leq(v23, v0) = 0 & leq(v22, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v23) = 0 & leq(n0, v22) = 0) | (a_select3(v18, v20, v19) = v26 & leq(v20, v0) = v25 & leq(v19, v0) = v23 & leq(n0, v20) = v24 & leq(n0, v19) = v22 & ( ~ (v25 = 0) | ~ (v24 = 0) | ~ (v23 = 0) | ~ (v22 = 0) | v26 = v21))))
% 69.20/30.00 | (87) ! [v0] : (v0 = n5 | v0 = n4 | v0 = n3 | v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 | ~ (leq(v0, n5) = 0) | ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1))
% 69.20/30.00 | (88) gt(n4, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 69.20/30.00 | (89) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (leq(v1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(v0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : ? [v4] : ? [v5] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, v1, v0) = v5 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, v0, v1) = v4 & leq(n0, v1) = v3 & leq(n0, v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | ~ (v2 = 0) | v5 = v4)))
% 69.20/30.01 | (90) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n3, v0) = v1) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (succ(v3) = v1 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2))
% 69.20/30.01 | (91) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (succ(v1) = v2) | ~ (gt(v2, v0) = 0) | leq(v0, v1) = 0)
% 69.20/30.01 | (92) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tptp_msub(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (tptp_msub(v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/30.01 | (93) ? [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ( ~ (trans(v1) = v2) | ~ (a_select3(v2, v3, v4) = v5) | ? [v6] : ? [v7] : ? [v8] : ? [v9] : ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ((v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 & ~ (v13 = v12) & a_select3(v1, v7, v6) = v13 & a_select3(v1, v6, v7) = v12 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(v6, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0 & leq(n0, v6) = 0) | (a_select3(v2, v4, v3) = v10 & leq(v4, v0) = v9 & leq(v3, v0) = v7 & leq(n0, v4) = v8 & leq(n0, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v9 = 0) | ~ (v8 = 0) | ~ (v7 = 0) | ~ (v6 = 0) | v10 = v5))))
% 69.20/30.01 | (94) ? [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ! [v7] : ! [v8] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v2, v3) = v4) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v1, v4) = v5) | ~ (trans(v1) = v3) | ~ (a_select3(v5, v6, v7) = v8) | ? [v9] : ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ? [v14] : ? [v15] : ? [v16] : ((v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & ~ (v16 = v15) & a_select3(v2, v10, v9) = v16 & a_select3(v2, v9, v10) = v15 & leq(v10, v0) = 0 & leq(v9, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v10) = 0 & leq(n0, v9) = 0) | (a_select3(v5, v7, v6) = v13 & leq(v7, v0) = v12 & leq(v6, v0) = v10 & leq(n0, v7) = v11 & leq(n0, v6) = v9 & ( ~ (v12 = 0) | ~ (v11 = 0) | ~ (v10 = 0) | ~ (v9 = 0) | v13 = v8))))
% 69.20/30.01 | (95) leq(pv5, all_0_11_11) = 0
% 69.20/30.01 | (96) ? [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ( ~ (tptp_madd(v1, v2) = v3) | ~ (a_select3(v3, v4, v5) = v6) | ? [v7] : ? [v8] : ? [v9] : ? [v10] : ? [v11] : ? [v12] : ? [v13] : ? [v14] : ((v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & ~ (v14 = v13) & a_select3(v2, v8, v7) = v14 & a_select3(v2, v7, v8) = v13 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & ~ (v14 = v13) & a_select3(v1, v8, v7) = v14 & a_select3(v1, v7, v8) = v13 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0) | (a_select3(v3, v5, v4) = v11 & leq(v5, v0) = v10 & leq(v4, v0) = v8 & leq(n0, v5) = v9 & leq(n0, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v10 = 0) | ~ (v9 = 0) | ~ (v8 = 0) | ~ (v7 = 0) | v11 = v6))))
% 69.20/30.01 | (97) gt(n5, n4) = 0
% 69.20/30.01 | (98) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (plus(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (plus(v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/30.01 | (99) gt(n1, n0) = 0
% 69.20/30.01 | (100) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v1, v0) = v2) | ? [v3] : ? [v4] : (leq(n0, v2) = v4 & leq(n0, v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0)))
% 69.20/30.01 | (101) gt(n2, n1) = 0
% 69.20/30.01 | (102) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (minus(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ (leq(v2, v0) = 0) | leq(n0, v1) = 0)
% 69.20/30.01 | (103) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n4, v0) = v1) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : ? [v4] : (succ(v4) = v1 & succ(v3) = v4 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2))
% 69.20/30.01 | (104) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : (v6 = v3 | ~ (dim(v1, v2) = v4) | ~ (tptp_const_array1(v4, v3) = v5) | ~ (a_select2(v5, v0) = v6) | ? [v7] : ? [v8] : (leq(v1, v0) = v7 & leq(v0, v2) = v8 & ( ~ (v8 = 0) | ~ (v7 = 0))))
% 69.20/30.01 | (105) gt(n4, n3) = 0
% 69.20/30.01 | (106) gt(n999, n0) = 0
% 69.20/30.01 | (107) gt(n6, n4) = 0
% 69.20/30.01 | (108) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (dim(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (dim(v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/30.01 | (109) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | ~ (succ(v1) = v3) | ~ (succ(v0) = v2) | ~ (leq(v2, v3) = v4) | ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v5))
% 69.20/30.01 | (110) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n5) = v1) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : ? [v4] : ? [v5] : (succ(v5) = v1 & succ(v4) = v5 & succ(v3) = v4 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2))
% 69.20/30.01 | (111) gt(n2, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 69.20/30.01 | (112) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ( ~ (succ(v0) = v2) | ~ (leq(v2, v1) = 0) | gt(v1, v0) = 0)
% 69.20/30.01 | (113) ? [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : ! [v7] : (v7 = v0 | v3 = v1 | ~ (tptp_update3(v4, v1, v2, v5) = v6) | ~ (a_select3(v6, v3, v2) = v7) | ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = v0) & a_select3(v4, v3, v2) = v8))
% 69.20/30.01 | (114) gt(n999, n6) = 0
% 69.20/30.01 | (115) gt(n999, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 69.20/30.01 | (116) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (a_select2(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (a_select2(v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/30.02 | (117) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (minus(v0, n1) = v1) | pred(v0) = v1)
% 69.20/30.02 | (118) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v1, v0) = v2) | ~ (leq(v2, v0) = v3) | ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v4))
% 69.20/30.02 | (119) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (pred(v2) = v1) | ~ (pred(v2) = v0))
% 69.20/30.02 | (120) succ(n3) = n4
% 69.20/30.02 | (121) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (gt(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (gt(v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/30.02 | (122) gt(n6, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 69.20/30.02 | (123) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n5, v0) = v1) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : ? [v4] : ? [v5] : (succ(v5) = v1 & succ(v4) = v5 & succ(v3) = v4 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2))
% 69.20/30.02 | (124) ? [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ! [v5] : ! [v6] : (v6 = v0 | v2 = v1 | ~ (tptp_update2(v3, v1, v4) = v5) | ~ (a_select2(v5, v2) = v6) | ? [v7] : ( ~ (v7 = v0) & a_select2(v3, v2) = v7))
% 69.20/30.02 | (125) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (gt(v0, v2) = v3) | ~ (gt(v0, v1) = 0) | ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & gt(v1, v2) = v4))
% 69.20/30.02 | (126) minus(n999, n1) = all_0_11_11
% 69.20/30.02 | (127) ~ (def = use)
% 69.20/30.02 | (128) gt(n6, n0) = 0
% 69.20/30.02 | (129) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tptp_mmul(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (tptp_mmul(v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/30.02 | (130) leq(n0, pv5) = 0
% 69.20/30.02 | (131) ! [v0] : (v0 = n0 | ~ (leq(n0, v0) = 0) | ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(v0, n0) = v1))
% 69.20/30.02 | (132) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ (leq(v1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(v0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v2] : ? [v3] : ? [v4] : ? [v5] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, v1, v0) = v5 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, v0, v1) = v4 & leq(n0, v1) = v3 & leq(n0, v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | ~ (v2 = 0) | v5 = v4)))
% 69.20/30.02 | (133) gt(n4, n2) = 0
% 69.20/30.02 | (134) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/30.02 | (135) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | ~ (geq(v0, v1) = v2) | ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & leq(v1, v0) = v3))
% 69.20/30.02 | (136) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (tptp_update2(v4, v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (tptp_update2(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/30.02 | (137) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (minus(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (minus(v3, v2) = v0))
% 69.20/30.02 | (138) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ! [v2] : ! [v3] : ( ~ (succ(v1) = v3) | ~ (succ(v0) = v2) | ~ (leq(v2, v3) = 0) | leq(v0, v1) = 0)
% 69.20/30.02 | (139) gt(n999, n4) = 0
% 69.20/30.02 |
% 69.20/30.02 | Instantiating formula (68) with n4 yields:
% 69.20/30.02 | (140) ~ (gt(n4, n4) = 0)
% 69.20/30.02 |
% 69.20/30.02 | Instantiating formula (68) with n3 yields:
% 69.20/30.02 | (141) ~ (gt(n3, n3) = 0)
% 69.20/30.02 |
% 69.20/30.02 | Instantiating formula (68) with n2 yields:
% 69.20/30.02 | (142) ~ (gt(n2, n2) = 0)
% 69.20/30.02 |
% 69.20/30.02 | Instantiating formula (68) with n1 yields:
% 69.20/30.02 | (143) ~ (gt(n1, n1) = 0)
% 69.20/30.02 |
% 69.20/30.02 | Instantiating formula (68) with tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.20/30.02 | (144) ~ (gt(tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = 0)
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Using (88) and (140) yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (145) ~ (n4 = tptp_minus_1)
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Using (70) and (141) yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (146) ~ (n3 = tptp_minus_1)
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Using (111) and (142) yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (147) ~ (n2 = tptp_minus_1)
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Using (23) and (143) yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (148) ~ (n1 = tptp_minus_1)
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Using (51) and (144) yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (149) ~ (tptp_minus_1 = n0)
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Instantiating formula (117) with all_0_10_10, n6 and discharging atoms minus(n6, n1) = all_0_10_10, yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (150) pred(n6) = all_0_10_10
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Instantiating formula (117) with all_0_9_9, n3 and discharging atoms minus(n3, n1) = all_0_9_9, yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (151) pred(n3) = all_0_9_9
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Instantiating formula (117) with all_0_8_8, n0 and discharging atoms minus(n0, n1) = all_0_8_8, yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (152) pred(n0) = all_0_8_8
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Instantiating formula (19) with n6, n5 and discharging atoms succ(n5) = n6, yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (153) pred(n6) = n5
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Instantiating formula (19) with n3, n2 and discharging atoms succ(n2) = n3, yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (154) pred(n3) = n2
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Instantiating formula (19) with n0, tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0, yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (155) pred(n0) = tptp_minus_1
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Instantiating formula (91) with n6, n5, n5 and discharging atoms succ(n5) = n6, gt(n6, n5) = 0, yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Instantiating formula (26) with n5, n4 and discharging atoms gt(n5, n4) = 0, yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Instantiating formula (26) with n5, n3 and discharging atoms gt(n5, n3) = 0, yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Instantiating formula (26) with n5, n2 and discharging atoms gt(n5, n2) = 0, yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Instantiating formula (26) with n5, n1 and discharging atoms gt(n5, n1) = 0, yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Instantiating formula (26) with n5, tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms gt(n5, tptp_minus_1) = 0, yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Instantiating formula (26) with n5, n0 and discharging atoms gt(n5, n0) = 0, yields:
% 69.20/30.03 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 69.20/30.03 |
% 69.20/30.03 | Instantiating formula (26) with n4, tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms gt(n4, tptp_minus_1) = 0, yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (163) leq(tptp_minus_1, n4) = 0
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (26) with n4, n0 and discharging atoms gt(n4, n0) = 0, yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (164) leq(n0, n4) = 0
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (91) with n3, n2, n2 and discharging atoms succ(n2) = n3, gt(n3, n2) = 0, yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (165) leq(n2, n2) = 0
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (26) with n3, tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms gt(n3, tptp_minus_1) = 0, yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (166) leq(tptp_minus_1, n3) = 0
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (26) with n3, n0 and discharging atoms gt(n3, n0) = 0, yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (167) leq(n0, n3) = 0
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (26) with n2, n1 and discharging atoms gt(n2, n1) = 0, yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (168) leq(n1, n2) = 0
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (26) with n2, tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms gt(n2, tptp_minus_1) = 0, yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (169) leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (26) with n2, n0 and discharging atoms gt(n2, n0) = 0, yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (170) leq(n0, n2) = 0
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (26) with n1, tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms gt(n1, tptp_minus_1) = 0, yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (171) leq(tptp_minus_1, n1) = 0
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (26) with n1, n0 and discharging atoms gt(n1, n0) = 0, yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (172) leq(n0, n1) = 0
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (119) with n6, n5, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms pred(n6) = all_0_10_10, pred(n6) = n5, yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (173) all_0_10_10 = n5
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (119) with n3, n2, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms pred(n3) = all_0_9_9, pred(n3) = n2, yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (174) all_0_9_9 = n2
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (119) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms pred(n0) = all_0_8_8, pred(n0) = tptp_minus_1, yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (175) all_0_8_8 = tptp_minus_1
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | From (175) and (152) follows:
% 69.43/30.03 | (155) pred(n0) = tptp_minus_1
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (89) with n5, n5 yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (177) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n5) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (89) with n4, n5 yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (178) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (89) with n5, n4 yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (179) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (132) with n4, n5 yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (180) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (132) with n5, n4 yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (181) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (89) with n4, n4 yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (182) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n4) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.03 |
% 69.43/30.03 | Instantiating formula (132) with n4, n4 yields:
% 69.43/30.03 | (183) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n4) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (89) with n3, n5 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (184) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (89) with n5, n3 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (185) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (132) with n3, n5 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (186) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (132) with n5, n3 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (187) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (89) with n3, n4 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (188) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (89) with n4, n3 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (189) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (132) with n3, n4 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (190) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (132) with n4, n3 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (191) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (89) with n3, n3 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (192) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n3) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (132) with n3, n3 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (193) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n3) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (89) with n2, n5 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (194) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (89) with n5, n2 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (195) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (132) with n2, n5 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (196) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (132) with n5, n2 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (197) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (89) with n2, n4 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (198) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (89) with n4, n2 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (199) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (132) with n2, n4 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (200) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (132) with n4, n2 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (201) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (89) with n2, n3 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (202) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (89) with n3, n2 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (203) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (132) with n2, n3 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (204) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (132) with n3, n2 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (205) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (89) with n2, n2 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (206) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (132) with n2, n2 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (207) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (71) with n2, n2 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (208) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.04 | Instantiating formula (89) with n1, n5 yields:
% 69.43/30.04 | (209) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.04 |
% 69.43/30.05 | Instantiating formula (89) with n5, n1 yields:
% 69.43/30.05 | (210) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.05 |
% 69.43/30.05 | Instantiating formula (132) with n1, n5 yields:
% 69.43/30.05 | (211) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.05 |
% 69.43/30.05 | Instantiating formula (132) with n5, n1 yields:
% 69.43/30.05 | (212) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.05 |
% 69.43/30.05 | Instantiating formula (89) with n1, n4 yields:
% 69.43/30.05 | (213) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.43/30.05 |
% 69.43/30.05 | Instantiating formula (89) with n4, n1 yields:
% 69.43/30.05 | (214) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (132) with n1, n4 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (215) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (132) with n4, n1 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (216) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (89) with n1, n3 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (217) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (89) with n3, n1 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (218) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (132) with n1, n3 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (219) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (132) with n3, n1 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (220) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (89) with n1, n2 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (221) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (89) with n2, n1 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (222) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (132) with n1, n2 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (223) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (132) with n2, n1 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (224) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (89) with n1, n1 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (225) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (132) with n1, n1 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (226) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (71) with n1, n2 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (227) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (71) with n2, n1 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (228) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ~ (leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (71) with n1, n1 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (229) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (89) with tptp_minus_1, n5 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (230) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (89) with n5, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (231) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (132) with tptp_minus_1, n5 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (232) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (132) with n5, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (233) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (89) with tptp_minus_1, n4 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (234) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (89) with n4, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (235) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (132) with tptp_minus_1, n4 yields:
% 69.52/30.05 | (236) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.05 |
% 69.52/30.05 | Instantiating formula (132) with n4, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (237) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (89) with tptp_minus_1, n3 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (238) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (89) with n3, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (239) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (132) with tptp_minus_1, n3 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (240) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (132) with n3, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (241) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (89) with tptp_minus_1, n2 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (242) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (89) with n2, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (243) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (132) with tptp_minus_1, n2 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (244) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (132) with n2, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (245) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (89) with tptp_minus_1, n1 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (246) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (89) with n1, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (247) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (132) with tptp_minus_1, n1 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (248) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (132) with n1, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (249) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (89) with tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (250) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (132) with tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (251) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (34) with tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms leq(tptp_minus_1, n4) = 0, yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (252) n4 = tptp_minus_1 | n3 = tptp_minus_1 | n2 = tptp_minus_1 | n1 = tptp_minus_1 | tptp_minus_1 = n0 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (67) with tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms leq(tptp_minus_1, n3) = 0, yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (253) n3 = tptp_minus_1 | n2 = tptp_minus_1 | n1 = tptp_minus_1 | tptp_minus_1 = n0 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (71) with tptp_minus_1, n2 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (254) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (71) with n2, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (255) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (71) with tptp_minus_1, n1 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (256) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (71) with n1, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (257) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (71) with tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (258) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (16) with tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0, yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (259) n2 = tptp_minus_1 | n1 = tptp_minus_1 | tptp_minus_1 = n0 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (4) with tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms leq(tptp_minus_1, n1) = 0, yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (260) n1 = tptp_minus_1 | tptp_minus_1 = n0 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (89) with n0, n5 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (261) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (89) with n5, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (262) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (132) with n0, n5 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (263) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (132) with n5, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (264) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (89) with n0, n4 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (265) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.06 |
% 69.52/30.06 | Instantiating formula (89) with n4, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.06 | (266) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (132) with n0, n4 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (267) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (132) with n4, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (268) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (89) with n0, n3 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (269) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (89) with n3, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (270) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (132) with n0, n3 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (271) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (132) with n3, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (272) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (89) with n0, n2 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (273) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (89) with n2, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (274) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (132) with n0, n2 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (275) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (132) with n2, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (276) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (89) with n0, n1 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (277) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (89) with n1, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (278) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (132) with n0, n1 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (279) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (132) with n1, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (280) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (89) with n0, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (281) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (89) with tptp_minus_1, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (282) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (132) with n0, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (283) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (132) with tptp_minus_1, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (284) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (89) with n0, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (285) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n0) = v2 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (132) with n0, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (286) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n0) = v2 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (71) with n0, n2 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (287) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (71) with n2, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (288) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (71) with n0, n1 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (289) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (71) with n1, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (290) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (71) with n0, tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (291) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (71) with tptp_minus_1, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (292) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 | Instantiating formula (71) with n0, n0 yields:
% 69.52/30.07 | (293) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n0) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n0) = v2 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.07 |
% 69.52/30.07 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (275), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.07 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.07 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 69.52/30.08 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.08 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 | (298) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (276), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.08 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 69.52/30.08 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.08 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 | (304) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (277), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.08 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 69.52/30.08 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.08 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 | (310) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (278), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.08 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 69.52/30.08 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.08 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 | (316) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (281), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.08 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 69.52/30.08 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.08 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 | (322) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (279), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.08 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 69.52/30.08 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.08 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 | (328) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (280), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.08 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 69.52/30.08 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.08 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 | (334) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (282), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.08 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 69.52/30.08 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.08 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 | (340) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (283), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.08 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 69.52/30.08 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.08 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 | (346) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (284), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.08 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 69.52/30.08 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.08 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 | (352) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (246), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.08 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.08 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.08 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 69.52/30.08 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.08 |
% 69.52/30.09 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 69.52/30.09 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.09 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 | (358) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (247), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.09 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 69.52/30.09 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.09 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 | (364) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (248), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.09 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 69.52/30.09 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.09 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 | (370) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (249), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.09 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 69.52/30.09 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.09 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 | (376) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (250), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.09 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 69.52/30.09 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.09 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 | (382) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | Instantiating (382) with all_93_0_24, all_93_1_25, all_93_2_26, all_93_3_27 yields:
% 69.52/30.09 | (383) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_0_24 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_1_25 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_2_26 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_3_27 & ( ~ (all_93_2_26 = 0) | ~ (all_93_3_27 = 0) | all_93_0_24 = all_93_1_25)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | Applying alpha-rule on (383) yields:
% 69.52/30.09 | (384) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_0_24
% 69.52/30.09 | (385) ~ (all_93_2_26 = 0) | ~ (all_93_3_27 = 0) | all_93_0_24 = all_93_1_25
% 69.52/30.09 | (386) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_2_26
% 69.52/30.09 | (387) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_1_25
% 69.52/30.09 | (388) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_3_27
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (251), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.09 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 69.52/30.09 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.09 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 | (394) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | Instantiating (394) with all_98_0_28, all_98_1_29, all_98_2_30, all_98_3_31 yields:
% 69.52/30.09 | (395) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = all_98_0_28 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = all_98_1_29 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_98_2_30 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_98_3_31 & ( ~ (all_98_2_30 = 0) | ~ (all_98_3_31 = 0) | all_98_0_28 = all_98_1_29)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | Applying alpha-rule on (395) yields:
% 69.52/30.09 | (396) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = all_98_0_28
% 69.52/30.09 | (397) ~ (all_98_2_30 = 0) | ~ (all_98_3_31 = 0) | all_98_0_28 = all_98_1_29
% 69.52/30.09 | (398) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = all_98_1_29
% 69.52/30.09 | (399) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_98_2_30
% 69.52/30.09 | (400) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_98_3_31
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.09 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.52/30.09 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.09 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 | (406) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.09 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.52/30.09 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.09 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 | (412) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.09 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.52/30.09 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.09 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 | (418) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.09 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.52/30.09 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.09 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 | (424) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (236), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.09 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.52/30.09 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.09 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 | (430) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.52/30.09 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (234), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.09 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.09 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.09 |
% 69.52/30.09 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.52/30.10 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.10 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 | (436) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (235), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.10 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.52/30.10 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.10 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 | (442) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (237), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.10 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.52/30.10 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.10 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 | (448) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (242), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.10 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 69.52/30.10 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.10 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 | (454) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (243), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.10 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 69.52/30.10 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.10 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 | (460) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (238), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.10 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.52/30.10 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.10 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 | (466) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (239), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.10 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.52/30.10 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.10 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 | (472) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (240), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.10 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.52/30.10 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.10 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 | (478) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (241), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.10 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.52/30.10 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.10 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 | (484) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (244), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.10 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 69.52/30.10 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.10 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 | (490) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (245), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.10 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 69.52/30.10 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.10 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 | (496) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (254), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.10 | (498) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (174) and (498) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (499) ~ (leq(n2, n2) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | Using (165) and (499) yields:
% 69.52/30.10 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.10 | (501) leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 | (502) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (174) and (501) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (165) leq(n2, n2) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (255), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.10 | (498) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (174) and (498) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (499) ~ (leq(n2, n2) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | Using (165) and (499) yields:
% 69.52/30.10 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.10 | (501) leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 | (508) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (174) and (501) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (165) leq(n2, n2) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (256), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.10 | (510) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (174) and (510) follows:
% 69.52/30.10 | (511) ~ (leq(n1, n2) = 0)
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | Using (168) and (511) yields:
% 69.52/30.10 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.10 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.10 | (513) leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.52/30.10 | (514) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.10 |
% 69.52/30.10 | From (174) and (513) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (168) leq(n1, n2) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (257), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.11 | (510) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (174) and (510) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (511) ~ (leq(n1, n2) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | Using (168) and (511) yields:
% 69.52/30.11 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.11 | (513) leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 | (520) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (174) and (513) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (168) leq(n1, n2) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (258), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.11 | (522) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (174) and (522) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (523) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | Using (169) and (523) yields:
% 69.52/30.11 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.11 | (525) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 | (526) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | Instantiating (526) with all_163_0_32, all_163_1_33, all_163_2_34, all_163_3_35 yields:
% 69.52/30.11 | (527) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = all_163_0_32 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = all_163_1_33 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_163_2_34 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_163_3_35 & ( ~ (all_163_2_34 = 0) | ~ (all_163_3_35 = 0) | all_163_0_32 = all_163_1_33)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | Applying alpha-rule on (527) yields:
% 69.52/30.11 | (528) ~ (all_163_2_34 = 0) | ~ (all_163_3_35 = 0) | all_163_0_32 = all_163_1_33
% 69.52/30.11 | (529) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_163_2_34
% 69.52/30.11 | (530) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_163_3_35
% 69.52/30.11 | (531) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = all_163_1_33
% 69.52/30.11 | (532) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = all_163_0_32
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (174) and (525) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (169) leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (261), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.11 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.52/30.11 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.11 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 | (538) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (262), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.11 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.52/30.11 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.11 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 | (544) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (265), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.11 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.52/30.11 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.11 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 | (550) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (263), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.11 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.52/30.11 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.11 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 | (556) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (264), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.11 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.52/30.11 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.11 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 | (562) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (266), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.11 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.52/30.11 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.11 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 | (568) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (271), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.11 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.52/30.11 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.11 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 | (574) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (272), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.11 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.52/30.11 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.11 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 | (580) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (267), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.11 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.52/30.11 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.11 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 | (586) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (268), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.11 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.52/30.11 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.11 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 | (592) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (269), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.11 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.52/30.11 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.52/30.11 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.11 |
% 69.52/30.11 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.11 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.11 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.11 | (598) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (270), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.12 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.52/30.12 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.12 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 | (604) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (273), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.12 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 69.52/30.12 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.12 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 | (610) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (274), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.12 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 69.52/30.12 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.12 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 | (616) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (287), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.12 | (498) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (174) and (498) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (499) ~ (leq(n2, n2) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | Using (165) and (499) yields:
% 69.52/30.12 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.12 | (501) leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 | (622) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (174) and (501) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (165) leq(n2, n2) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (285), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.12 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 69.52/30.12 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.12 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 | (628) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n0) = v2 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (286), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.12 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 69.52/30.12 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.12 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 | (634) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n0) = v2 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (184), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.12 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.52/30.12 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.12 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 | (640) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (189), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.12 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.52/30.12 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.12 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 | (646) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (187), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.12 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.52/30.12 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.12 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 | (652) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (188), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.12 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.52/30.12 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.12 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 | (658) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (190), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.12 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.52/30.12 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.12 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 | (664) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (185), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.12 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.52/30.12 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.12 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 | (670) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (186), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.12 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.52/30.12 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.12 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 | (676) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (183), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.12 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.52/30.12 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.52/30.12 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.12 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.12 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.12 | (682) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n4) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.12 |
% 69.52/30.12 | Instantiating (682) with all_244_0_44, all_244_1_45, all_244_2_46, all_244_3_47 yields:
% 69.52/30.13 | (683) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n4) = all_244_0_44 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n4) = all_244_1_45 & leq(n0, n4) = all_244_2_46 & leq(n0, n4) = all_244_3_47 & ( ~ (all_244_2_46 = 0) | ~ (all_244_3_47 = 0) | all_244_0_44 = all_244_1_45)
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | Applying alpha-rule on (683) yields:
% 69.52/30.13 | (684) leq(n0, n4) = all_244_3_47
% 69.52/30.13 | (685) leq(n0, n4) = all_244_2_46
% 69.52/30.13 | (686) ~ (all_244_2_46 = 0) | ~ (all_244_3_47 = 0) | all_244_0_44 = all_244_1_45
% 69.52/30.13 | (687) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n4) = all_244_1_45
% 69.52/30.13 | (688) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n4) = all_244_0_44
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.52/30.13 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (191), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.13 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.13 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.52/30.13 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.52/30.13 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.13 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.13 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.13 | (694) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.52/30.13 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (192), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.13 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.13 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.52/30.13 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.52/30.13 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.13 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.13 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.13 | (700) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n3) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | Instantiating (700) with all_252_0_48, all_252_1_49, all_252_2_50, all_252_3_51 yields:
% 69.52/30.13 | (701) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n3) = all_252_0_48 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n3) = all_252_1_49 & leq(n0, n3) = all_252_2_50 & leq(n0, n3) = all_252_3_51 & ( ~ (all_252_2_50 = 0) | ~ (all_252_3_51 = 0) | all_252_0_48 = all_252_1_49)
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | Applying alpha-rule on (701) yields:
% 69.52/30.13 | (702) ~ (all_252_2_50 = 0) | ~ (all_252_3_51 = 0) | all_252_0_48 = all_252_1_49
% 69.52/30.13 | (703) leq(n0, n3) = all_252_3_51
% 69.52/30.13 | (704) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n3) = all_252_0_48
% 69.52/30.13 | (705) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n3) = all_252_1_49
% 69.52/30.13 | (706) leq(n0, n3) = all_252_2_50
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.52/30.13 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.13 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.13 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.52/30.13 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.52/30.13 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.13 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.13 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.13 | (712) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.52/30.13 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (197), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.13 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.13 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.52/30.13 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.52/30.13 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.13 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.13 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.13 | (718) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.52/30.13 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (195), into two cases.
% 69.52/30.13 |-Branch one:
% 69.52/30.13 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.52/30.13 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.52/30.13 | (296) $false
% 69.52/30.13 |
% 69.52/30.13 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.52/30.13 |-Branch two:
% 69.52/30.13 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.52/30.13 | (724) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.90/30.13 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (196), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.13 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.13 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.90/30.13 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.90/30.13 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.13 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.13 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.13 | (730) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.90/30.13 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.13 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.13 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.90/30.13 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.90/30.13 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.13 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.13 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.13 | (736) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.90/30.13 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (193), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.13 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.13 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.90/30.13 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.90/30.13 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.13 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.13 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.13 | (742) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n3) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | Instantiating (742) with all_272_0_52, all_272_1_53, all_272_2_54, all_272_3_55 yields:
% 69.90/30.13 | (743) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n3) = all_272_0_52 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n3) = all_272_1_53 & leq(n0, n3) = all_272_2_54 & leq(n0, n3) = all_272_3_55 & ( ~ (all_272_2_54 = 0) | ~ (all_272_3_55 = 0) | all_272_0_52 = all_272_1_53)
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | Applying alpha-rule on (743) yields:
% 69.90/30.13 | (744) leq(n0, n3) = all_272_3_55
% 69.90/30.13 | (745) ~ (all_272_2_54 = 0) | ~ (all_272_3_55 = 0) | all_272_0_52 = all_272_1_53
% 69.90/30.13 | (746) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n3) = all_272_1_53
% 69.90/30.13 | (747) leq(n0, n3) = all_272_2_54
% 69.90/30.13 | (748) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n3) = all_272_0_52
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.90/30.13 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (211), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.13 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.13 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.90/30.13 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.90/30.13 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.13 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.13 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.13 | (754) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.90/30.13 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (212), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.13 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.13 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.90/30.13 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.90/30.13 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.13 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.13 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.13 | (760) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.90/30.13 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (213), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.13 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.13 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.90/30.13 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.90/30.13 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.13 |
% 69.90/30.13 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.13 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.13 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.13 | (766) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (214), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.14 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.90/30.14 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.14 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 | (772) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.14 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 69.90/30.14 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.14 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 | (778) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.14 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 69.90/30.14 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.14 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 | (784) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.14 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 69.90/30.14 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.14 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 | (790) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | Instantiating (790) with all_295_0_56, all_295_1_57, all_295_2_58, all_295_3_59 yields:
% 69.90/30.14 | (791) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = all_295_0_56 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = all_295_1_57 & leq(n0, n2) = all_295_2_58 & leq(n0, n2) = all_295_3_59 & ( ~ (all_295_2_58 = 0) | ~ (all_295_3_59 = 0) | all_295_0_56 = all_295_1_57)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | Applying alpha-rule on (791) yields:
% 69.90/30.14 | (792) leq(n0, n2) = all_295_3_59
% 69.90/30.14 | (793) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = all_295_0_56
% 69.90/30.14 | (794) leq(n0, n2) = all_295_2_58
% 69.90/30.14 | (795) ~ (all_295_2_58 = 0) | ~ (all_295_3_59 = 0) | all_295_0_56 = all_295_1_57
% 69.90/30.14 | (796) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = all_295_1_57
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.14 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.90/30.14 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.14 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 | (802) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.14 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.90/30.14 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.14 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 | (808) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.14 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.90/30.14 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.14 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 | (814) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (210), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.14 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.90/30.14 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.14 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 | (820) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (199), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.14 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.90/30.14 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.14 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 | (826) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (200), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.14 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.90/30.14 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.14 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 | (832) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.14 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.90/30.14 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.14 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 | (838) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (202), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.14 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.90/30.14 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.14 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 | (844) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.14 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.90/30.14 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.90/30.14 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.14 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.14 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.14 | (850) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.14 |
% 69.90/30.14 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.15 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.15 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 | (856) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Instantiating (856) with all_327_0_60, all_327_1_61, all_327_2_62, all_327_3_63 yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (857) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = all_327_0_60 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = all_327_1_61 & leq(n0, n2) = all_327_2_62 & leq(n0, n2) = all_327_3_63 & ( ~ (all_327_2_62 = 0) | ~ (all_327_3_63 = 0) | all_327_0_60 = all_327_1_61)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Applying alpha-rule on (857) yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (858) leq(n0, n2) = all_327_3_63
% 69.90/30.15 | (859) leq(n0, n2) = all_327_2_62
% 69.90/30.15 | (860) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = all_327_1_61
% 69.90/30.15 | (861) ~ (all_327_2_62 = 0) | ~ (all_327_3_63 = 0) | all_327_0_60 = all_327_1_61
% 69.90/30.15 | (862) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = all_327_0_60
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.15 | (498) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (174) and (498) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (499) ~ (leq(n2, n2) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Using (165) and (499) yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.15 | (501) leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 | (868) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Instantiating (868) with all_332_0_64, all_332_1_65, all_332_2_66, all_332_3_67 yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (869) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = all_332_0_64 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = all_332_1_65 & leq(n0, n2) = all_332_2_66 & leq(n0, n2) = all_332_3_67 & ( ~ (all_332_2_66 = 0) | ~ (all_332_3_67 = 0) | all_332_0_64 = all_332_1_65)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Applying alpha-rule on (869) yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (870) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = all_332_0_64
% 69.90/30.15 | (871) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n2) = all_332_1_65
% 69.90/30.15 | (872) leq(n0, n2) = all_332_3_67
% 69.90/30.15 | (873) ~ (all_332_2_66 = 0) | ~ (all_332_3_67 = 0) | all_332_0_64 = all_332_1_65
% 69.90/30.15 | (874) leq(n0, n2) = all_332_2_66
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (174) and (501) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (165) leq(n2, n2) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.15 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.15 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 | (880) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Instantiating (880) with all_337_0_68, all_337_1_69, all_337_2_70, all_337_3_71 yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (881) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = all_337_0_68 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = all_337_1_69 & leq(n0, n1) = all_337_2_70 & leq(n0, n1) = all_337_3_71 & ( ~ (all_337_2_70 = 0) | ~ (all_337_3_71 = 0) | all_337_0_68 = all_337_1_69)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Applying alpha-rule on (881) yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (882) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = all_337_1_69
% 69.90/30.15 | (883) ~ (all_337_2_70 = 0) | ~ (all_337_3_71 = 0) | all_337_0_68 = all_337_1_69
% 69.90/30.15 | (884) leq(n0, n1) = all_337_2_70
% 69.90/30.15 | (885) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = all_337_0_68
% 69.90/30.15 | (886) leq(n0, n1) = all_337_3_71
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (226), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.15 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.15 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 | (892) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Instantiating (892) with all_342_0_72, all_342_1_73, all_342_2_74, all_342_3_75 yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (893) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = all_342_0_72 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = all_342_1_73 & leq(n0, n1) = all_342_2_74 & leq(n0, n1) = all_342_3_75 & ( ~ (all_342_2_74 = 0) | ~ (all_342_3_75 = 0) | all_342_0_72 = all_342_1_73)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Applying alpha-rule on (893) yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (894) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = all_342_1_73
% 69.90/30.15 | (895) leq(n0, n1) = all_342_2_74
% 69.90/30.15 | (896) leq(n0, n1) = all_342_3_75
% 69.90/30.15 | (897) ~ (all_342_2_74 = 0) | ~ (all_342_3_75 = 0) | all_342_0_72 = all_342_1_73
% 69.90/30.15 | (898) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = all_342_0_72
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (215), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.15 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.15 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 | (904) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (216), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.15 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.15 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 | (910) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.15 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.15 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 | (916) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (218), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.15 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.15 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 | (922) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.15 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.15 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 | (928) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (219), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.15 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.90/30.15 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.90/30.15 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.15 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.15 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.15 | (934) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.15 |
% 69.90/30.15 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (220), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.16 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 69.90/30.16 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.16 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 | (940) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.16 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 69.90/30.16 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.16 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 | (946) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (227), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.16 | (498) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (498) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (499) ~ (leq(n2, n2) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | Using (165) and (499) yields:
% 69.90/30.16 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.16 | (501) leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 | (952) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (501) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (165) leq(n2, n2) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.16 | (498) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (498) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (499) ~ (leq(n2, n2) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | Using (165) and (499) yields:
% 69.90/30.16 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.16 | (501) leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 | (958) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (501) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (165) leq(n2, n2) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.16 | (510) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (510) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (511) ~ (leq(n1, n2) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | Using (168) and (511) yields:
% 69.90/30.16 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.16 | (513) leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 | (964) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | Instantiating (964) with all_377_0_76, all_377_1_77, all_377_2_78, all_377_3_79 yields:
% 69.90/30.16 | (965) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = all_377_0_76 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = all_377_1_77 & leq(n0, n1) = all_377_2_78 & leq(n0, n1) = all_377_3_79 & ( ~ (all_377_2_78 = 0) | ~ (all_377_3_79 = 0) | all_377_0_76 = all_377_1_77)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | Applying alpha-rule on (965) yields:
% 69.90/30.16 | (966) ~ (all_377_2_78 = 0) | ~ (all_377_3_79 = 0) | all_377_0_76 = all_377_1_77
% 69.90/30.16 | (967) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = all_377_1_77
% 69.90/30.16 | (968) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n1) = all_377_0_76
% 69.90/30.16 | (969) leq(n0, n1) = all_377_3_79
% 69.90/30.16 | (970) leq(n0, n1) = all_377_2_78
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (513) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (168) leq(n1, n2) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (288), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.16 | (498) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (498) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (499) ~ (leq(n2, n2) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | Using (165) and (499) yields:
% 69.90/30.16 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.16 | (501) leq(n2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 | (976) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (289), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.16 | (510) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (510) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (511) ~ (leq(n1, n2) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | Using (168) and (511) yields:
% 69.90/30.16 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.16 | (513) leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 | (981) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (513) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (168) leq(n1, n2) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (290), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.16 | (510) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (510) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (511) ~ (leq(n1, n2) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | Using (168) and (511) yields:
% 69.90/30.16 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.16 | (513) leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 | (987) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (513) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (168) leq(n1, n2) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (291), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.16 | (522) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (522) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (523) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | Using (169) and (523) yields:
% 69.90/30.16 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.16 | (525) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 | (993) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (525) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (169) leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (292), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.16 | (522) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (522) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (523) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | Using (169) and (523) yields:
% 69.90/30.16 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.16 | (525) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 | (999) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (525) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (169) leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (293), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.16 | (1001) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (1001) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (1002) ~ (leq(n0, n2) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | Using (170) and (1002) yields:
% 69.90/30.16 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.16 | (1004) leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 | (1005) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n0) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n0) = v2 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (174) and (1004) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (170) leq(n0, n2) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (181), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.16 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.90/30.16 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.16 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 | (1011) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (177), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.16 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.90/30.16 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.90/30.16 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.16 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.16 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.16 | (1017) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n5) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.16 |
% 69.90/30.16 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.90/30.17 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (179), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.17 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.90/30.17 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.90/30.17 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.17 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.17 | (1023) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.90/30.17 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (180), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.17 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.90/30.17 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.90/30.17 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.17 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.17 | (1029) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | From (173) and (405) follows:
% 69.90/30.17 | (156) leq(n5, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (182), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.17 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 69.90/30.17 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 69.90/30.17 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.17 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.17 | (1035) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n4) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Instantiating (1035) with all_416_0_88, all_416_1_89, all_416_2_90, all_416_3_91 yields:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1036) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n4) = all_416_0_88 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n4) = all_416_1_89 & leq(n0, n4) = all_416_2_90 & leq(n0, n4) = all_416_3_91 & ( ~ (all_416_2_90 = 0) | ~ (all_416_3_91 = 0) | all_416_0_88 = all_416_1_89)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Applying alpha-rule on (1036) yields:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1037) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n4) = all_416_0_88
% 69.90/30.17 | (1038) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n4) = all_416_1_89
% 69.90/30.17 | (1039) leq(n0, n4) = all_416_3_91
% 69.90/30.17 | (1040) ~ (all_416_2_90 = 0) | ~ (all_416_3_91 = 0) | all_416_0_88 = all_416_1_89
% 69.90/30.17 | (1041) leq(n0, n4) = all_416_2_90
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 69.90/30.17 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (178), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.17 | (402) ~ (leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | From (173) and (402) follows:
% 69.90/30.17 | (403) ~ (leq(n5, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Using (156) and (403) yields:
% 69.90/30.17 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.17 | (405) leq(n5, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.17 | (1047) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (260), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1048) tptp_minus_1 = n0
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Equations (1048) can reduce 149 to:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1049) $false
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.17 | (149) ~ (tptp_minus_1 = n0)
% 69.90/30.17 | (1051) n1 = tptp_minus_1 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (259), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1048) tptp_minus_1 = n0
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Equations (1048) can reduce 149 to:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1049) $false
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.17 | (149) ~ (tptp_minus_1 = n0)
% 69.90/30.17 | (1055) n2 = tptp_minus_1 | n1 = tptp_minus_1 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (253), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1048) tptp_minus_1 = n0
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Equations (1048) can reduce 149 to:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1049) $false
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.17 | (149) ~ (tptp_minus_1 = n0)
% 69.90/30.17 | (1059) n3 = tptp_minus_1 | n2 = tptp_minus_1 | n1 = tptp_minus_1 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (252), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1048) tptp_minus_1 = n0
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Equations (1048) can reduce 149 to:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1049) $false
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.17 | (149) ~ (tptp_minus_1 = n0)
% 69.90/30.17 | (1063) n4 = tptp_minus_1 | n3 = tptp_minus_1 | n2 = tptp_minus_1 | n1 = tptp_minus_1 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1063), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1064) n1 = tptp_minus_1
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Equations (1064) can reduce 148 to:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1049) $false
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.17 | (148) ~ (n1 = tptp_minus_1)
% 69.90/30.17 | (1067) n4 = tptp_minus_1 | n3 = tptp_minus_1 | n2 = tptp_minus_1 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (993), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1001) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | From (174) and (1001) follows:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1002) ~ (leq(n0, n2) = 0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Using (170) and (1002) yields:
% 69.90/30.17 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1004) leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.90/30.17 | (1072) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Instantiating (1072) with all_486_0_103, all_486_1_104, all_486_2_105, all_486_3_106 yields:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1073) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = all_486_1_104 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_486_0_103 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_486_3_106 & leq(n0, n0) = all_486_2_105 & ( ~ (all_486_2_105 = 0) | ~ (all_486_3_106 = 0) | all_486_0_103 = all_486_1_104)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Applying alpha-rule on (1073) yields:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1074) leq(n0, n0) = all_486_2_105
% 69.90/30.17 | (1075) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_486_3_106
% 69.90/30.17 | (1076) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = all_486_1_104
% 69.90/30.17 | (1077) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_486_0_103
% 69.90/30.17 | (1078) ~ (all_486_2_105 = 0) | ~ (all_486_3_106 = 0) | all_486_0_103 = all_486_1_104
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | From (174) and (1004) follows:
% 69.90/30.17 | (170) leq(n0, n2) = 0
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (999), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1001) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | From (174) and (1001) follows:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1002) ~ (leq(n0, n2) = 0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Using (170) and (1002) yields:
% 69.90/30.17 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1004) leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 69.90/30.17 | (1084) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Instantiating (1084) with all_491_0_107, all_491_1_108, all_491_2_109, all_491_3_110 yields:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1085) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = all_491_0_107 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_491_1_108 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_491_2_109 & leq(n0, n0) = all_491_3_110 & ( ~ (all_491_2_109 = 0) | ~ (all_491_3_110 = 0) | all_491_0_107 = all_491_1_108)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Applying alpha-rule on (1085) yields:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1086) leq(n0, n0) = all_491_3_110
% 69.90/30.17 | (1087) ~ (all_491_2_109 = 0) | ~ (all_491_3_110 = 0) | all_491_0_107 = all_491_1_108
% 69.90/30.17 | (1088) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = all_491_0_107
% 69.90/30.17 | (1089) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_491_2_109
% 69.90/30.17 | (1090) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_491_1_108
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | From (174) and (1004) follows:
% 69.90/30.17 | (170) leq(n0, n2) = 0
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1067), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1092) n3 = tptp_minus_1
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Equations (1092) can reduce 146 to:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1049) $false
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.17 | (146) ~ (n3 = tptp_minus_1)
% 69.90/30.17 | (1095) n4 = tptp_minus_1 | n2 = tptp_minus_1 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1095), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1096) n2 = tptp_minus_1
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Equations (1096) can reduce 147 to:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1049) $false
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.17 | (147) ~ (n2 = tptp_minus_1)
% 69.90/30.17 | (1099) n4 = tptp_minus_1 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1099), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1100) n4 = tptp_minus_1
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 | Equations (1100) can reduce 145 to:
% 69.90/30.17 | (1049) $false
% 69.90/30.17 |
% 69.90/30.17 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.17 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.17 | (145) ~ (n4 = tptp_minus_1)
% 69.90/30.18 | (1103) ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 | Instantiating (1103) with all_505_0_111 yields:
% 69.90/30.18 | (1104) ~ (all_505_0_111 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_505_0_111
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 | Applying alpha-rule on (1104) yields:
% 69.90/30.18 | (1105) ~ (all_505_0_111 = 0)
% 69.90/30.18 | (1106) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_505_0_111
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (298), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.18 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.18 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 69.90/30.18 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 69.90/30.18 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.18 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.18 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.18 | (1111) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 | Instantiating (1111) with all_511_0_112, all_511_1_113, all_511_2_114, all_511_3_115 yields:
% 69.90/30.18 | (1112) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = all_511_1_113 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = all_511_0_112 & leq(n0, n2) = all_511_3_115 & leq(n0, n0) = all_511_2_114 & ( ~ (all_511_2_114 = 0) | ~ (all_511_3_115 = 0) | all_511_0_112 = all_511_1_113)
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 | Applying alpha-rule on (1112) yields:
% 69.90/30.18 | (1113) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = all_511_0_112
% 69.90/30.18 | (1114) leq(n0, n0) = all_511_2_114
% 69.90/30.18 | (1115) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = all_511_1_113
% 69.90/30.18 | (1116) leq(n0, n2) = all_511_3_115
% 69.90/30.18 | (1117) ~ (all_511_2_114 = 0) | ~ (all_511_3_115 = 0) | all_511_0_112 = all_511_1_113
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 69.90/30.18 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (304), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.18 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.18 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 69.90/30.18 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 69.90/30.18 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.18 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.18 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.18 | (1123) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 | Instantiating (1123) with all_516_0_116, all_516_1_117, all_516_2_118, all_516_3_119 yields:
% 69.90/30.18 | (1124) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = all_516_0_116 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = all_516_1_117 & leq(n0, n2) = all_516_2_118 & leq(n0, n0) = all_516_3_119 & ( ~ (all_516_2_118 = 0) | ~ (all_516_3_119 = 0) | all_516_0_116 = all_516_1_117)
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 | Applying alpha-rule on (1124) yields:
% 69.90/30.18 | (1125) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = all_516_0_116
% 69.90/30.18 | (1126) leq(n0, n0) = all_516_3_119
% 69.90/30.18 | (1127) leq(n0, n2) = all_516_2_118
% 69.90/30.18 | (1128) ~ (all_516_2_118 = 0) | ~ (all_516_3_119 = 0) | all_516_0_116 = all_516_1_117
% 69.90/30.18 | (1129) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = all_516_1_117
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 69.90/30.18 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (310), into two cases.
% 69.90/30.18 |-Branch one:
% 69.90/30.18 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 69.90/30.18 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 69.90/30.18 | (296) $false
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 69.90/30.18 |-Branch two:
% 69.90/30.18 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 69.90/30.18 | (1135) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 69.90/30.18 |
% 69.90/30.18 | Instantiating (1135) with all_521_0_120, all_521_1_121, all_521_2_122, all_521_3_123 yields:
% 69.90/30.18 | (1136) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = all_521_1_121 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = all_521_0_120 & leq(n0, n1) = all_521_3_123 & leq(n0, n0) = all_521_2_122 & ( ~ (all_521_2_122 = 0) | ~ (all_521_3_123 = 0) | all_521_0_120 = all_521_1_121)
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | Applying alpha-rule on (1136) yields:
% 70.11/30.18 | (1137) ~ (all_521_2_122 = 0) | ~ (all_521_3_123 = 0) | all_521_0_120 = all_521_1_121
% 70.11/30.18 | (1138) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = all_521_0_120
% 70.11/30.18 | (1139) leq(n0, n0) = all_521_2_122
% 70.11/30.18 | (1140) leq(n0, n1) = all_521_3_123
% 70.11/30.18 | (1141) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = all_521_1_121
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.18 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (316), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.18 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.18 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.18 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.18 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.18 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.18 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.18 | (1147) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | Instantiating (1147) with all_526_0_124, all_526_1_125, all_526_2_126, all_526_3_127 yields:
% 70.11/30.18 | (1148) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = all_526_0_124 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = all_526_1_125 & leq(n0, n1) = all_526_2_126 & leq(n0, n0) = all_526_3_127 & ( ~ (all_526_2_126 = 0) | ~ (all_526_3_127 = 0) | all_526_0_124 = all_526_1_125)
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | Applying alpha-rule on (1148) yields:
% 70.11/30.18 | (1149) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = all_526_1_125
% 70.11/30.18 | (1150) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = all_526_0_124
% 70.11/30.18 | (1151) leq(n0, n1) = all_526_2_126
% 70.11/30.18 | (1152) ~ (all_526_2_126 = 0) | ~ (all_526_3_127 = 0) | all_526_0_124 = all_526_1_125
% 70.11/30.18 | (1153) leq(n0, n0) = all_526_3_127
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.18 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (322), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.18 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.18 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.18 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.18 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.18 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.18 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.18 | (1159) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | Instantiating (1159) with all_531_0_128, all_531_1_129, all_531_2_130, all_531_3_131 yields:
% 70.11/30.18 | (1160) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = all_531_1_129 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_531_0_128 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_531_3_131 & leq(n0, n0) = all_531_2_130 & ( ~ (all_531_2_130 = 0) | ~ (all_531_3_131 = 0) | all_531_0_128 = all_531_1_129)
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | Applying alpha-rule on (1160) yields:
% 70.11/30.18 | (1161) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_531_0_128
% 70.11/30.18 | (1162) ~ (all_531_2_130 = 0) | ~ (all_531_3_131 = 0) | all_531_0_128 = all_531_1_129
% 70.11/30.18 | (1163) leq(n0, n0) = all_531_2_130
% 70.11/30.18 | (1164) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = all_531_1_129
% 70.11/30.18 | (1165) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_531_3_131
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.18 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (328), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.18 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.18 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.18 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.18 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.18 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.18 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.18 | (1171) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | Instantiating (1171) with all_536_0_132, all_536_1_133, all_536_2_134, all_536_3_135 yields:
% 70.11/30.18 | (1172) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = all_536_1_133 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = all_536_0_132 & leq(n0, n1) = all_536_3_135 & leq(n0, n0) = all_536_2_134 & ( ~ (all_536_2_134 = 0) | ~ (all_536_3_135 = 0) | all_536_0_132 = all_536_1_133)
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | Applying alpha-rule on (1172) yields:
% 70.11/30.18 | (1173) ~ (all_536_2_134 = 0) | ~ (all_536_3_135 = 0) | all_536_0_132 = all_536_1_133
% 70.11/30.18 | (1174) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = all_536_1_133
% 70.11/30.18 | (1175) leq(n0, n0) = all_536_2_134
% 70.11/30.18 | (1176) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = all_536_0_132
% 70.11/30.18 | (1177) leq(n0, n1) = all_536_3_135
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.18 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (334), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.18 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.18 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.18 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.18 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.18 |
% 70.11/30.18 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.18 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.18 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.19 | (1183) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Instantiating (1183) with all_541_0_136, all_541_1_137, all_541_2_138, all_541_3_139 yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (1184) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = all_541_0_136 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = all_541_1_137 & leq(n0, n1) = all_541_2_138 & leq(n0, n0) = all_541_3_139 & ( ~ (all_541_2_138 = 0) | ~ (all_541_3_139 = 0) | all_541_0_136 = all_541_1_137)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Applying alpha-rule on (1184) yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (1185) leq(n0, n1) = all_541_2_138
% 70.11/30.19 | (1186) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = all_541_0_136
% 70.11/30.19 | (1187) leq(n0, n0) = all_541_3_139
% 70.11/30.19 | (1188) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = all_541_1_137
% 70.11/30.19 | (1189) ~ (all_541_2_138 = 0) | ~ (all_541_3_139 = 0) | all_541_0_136 = all_541_1_137
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.19 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (340), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.19 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.19 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.19 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.19 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.19 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.19 | (1195) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Instantiating (1195) with all_546_0_140, all_546_1_141, all_546_2_142, all_546_3_143 yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (1196) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = all_546_0_140 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_546_1_141 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_546_2_142 & leq(n0, n0) = all_546_3_143 & ( ~ (all_546_2_142 = 0) | ~ (all_546_3_143 = 0) | all_546_0_140 = all_546_1_141)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Applying alpha-rule on (1196) yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (1197) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_546_1_141
% 70.11/30.19 | (1198) leq(n0, n0) = all_546_3_143
% 70.11/30.19 | (1199) ~ (all_546_2_142 = 0) | ~ (all_546_3_143 = 0) | all_546_0_140 = all_546_1_141
% 70.11/30.19 | (1200) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = all_546_0_140
% 70.11/30.19 | (1201) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_546_2_142
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.19 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (346), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.19 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.19 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.19 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.19 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.19 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.19 | (1207) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Instantiating (1207) with all_551_0_144, all_551_1_145, all_551_2_146, all_551_3_147 yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (1208) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = all_551_1_145 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_551_0_144 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_551_3_147 & leq(n0, n0) = all_551_2_146 & ( ~ (all_551_2_146 = 0) | ~ (all_551_3_147 = 0) | all_551_0_144 = all_551_1_145)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Applying alpha-rule on (1208) yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (1209) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_551_0_144
% 70.11/30.19 | (1210) ~ (all_551_2_146 = 0) | ~ (all_551_3_147 = 0) | all_551_0_144 = all_551_1_145
% 70.11/30.19 | (1211) leq(n0, n0) = all_551_2_146
% 70.11/30.19 | (1212) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = all_551_1_145
% 70.11/30.19 | (1213) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_551_3_147
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.19 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (352), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.19 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.19 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.19 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.19 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.19 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.19 | (1219) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Instantiating (1219) with all_556_0_148, all_556_1_149, all_556_2_150, all_556_3_151 yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (1220) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = all_556_0_148 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_556_1_149 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_556_2_150 & leq(n0, n0) = all_556_3_151 & ( ~ (all_556_2_150 = 0) | ~ (all_556_3_151 = 0) | all_556_0_148 = all_556_1_149)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Applying alpha-rule on (1220) yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (1221) ~ (all_556_2_150 = 0) | ~ (all_556_3_151 = 0) | all_556_0_148 = all_556_1_149
% 70.11/30.19 | (1222) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_556_1_149
% 70.11/30.19 | (1223) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n0) = all_556_0_148
% 70.11/30.19 | (1224) leq(n0, n0) = all_556_3_151
% 70.11/30.19 | (1225) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_556_2_150
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.19 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (358), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.19 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.19 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.19 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.19 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.19 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.19 | (1231) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Instantiating (1231) with all_561_0_152, all_561_1_153, all_561_2_154, all_561_3_155 yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (1232) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = all_561_1_153 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = all_561_0_152 & leq(n0, n1) = all_561_3_155 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_561_2_154 & ( ~ (all_561_2_154 = 0) | ~ (all_561_3_155 = 0) | all_561_0_152 = all_561_1_153)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Applying alpha-rule on (1232) yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (1233) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = all_561_0_152
% 70.11/30.19 | (1234) ~ (all_561_2_154 = 0) | ~ (all_561_3_155 = 0) | all_561_0_152 = all_561_1_153
% 70.11/30.19 | (1235) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_561_2_154
% 70.11/30.19 | (1236) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = all_561_1_153
% 70.11/30.19 | (1237) leq(n0, n1) = all_561_3_155
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.19 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (364), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.19 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.19 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.19 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.19 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.19 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.19 | (1243) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Instantiating (1243) with all_566_0_156, all_566_1_157, all_566_2_158, all_566_3_159 yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (1244) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = all_566_0_156 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = all_566_1_157 & leq(n0, n1) = all_566_2_158 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_566_3_159 & ( ~ (all_566_2_158 = 0) | ~ (all_566_3_159 = 0) | all_566_0_156 = all_566_1_157)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Applying alpha-rule on (1244) yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (1245) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_566_3_159
% 70.11/30.19 | (1246) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = all_566_1_157
% 70.11/30.19 | (1247) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = all_566_0_156
% 70.11/30.19 | (1248) leq(n0, n1) = all_566_2_158
% 70.11/30.19 | (1249) ~ (all_566_2_158 = 0) | ~ (all_566_3_159 = 0) | all_566_0_156 = all_566_1_157
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.19 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (370), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.19 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.19 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.19 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.19 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.19 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.19 | (1255) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.19 | Instantiating (1255) with all_571_0_160, all_571_1_161, all_571_2_162, all_571_3_163 yields:
% 70.11/30.19 | (1256) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = all_571_1_161 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = all_571_0_160 & leq(n0, n1) = all_571_3_163 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_571_2_162 & ( ~ (all_571_2_162 = 0) | ~ (all_571_3_163 = 0) | all_571_0_160 = all_571_1_161)
% 70.11/30.19 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Applying alpha-rule on (1256) yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (1257) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = all_571_1_161
% 70.11/30.20 | (1258) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = all_571_0_160
% 70.11/30.20 | (1259) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_571_2_162
% 70.11/30.20 | (1260) leq(n0, n1) = all_571_3_163
% 70.11/30.20 | (1261) ~ (all_571_2_162 = 0) | ~ (all_571_3_163 = 0) | all_571_0_160 = all_571_1_161
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.20 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (376), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.20 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.20 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.20 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.20 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.20 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.20 | (1267) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Instantiating (1267) with all_576_0_164, all_576_1_165, all_576_2_166, all_576_3_167 yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (1268) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = all_576_0_164 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = all_576_1_165 & leq(n0, n1) = all_576_2_166 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_576_3_167 & ( ~ (all_576_2_166 = 0) | ~ (all_576_3_167 = 0) | all_576_0_164 = all_576_1_165)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Applying alpha-rule on (1268) yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (1269) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_576_3_167
% 70.11/30.20 | (1270) leq(n0, n1) = all_576_2_166
% 70.11/30.20 | (1271) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = all_576_1_165
% 70.11/30.20 | (1272) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = all_576_0_164
% 70.11/30.20 | (1273) ~ (all_576_2_166 = 0) | ~ (all_576_3_167 = 0) | all_576_0_164 = all_576_1_165
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.20 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (406), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.20 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.20 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.20 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.20 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.20 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.20 | (1279) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Instantiating (1279) with all_581_0_168, all_581_1_169, all_581_2_170, all_581_3_171 yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (1280) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = all_581_1_169 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = all_581_0_168 & leq(n0, n5) = all_581_3_171 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_581_2_170 & ( ~ (all_581_2_170 = 0) | ~ (all_581_3_171 = 0) | all_581_0_168 = all_581_1_169)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Applying alpha-rule on (1280) yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (1281) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = all_581_0_168
% 70.11/30.20 | (1282) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = all_581_1_169
% 70.11/30.20 | (1283) ~ (all_581_2_170 = 0) | ~ (all_581_3_171 = 0) | all_581_0_168 = all_581_1_169
% 70.11/30.20 | (1284) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_581_2_170
% 70.11/30.20 | (1285) leq(n0, n5) = all_581_3_171
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.20 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (412), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.20 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.20 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.20 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.20 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.20 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.20 | (1291) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Instantiating (1291) with all_586_0_172, all_586_1_173, all_586_2_174, all_586_3_175 yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (1292) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = all_586_0_172 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = all_586_1_173 & leq(n0, n5) = all_586_2_174 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_586_3_175 & ( ~ (all_586_2_174 = 0) | ~ (all_586_3_175 = 0) | all_586_0_172 = all_586_1_173)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Applying alpha-rule on (1292) yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (1293) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_586_3_175
% 70.11/30.20 | (1294) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = all_586_1_173
% 70.11/30.20 | (1295) ~ (all_586_2_174 = 0) | ~ (all_586_3_175 = 0) | all_586_0_172 = all_586_1_173
% 70.11/30.20 | (1296) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = all_586_0_172
% 70.11/30.20 | (1297) leq(n0, n5) = all_586_2_174
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.20 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (418), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.20 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.20 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.20 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.20 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.20 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.20 | (1303) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Instantiating (1303) with all_591_0_176, all_591_1_177, all_591_2_178, all_591_3_179 yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (1304) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = all_591_1_177 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = all_591_0_176 & leq(n0, n5) = all_591_3_179 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_591_2_178 & ( ~ (all_591_2_178 = 0) | ~ (all_591_3_179 = 0) | all_591_0_176 = all_591_1_177)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Applying alpha-rule on (1304) yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (1305) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_591_2_178
% 70.11/30.20 | (1306) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = all_591_0_176
% 70.11/30.20 | (1307) ~ (all_591_2_178 = 0) | ~ (all_591_3_179 = 0) | all_591_0_176 = all_591_1_177
% 70.11/30.20 | (1308) leq(n0, n5) = all_591_3_179
% 70.11/30.20 | (1309) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = all_591_1_177
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.20 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (424), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.20 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.20 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.20 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.20 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.20 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.20 | (1315) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Instantiating (1315) with all_596_0_180, all_596_1_181, all_596_2_182, all_596_3_183 yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (1316) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = all_596_0_180 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = all_596_1_181 & leq(n0, n5) = all_596_2_182 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_596_3_183 & ( ~ (all_596_2_182 = 0) | ~ (all_596_3_183 = 0) | all_596_0_180 = all_596_1_181)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Applying alpha-rule on (1316) yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (1317) ~ (all_596_2_182 = 0) | ~ (all_596_3_183 = 0) | all_596_0_180 = all_596_1_181
% 70.11/30.20 | (1318) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, tptp_minus_1) = all_596_0_180
% 70.11/30.20 | (1319) leq(n0, n5) = all_596_2_182
% 70.11/30.20 | (1320) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n5) = all_596_1_181
% 70.11/30.20 | (1321) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_596_3_183
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.20 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (430), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.20 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.20 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.20 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.20 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.20 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.20 | (1327) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Instantiating (1327) with all_601_0_184, all_601_1_185, all_601_2_186, all_601_3_187 yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (1328) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = all_601_1_185 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = all_601_0_184 & leq(n0, n4) = all_601_3_187 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_601_2_186 & ( ~ (all_601_2_186 = 0) | ~ (all_601_3_187 = 0) | all_601_0_184 = all_601_1_185)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Applying alpha-rule on (1328) yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (1329) leq(n0, n4) = all_601_3_187
% 70.11/30.20 | (1330) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = all_601_0_184
% 70.11/30.20 | (1331) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_601_2_186
% 70.11/30.20 | (1332) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = all_601_1_185
% 70.11/30.20 | (1333) ~ (all_601_2_186 = 0) | ~ (all_601_3_187 = 0) | all_601_0_184 = all_601_1_185
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.20 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (436), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.20 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.20 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.20 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.20 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.20 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.20 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.20 | (1339) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.20 |
% 70.11/30.20 | Instantiating (1339) with all_606_0_188, all_606_1_189, all_606_2_190, all_606_3_191 yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (1340) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = all_606_1_189 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = all_606_0_188 & leq(n0, n4) = all_606_3_191 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_606_2_190 & ( ~ (all_606_2_190 = 0) | ~ (all_606_3_191 = 0) | all_606_0_188 = all_606_1_189)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Applying alpha-rule on (1340) yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (1341) ~ (all_606_2_190 = 0) | ~ (all_606_3_191 = 0) | all_606_0_188 = all_606_1_189
% 70.11/30.21 | (1342) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = all_606_1_189
% 70.11/30.21 | (1343) leq(n0, n4) = all_606_3_191
% 70.11/30.21 | (1344) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_606_2_190
% 70.11/30.21 | (1345) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = all_606_0_188
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.21 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (442), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.21 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.21 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.21 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.21 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.21 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.21 | (1351) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Instantiating (1351) with all_611_0_192, all_611_1_193, all_611_2_194, all_611_3_195 yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (1352) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = all_611_0_192 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = all_611_1_193 & leq(n0, n4) = all_611_2_194 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_611_3_195 & ( ~ (all_611_2_194 = 0) | ~ (all_611_3_195 = 0) | all_611_0_192 = all_611_1_193)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Applying alpha-rule on (1352) yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (1353) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = all_611_0_192
% 70.11/30.21 | (1354) ~ (all_611_2_194 = 0) | ~ (all_611_3_195 = 0) | all_611_0_192 = all_611_1_193
% 70.11/30.21 | (1355) leq(n0, n4) = all_611_2_194
% 70.11/30.21 | (1356) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_611_3_195
% 70.11/30.21 | (1357) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = all_611_1_193
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.21 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (448), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.21 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.21 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.21 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.21 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.21 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.21 | (1363) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Instantiating (1363) with all_616_0_196, all_616_1_197, all_616_2_198, all_616_3_199 yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (1364) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = all_616_0_196 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = all_616_1_197 & leq(n0, n4) = all_616_2_198 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_616_3_199 & ( ~ (all_616_2_198 = 0) | ~ (all_616_3_199 = 0) | all_616_0_196 = all_616_1_197)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Applying alpha-rule on (1364) yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (1365) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n4) = all_616_1_197
% 70.11/30.21 | (1366) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_616_3_199
% 70.11/30.21 | (1367) leq(n0, n4) = all_616_2_198
% 70.11/30.21 | (1368) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, tptp_minus_1) = all_616_0_196
% 70.11/30.21 | (1369) ~ (all_616_2_198 = 0) | ~ (all_616_3_199 = 0) | all_616_0_196 = all_616_1_197
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.21 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (454), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.21 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.21 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.21 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.21 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.21 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.21 | (1375) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Instantiating (1375) with all_621_0_200, all_621_1_201, all_621_2_202, all_621_3_203 yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (1376) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = all_621_1_201 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = all_621_0_200 & leq(n0, n2) = all_621_3_203 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_621_2_202 & ( ~ (all_621_2_202 = 0) | ~ (all_621_3_203 = 0) | all_621_0_200 = all_621_1_201)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Applying alpha-rule on (1376) yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (1377) ~ (all_621_2_202 = 0) | ~ (all_621_3_203 = 0) | all_621_0_200 = all_621_1_201
% 70.11/30.21 | (1378) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_621_2_202
% 70.11/30.21 | (1379) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = all_621_0_200
% 70.11/30.21 | (1380) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = all_621_1_201
% 70.11/30.21 | (1381) leq(n0, n2) = all_621_3_203
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.21 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (460), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.21 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.21 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.21 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.21 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.21 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.21 | (1387) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Instantiating (1387) with all_626_0_204, all_626_1_205, all_626_2_206, all_626_3_207 yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (1388) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = all_626_0_204 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = all_626_1_205 & leq(n0, n2) = all_626_2_206 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_626_3_207 & ( ~ (all_626_2_206 = 0) | ~ (all_626_3_207 = 0) | all_626_0_204 = all_626_1_205)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Applying alpha-rule on (1388) yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (1389) ~ (all_626_2_206 = 0) | ~ (all_626_3_207 = 0) | all_626_0_204 = all_626_1_205
% 70.11/30.21 | (1390) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = all_626_1_205
% 70.11/30.21 | (1391) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_626_3_207
% 70.11/30.21 | (1392) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = all_626_0_204
% 70.11/30.21 | (1393) leq(n0, n2) = all_626_2_206
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.21 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (466), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.21 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.21 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.21 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.21 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.21 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.21 | (1399) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Instantiating (1399) with all_631_0_208, all_631_1_209, all_631_2_210, all_631_3_211 yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (1400) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = all_631_1_209 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = all_631_0_208 & leq(n0, n3) = all_631_3_211 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_631_2_210 & ( ~ (all_631_2_210 = 0) | ~ (all_631_3_211 = 0) | all_631_0_208 = all_631_1_209)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Applying alpha-rule on (1400) yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (1401) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = all_631_0_208
% 70.11/30.21 | (1402) leq(n0, n3) = all_631_3_211
% 70.11/30.21 | (1403) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_631_2_210
% 70.11/30.21 | (1404) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = all_631_1_209
% 70.11/30.21 | (1405) ~ (all_631_2_210 = 0) | ~ (all_631_3_211 = 0) | all_631_0_208 = all_631_1_209
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.21 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (472), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.21 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.21 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.21 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.21 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.21 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.21 | (1411) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Instantiating (1411) with all_636_0_212, all_636_1_213, all_636_2_214, all_636_3_215 yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (1412) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = all_636_0_212 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = all_636_1_213 & leq(n0, n3) = all_636_2_214 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_636_3_215 & ( ~ (all_636_2_214 = 0) | ~ (all_636_3_215 = 0) | all_636_0_212 = all_636_1_213)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Applying alpha-rule on (1412) yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (1413) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = all_636_1_213
% 70.11/30.21 | (1414) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_636_3_215
% 70.11/30.21 | (1415) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = all_636_0_212
% 70.11/30.21 | (1416) ~ (all_636_2_214 = 0) | ~ (all_636_3_215 = 0) | all_636_0_212 = all_636_1_213
% 70.11/30.21 | (1417) leq(n0, n3) = all_636_2_214
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.21 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (478), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.21 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.21 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.21 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.21 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.21 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.21 | (1423) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.21 |
% 70.11/30.21 | Instantiating (1423) with all_641_0_216, all_641_1_217, all_641_2_218, all_641_3_219 yields:
% 70.11/30.21 | (1424) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = all_641_1_217 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = all_641_0_216 & leq(n0, n3) = all_641_3_219 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_641_2_218 & ( ~ (all_641_2_218 = 0) | ~ (all_641_3_219 = 0) | all_641_0_216 = all_641_1_217)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Applying alpha-rule on (1424) yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (1425) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = all_641_1_217
% 70.11/30.22 | (1426) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = all_641_0_216
% 70.11/30.22 | (1427) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_641_2_218
% 70.11/30.22 | (1428) leq(n0, n3) = all_641_3_219
% 70.11/30.22 | (1429) ~ (all_641_2_218 = 0) | ~ (all_641_3_219 = 0) | all_641_0_216 = all_641_1_217
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.22 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (484), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.22 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.22 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.22 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.22 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.22 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.22 | (1435) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Instantiating (1435) with all_646_0_220, all_646_1_221, all_646_2_222, all_646_3_223 yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (1436) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = all_646_0_220 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = all_646_1_221 & leq(n0, n3) = all_646_2_222 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_646_3_223 & ( ~ (all_646_2_222 = 0) | ~ (all_646_3_223 = 0) | all_646_0_220 = all_646_1_221)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Applying alpha-rule on (1436) yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (1437) ~ (all_646_2_222 = 0) | ~ (all_646_3_223 = 0) | all_646_0_220 = all_646_1_221
% 70.11/30.22 | (1438) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_646_3_223
% 70.11/30.22 | (1439) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, tptp_minus_1) = all_646_0_220
% 70.11/30.22 | (1440) leq(n0, n3) = all_646_2_222
% 70.11/30.22 | (1441) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n3) = all_646_1_221
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.22 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.22 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.22 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.22 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.22 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.22 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.22 | (1447) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Instantiating (1447) with all_651_0_224, all_651_1_225, all_651_2_226, all_651_3_227 yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (1448) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = all_651_1_225 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = all_651_0_224 & leq(n0, n2) = all_651_3_227 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_651_2_226 & ( ~ (all_651_2_226 = 0) | ~ (all_651_3_227 = 0) | all_651_0_224 = all_651_1_225)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Applying alpha-rule on (1448) yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (1449) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = all_651_1_225
% 70.11/30.22 | (1450) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = all_651_0_224
% 70.11/30.22 | (1451) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_651_2_226
% 70.11/30.22 | (1452) leq(n0, n2) = all_651_3_227
% 70.11/30.22 | (1453) ~ (all_651_2_226 = 0) | ~ (all_651_3_227 = 0) | all_651_0_224 = all_651_1_225
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | From (173) and (321) follows:
% 70.11/30.22 | (161) leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (496), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.22 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.22 | (318) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | From (173) and (318) follows:
% 70.11/30.22 | (319) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Using (161) and (319) yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.22 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.22 | (321) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.22 | (1459) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Instantiating (1459) with all_656_0_228, all_656_1_229, all_656_2_230, all_656_3_231 yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (1460) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = all_656_0_228 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = all_656_1_229 & leq(n0, n2) = all_656_2_230 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_656_3_231 & ( ~ (all_656_2_230 = 0) | ~ (all_656_3_231 = 0) | all_656_0_228 = all_656_1_229)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Applying alpha-rule on (1460) yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (1461) leq(n0, n2) = all_656_2_230
% 70.11/30.22 | (1462) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = all_656_0_228
% 70.11/30.22 | (1463) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = all_656_1_229
% 70.11/30.22 | (1464) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_656_3_231
% 70.11/30.22 | (1465) ~ (all_656_2_230 = 0) | ~ (all_656_3_231 = 0) | all_656_0_228 = all_656_1_229
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (502), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.22 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.22 | (522) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | From (174) and (522) follows:
% 70.11/30.22 | (523) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Using (169) and (523) yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.22 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.22 | (525) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 70.11/30.22 | (1470) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Instantiating (1470) with all_661_0_232, all_661_1_233, all_661_2_234, all_661_3_235 yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (1471) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = all_661_1_233 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = all_661_0_232 & leq(n0, n2) = all_661_3_235 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_661_2_234 & ( ~ (all_661_2_234 = 0) | ~ (all_661_3_235 = 0) | all_661_0_232 = all_661_1_233)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Applying alpha-rule on (1471) yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (1472) ~ (all_661_2_234 = 0) | ~ (all_661_3_235 = 0) | all_661_0_232 = all_661_1_233
% 70.11/30.22 | (1473) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = all_661_1_233
% 70.11/30.22 | (1474) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = all_661_0_232
% 70.11/30.22 | (1475) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_661_2_234
% 70.11/30.22 | (1476) leq(n0, n2) = all_661_3_235
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | From (174) and (525) follows:
% 70.11/30.22 | (169) leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (508), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.22 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.22 | (522) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | From (174) and (522) follows:
% 70.11/30.22 | (523) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Using (169) and (523) yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.22 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.22 | (525) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 70.11/30.22 | (1482) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Instantiating (1482) with all_666_0_236, all_666_1_237, all_666_2_238, all_666_3_239 yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (1483) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = all_666_0_236 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = all_666_1_237 & leq(n0, n2) = all_666_2_238 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_666_3_239 & ( ~ (all_666_2_238 = 0) | ~ (all_666_3_239 = 0) | all_666_0_236 = all_666_1_237)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Applying alpha-rule on (1483) yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (1484) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_666_3_239
% 70.11/30.22 | (1485) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n2) = all_666_1_237
% 70.11/30.22 | (1486) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, tptp_minus_1) = all_666_0_236
% 70.11/30.22 | (1487) leq(n0, n2) = all_666_2_238
% 70.11/30.22 | (1488) ~ (all_666_2_238 = 0) | ~ (all_666_3_239 = 0) | all_666_0_236 = all_666_1_237
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | From (174) and (525) follows:
% 70.11/30.22 | (169) leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (514), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.22 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.22 | (522) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | From (174) and (522) follows:
% 70.11/30.22 | (523) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Using (169) and (523) yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.22 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.22 | (525) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 70.11/30.22 | (1494) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Instantiating (1494) with all_671_0_240, all_671_1_241, all_671_2_242, all_671_3_243 yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (1495) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = all_671_1_241 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = all_671_0_240 & leq(n0, n1) = all_671_3_243 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_671_2_242 & ( ~ (all_671_2_242 = 0) | ~ (all_671_3_243 = 0) | all_671_0_240 = all_671_1_241)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Applying alpha-rule on (1495) yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (1496) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = all_671_1_241
% 70.11/30.22 | (1497) leq(n0, n1) = all_671_3_243
% 70.11/30.22 | (1498) ~ (all_671_2_242 = 0) | ~ (all_671_3_243 = 0) | all_671_0_240 = all_671_1_241
% 70.11/30.22 | (1499) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_671_2_242
% 70.11/30.22 | (1500) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = all_671_0_240
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | From (174) and (525) follows:
% 70.11/30.22 | (169) leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (520), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.22 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.22 | (522) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | From (174) and (522) follows:
% 70.11/30.22 | (523) ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0)
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 | Using (169) and (523) yields:
% 70.11/30.22 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.22 |
% 70.11/30.22 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.22 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.22 | (525) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 70.11/30.23 | (1506) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Instantiating (1506) with all_676_0_244, all_676_1_245, all_676_2_246, all_676_3_247 yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (1507) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = all_676_0_244 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = all_676_1_245 & leq(n0, n1) = all_676_2_246 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_676_3_247 & ( ~ (all_676_2_246 = 0) | ~ (all_676_3_247 = 0) | all_676_0_244 = all_676_1_245)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Applying alpha-rule on (1507) yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (1508) ~ (all_676_2_246 = 0) | ~ (all_676_3_247 = 0) | all_676_0_244 = all_676_1_245
% 70.11/30.23 | (1509) leq(n0, n1) = all_676_2_246
% 70.11/30.23 | (1510) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, tptp_minus_1, n1) = all_676_1_245
% 70.11/30.23 | (1511) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, tptp_minus_1) = all_676_0_244
% 70.11/30.23 | (1512) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_676_3_247
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (538), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.23 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.23 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.23 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.23 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.23 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.23 | (1517) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.23 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.23 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.23 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.23 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.23 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.23 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.23 | (1523) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.23 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (550), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.23 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.23 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.23 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.23 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.23 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.23 | (1529) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Instantiating (1529) with all_691_0_256, all_691_1_257, all_691_2_258, all_691_3_259 yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (1530) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = all_691_1_257 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = all_691_0_256 & leq(n0, n4) = all_691_3_259 & leq(n0, n0) = all_691_2_258 & ( ~ (all_691_2_258 = 0) | ~ (all_691_3_259 = 0) | all_691_0_256 = all_691_1_257)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Applying alpha-rule on (1530) yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (1531) leq(n0, n0) = all_691_2_258
% 70.11/30.23 | (1532) leq(n0, n4) = all_691_3_259
% 70.11/30.23 | (1533) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = all_691_1_257
% 70.11/30.23 | (1534) ~ (all_691_2_258 = 0) | ~ (all_691_3_259 = 0) | all_691_0_256 = all_691_1_257
% 70.11/30.23 | (1535) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = all_691_0_256
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.23 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (556), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.23 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.23 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.23 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.23 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.23 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.23 | (1541) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.23 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (562), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.23 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.23 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.23 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.23 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.23 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.23 | (1547) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.23 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (568), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.23 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.23 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.23 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.23 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.23 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.23 | (1553) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Instantiating (1553) with all_706_0_268, all_706_1_269, all_706_2_270, all_706_3_271 yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (1554) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = all_706_0_268 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = all_706_1_269 & leq(n0, n4) = all_706_2_270 & leq(n0, n0) = all_706_3_271 & ( ~ (all_706_2_270 = 0) | ~ (all_706_3_271 = 0) | all_706_0_268 = all_706_1_269)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Applying alpha-rule on (1554) yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (1555) ~ (all_706_2_270 = 0) | ~ (all_706_3_271 = 0) | all_706_0_268 = all_706_1_269
% 70.11/30.23 | (1556) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = all_706_0_268
% 70.11/30.23 | (1557) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = all_706_1_269
% 70.11/30.23 | (1558) leq(n0, n4) = all_706_2_270
% 70.11/30.23 | (1559) leq(n0, n0) = all_706_3_271
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.23 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (574), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.23 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.23 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.23 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.23 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.23 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.23 | (1565) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Instantiating (1565) with all_711_0_272, all_711_1_273, all_711_2_274, all_711_3_275 yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (1566) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = all_711_1_273 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = all_711_0_272 & leq(n0, n3) = all_711_3_275 & leq(n0, n0) = all_711_2_274 & ( ~ (all_711_2_274 = 0) | ~ (all_711_3_275 = 0) | all_711_0_272 = all_711_1_273)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Applying alpha-rule on (1566) yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (1567) ~ (all_711_2_274 = 0) | ~ (all_711_3_275 = 0) | all_711_0_272 = all_711_1_273
% 70.11/30.23 | (1568) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = all_711_1_273
% 70.11/30.23 | (1569) leq(n0, n0) = all_711_2_274
% 70.11/30.23 | (1570) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = all_711_0_272
% 70.11/30.23 | (1571) leq(n0, n3) = all_711_3_275
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.23 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (580), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.23 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.23 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.23 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.23 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.23 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.23 | (1577) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Instantiating (1577) with all_716_0_276, all_716_1_277, all_716_2_278, all_716_3_279 yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (1578) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = all_716_0_276 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = all_716_1_277 & leq(n0, n3) = all_716_2_278 & leq(n0, n0) = all_716_3_279 & ( ~ (all_716_2_278 = 0) | ~ (all_716_3_279 = 0) | all_716_0_276 = all_716_1_277)
% 70.11/30.23 |
% 70.11/30.23 | Applying alpha-rule on (1578) yields:
% 70.11/30.23 | (1579) leq(n0, n0) = all_716_3_279
% 70.11/30.23 | (1580) ~ (all_716_2_278 = 0) | ~ (all_716_3_279 = 0) | all_716_0_276 = all_716_1_277
% 70.11/30.24 | (1581) leq(n0, n3) = all_716_2_278
% 70.11/30.24 | (1582) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = all_716_0_276
% 70.11/30.24 | (1583) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = all_716_1_277
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.24 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (586), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.24 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.24 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.24 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.24 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.24 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.24 | (1589) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Instantiating (1589) with all_721_0_280, all_721_1_281, all_721_2_282, all_721_3_283 yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (1590) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = all_721_1_281 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = all_721_0_280 & leq(n0, n4) = all_721_3_283 & leq(n0, n0) = all_721_2_282 & ( ~ (all_721_2_282 = 0) | ~ (all_721_3_283 = 0) | all_721_0_280 = all_721_1_281)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Applying alpha-rule on (1590) yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (1591) ~ (all_721_2_282 = 0) | ~ (all_721_3_283 = 0) | all_721_0_280 = all_721_1_281
% 70.11/30.24 | (1592) leq(n0, n0) = all_721_2_282
% 70.11/30.24 | (1593) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = all_721_1_281
% 70.11/30.24 | (1594) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = all_721_0_280
% 70.11/30.24 | (1595) leq(n0, n4) = all_721_3_283
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.24 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (592), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.24 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.24 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.24 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.24 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.24 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.24 | (1601) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Instantiating (1601) with all_726_0_284, all_726_1_285, all_726_2_286, all_726_3_287 yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (1602) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = all_726_0_284 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = all_726_1_285 & leq(n0, n4) = all_726_2_286 & leq(n0, n0) = all_726_3_287 & ( ~ (all_726_2_286 = 0) | ~ (all_726_3_287 = 0) | all_726_0_284 = all_726_1_285)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Applying alpha-rule on (1602) yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (1603) leq(n0, n4) = all_726_2_286
% 70.11/30.24 | (1604) ~ (all_726_2_286 = 0) | ~ (all_726_3_287 = 0) | all_726_0_284 = all_726_1_285
% 70.11/30.24 | (1605) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n0, n4) = all_726_1_285
% 70.11/30.24 | (1606) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n0) = all_726_0_284
% 70.11/30.24 | (1607) leq(n0, n0) = all_726_3_287
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.24 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (598), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.24 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.24 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.24 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.24 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.24 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.24 | (1613) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Instantiating (1613) with all_731_0_288, all_731_1_289, all_731_2_290, all_731_3_291 yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (1614) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = all_731_1_289 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = all_731_0_288 & leq(n0, n3) = all_731_3_291 & leq(n0, n0) = all_731_2_290 & ( ~ (all_731_2_290 = 0) | ~ (all_731_3_291 = 0) | all_731_0_288 = all_731_1_289)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Applying alpha-rule on (1614) yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (1615) ~ (all_731_2_290 = 0) | ~ (all_731_3_291 = 0) | all_731_0_288 = all_731_1_289
% 70.11/30.24 | (1616) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = all_731_1_289
% 70.11/30.24 | (1617) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = all_731_0_288
% 70.11/30.24 | (1618) leq(n0, n3) = all_731_3_291
% 70.11/30.24 | (1619) leq(n0, n0) = all_731_2_290
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.24 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (604), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.24 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.24 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.24 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.24 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.24 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.24 | (1625) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Instantiating (1625) with all_736_0_292, all_736_1_293, all_736_2_294, all_736_3_295 yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (1626) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = all_736_0_292 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = all_736_1_293 & leq(n0, n3) = all_736_2_294 & leq(n0, n0) = all_736_3_295 & ( ~ (all_736_2_294 = 0) | ~ (all_736_3_295 = 0) | all_736_0_292 = all_736_1_293)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Applying alpha-rule on (1626) yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (1627) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n3) = all_736_1_293
% 70.11/30.24 | (1628) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n0) = all_736_0_292
% 70.11/30.24 | (1629) leq(n0, n3) = all_736_2_294
% 70.11/30.24 | (1630) leq(n0, n0) = all_736_3_295
% 70.11/30.24 | (1631) ~ (all_736_2_294 = 0) | ~ (all_736_3_295 = 0) | all_736_0_292 = all_736_1_293
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.24 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (610), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.24 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.24 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.24 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.24 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.24 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.24 | (1637) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Instantiating (1637) with all_741_0_296, all_741_1_297, all_741_2_298, all_741_3_299 yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (1638) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = all_741_1_297 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = all_741_0_296 & leq(n0, n2) = all_741_3_299 & leq(n0, n0) = all_741_2_298 & ( ~ (all_741_2_298 = 0) | ~ (all_741_3_299 = 0) | all_741_0_296 = all_741_1_297)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Applying alpha-rule on (1638) yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (1639) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = all_741_1_297
% 70.11/30.24 | (1640) leq(n0, n2) = all_741_3_299
% 70.11/30.24 | (1641) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = all_741_0_296
% 70.11/30.24 | (1642) ~ (all_741_2_298 = 0) | ~ (all_741_3_299 = 0) | all_741_0_296 = all_741_1_297
% 70.11/30.24 | (1643) leq(n0, n0) = all_741_2_298
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | From (173) and (627) follows:
% 70.11/30.24 | (162) leq(n0, n5) = 0
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (616), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.24 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.24 | (624) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | From (173) and (624) follows:
% 70.11/30.24 | (625) ~ (leq(n0, n5) = 0)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Using (162) and (625) yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.24 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.24 | (627) leq(n0, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.11/30.24 | (1649) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Instantiating (1649) with all_746_0_300, all_746_1_301, all_746_2_302, all_746_3_303 yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (1650) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = all_746_0_300 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = all_746_1_301 & leq(n0, n2) = all_746_2_302 & leq(n0, n0) = all_746_3_303 & ( ~ (all_746_2_302 = 0) | ~ (all_746_3_303 = 0) | all_746_0_300 = all_746_1_301)
% 70.11/30.24 |
% 70.11/30.24 | Applying alpha-rule on (1650) yields:
% 70.11/30.24 | (1651) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = all_746_0_300
% 70.11/30.24 | (1652) leq(n0, n0) = all_746_3_303
% 70.11/30.24 | (1653) ~ (all_746_2_302 = 0) | ~ (all_746_3_303 = 0) | all_746_0_300 = all_746_1_301
% 70.11/30.24 | (1654) leq(n0, n2) = all_746_2_302
% 70.11/30.25 | (1655) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = all_746_1_301
% 70.11/30.25 |
% 70.11/30.25 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (622), into two cases.
% 70.11/30.25 |-Branch one:
% 70.11/30.25 | (1001) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 70.11/30.25 |
% 70.11/30.25 | From (174) and (1001) follows:
% 70.11/30.25 | (1002) ~ (leq(n0, n2) = 0)
% 70.11/30.25 |
% 70.11/30.25 | Using (170) and (1002) yields:
% 70.11/30.25 | (296) $false
% 70.11/30.25 |
% 70.11/30.25 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.11/30.25 |-Branch two:
% 70.11/30.25 | (1004) leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 70.11/30.25 | (1660) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.11/30.25 |
% 70.11/30.25 | Instantiating (1660) with all_751_0_304, all_751_1_305, all_751_2_306, all_751_3_307 yields:
% 70.11/30.25 | (1661) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = all_751_1_305 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = all_751_0_304 & leq(n0, n2) = all_751_3_307 & leq(n0, n0) = all_751_2_306 & ( ~ (all_751_2_306 = 0) | ~ (all_751_3_307 = 0) | all_751_0_304 = all_751_1_305)
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | Applying alpha-rule on (1661) yields:
% 70.39/30.25 | (1662) leq(n0, n0) = all_751_2_306
% 70.39/30.25 | (1663) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = all_751_1_305
% 70.39/30.25 | (1664) leq(n0, n2) = all_751_3_307
% 70.39/30.25 | (1665) ~ (all_751_2_306 = 0) | ~ (all_751_3_307 = 0) | all_751_0_304 = all_751_1_305
% 70.39/30.25 | (1666) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = all_751_0_304
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | From (174) and (1004) follows:
% 70.39/30.25 | (170) leq(n0, n2) = 0
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (640), into two cases.
% 70.39/30.25 |-Branch one:
% 70.39/30.25 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 70.39/30.25 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 70.39/30.25 | (296) $false
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.39/30.25 |-Branch two:
% 70.39/30.25 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.39/30.25 | (1672) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | Instantiating (1672) with all_756_0_308, all_756_1_309, all_756_2_310, all_756_3_311 yields:
% 70.39/30.25 | (1673) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = all_756_1_309 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = all_756_0_308 & leq(n0, n5) = all_756_3_311 & leq(n0, n3) = all_756_2_310 & ( ~ (all_756_2_310 = 0) | ~ (all_756_3_311 = 0) | all_756_0_308 = all_756_1_309)
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | Applying alpha-rule on (1673) yields:
% 70.39/30.25 | (1674) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = all_756_1_309
% 70.39/30.25 | (1675) leq(n0, n3) = all_756_2_310
% 70.39/30.25 | (1676) leq(n0, n5) = all_756_3_311
% 70.39/30.25 | (1677) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = all_756_0_308
% 70.39/30.25 | (1678) ~ (all_756_2_310 = 0) | ~ (all_756_3_311 = 0) | all_756_0_308 = all_756_1_309
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 70.39/30.25 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (646), into two cases.
% 70.39/30.25 |-Branch one:
% 70.39/30.25 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 70.39/30.25 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 70.39/30.25 | (296) $false
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.39/30.25 |-Branch two:
% 70.39/30.25 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.39/30.25 | (1684) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | Instantiating (1684) with all_761_0_312, all_761_1_313, all_761_2_314, all_761_3_315 yields:
% 70.39/30.25 | (1685) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = all_761_0_312 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = all_761_1_313 & leq(n0, n4) = all_761_2_314 & leq(n0, n3) = all_761_3_315 & ( ~ (all_761_2_314 = 0) | ~ (all_761_3_315 = 0) | all_761_0_312 = all_761_1_313)
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | Applying alpha-rule on (1685) yields:
% 70.39/30.25 | (1686) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = all_761_0_312
% 70.39/30.25 | (1687) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = all_761_1_313
% 70.39/30.25 | (1688) ~ (all_761_2_314 = 0) | ~ (all_761_3_315 = 0) | all_761_0_312 = all_761_1_313
% 70.39/30.25 | (1689) leq(n0, n3) = all_761_3_315
% 70.39/30.25 | (1690) leq(n0, n4) = all_761_2_314
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 70.39/30.25 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (652), into two cases.
% 70.39/30.25 |-Branch one:
% 70.39/30.25 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 70.39/30.25 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 70.39/30.25 | (296) $false
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.39/30.25 |-Branch two:
% 70.39/30.25 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.39/30.25 | (1696) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | Instantiating (1696) with all_766_0_316, all_766_1_317, all_766_2_318, all_766_3_319 yields:
% 70.39/30.25 | (1697) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = all_766_0_316 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = all_766_1_317 & leq(n0, n5) = all_766_2_318 & leq(n0, n3) = all_766_3_319 & ( ~ (all_766_2_318 = 0) | ~ (all_766_3_319 = 0) | all_766_0_316 = all_766_1_317)
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | Applying alpha-rule on (1697) yields:
% 70.39/30.25 | (1698) ~ (all_766_2_318 = 0) | ~ (all_766_3_319 = 0) | all_766_0_316 = all_766_1_317
% 70.39/30.25 | (1699) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = all_766_0_316
% 70.39/30.25 | (1700) leq(n0, n5) = all_766_2_318
% 70.39/30.25 | (1701) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = all_766_1_317
% 70.39/30.25 | (1702) leq(n0, n3) = all_766_3_319
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 70.39/30.25 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (658), into two cases.
% 70.39/30.25 |-Branch one:
% 70.39/30.25 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 70.39/30.25 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 70.39/30.25 | (296) $false
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.39/30.25 |-Branch two:
% 70.39/30.25 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.39/30.25 | (1708) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | Instantiating (1708) with all_771_0_320, all_771_1_321, all_771_2_322, all_771_3_323 yields:
% 70.39/30.25 | (1709) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = all_771_1_321 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = all_771_0_320 & leq(n0, n4) = all_771_3_323 & leq(n0, n3) = all_771_2_322 & ( ~ (all_771_2_322 = 0) | ~ (all_771_3_323 = 0) | all_771_0_320 = all_771_1_321)
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | Applying alpha-rule on (1709) yields:
% 70.39/30.25 | (1710) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = all_771_0_320
% 70.39/30.25 | (1711) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = all_771_1_321
% 70.39/30.25 | (1712) leq(n0, n4) = all_771_3_323
% 70.39/30.25 | (1713) ~ (all_771_2_322 = 0) | ~ (all_771_3_323 = 0) | all_771_0_320 = all_771_1_321
% 70.39/30.25 | (1714) leq(n0, n3) = all_771_2_322
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 70.39/30.25 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (664), into two cases.
% 70.39/30.25 |-Branch one:
% 70.39/30.25 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 70.39/30.25 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 70.39/30.25 | (296) $false
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.39/30.25 |-Branch two:
% 70.39/30.25 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.39/30.25 | (1720) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.39/30.25 |
% 70.39/30.25 | Instantiating (1720) with all_776_0_324, all_776_1_325, all_776_2_326, all_776_3_327 yields:
% 70.39/30.25 | (1721) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = all_776_1_325 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = all_776_0_324 & leq(n0, n4) = all_776_3_327 & leq(n0, n3) = all_776_2_326 & ( ~ (all_776_2_326 = 0) | ~ (all_776_3_327 = 0) | all_776_0_324 = all_776_1_325)
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | Applying alpha-rule on (1721) yields:
% 70.39/30.26 | (1722) leq(n0, n4) = all_776_3_327
% 70.39/30.26 | (1723) ~ (all_776_2_326 = 0) | ~ (all_776_3_327 = 0) | all_776_0_324 = all_776_1_325
% 70.39/30.26 | (1724) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = all_776_1_325
% 70.39/30.26 | (1725) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = all_776_0_324
% 70.39/30.26 | (1726) leq(n0, n3) = all_776_2_326
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 70.39/30.26 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (670), into two cases.
% 70.39/30.26 |-Branch one:
% 70.39/30.26 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 70.39/30.26 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 70.39/30.26 | (296) $false
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.39/30.26 |-Branch two:
% 70.39/30.26 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.39/30.26 | (1732) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | Instantiating (1732) with all_781_0_328, all_781_1_329, all_781_2_330, all_781_3_331 yields:
% 70.39/30.26 | (1733) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = all_781_0_328 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = all_781_1_329 & leq(n0, n5) = all_781_2_330 & leq(n0, n3) = all_781_3_331 & ( ~ (all_781_2_330 = 0) | ~ (all_781_3_331 = 0) | all_781_0_328 = all_781_1_329)
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | Applying alpha-rule on (1733) yields:
% 70.39/30.26 | (1734) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = all_781_0_328
% 70.39/30.26 | (1735) leq(n0, n3) = all_781_3_331
% 70.39/30.26 | (1736) leq(n0, n5) = all_781_2_330
% 70.39/30.26 | (1737) ~ (all_781_2_330 = 0) | ~ (all_781_3_331 = 0) | all_781_0_328 = all_781_1_329
% 70.39/30.26 | (1738) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = all_781_1_329
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 70.39/30.26 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (676), into two cases.
% 70.39/30.26 |-Branch one:
% 70.39/30.26 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 70.39/30.26 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 70.39/30.26 | (296) $false
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.39/30.26 |-Branch two:
% 70.39/30.26 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.39/30.26 | (1744) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | Instantiating (1744) with all_786_0_332, all_786_1_333, all_786_2_334, all_786_3_335 yields:
% 70.39/30.26 | (1745) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = all_786_1_333 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = all_786_0_332 & leq(n0, n5) = all_786_3_335 & leq(n0, n3) = all_786_2_334 & ( ~ (all_786_2_334 = 0) | ~ (all_786_3_335 = 0) | all_786_0_332 = all_786_1_333)
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | Applying alpha-rule on (1745) yields:
% 70.39/30.26 | (1746) leq(n0, n5) = all_786_3_335
% 70.39/30.26 | (1747) leq(n0, n3) = all_786_2_334
% 70.39/30.26 | (1748) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n5) = all_786_0_332
% 70.39/30.26 | (1749) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n3) = all_786_1_333
% 70.39/30.26 | (1750) ~ (all_786_2_334 = 0) | ~ (all_786_3_335 = 0) | all_786_0_332 = all_786_1_333
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | From (173) and (465) follows:
% 70.39/30.26 | (158) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (694), into two cases.
% 70.39/30.26 |-Branch one:
% 70.39/30.26 | (462) ~ (leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | From (173) and (462) follows:
% 70.39/30.26 | (463) ~ (leq(n3, n5) = 0)
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | Using (158) and (463) yields:
% 70.39/30.26 | (296) $false
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.39/30.26 |-Branch two:
% 70.39/30.26 | (465) leq(n3, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.39/30.26 | (1756) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | Instantiating (1756) with all_791_0_336, all_791_1_337, all_791_2_338, all_791_3_339 yields:
% 70.39/30.26 | (1757) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = all_791_0_336 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = all_791_1_337 & leq(n0, n4) = all_791_2_338 & leq(n0, n3) = all_791_3_339 & ( ~ (all_791_2_338 = 0) | ~ (all_791_3_339 = 0) | all_791_0_336 = all_791_1_337)
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | Applying alpha-rule on (1757) yields:
% 70.39/30.26 | (1758) leq(n0, n3) = all_791_3_339
% 70.39/30.26 | (1759) ~ (all_791_2_338 = 0) | ~ (all_791_3_339 = 0) | all_791_0_336 = all_791_1_337
% 70.39/30.26 | (1760) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n4) = all_791_1_337
% 70.39/30.26 | (1761) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n3) = all_791_0_336
% 70.39/30.26 | (1762) leq(n0, n4) = all_791_2_338
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (712), into two cases.
% 70.39/30.26 |-Branch one:
% 70.39/30.26 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 70.39/30.26 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 70.39/30.26 | (296) $false
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.39/30.26 |-Branch two:
% 70.39/30.26 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.39/30.26 | (1767) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | Instantiating (1767) with all_796_0_340, all_796_1_341, all_796_2_342, all_796_3_343 yields:
% 70.39/30.26 | (1768) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = all_796_1_341 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = all_796_0_340 & leq(n0, n5) = all_796_3_343 & leq(n0, n2) = all_796_2_342 & ( ~ (all_796_2_342 = 0) | ~ (all_796_3_343 = 0) | all_796_0_340 = all_796_1_341)
% 70.39/30.26 |
% 70.39/30.26 | Applying alpha-rule on (1768) yields:
% 70.39/30.26 | (1769) ~ (all_796_2_342 = 0) | ~ (all_796_3_343 = 0) | all_796_0_340 = all_796_1_341
% 70.46/30.26 | (1770) leq(n0, n2) = all_796_2_342
% 70.46/30.26 | (1771) leq(n0, n5) = all_796_3_343
% 70.46/30.26 | (1772) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = all_796_0_340
% 70.46/30.26 | (1773) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = all_796_1_341
% 70.46/30.26 |
% 70.46/30.26 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 70.46/30.26 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.26 |
% 70.46/30.26 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (718), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.26 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.26 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.26 |
% 70.46/30.26 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 70.46/30.26 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.26 |
% 70.46/30.26 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 70.46/30.26 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.26 |
% 70.46/30.26 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.26 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.26 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.26 | (1779) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.26 |
% 70.46/30.26 | Instantiating (1779) with all_801_0_344, all_801_1_345, all_801_2_346, all_801_3_347 yields:
% 70.46/30.26 | (1780) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = all_801_0_344 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = all_801_1_345 & leq(n0, n5) = all_801_2_346 & leq(n0, n2) = all_801_3_347 & ( ~ (all_801_2_346 = 0) | ~ (all_801_3_347 = 0) | all_801_0_344 = all_801_1_345)
% 70.46/30.26 |
% 70.46/30.26 | Applying alpha-rule on (1780) yields:
% 70.46/30.26 | (1781) ~ (all_801_2_346 = 0) | ~ (all_801_3_347 = 0) | all_801_0_344 = all_801_1_345
% 70.46/30.26 | (1782) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = all_801_0_344
% 70.46/30.26 | (1783) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = all_801_1_345
% 70.46/30.27 | (1784) leq(n0, n2) = all_801_3_347
% 70.46/30.27 | (1785) leq(n0, n5) = all_801_2_346
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 70.46/30.27 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (724), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.27 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.27 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 70.46/30.27 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 70.46/30.27 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.27 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.27 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.27 | (1791) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | Instantiating (1791) with all_806_0_348, all_806_1_349, all_806_2_350, all_806_3_351 yields:
% 70.46/30.27 | (1792) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = all_806_0_348 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = all_806_1_349 & leq(n0, n5) = all_806_2_350 & leq(n0, n2) = all_806_3_351 & ( ~ (all_806_2_350 = 0) | ~ (all_806_3_351 = 0) | all_806_0_348 = all_806_1_349)
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | Applying alpha-rule on (1792) yields:
% 70.46/30.27 | (1793) leq(n0, n5) = all_806_2_350
% 70.46/30.27 | (1794) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = all_806_1_349
% 70.46/30.27 | (1795) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = all_806_0_348
% 70.46/30.27 | (1796) leq(n0, n2) = all_806_3_351
% 70.46/30.27 | (1797) ~ (all_806_2_350 = 0) | ~ (all_806_3_351 = 0) | all_806_0_348 = all_806_1_349
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 70.46/30.27 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (730), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.27 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.27 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 70.46/30.27 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 70.46/30.27 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.27 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.27 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.27 | (1803) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | Instantiating (1803) with all_811_0_352, all_811_1_353, all_811_2_354, all_811_3_355 yields:
% 70.46/30.27 | (1804) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = all_811_1_353 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = all_811_0_352 & leq(n0, n5) = all_811_3_355 & leq(n0, n2) = all_811_2_354 & ( ~ (all_811_2_354 = 0) | ~ (all_811_3_355 = 0) | all_811_0_352 = all_811_1_353)
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | Applying alpha-rule on (1804) yields:
% 70.46/30.27 | (1805) leq(n0, n5) = all_811_3_355
% 70.46/30.27 | (1806) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n2) = all_811_1_353
% 70.46/30.27 | (1807) leq(n0, n2) = all_811_2_354
% 70.46/30.27 | (1808) ~ (all_811_2_354 = 0) | ~ (all_811_3_355 = 0) | all_811_0_352 = all_811_1_353
% 70.46/30.27 | (1809) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n5) = all_811_0_352
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 70.46/30.27 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (736), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.27 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.27 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 70.46/30.27 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 70.46/30.27 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.27 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.27 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.27 | (1815) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | Instantiating (1815) with all_816_0_356, all_816_1_357, all_816_2_358, all_816_3_359 yields:
% 70.46/30.27 | (1816) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = all_816_1_357 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = all_816_0_356 & leq(n0, n4) = all_816_3_359 & leq(n0, n2) = all_816_2_358 & ( ~ (all_816_2_358 = 0) | ~ (all_816_3_359 = 0) | all_816_0_356 = all_816_1_357)
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | Applying alpha-rule on (1816) yields:
% 70.46/30.27 | (1817) leq(n0, n4) = all_816_3_359
% 70.46/30.27 | (1818) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = all_816_1_357
% 70.46/30.27 | (1819) ~ (all_816_2_358 = 0) | ~ (all_816_3_359 = 0) | all_816_0_356 = all_816_1_357
% 70.46/30.27 | (1820) leq(n0, n2) = all_816_2_358
% 70.46/30.27 | (1821) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = all_816_0_356
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 70.46/30.27 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (754), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.27 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.27 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 70.46/30.27 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 70.46/30.27 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.27 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.27 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.27 | (1827) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | Instantiating (1827) with all_821_0_360, all_821_1_361, all_821_2_362, all_821_3_363 yields:
% 70.46/30.27 | (1828) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = all_821_1_361 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = all_821_0_360 & leq(n0, n5) = all_821_3_363 & leq(n0, n1) = all_821_2_362 & ( ~ (all_821_2_362 = 0) | ~ (all_821_3_363 = 0) | all_821_0_360 = all_821_1_361)
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | Applying alpha-rule on (1828) yields:
% 70.46/30.27 | (1829) leq(n0, n1) = all_821_2_362
% 70.46/30.27 | (1830) leq(n0, n5) = all_821_3_363
% 70.46/30.27 | (1831) ~ (all_821_2_362 = 0) | ~ (all_821_3_363 = 0) | all_821_0_360 = all_821_1_361
% 70.46/30.27 | (1832) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = all_821_0_360
% 70.46/30.27 | (1833) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = all_821_1_361
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 70.46/30.27 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (760), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.27 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.27 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 70.46/30.27 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 70.46/30.27 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.27 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.27 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.27 | (1839) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | Instantiating (1839) with all_826_0_364, all_826_1_365, all_826_2_366, all_826_3_367 yields:
% 70.46/30.27 | (1840) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = all_826_0_364 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = all_826_1_365 & leq(n0, n5) = all_826_2_366 & leq(n0, n1) = all_826_3_367 & ( ~ (all_826_2_366 = 0) | ~ (all_826_3_367 = 0) | all_826_0_364 = all_826_1_365)
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | Applying alpha-rule on (1840) yields:
% 70.46/30.27 | (1841) ~ (all_826_2_366 = 0) | ~ (all_826_3_367 = 0) | all_826_0_364 = all_826_1_365
% 70.46/30.27 | (1842) leq(n0, n5) = all_826_2_366
% 70.46/30.27 | (1843) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = all_826_1_365
% 70.46/30.27 | (1844) leq(n0, n1) = all_826_3_367
% 70.46/30.27 | (1845) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = all_826_0_364
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 70.46/30.27 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.27 |
% 70.46/30.27 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (766), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.27 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.27 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 70.46/30.28 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.28 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.28 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.28 | (1851) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Instantiating (1851) with all_831_0_368, all_831_1_369, all_831_2_370, all_831_3_371 yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (1852) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = all_831_1_369 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = all_831_0_368 & leq(n0, n4) = all_831_3_371 & leq(n0, n1) = all_831_2_370 & ( ~ (all_831_2_370 = 0) | ~ (all_831_3_371 = 0) | all_831_0_368 = all_831_1_369)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Applying alpha-rule on (1852) yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (1853) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = all_831_0_368
% 70.46/30.28 | (1854) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = all_831_1_369
% 70.46/30.28 | (1855) leq(n0, n1) = all_831_2_370
% 70.46/30.28 | (1856) ~ (all_831_2_370 = 0) | ~ (all_831_3_371 = 0) | all_831_0_368 = all_831_1_369
% 70.46/30.28 | (1857) leq(n0, n4) = all_831_3_371
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 70.46/30.28 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (772), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.28 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.28 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 70.46/30.28 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.28 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.28 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.28 | (1863) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Instantiating (1863) with all_836_0_372, all_836_1_373, all_836_2_374, all_836_3_375 yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (1864) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = all_836_0_372 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = all_836_1_373 & leq(n0, n4) = all_836_2_374 & leq(n0, n1) = all_836_3_375 & ( ~ (all_836_2_374 = 0) | ~ (all_836_3_375 = 0) | all_836_0_372 = all_836_1_373)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Applying alpha-rule on (1864) yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (1865) ~ (all_836_2_374 = 0) | ~ (all_836_3_375 = 0) | all_836_0_372 = all_836_1_373
% 70.46/30.28 | (1866) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = all_836_0_372
% 70.46/30.28 | (1867) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = all_836_1_373
% 70.46/30.28 | (1868) leq(n0, n1) = all_836_3_375
% 70.46/30.28 | (1869) leq(n0, n4) = all_836_2_374
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 70.46/30.28 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (778), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.28 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.28 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 70.46/30.28 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.28 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.28 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.28 | (1875) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Instantiating (1875) with all_841_0_376, all_841_1_377, all_841_2_378, all_841_3_379 yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (1876) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = all_841_1_377 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = all_841_0_376 & leq(n0, n2) = all_841_3_379 & leq(n0, n1) = all_841_2_378 & ( ~ (all_841_2_378 = 0) | ~ (all_841_3_379 = 0) | all_841_0_376 = all_841_1_377)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Applying alpha-rule on (1876) yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (1877) leq(n0, n1) = all_841_2_378
% 70.46/30.28 | (1878) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = all_841_1_377
% 70.46/30.28 | (1879) leq(n0, n2) = all_841_3_379
% 70.46/30.28 | (1880) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = all_841_0_376
% 70.46/30.28 | (1881) ~ (all_841_2_378 = 0) | ~ (all_841_3_379 = 0) | all_841_0_376 = all_841_1_377
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 70.46/30.28 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (784), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.28 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.28 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 70.46/30.28 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.28 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.28 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.28 | (1887) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Instantiating (1887) with all_846_0_380, all_846_1_381, all_846_2_382, all_846_3_383 yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (1888) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = all_846_0_380 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = all_846_1_381 & leq(n0, n2) = all_846_2_382 & leq(n0, n1) = all_846_3_383 & ( ~ (all_846_2_382 = 0) | ~ (all_846_3_383 = 0) | all_846_0_380 = all_846_1_381)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Applying alpha-rule on (1888) yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (1889) ~ (all_846_2_382 = 0) | ~ (all_846_3_383 = 0) | all_846_0_380 = all_846_1_381
% 70.46/30.28 | (1890) leq(n0, n2) = all_846_2_382
% 70.46/30.28 | (1891) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = all_846_1_381
% 70.46/30.28 | (1892) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = all_846_0_380
% 70.46/30.28 | (1893) leq(n0, n1) = all_846_3_383
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 70.46/30.28 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (802), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.28 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.28 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 70.46/30.28 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.28 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.28 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.28 | (1899) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Instantiating (1899) with all_851_0_384, all_851_1_385, all_851_2_386, all_851_3_387 yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (1900) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = all_851_0_384 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = all_851_1_385 & leq(n0, n3) = all_851_2_386 & leq(n0, n2) = all_851_3_387 & ( ~ (all_851_2_386 = 0) | ~ (all_851_3_387 = 0) | all_851_0_384 = all_851_1_385)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Applying alpha-rule on (1900) yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (1901) leq(n0, n3) = all_851_2_386
% 70.46/30.28 | (1902) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = all_851_0_384
% 70.46/30.28 | (1903) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = all_851_1_385
% 70.46/30.28 | (1904) ~ (all_851_2_386 = 0) | ~ (all_851_3_387 = 0) | all_851_0_384 = all_851_1_385
% 70.46/30.28 | (1905) leq(n0, n2) = all_851_3_387
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 70.46/30.28 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (808), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.28 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.28 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 70.46/30.28 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.28 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.28 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.28 | (1911) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.28 |
% 70.46/30.28 | Instantiating (1911) with all_856_0_388, all_856_1_389, all_856_2_390, all_856_3_391 yields:
% 70.46/30.28 | (1912) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = all_856_1_389 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = all_856_0_388 & leq(n0, n3) = all_856_3_391 & leq(n0, n2) = all_856_2_390 & ( ~ (all_856_2_390 = 0) | ~ (all_856_3_391 = 0) | all_856_0_388 = all_856_1_389)
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | Applying alpha-rule on (1912) yields:
% 70.46/30.29 | (1913) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = all_856_0_388
% 70.46/30.29 | (1914) ~ (all_856_2_390 = 0) | ~ (all_856_3_391 = 0) | all_856_0_388 = all_856_1_389
% 70.46/30.29 | (1915) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = all_856_1_389
% 70.46/30.29 | (1916) leq(n0, n2) = all_856_2_390
% 70.46/30.29 | (1917) leq(n0, n3) = all_856_3_391
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 70.46/30.29 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (814), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.29 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.29 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 70.46/30.29 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 70.46/30.29 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.29 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.29 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.29 | (1923) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | Instantiating (1923) with all_861_0_392, all_861_1_393, all_861_2_394, all_861_3_395 yields:
% 70.46/30.29 | (1924) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = all_861_1_393 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = all_861_0_392 & leq(n0, n5) = all_861_3_395 & leq(n0, n1) = all_861_2_394 & ( ~ (all_861_2_394 = 0) | ~ (all_861_3_395 = 0) | all_861_0_392 = all_861_1_393)
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | Applying alpha-rule on (1924) yields:
% 70.46/30.29 | (1925) ~ (all_861_2_394 = 0) | ~ (all_861_3_395 = 0) | all_861_0_392 = all_861_1_393
% 70.46/30.29 | (1926) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = all_861_1_393
% 70.46/30.29 | (1927) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = all_861_0_392
% 70.46/30.29 | (1928) leq(n0, n5) = all_861_3_395
% 70.46/30.29 | (1929) leq(n0, n1) = all_861_2_394
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 70.46/30.29 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (820), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.29 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.29 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 70.46/30.29 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 70.46/30.29 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.29 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.29 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.29 | (1935) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | Instantiating (1935) with all_866_0_396, all_866_1_397, all_866_2_398, all_866_3_399 yields:
% 70.46/30.29 | (1936) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = all_866_0_396 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = all_866_1_397 & leq(n0, n5) = all_866_2_398 & leq(n0, n1) = all_866_3_399 & ( ~ (all_866_2_398 = 0) | ~ (all_866_3_399 = 0) | all_866_0_396 = all_866_1_397)
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | Applying alpha-rule on (1936) yields:
% 70.46/30.29 | (1937) leq(n0, n5) = all_866_2_398
% 70.46/30.29 | (1938) leq(n0, n1) = all_866_3_399
% 70.46/30.29 | (1939) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n5) = all_866_1_397
% 70.46/30.29 | (1940) ~ (all_866_2_398 = 0) | ~ (all_866_3_399 = 0) | all_866_0_396 = all_866_1_397
% 70.46/30.29 | (1941) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n1) = all_866_0_396
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 70.46/30.29 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (826), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.29 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.29 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 70.46/30.29 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 70.46/30.29 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.29 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.29 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.29 | (1947) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | Instantiating (1947) with all_871_0_400, all_871_1_401, all_871_2_402, all_871_3_403 yields:
% 70.46/30.29 | (1948) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = all_871_0_400 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = all_871_1_401 & leq(n0, n4) = all_871_2_402 & leq(n0, n2) = all_871_3_403 & ( ~ (all_871_2_402 = 0) | ~ (all_871_3_403 = 0) | all_871_0_400 = all_871_1_401)
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | Applying alpha-rule on (1948) yields:
% 70.46/30.29 | (1949) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = all_871_0_400
% 70.46/30.29 | (1950) ~ (all_871_2_402 = 0) | ~ (all_871_3_403 = 0) | all_871_0_400 = all_871_1_401
% 70.46/30.29 | (1951) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = all_871_1_401
% 70.46/30.29 | (1952) leq(n0, n4) = all_871_2_402
% 70.46/30.29 | (1953) leq(n0, n2) = all_871_3_403
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 70.46/30.29 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (832), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.29 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.29 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 70.46/30.29 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 70.46/30.29 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.29 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.29 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.29 | (1959) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | Instantiating (1959) with all_876_0_404, all_876_1_405, all_876_2_406, all_876_3_407 yields:
% 70.46/30.29 | (1960) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = all_876_1_405 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = all_876_0_404 & leq(n0, n4) = all_876_3_407 & leq(n0, n2) = all_876_2_406 & ( ~ (all_876_2_406 = 0) | ~ (all_876_3_407 = 0) | all_876_0_404 = all_876_1_405)
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | Applying alpha-rule on (1960) yields:
% 70.46/30.29 | (1961) leq(n0, n4) = all_876_3_407
% 70.46/30.29 | (1962) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = all_876_0_404
% 70.46/30.29 | (1963) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = all_876_1_405
% 70.46/30.29 | (1964) leq(n0, n2) = all_876_2_406
% 70.46/30.29 | (1965) ~ (all_876_2_406 = 0) | ~ (all_876_3_407 = 0) | all_876_0_404 = all_876_1_405
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 70.46/30.29 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (838), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.29 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.29 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 70.46/30.29 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 70.46/30.29 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.29 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.29 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.29 | (1971) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | Instantiating (1971) with all_881_0_408, all_881_1_409, all_881_2_410, all_881_3_411 yields:
% 70.46/30.29 | (1972) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = all_881_0_408 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = all_881_1_409 & leq(n0, n4) = all_881_2_410 & leq(n0, n2) = all_881_3_411 & ( ~ (all_881_2_410 = 0) | ~ (all_881_3_411 = 0) | all_881_0_408 = all_881_1_409)
% 70.46/30.29 |
% 70.46/30.29 | Applying alpha-rule on (1972) yields:
% 70.46/30.29 | (1973) ~ (all_881_2_410 = 0) | ~ (all_881_3_411 = 0) | all_881_0_408 = all_881_1_409
% 70.46/30.29 | (1974) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n2) = all_881_0_408
% 70.46/30.29 | (1975) leq(n0, n4) = all_881_2_410
% 70.46/30.29 | (1976) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n4) = all_881_1_409
% 70.46/30.29 | (1977) leq(n0, n2) = all_881_3_411
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 70.46/30.30 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (844), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.30 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.30 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 70.46/30.30 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 70.46/30.30 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.30 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.30 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.30 | (1983) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | Instantiating (1983) with all_886_0_412, all_886_1_413, all_886_2_414, all_886_3_415 yields:
% 70.46/30.30 | (1984) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = all_886_1_413 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = all_886_0_412 & leq(n0, n3) = all_886_3_415 & leq(n0, n2) = all_886_2_414 & ( ~ (all_886_2_414 = 0) | ~ (all_886_3_415 = 0) | all_886_0_412 = all_886_1_413)
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | Applying alpha-rule on (1984) yields:
% 70.46/30.30 | (1985) leq(n0, n3) = all_886_3_415
% 70.46/30.30 | (1986) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = all_886_0_412
% 70.46/30.30 | (1987) ~ (all_886_2_414 = 0) | ~ (all_886_3_415 = 0) | all_886_0_412 = all_886_1_413
% 70.46/30.30 | (1988) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = all_886_1_413
% 70.46/30.30 | (1989) leq(n0, n2) = all_886_2_414
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | From (173) and (297) follows:
% 70.46/30.30 | (159) leq(n2, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (850), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.30 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.30 | (294) ~ (leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | From (173) and (294) follows:
% 70.46/30.30 | (295) ~ (leq(n2, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | Using (159) and (295) yields:
% 70.46/30.30 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.30 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.30 | (297) leq(n2, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.30 | (1995) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | Instantiating (1995) with all_891_0_416, all_891_1_417, all_891_2_418, all_891_3_419 yields:
% 70.46/30.30 | (1996) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = all_891_0_416 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = all_891_1_417 & leq(n0, n3) = all_891_2_418 & leq(n0, n2) = all_891_3_419 & ( ~ (all_891_2_418 = 0) | ~ (all_891_3_419 = 0) | all_891_0_416 = all_891_1_417)
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | Applying alpha-rule on (1996) yields:
% 70.46/30.30 | (1997) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n2) = all_891_0_416
% 70.46/30.30 | (1998) leq(n0, n2) = all_891_3_419
% 70.46/30.30 | (1999) leq(n0, n3) = all_891_2_418
% 70.46/30.30 | (2000) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n2, n3) = all_891_1_417
% 70.46/30.30 | (2001) ~ (all_891_2_418 = 0) | ~ (all_891_3_419 = 0) | all_891_0_416 = all_891_1_417
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (904), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.30 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.30 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 70.46/30.30 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 70.46/30.30 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.30 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.30 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.30 | (2006) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = v3 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | Instantiating (2006) with all_896_0_420, all_896_1_421, all_896_2_422, all_896_3_423 yields:
% 70.46/30.30 | (2007) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = all_896_1_421 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = all_896_0_420 & leq(n0, n4) = all_896_3_423 & leq(n0, n1) = all_896_2_422 & ( ~ (all_896_2_422 = 0) | ~ (all_896_3_423 = 0) | all_896_0_420 = all_896_1_421)
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | Applying alpha-rule on (2007) yields:
% 70.46/30.30 | (2008) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = all_896_0_420
% 70.46/30.30 | (2009) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = all_896_1_421
% 70.46/30.30 | (2010) leq(n0, n4) = all_896_3_423
% 70.46/30.30 | (2011) ~ (all_896_2_422 = 0) | ~ (all_896_3_423 = 0) | all_896_0_420 = all_896_1_421
% 70.46/30.30 | (2012) leq(n0, n1) = all_896_2_422
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 70.46/30.30 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (910), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.30 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.30 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 70.46/30.30 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 70.46/30.30 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.30 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.30 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.30 | (2018) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = v2 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | Instantiating (2018) with all_901_0_424, all_901_1_425, all_901_2_426, all_901_3_427 yields:
% 70.46/30.30 | (2019) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = all_901_0_424 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = all_901_1_425 & leq(n0, n4) = all_901_2_426 & leq(n0, n1) = all_901_3_427 & ( ~ (all_901_2_426 = 0) | ~ (all_901_3_427 = 0) | all_901_0_424 = all_901_1_425)
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | Applying alpha-rule on (2019) yields:
% 70.46/30.30 | (2020) ~ (all_901_2_426 = 0) | ~ (all_901_3_427 = 0) | all_901_0_424 = all_901_1_425
% 70.46/30.30 | (2021) leq(n0, n4) = all_901_2_426
% 70.46/30.30 | (2022) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n1) = all_901_0_424
% 70.46/30.30 | (2023) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n4) = all_901_1_425
% 70.46/30.30 | (2024) leq(n0, n1) = all_901_3_427
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 70.46/30.30 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (916), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.30 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.30 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 70.46/30.30 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 70.46/30.30 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.30 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.30 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.30 | (2030) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | Instantiating (2030) with all_906_0_428, all_906_1_429, all_906_2_430, all_906_3_431 yields:
% 70.46/30.30 | (2031) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = all_906_1_429 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = all_906_0_428 & leq(n0, n3) = all_906_3_431 & leq(n0, n1) = all_906_2_430 & ( ~ (all_906_2_430 = 0) | ~ (all_906_3_431 = 0) | all_906_0_428 = all_906_1_429)
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | Applying alpha-rule on (2031) yields:
% 70.46/30.30 | (2032) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = all_906_0_428
% 70.46/30.30 | (2033) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = all_906_1_429
% 70.46/30.30 | (2034) leq(n0, n3) = all_906_3_431
% 70.46/30.30 | (2035) leq(n0, n1) = all_906_2_430
% 70.46/30.30 | (2036) ~ (all_906_2_430 = 0) | ~ (all_906_3_431 = 0) | all_906_0_428 = all_906_1_429
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 70.46/30.30 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (922), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.30 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.30 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.30 |
% 70.46/30.30 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 70.46/30.31 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 70.46/30.31 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.31 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.31 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.31 | (2042) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | Instantiating (2042) with all_911_0_432, all_911_1_433, all_911_2_434, all_911_3_435 yields:
% 70.46/30.31 | (2043) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = all_911_0_432 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = all_911_1_433 & leq(n0, n3) = all_911_2_434 & leq(n0, n1) = all_911_3_435 & ( ~ (all_911_2_434 = 0) | ~ (all_911_3_435 = 0) | all_911_0_432 = all_911_1_433)
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | Applying alpha-rule on (2043) yields:
% 70.46/30.31 | (2044) leq(n0, n1) = all_911_3_435
% 70.46/30.31 | (2045) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = all_911_0_432
% 70.46/30.31 | (2046) ~ (all_911_2_434 = 0) | ~ (all_911_3_435 = 0) | all_911_0_432 = all_911_1_433
% 70.46/30.31 | (2047) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = all_911_1_433
% 70.46/30.31 | (2048) leq(n0, n3) = all_911_2_434
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 70.46/30.31 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (928), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.31 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.31 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 70.46/30.31 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 70.46/30.31 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.31 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.31 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.31 | (2054) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | Instantiating (2054) with all_916_0_436, all_916_1_437, all_916_2_438, all_916_3_439 yields:
% 70.46/30.31 | (2055) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = all_916_1_437 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = all_916_0_436 & leq(n0, n2) = all_916_3_439 & leq(n0, n1) = all_916_2_438 & ( ~ (all_916_2_438 = 0) | ~ (all_916_3_439 = 0) | all_916_0_436 = all_916_1_437)
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | Applying alpha-rule on (2055) yields:
% 70.46/30.31 | (2056) ~ (all_916_2_438 = 0) | ~ (all_916_3_439 = 0) | all_916_0_436 = all_916_1_437
% 70.46/30.31 | (2057) leq(n0, n2) = all_916_3_439
% 70.46/30.31 | (2058) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = all_916_0_436
% 70.46/30.31 | (2059) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = all_916_1_437
% 70.46/30.31 | (2060) leq(n0, n1) = all_916_2_438
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 70.46/30.31 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (934), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.31 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.31 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 70.46/30.31 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 70.46/30.31 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.31 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.31 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.31 | (2066) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = v3 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | Instantiating (2066) with all_921_0_440, all_921_1_441, all_921_2_442, all_921_3_443 yields:
% 70.46/30.31 | (2067) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = all_921_1_441 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = all_921_0_440 & leq(n0, n3) = all_921_3_443 & leq(n0, n1) = all_921_2_442 & ( ~ (all_921_2_442 = 0) | ~ (all_921_3_443 = 0) | all_921_0_440 = all_921_1_441)
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | Applying alpha-rule on (2067) yields:
% 70.46/30.31 | (2068) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = all_921_1_441
% 70.46/30.31 | (2069) leq(n0, n1) = all_921_2_442
% 70.46/30.31 | (2070) leq(n0, n3) = all_921_3_443
% 70.46/30.31 | (2071) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = all_921_0_440
% 70.46/30.31 | (2072) ~ (all_921_2_442 = 0) | ~ (all_921_3_443 = 0) | all_921_0_440 = all_921_1_441
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 70.46/30.31 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (940), into two cases.
% 70.46/30.31 |-Branch one:
% 70.46/30.31 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 70.46/30.31 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 70.46/30.31 | (296) $false
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.46/30.31 |-Branch two:
% 70.46/30.31 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.46/30.31 | (2078) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = v2 & leq(n0, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | Instantiating (2078) with all_926_0_444, all_926_1_445, all_926_2_446, all_926_3_447 yields:
% 70.46/30.31 | (2079) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = all_926_0_444 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = all_926_1_445 & leq(n0, n3) = all_926_2_446 & leq(n0, n1) = all_926_3_447 & ( ~ (all_926_2_446 = 0) | ~ (all_926_3_447 = 0) | all_926_0_444 = all_926_1_445)
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | Applying alpha-rule on (2079) yields:
% 70.46/30.31 | (2080) leq(n0, n3) = all_926_2_446
% 70.46/30.31 | (2081) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n3, n1) = all_926_0_444
% 70.46/30.31 | (2082) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n1, n3) = all_926_1_445
% 70.46/30.31 | (2083) ~ (all_926_2_446 = 0) | ~ (all_926_3_447 = 0) | all_926_0_444 = all_926_1_445
% 70.46/30.31 | (2084) leq(n0, n1) = all_926_3_447
% 70.46/30.31 |
% 70.46/30.31 | From (173) and (309) follows:
% 70.68/30.31 | (160) leq(n1, n5) = 0
% 70.68/30.31 |
% 70.68/30.31 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (946), into two cases.
% 70.68/30.31 |-Branch one:
% 70.68/30.31 | (306) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.68/30.31 |
% 70.68/30.31 | From (173) and (306) follows:
% 70.68/30.31 | (307) ~ (leq(n1, n5) = 0)
% 70.68/30.31 |
% 70.68/30.31 | Using (160) and (307) yields:
% 70.68/30.31 | (296) $false
% 70.68/30.31 |
% 70.68/30.31 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.68/30.31 |-Branch two:
% 70.68/30.31 | (309) leq(n1, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.68/30.31 | (2090) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.68/30.31 |
% 70.68/30.31 | Instantiating (2090) with all_931_0_448, all_931_1_449, all_931_2_450, all_931_3_451 yields:
% 70.68/30.31 | (2091) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = all_931_0_448 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = all_931_1_449 & leq(n0, n2) = all_931_2_450 & leq(n0, n1) = all_931_3_451 & ( ~ (all_931_2_450 = 0) | ~ (all_931_3_451 = 0) | all_931_0_448 = all_931_1_449)
% 70.68/30.31 |
% 70.68/30.31 | Applying alpha-rule on (2091) yields:
% 70.68/30.31 | (2092) ~ (all_931_2_450 = 0) | ~ (all_931_3_451 = 0) | all_931_0_448 = all_931_1_449
% 70.68/30.31 | (2093) leq(n0, n2) = all_931_2_450
% 70.68/30.31 | (2094) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = all_931_0_448
% 70.68/30.31 | (2095) leq(n0, n1) = all_931_3_451
% 70.68/30.31 | (2096) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = all_931_1_449
% 70.68/30.31 |
% 70.68/30.31 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (952), into two cases.
% 70.68/30.31 |-Branch one:
% 70.68/30.31 | (510) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 70.68/30.31 |
% 70.68/30.31 | From (174) and (510) follows:
% 70.68/30.31 | (511) ~ (leq(n1, n2) = 0)
% 70.68/30.31 |
% 70.68/30.32 | Using (168) and (511) yields:
% 70.68/30.32 | (296) $false
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.68/30.32 |-Branch two:
% 70.68/30.32 | (513) leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 70.68/30.32 | (2101) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v3 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | Instantiating (2101) with all_936_0_452, all_936_1_453, all_936_2_454, all_936_3_455 yields:
% 70.68/30.32 | (2102) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = all_936_1_453 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = all_936_0_452 & leq(n0, n2) = all_936_3_455 & leq(n0, n1) = all_936_2_454 & ( ~ (all_936_2_454 = 0) | ~ (all_936_3_455 = 0) | all_936_0_452 = all_936_1_453)
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | Applying alpha-rule on (2102) yields:
% 70.68/30.32 | (2103) leq(n0, n2) = all_936_3_455
% 70.68/30.32 | (2104) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = all_936_1_453
% 70.68/30.32 | (2105) ~ (all_936_2_454 = 0) | ~ (all_936_3_455 = 0) | all_936_0_452 = all_936_1_453
% 70.68/30.32 | (2106) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = all_936_0_452
% 70.68/30.32 | (2107) leq(n0, n1) = all_936_2_454
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | From (174) and (513) follows:
% 70.68/30.32 | (168) leq(n1, n2) = 0
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (958), into two cases.
% 70.68/30.32 |-Branch one:
% 70.68/30.32 | (510) ~ (leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | From (174) and (510) follows:
% 70.68/30.32 | (511) ~ (leq(n1, n2) = 0)
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | Using (168) and (511) yields:
% 70.68/30.32 | (296) $false
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.68/30.32 |-Branch two:
% 70.68/30.32 | (513) leq(n1, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 70.68/30.32 | (2113) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | Instantiating (2113) with all_941_0_456, all_941_1_457, all_941_2_458, all_941_3_459 yields:
% 70.68/30.32 | (2114) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = all_941_0_456 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = all_941_1_457 & leq(n0, n2) = all_941_2_458 & leq(n0, n1) = all_941_3_459 & ( ~ (all_941_2_458 = 0) | ~ (all_941_3_459 = 0) | all_941_0_456 = all_941_1_457)
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | Applying alpha-rule on (2114) yields:
% 70.68/30.32 | (2115) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n2) = all_941_1_457
% 70.68/30.32 | (2116) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n1) = all_941_0_456
% 70.68/30.32 | (2117) leq(n0, n1) = all_941_3_459
% 70.68/30.32 | (2118) ~ (all_941_2_458 = 0) | ~ (all_941_3_459 = 0) | all_941_0_456 = all_941_1_457
% 70.68/30.32 | (2119) leq(n0, n2) = all_941_2_458
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (976), into two cases.
% 70.68/30.32 |-Branch one:
% 70.68/30.32 | (1001) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | From (174) and (1001) follows:
% 70.68/30.32 | (1002) ~ (leq(n0, n2) = 0)
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | Using (170) and (1002) yields:
% 70.68/30.32 | (296) $false
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.68/30.32 |-Branch two:
% 70.68/30.32 | (1004) leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 70.68/30.32 | (2124) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = v2 & leq(n0, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | Instantiating (2124) with all_946_0_460, all_946_1_461, all_946_2_462, all_946_3_463 yields:
% 70.68/30.32 | (2125) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = all_946_0_460 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = all_946_1_461 & leq(n0, n2) = all_946_2_462 & leq(n0, n0) = all_946_3_463 & ( ~ (all_946_2_462 = 0) | ~ (all_946_3_463 = 0) | all_946_0_460 = all_946_1_461)
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | Applying alpha-rule on (2125) yields:
% 70.68/30.32 | (2126) leq(n0, n2) = all_946_2_462
% 70.68/30.32 | (2127) leq(n0, n0) = all_946_3_463
% 70.68/30.32 | (2128) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n2, n0) = all_946_0_460
% 70.68/30.32 | (2129) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n2) = all_946_1_461
% 70.68/30.32 | (2130) ~ (all_946_2_462 = 0) | ~ (all_946_3_463 = 0) | all_946_0_460 = all_946_1_461
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | From (174) and (1004) follows:
% 70.68/30.32 | (170) leq(n0, n2) = 0
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (981), into two cases.
% 70.68/30.32 |-Branch one:
% 70.68/30.32 | (1001) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | From (174) and (1001) follows:
% 70.68/30.32 | (1002) ~ (leq(n0, n2) = 0)
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | Using (170) and (1002) yields:
% 70.68/30.32 | (296) $false
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.68/30.32 |-Branch two:
% 70.68/30.32 | (1004) leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 70.68/30.32 | (2136) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v2 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v3 & leq(n0, n1) = v0 & leq(n0, n0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | Instantiating (2136) with all_951_0_464, all_951_1_465, all_951_2_466, all_951_3_467 yields:
% 70.68/30.32 | (2137) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = all_951_1_465 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = all_951_0_464 & leq(n0, n1) = all_951_3_467 & leq(n0, n0) = all_951_2_466 & ( ~ (all_951_2_466 = 0) | ~ (all_951_3_467 = 0) | all_951_0_464 = all_951_1_465)
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | Applying alpha-rule on (2137) yields:
% 70.68/30.32 | (2138) ~ (all_951_2_466 = 0) | ~ (all_951_3_467 = 0) | all_951_0_464 = all_951_1_465
% 70.68/30.32 | (2139) leq(n0, n1) = all_951_3_467
% 70.68/30.32 | (2140) leq(n0, n0) = all_951_2_466
% 70.68/30.32 | (2141) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = all_951_0_464
% 70.68/30.32 | (2142) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = all_951_1_465
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | From (174) and (1004) follows:
% 70.68/30.32 | (170) leq(n0, n2) = 0
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (987), into two cases.
% 70.68/30.32 |-Branch one:
% 70.68/30.32 | (1001) ~ (leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | From (174) and (1001) follows:
% 70.68/30.32 | (1002) ~ (leq(n0, n2) = 0)
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | Using (170) and (1002) yields:
% 70.68/30.32 | (296) $false
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.68/30.32 |-Branch two:
% 70.68/30.32 | (1004) leq(n0, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 70.68/30.32 | (2148) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = v2 & leq(n0, n1) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | Instantiating (2148) with all_956_0_468, all_956_1_469, all_956_2_470, all_956_3_471 yields:
% 70.68/30.32 | (2149) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = all_956_0_468 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = all_956_1_469 & leq(n0, n1) = all_956_2_470 & leq(n0, n0) = all_956_3_471 & ( ~ (all_956_2_470 = 0) | ~ (all_956_3_471 = 0) | all_956_0_468 = all_956_1_469)
% 70.68/30.32 |
% 70.68/30.32 | Applying alpha-rule on (2149) yields:
% 70.68/30.32 | (2150) leq(n0, n1) = all_956_2_470
% 70.68/30.32 | (2151) leq(n0, n0) = all_956_3_471
% 70.68/30.33 | (2152) ~ (all_956_2_470 = 0) | ~ (all_956_3_471 = 0) | all_956_0_468 = all_956_1_469
% 70.68/30.33 | (2153) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n0, n1) = all_956_1_469
% 70.68/30.33 | (2154) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, n1, n0) = all_956_0_468
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | From (174) and (1004) follows:
% 70.68/30.33 | (170) leq(n0, n2) = 0
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1011), into two cases.
% 70.68/30.33 |-Branch one:
% 70.68/30.33 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 70.68/30.33 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (296) $false
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.68/30.33 |-Branch two:
% 70.68/30.33 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.68/30.33 | (2160) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Instantiating (2160) with all_961_0_472, all_961_1_473, all_961_2_474, all_961_3_475 yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2161) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = all_961_0_472 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = all_961_1_473 & leq(n0, n5) = all_961_2_474 & leq(n0, n4) = all_961_3_475 & ( ~ (all_961_2_474 = 0) | ~ (all_961_3_475 = 0) | all_961_0_472 = all_961_1_473)
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Applying alpha-rule on (2161) yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2162) leq(n0, n4) = all_961_3_475
% 70.68/30.33 | (2163) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = all_961_1_473
% 70.68/30.33 | (2164) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = all_961_0_472
% 70.68/30.33 | (2165) ~ (all_961_2_474 = 0) | ~ (all_961_3_475 = 0) | all_961_0_472 = all_961_1_473
% 70.68/30.33 | (2166) leq(n0, n5) = all_961_2_474
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 70.68/30.33 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1023), into two cases.
% 70.68/30.33 |-Branch one:
% 70.68/30.33 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 70.68/30.33 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (296) $false
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.68/30.33 |-Branch two:
% 70.68/30.33 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.68/30.33 | (2172) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = v2 & leq(n0, n5) = v1 & leq(n0, n4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Instantiating (2172) with all_966_0_476, all_966_1_477, all_966_2_478, all_966_3_479 yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2173) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = all_966_0_476 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = all_966_1_477 & leq(n0, n5) = all_966_2_478 & leq(n0, n4) = all_966_3_479 & ( ~ (all_966_2_478 = 0) | ~ (all_966_3_479 = 0) | all_966_0_476 = all_966_1_477)
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Applying alpha-rule on (2173) yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2174) leq(n0, n5) = all_966_2_478
% 70.68/30.33 | (2175) ~ (all_966_2_478 = 0) | ~ (all_966_3_479 = 0) | all_966_0_476 = all_966_1_477
% 70.68/30.33 | (2176) leq(n0, n4) = all_966_3_479
% 70.68/30.33 | (2177) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = all_966_1_477
% 70.68/30.33 | (2178) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = all_966_0_476
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 70.68/30.33 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1029), into two cases.
% 70.68/30.33 |-Branch one:
% 70.68/30.33 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 70.68/30.33 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (296) $false
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.68/30.33 |-Branch two:
% 70.68/30.33 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.68/30.33 | (2184) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Instantiating (2184) with all_971_0_480, all_971_1_481, all_971_2_482, all_971_3_483 yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2185) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = all_971_1_481 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = all_971_0_480 & leq(n0, n5) = all_971_3_483 & leq(n0, n4) = all_971_2_482 & ( ~ (all_971_2_482 = 0) | ~ (all_971_3_483 = 0) | all_971_0_480 = all_971_1_481)
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Applying alpha-rule on (2185) yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2186) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = all_971_0_480
% 70.68/30.33 | (2187) ~ (all_971_2_482 = 0) | ~ (all_971_3_483 = 0) | all_971_0_480 = all_971_1_481
% 70.68/30.33 | (2188) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = all_971_1_481
% 70.68/30.33 | (2189) leq(n0, n5) = all_971_3_483
% 70.68/30.33 | (2190) leq(n0, n4) = all_971_2_482
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | From (173) and (429) follows:
% 70.68/30.33 | (157) leq(n4, n5) = 0
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1047), into two cases.
% 70.68/30.33 |-Branch one:
% 70.68/30.33 | (426) ~ (leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | From (173) and (426) follows:
% 70.68/30.33 | (427) ~ (leq(n4, n5) = 0)
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Using (157) and (427) yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (296) $false
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.68/30.33 |-Branch two:
% 70.68/30.33 | (429) leq(n4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 70.68/30.33 | (2196) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = v2 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = v3 & leq(n0, n5) = v0 & leq(n0, n4) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Instantiating (2196) with all_976_0_484, all_976_1_485, all_976_2_486, all_976_3_487 yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2197) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = all_976_1_485 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = all_976_0_484 & leq(n0, n5) = all_976_3_487 & leq(n0, n4) = all_976_2_486 & ( ~ (all_976_2_486 = 0) | ~ (all_976_3_487 = 0) | all_976_0_484 = all_976_1_485)
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Applying alpha-rule on (2197) yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2198) leq(n0, n4) = all_976_2_486
% 70.68/30.33 | (2199) ~ (all_976_2_486 = 0) | ~ (all_976_3_487 = 0) | all_976_0_484 = all_976_1_485
% 70.68/30.33 | (2200) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n5, n4) = all_976_1_485
% 70.68/30.33 | (2201) leq(n0, n5) = all_976_3_487
% 70.68/30.33 | (2202) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, n4, n5) = all_976_0_484
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_901_2_426, all_976_2_486 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_976_2_486, leq(n0, n4) = all_901_2_426, yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2203) all_976_2_486 = all_901_2_426
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_901_2_426, all_966_3_479 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_966_3_479, leq(n0, n4) = all_901_2_426, yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2204) all_966_3_479 = all_901_2_426
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_896_3_423, all_976_2_486 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_976_2_486, leq(n0, n4) = all_896_3_423, yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2205) all_976_2_486 = all_896_3_423
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_881_2_410, all_971_2_482 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_971_2_482, leq(n0, n4) = all_881_2_410, yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2206) all_971_2_482 = all_881_2_410
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_876_3_407, all_881_2_410 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_881_2_410, leq(n0, n4) = all_876_3_407, yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2207) all_881_2_410 = all_876_3_407
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_871_2_402, all_901_2_426 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_901_2_426, leq(n0, n4) = all_871_2_402, yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2208) all_901_2_426 = all_871_2_402
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_871_2_402, all_876_3_407 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_876_3_407, leq(n0, n4) = all_871_2_402, yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2209) all_876_3_407 = all_871_2_402
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_836_2_374, all_961_3_475 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_961_3_475, leq(n0, n4) = all_836_2_374, yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2210) all_961_3_475 = all_836_2_374
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_831_3_371, all_876_3_407 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_876_3_407, leq(n0, n4) = all_831_3_371, yields:
% 70.68/30.33 | (2211) all_876_3_407 = all_831_3_371
% 70.68/30.33 |
% 70.68/30.33 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_816_3_359, all_971_2_482 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_971_2_482, leq(n0, n4) = all_816_3_359, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2212) all_971_2_482 = all_816_3_359
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_791_2_338, all_831_3_371 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_831_3_371, leq(n0, n4) = all_791_2_338, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2213) all_831_3_371 = all_791_2_338
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_776_3_327, all_966_3_479 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_966_3_479, leq(n0, n4) = all_776_3_327, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2214) all_966_3_479 = all_776_3_327
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_771_3_323, all_836_2_374 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_836_2_374, leq(n0, n4) = all_771_3_323, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2215) all_836_2_374 = all_771_3_323
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_761_2_314, all_771_3_323 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_771_3_323, leq(n0, n4) = all_761_2_314, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2216) all_771_3_323 = all_761_2_314
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_726_2_286, all_761_2_314 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_761_2_314, leq(n0, n4) = all_726_2_286, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2217) all_761_2_314 = all_726_2_286
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_721_3_283, all_726_2_286 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_726_2_286, leq(n0, n4) = all_721_3_283, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2218) all_726_2_286 = all_721_3_283
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_691_3_259, all_831_3_371 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_831_3_371, leq(n0, n4) = all_691_3_259, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2219) all_831_3_371 = all_691_3_259
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_616_2_198, all_721_3_283 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_721_3_283, leq(n0, n4) = all_616_2_198, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2220) all_721_3_283 = all_616_2_198
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_611_2_194, all_831_3_371 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_831_3_371, leq(n0, n4) = all_611_2_194, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2221) all_831_3_371 = all_611_2_194
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_606_3_191, all_831_3_371 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_831_3_371, leq(n0, n4) = all_606_3_191, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2222) all_831_3_371 = all_606_3_191
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_606_3_191, all_616_2_198 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_616_2_198, leq(n0, n4) = all_606_3_191, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2223) all_616_2_198 = all_606_3_191
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_601_3_187, all_831_3_371 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_831_3_371, leq(n0, n4) = all_601_3_187, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2224) all_831_3_371 = all_601_3_187
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_416_2_90, all_831_3_371 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_831_3_371, leq(n0, n4) = all_416_2_90, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2225) all_831_3_371 = all_416_2_90
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_416_2_90, all_706_2_270 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_706_2_270, leq(n0, n4) = all_416_2_90, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2226) all_706_2_270 = all_416_2_90
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_416_3_91, all_706_2_270 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_706_2_270, leq(n0, n4) = all_416_3_91, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2227) all_706_2_270 = all_416_3_91
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_244_2_46, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_244_2_46, leq(n0, n4) = 0, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2228) all_244_2_46 = 0
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_244_2_46, all_416_2_90 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_416_2_90, leq(n0, n4) = all_244_2_46, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2229) all_416_2_90 = all_244_2_46
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n4, all_244_3_47, all_961_3_475 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = all_961_3_475, leq(n0, n4) = all_244_3_47, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2230) all_961_3_475 = all_244_3_47
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_921_3_443, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_921_3_443, leq(n0, n3) = 0, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2231) all_921_3_443 = 0
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_911_2_434, all_926_2_446 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_926_2_446, leq(n0, n3) = all_911_2_434, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2232) all_926_2_446 = all_911_2_434
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_906_3_431, all_911_2_434 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_911_2_434, leq(n0, n3) = all_906_3_431, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2233) all_911_2_434 = all_906_3_431
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_891_2_418, all_906_3_431 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_906_3_431, leq(n0, n3) = all_891_2_418, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2234) all_906_3_431 = all_891_2_418
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_886_3_415, all_891_2_418 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_891_2_418, leq(n0, n3) = all_886_3_415, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2235) all_891_2_418 = all_886_3_415
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_851_2_386, all_886_3_415 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_886_3_415, leq(n0, n3) = all_851_2_386, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2236) all_886_3_415 = all_851_2_386
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_791_3_339, all_851_2_386 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_851_2_386, leq(n0, n3) = all_791_3_339, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2237) all_851_2_386 = all_791_3_339
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_786_2_334, all_791_3_339 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_791_3_339, leq(n0, n3) = all_786_2_334, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2238) all_791_3_339 = all_786_2_334
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_771_2_322, all_776_2_326 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_776_2_326, leq(n0, n3) = all_771_2_322, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2239) all_776_2_326 = all_771_2_322
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_766_3_319, all_786_2_334 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_786_2_334, leq(n0, n3) = all_766_3_319, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2240) all_786_2_334 = all_766_3_319
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_761_3_315, all_766_3_319 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_766_3_319, leq(n0, n3) = all_761_3_315, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2241) all_766_3_319 = all_761_3_315
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_756_2_310, all_781_3_331 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_781_3_331, leq(n0, n3) = all_756_2_310, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2242) all_781_3_331 = all_756_2_310
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_756_2_310, all_761_3_315 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_761_3_315, leq(n0, n3) = all_756_2_310, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2243) all_761_3_315 = all_756_2_310
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_731_3_291, all_771_2_322 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_771_2_322, leq(n0, n3) = all_731_3_291, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2244) all_771_2_322 = all_731_3_291
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_731_3_291, all_736_2_294 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_736_2_294, leq(n0, n3) = all_731_3_291, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2245) all_736_2_294 = all_731_3_291
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_716_2_278, all_921_3_443 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_921_3_443, leq(n0, n3) = all_716_2_278, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2246) all_921_3_443 = all_716_2_278
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_716_2_278, all_856_3_391 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_856_3_391, leq(n0, n3) = all_716_2_278, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2247) all_856_3_391 = all_716_2_278
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_716_2_278, all_781_3_331 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_781_3_331, leq(n0, n3) = all_716_2_278, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2248) all_781_3_331 = all_716_2_278
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_716_2_278, all_771_2_322 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_771_2_322, leq(n0, n3) = all_716_2_278, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2249) all_771_2_322 = all_716_2_278
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_646_2_222, all_771_2_322 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_771_2_322, leq(n0, n3) = all_646_2_222, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2250) all_771_2_322 = all_646_2_222
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_646_2_222, all_711_3_275 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_711_3_275, leq(n0, n3) = all_646_2_222, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2251) all_711_3_275 = all_646_2_222
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_641_3_219, all_776_2_326 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_776_2_326, leq(n0, n3) = all_641_3_219, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2252) all_776_2_326 = all_641_3_219
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_636_2_214, all_781_3_331 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_781_3_331, leq(n0, n3) = all_636_2_214, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2253) all_781_3_331 = all_636_2_214
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_631_3_211, all_921_3_443 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_921_3_443, leq(n0, n3) = all_631_3_211, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2254) all_921_3_443 = all_631_3_211
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_272_2_54, all_856_3_391 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_856_3_391, leq(n0, n3) = all_272_2_54, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2255) all_856_3_391 = all_272_2_54
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_272_3_55, all_926_2_446 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_926_2_446, leq(n0, n3) = all_272_3_55, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2256) all_926_2_446 = all_272_3_55
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_252_2_50, all_711_3_275 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_711_3_275, leq(n0, n3) = all_252_2_50, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2257) all_711_3_275 = all_252_2_50
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n3, all_252_3_51, all_736_2_294 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = all_736_2_294, leq(n0, n3) = all_252_3_51, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2258) all_736_2_294 = all_252_3_51
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_931_2_450, all_936_3_455 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_936_3_455, leq(n0, n2) = all_931_2_450, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2259) all_936_3_455 = all_931_2_450
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_916_3_439, all_931_2_450 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_931_2_450, leq(n0, n2) = all_916_3_439, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2260) all_931_2_450 = all_916_3_439
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_891_3_419, all_916_3_439 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_916_3_439, leq(n0, n2) = all_891_3_419, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2261) all_916_3_439 = all_891_3_419
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_886_2_414, all_946_2_462 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_946_2_462, leq(n0, n2) = all_886_2_414, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2262) all_946_2_462 = all_886_2_414
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_881_3_411, all_891_3_419 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_891_3_419, leq(n0, n2) = all_881_3_411, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2263) all_891_3_419 = all_881_3_411
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_871_3_403, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_871_3_403, leq(n0, n2) = 0, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2264) all_871_3_403 = 0
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_871_3_403, all_941_2_458 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_941_2_458, leq(n0, n2) = all_871_3_403, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2265) all_941_2_458 = all_871_3_403
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_871_3_403, all_881_3_411 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_881_3_411, leq(n0, n2) = all_871_3_403, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2266) all_881_3_411 = all_871_3_403
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_851_3_387, all_856_2_390 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_856_2_390, leq(n0, n2) = all_851_3_387, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2267) all_856_2_390 = all_851_3_387
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_846_2_382, all_876_2_406 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_876_2_406, leq(n0, n2) = all_846_2_382, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2268) all_876_2_406 = all_846_2_382
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_841_3_379, all_941_2_458 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_941_2_458, leq(n0, n2) = all_841_3_379, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2269) all_941_2_458 = all_841_3_379
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_816_2_358, all_946_2_462 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_946_2_462, leq(n0, n2) = all_816_2_358, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2270) all_946_2_462 = all_816_2_358
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_811_2_354, all_936_3_455 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_936_3_455, leq(n0, n2) = all_811_2_354, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2271) all_936_3_455 = all_811_2_354
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_806_3_351, all_876_2_406 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_876_2_406, leq(n0, n2) = all_806_3_351, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2272) all_876_2_406 = all_806_3_351
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_801_3_347, all_806_3_351 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_806_3_351, leq(n0, n2) = all_801_3_347, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2273) all_806_3_351 = all_801_3_347
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_796_2_342, all_881_3_411 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_881_3_411, leq(n0, n2) = all_796_2_342, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2274) all_881_3_411 = all_796_2_342
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_751_3_307, all_881_3_411 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_881_3_411, leq(n0, n2) = all_751_3_307, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2275) all_881_3_411 = all_751_3_307
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_746_2_302, all_856_2_390 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_856_2_390, leq(n0, n2) = all_746_2_302, yields:
% 70.68/30.34 | (2276) all_856_2_390 = all_746_2_302
% 70.68/30.34 |
% 70.68/30.34 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_741_3_299, all_801_3_347 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_801_3_347, leq(n0, n2) = all_741_3_299, yields:
% 70.68/30.35 | (2277) all_801_3_347 = all_741_3_299
% 70.68/30.35 |
% 70.68/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_741_3_299, all_751_3_307 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_751_3_307, leq(n0, n2) = all_741_3_299, yields:
% 70.68/30.35 | (2278) all_751_3_307 = all_741_3_299
% 70.68/30.35 |
% 70.68/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_666_2_238, all_876_2_406 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_876_2_406, leq(n0, n2) = all_666_2_238, yields:
% 70.68/30.35 | (2279) all_876_2_406 = all_666_2_238
% 70.68/30.35 |
% 70.68/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_661_3_235, all_746_2_302 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_746_2_302, leq(n0, n2) = all_661_3_235, yields:
% 70.68/30.35 | (2280) all_746_2_302 = all_661_3_235
% 70.68/30.35 |
% 70.68/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_656_2_230, all_741_3_299 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_741_3_299, leq(n0, n2) = all_656_2_230, yields:
% 70.68/30.35 | (2281) all_741_3_299 = all_656_2_230
% 70.68/30.35 |
% 70.68/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_651_3_227, all_741_3_299 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_741_3_299, leq(n0, n2) = all_651_3_227, yields:
% 70.68/30.35 | (2282) all_741_3_299 = all_651_3_227
% 70.68/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_626_2_206, all_651_3_227 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_651_3_227, leq(n0, n2) = all_626_2_206, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2283) all_651_3_227 = all_626_2_206
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_621_3_203, all_746_2_302 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_746_2_302, leq(n0, n2) = all_621_3_203, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2284) all_746_2_302 = all_621_3_203
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_621_3_203, all_626_2_206 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_626_2_206, leq(n0, n2) = all_621_3_203, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2285) all_626_2_206 = all_621_3_203
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_516_2_118, all_856_2_390 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_856_2_390, leq(n0, n2) = all_516_2_118, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2286) all_856_2_390 = all_516_2_118
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_511_3_115, all_886_2_414 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_886_2_414, leq(n0, n2) = all_511_3_115, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2287) all_886_2_414 = all_511_3_115
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_332_2_66, all_746_2_302 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_746_2_302, leq(n0, n2) = all_332_2_66, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2288) all_746_2_302 = all_332_2_66
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_332_3_67, all_886_2_414 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_886_2_414, leq(n0, n2) = all_332_3_67, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2289) all_886_2_414 = all_332_3_67
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_332_3_67, all_332_2_66 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_332_2_66, leq(n0, n2) = all_332_3_67, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2290) all_332_2_66 = all_332_3_67
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_327_2_62, all_886_2_414 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_886_2_414, leq(n0, n2) = all_327_2_62, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2291) all_886_2_414 = all_327_2_62
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_327_3_63, all_886_2_414 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_886_2_414, leq(n0, n2) = all_327_3_63, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2292) all_886_2_414 = all_327_3_63
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_295_2_58, all_327_3_63 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_327_3_63, leq(n0, n2) = all_295_2_58, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2293) all_327_3_63 = all_295_2_58
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n2, all_295_3_59, all_327_3_63 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_327_3_63, leq(n0, n2) = all_295_3_59, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2294) all_327_3_63 = all_295_3_59
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_941_3_459, all_951_3_467 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_951_3_467, leq(n0, n1) = all_941_3_459, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2295) all_951_3_467 = all_941_3_459
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_936_2_454, all_941_3_459 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_941_3_459, leq(n0, n1) = all_936_2_454, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2296) all_941_3_459 = all_936_2_454
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_931_3_451, all_936_2_454 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_936_2_454, leq(n0, n1) = all_931_3_451, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2297) all_936_2_454 = all_931_3_451
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_926_3_447, all_931_3_451 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_931_3_451, leq(n0, n1) = all_926_3_447, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2298) all_931_3_451 = all_926_3_447
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_921_2_442, all_926_3_447 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_926_3_447, leq(n0, n1) = all_921_2_442, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2299) all_926_3_447 = all_921_2_442
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_901_3_427, all_906_2_430 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_906_2_430, leq(n0, n1) = all_901_3_427, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2300) all_906_2_430 = all_901_3_427
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_896_2_422, all_921_2_442 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_921_2_442, leq(n0, n1) = all_896_2_422, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2301) all_921_2_442 = all_896_2_422
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_866_3_399, all_901_3_427 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_901_3_427, leq(n0, n1) = all_866_3_399, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2302) all_901_3_427 = all_866_3_399
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_861_2_394, all_956_2_470 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_956_2_470, leq(n0, n1) = all_861_2_394, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2303) all_956_2_470 = all_861_2_394
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_846_3_383, all_896_2_422 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_896_2_422, leq(n0, n1) = all_846_3_383, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2304) all_896_2_422 = all_846_3_383
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_841_2_378, all_916_2_438 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_916_2_438, leq(n0, n1) = all_841_2_378, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2305) all_916_2_438 = all_841_2_378
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_836_3_375, all_841_2_378 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_841_2_378, leq(n0, n1) = all_836_3_375, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2306) all_841_2_378 = all_836_3_375
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_831_2_370, all_866_3_399 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_866_3_399, leq(n0, n1) = all_831_2_370, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2307) all_866_3_399 = all_831_2_370
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_826_3_367, all_831_2_370 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_831_2_370, leq(n0, n1) = all_826_3_367, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2308) all_831_2_370 = all_826_3_367
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_821_2_362, all_826_3_367 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_826_3_367, leq(n0, n1) = all_821_2_362, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2309) all_826_3_367 = all_821_2_362
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_676_2_246, all_821_2_362 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_821_2_362, leq(n0, n1) = all_676_2_246, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2310) all_821_2_362 = all_676_2_246
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_671_3_243, all_861_2_394 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_861_2_394, leq(n0, n1) = all_671_3_243, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2311) all_861_2_394 = all_671_3_243
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_576_2_166, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_576_2_166, leq(n0, n1) = 0, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2312) all_576_2_166 = 0
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_576_2_166, all_911_3_435 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_911_3_435, leq(n0, n1) = all_576_2_166, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2313) all_911_3_435 = all_576_2_166
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_576_2_166, all_846_3_383 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_846_3_383, leq(n0, n1) = all_576_2_166, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2314) all_846_3_383 = all_576_2_166
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_576_2_166, all_836_3_375 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_836_3_375, leq(n0, n1) = all_576_2_166, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2315) all_836_3_375 = all_576_2_166
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_571_3_163, all_676_2_246 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_676_2_246, leq(n0, n1) = all_571_3_163, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2316) all_676_2_246 = all_571_3_163
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_571_3_163, all_671_3_243 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_671_3_243, leq(n0, n1) = all_571_3_163, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2317) all_671_3_243 = all_571_3_163
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_566_2_158, all_911_3_435 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_911_3_435, leq(n0, n1) = all_566_2_158, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2318) all_911_3_435 = all_566_2_158
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_561_3_155, all_956_2_470 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_956_2_470, leq(n0, n1) = all_561_3_155, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2319) all_956_2_470 = all_561_3_155
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_541_2_138, all_951_3_467 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_951_3_467, leq(n0, n1) = all_541_2_138, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2320) all_951_3_467 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_536_3_135, all_671_3_243 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_671_3_243, leq(n0, n1) = all_536_3_135, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2321) all_671_3_243 = all_536_3_135
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_536_3_135, all_576_2_166 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_576_2_166, leq(n0, n1) = all_536_3_135, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2322) all_576_2_166 = all_536_3_135
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_521_3_123, all_916_2_438 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_916_2_438, leq(n0, n1) = all_521_3_123, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2323) all_916_2_438 = all_521_3_123
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_377_2_78, all_906_2_430 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_906_2_430, leq(n0, n1) = all_377_2_78, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2324) all_906_2_430 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_377_3_79, all_526_2_126 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_526_2_126, leq(n0, n1) = all_377_3_79, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2325) all_526_2_126 = all_377_3_79
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_342_2_74, all_576_2_166 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_576_2_166, leq(n0, n1) = all_342_2_74, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2326) all_576_2_166 = all_342_2_74
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_342_3_75, all_377_3_79 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_377_3_79, leq(n0, n1) = all_342_3_75, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2327) all_377_3_79 = all_342_3_75
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_342_3_75, all_342_2_74 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_342_2_74, leq(n0, n1) = all_342_3_75, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2328) all_342_2_74 = all_342_3_75
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_337_2_70, all_526_2_126 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_526_2_126, leq(n0, n1) = all_337_2_70, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2329) all_526_2_126 = all_337_2_70
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, n1, all_337_3_71, all_342_3_75 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_342_3_75, leq(n0, n1) = all_337_3_71, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2330) all_342_3_75 = all_337_3_71
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_661_2_234, all_671_2_242 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_671_2_242, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_661_2_234, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2331) all_671_2_242 = all_661_2_234
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_656_3_231, all_676_3_247 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_676_3_247, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_656_3_231, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2332) all_676_3_247 = all_656_3_231
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_651_2_226, all_661_2_234 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_661_2_234, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_651_2_226, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2333) all_661_2_234 = all_651_2_226
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_646_3_223, all_651_2_226 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_651_2_226, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_646_3_223, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2334) all_651_2_226 = all_646_3_223
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_636_3_215, all_646_3_223 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_646_3_223, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_636_3_215, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2335) all_646_3_223 = all_636_3_215
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_631_2_210, all_641_2_218 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_641_2_218, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_631_2_210, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2336) all_641_2_218 = all_631_2_210
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_626_3_207, all_631_2_210 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_631_2_210, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_626_3_207, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2337) all_631_2_210 = all_626_3_207
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_621_2_202, all_636_3_215 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_636_3_215, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_621_2_202, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2338) all_636_3_215 = all_621_2_202
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_606_2_190, all_621_2_202 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_621_2_202, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_606_2_190, yields:
% 70.79/30.35 | (2339) all_621_2_202 = all_606_2_190
% 70.79/30.35 |
% 70.79/30.35 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_601_2_186, all_626_3_207 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_626_3_207, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_601_2_186, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2340) all_626_3_207 = all_601_2_186
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_596_3_183, all_641_2_218 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_641_2_218, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_596_3_183, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2341) all_641_2_218 = all_596_3_183
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_591_2_178, all_606_2_190 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_606_2_190, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_591_2_178, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2342) all_606_2_190 = all_591_2_178
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_586_3_175, all_606_2_190 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_606_2_190, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_586_3_175, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2343) all_606_2_190 = all_586_3_175
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_581_2_170, all_656_3_231 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_656_3_231, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_581_2_170, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2344) all_656_3_231 = all_581_2_170
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_576_3_167, all_586_3_175 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_586_3_175, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_576_3_167, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2345) all_586_3_175 = all_576_3_167
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_571_2_162, all_581_2_170 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_581_2_170, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_571_2_162, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2346) all_581_2_170 = all_571_2_162
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_566_3_159, all_626_3_207 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_626_3_207, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_566_3_159, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2347) all_626_3_207 = all_566_3_159
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_566_3_159, all_611_3_195 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_611_3_195, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_566_3_159, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2348) all_611_3_195 = all_566_3_159
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_561_2_154, all_626_3_207 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_626_3_207, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_561_2_154, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2349) all_626_3_207 = all_561_2_154
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_561_2_154, all_576_3_167 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_576_3_167, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_561_2_154, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2350) all_576_3_167 = all_561_2_154
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_556_2_150, all_601_2_186 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_601_2_186, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_556_2_150, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2351) all_601_2_186 = all_556_2_150
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_551_3_147, all_671_2_242 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_671_2_242, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_551_3_147, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2352) all_671_2_242 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_546_2_142, all_676_3_247 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_676_3_247, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_546_2_142, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2353) all_676_3_247 = all_546_2_142
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_531_3_131, all_626_3_207 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_626_3_207, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_531_3_131, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2354) all_626_3_207 = all_531_3_131
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_505_0_111, all_531_3_131 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_531_3_131, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_505_0_111, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2355) all_531_3_131 = all_505_0_111
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_491_2_109, all_666_3_239 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_666_3_239, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_491_2_109, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2356) all_666_3_239 = all_491_2_109
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_491_2_109, all_571_2_162 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_571_2_162, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_491_2_109, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2357) all_571_2_162 = all_491_2_109
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_491_2_109, all_505_0_111 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_505_0_111, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_491_2_109, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2358) all_505_0_111 = all_491_2_109
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_486_3_106, all_611_3_195 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_611_3_195, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_486_3_106, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2359) all_611_3_195 = all_486_3_106
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_163_2_34, all_666_3_239 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_666_3_239, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_163_2_34, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2360) all_666_3_239 = all_163_2_34
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_163_3_35, all_571_2_162 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_571_2_162, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_163_3_35, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2361) all_571_2_162 = all_163_3_35
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_98_2_30, all_666_3_239 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_666_3_239, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_98_2_30, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2362) all_666_3_239 = all_98_2_30
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_98_2_30, all_616_3_199 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_616_3_199, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_98_2_30, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2363) all_616_3_199 = all_98_2_30
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_98_3_31, all_666_3_239 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_666_3_239, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_98_3_31, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2364) all_666_3_239 = all_98_3_31
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_93_2_26, all_666_3_239 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_666_3_239, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_2_26, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2365) all_666_3_239 = all_93_2_26
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_93_3_27, all_616_3_199 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_616_3_199, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_3_27, yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2366) all_616_3_199 = all_93_3_27
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2203,2205) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2367) all_901_2_426 = all_896_3_423
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2367 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2368) all_901_2_426 = all_896_3_423
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2206,2212) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2369) all_881_2_410 = all_816_3_359
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2369 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2370) all_881_2_410 = all_816_3_359
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2204,2214) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2371) all_901_2_426 = all_776_3_327
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2371 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2372) all_901_2_426 = all_776_3_327
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2210,2230) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2373) all_836_2_374 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2373 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2374) all_836_2_374 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2303,2319) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2375) all_861_2_394 = all_561_3_155
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2375 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2376) all_861_2_394 = all_561_3_155
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2295,2320) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2377) all_941_3_459 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2377 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2378) all_941_3_459 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2262,2270) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2379) all_886_2_414 = all_816_2_358
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2379 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2380) all_886_2_414 = all_816_2_358
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2265,2269) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2381) all_871_3_403 = all_841_3_379
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2381 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2382) all_871_3_403 = all_841_3_379
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2296,2378) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2383) all_936_2_454 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2383 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2384) all_936_2_454 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2297,2384) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2385) all_931_3_451 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2385 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2386) all_931_3_451 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2259,2271) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2387) all_931_2_450 = all_811_2_354
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2387 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2388) all_931_2_450 = all_811_2_354
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2260,2388) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2389) all_916_3_439 = all_811_2_354
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2389 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2390) all_916_3_439 = all_811_2_354
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2298,2386) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2391) all_926_3_447 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2391 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2392) all_926_3_447 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2232,2256) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2393) all_911_2_434 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2393 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2394) all_911_2_434 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2299,2392) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2395) all_921_2_442 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2395 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2396) all_921_2_442 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2301,2396) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2397) all_896_2_422 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2397 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2398) all_896_2_422 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2231,2254) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2399) all_631_3_211 = 0
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2246,2254) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2400) all_716_2_278 = all_631_3_211
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Simplifying 2400 yields:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2401) all_716_2_278 = all_631_3_211
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.36 | Combining equations (2305,2323) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.36 | (2402) all_841_2_378 = all_521_3_123
% 70.79/30.36 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2402 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2403) all_841_2_378 = all_521_3_123
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2261,2390) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2404) all_891_3_419 = all_811_2_354
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2404 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2405) all_891_3_419 = all_811_2_354
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2233,2394) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2406) all_906_3_431 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2406 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2407) all_906_3_431 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2313,2318) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2408) all_576_2_166 = all_566_2_158
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2408 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2409) all_576_2_166 = all_566_2_158
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2300,2324) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2410) all_901_3_427 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2410 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2411) all_901_3_427 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2234,2407) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2412) all_891_2_418 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2412 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2413) all_891_2_418 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2372,2368) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2414) all_896_3_423 = all_776_3_327
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2208,2368) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2415) all_896_3_423 = all_871_2_402
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2302,2411) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2416) all_866_3_399 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2416 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2417) all_866_3_399 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2304,2398) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2418) all_846_3_383 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2418 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2419) all_846_3_383 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2415,2414) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2420) all_871_2_402 = all_776_3_327
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2420 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2421) all_871_2_402 = all_776_3_327
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2235,2413) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2422) all_886_3_415 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2422 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2423) all_886_3_415 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2263,2405) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2424) all_881_3_411 = all_811_2_354
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2424 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2425) all_881_3_411 = all_811_2_354
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2289,2380) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2426) all_816_2_358 = all_332_3_67
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2287,2380) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2427) all_816_2_358 = all_511_3_115
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2292,2380) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2428) all_816_2_358 = all_327_3_63
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2291,2380) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2429) all_816_2_358 = all_327_2_62
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2236,2423) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2430) all_851_2_386 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2430 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2431) all_851_2_386 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2207,2370) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2432) all_876_3_407 = all_816_3_359
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2432 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2433) all_876_3_407 = all_816_3_359
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2274,2425) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2434) all_811_2_354 = all_796_2_342
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2266,2425) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2435) all_871_3_403 = all_811_2_354
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2435 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2436) all_871_3_403 = all_811_2_354
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2275,2425) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2437) all_811_2_354 = all_751_3_307
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2279,2268) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2438) all_846_2_382 = all_666_2_238
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2272,2268) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2439) all_846_2_382 = all_806_3_351
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2211,2433) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2440) all_831_3_371 = all_816_3_359
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2440 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2441) all_831_3_371 = all_816_3_359
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2209,2433) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2442) all_871_2_402 = all_816_3_359
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2442 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2443) all_871_2_402 = all_816_3_359
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2443,2421) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2444) all_816_3_359 = all_776_3_327
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2444 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2445) all_816_3_359 = all_776_3_327
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2264,2382) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2446) all_841_3_379 = 0
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2436,2382) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2447) all_841_3_379 = all_811_2_354
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2307,2417) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2448) all_831_2_370 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2448 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2449) all_831_2_370 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2311,2376) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2450) all_671_3_243 = all_561_3_155
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2450 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2451) all_671_3_243 = all_561_3_155
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2286,2267) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2452) all_851_3_387 = all_516_2_118
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2276,2267) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2453) all_851_3_387 = all_746_2_302
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2247,2255) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2454) all_716_2_278 = all_272_2_54
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2454 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2455) all_716_2_278 = all_272_2_54
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2237,2431) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2456) all_791_3_339 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2456 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2457) all_791_3_339 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2453,2452) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2458) all_746_2_302 = all_516_2_118
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2458 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2459) all_746_2_302 = all_516_2_118
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2439,2438) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2460) all_806_3_351 = all_666_2_238
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2460 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2461) all_806_3_351 = all_666_2_238
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2314,2419) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2462) all_576_2_166 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Simplifying 2462 yields:
% 70.79/30.37 | (2463) all_576_2_166 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.37 |
% 70.79/30.37 | Combining equations (2306,2403) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2464) all_836_3_375 = all_521_3_123
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2464 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2465) all_836_3_375 = all_521_3_123
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2447,2446) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2466) all_811_2_354 = 0
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2466 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2467) all_811_2_354 = 0
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2215,2374) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2468) all_771_3_323 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2468 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2469) all_771_3_323 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2315,2465) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2470) all_576_2_166 = all_521_3_123
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2470 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2471) all_576_2_166 = all_521_3_123
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2308,2449) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2472) all_826_3_367 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2472 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2473) all_826_3_367 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2224,2213) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2474) all_791_2_338 = all_601_3_187
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2225,2213) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2475) all_791_2_338 = all_416_2_90
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2222,2213) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2476) all_791_2_338 = all_606_3_191
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2221,2213) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2477) all_791_2_338 = all_611_2_194
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2441,2213) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2478) all_816_3_359 = all_791_2_338
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2478 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2479) all_816_3_359 = all_791_2_338
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2219,2213) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2480) all_791_2_338 = all_691_3_259
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2309,2473) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2481) all_821_2_362 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2481 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2482) all_821_2_362 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2310,2482) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2483) all_676_2_246 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2483 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2484) all_676_2_246 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2428,2427) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2485) all_511_3_115 = all_327_3_63
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2429,2427) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2486) all_511_3_115 = all_327_2_62
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2426,2427) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2487) all_511_3_115 = all_332_3_67
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2479,2445) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2488) all_791_2_338 = all_776_3_327
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2488 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2489) all_791_2_338 = all_776_3_327
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2437,2434) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2490) all_796_2_342 = all_751_3_307
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2467,2434) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2491) all_796_2_342 = 0
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2273,2461) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2492) all_801_3_347 = all_666_2_238
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2492 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2493) all_801_3_347 = all_666_2_238
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2277,2493) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2494) all_741_3_299 = all_666_2_238
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2494 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2495) all_741_3_299 = all_666_2_238
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2490,2491) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2496) all_751_3_307 = 0
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2496 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2497) all_751_3_307 = 0
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2476,2489) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2498) all_776_3_327 = all_606_3_191
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2475,2489) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2499) all_776_3_327 = all_416_2_90
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2474,2489) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2500) all_776_3_327 = all_601_3_187
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2477,2489) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2501) all_776_3_327 = all_611_2_194
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2480,2489) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2502) all_776_3_327 = all_691_3_259
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2238,2457) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2503) all_786_2_334 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2503 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2504) all_786_2_334 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2240,2504) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2505) all_766_3_319 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2505 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2506) all_766_3_319 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2242,2253) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2507) all_756_2_310 = all_636_2_214
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2507 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2508) all_756_2_310 = all_636_2_214
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2248,2253) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2509) all_716_2_278 = all_636_2_214
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2509 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2510) all_716_2_278 = all_636_2_214
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2239,2252) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2511) all_771_2_322 = all_641_3_219
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2511 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2512) all_771_2_322 = all_641_3_219
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2500,2502) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2513) all_691_3_259 = all_601_3_187
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2501,2502) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2514) all_691_3_259 = all_611_2_194
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2499,2502) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2515) all_691_3_259 = all_416_2_90
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2498,2502) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2516) all_691_3_259 = all_606_3_191
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2250,2512) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2517) all_646_2_222 = all_641_3_219
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2517 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2518) all_646_2_222 = all_641_3_219
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2249,2512) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2519) all_716_2_278 = all_641_3_219
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2519 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2520) all_716_2_278 = all_641_3_219
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2244,2512) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2521) all_731_3_291 = all_641_3_219
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2521 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2522) all_731_3_291 = all_641_3_219
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2216,2469) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2523) all_761_2_314 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Simplifying 2523 yields:
% 70.79/30.38 | (2524) all_761_2_314 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.38 |
% 70.79/30.38 | Combining equations (2241,2506) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2525) all_761_3_315 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2525 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2526) all_761_3_315 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2217,2524) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2527) all_726_2_286 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2527 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2528) all_726_2_286 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2243,2526) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2529) all_756_2_310 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2529 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2530) all_756_2_310 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2508,2530) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2531) all_636_2_214 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2531 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2532) all_636_2_214 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2278,2497) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2533) all_741_3_299 = 0
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2533 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2534) all_741_3_299 = 0
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2288,2280) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2535) all_661_3_235 = all_332_2_66
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2284,2280) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2536) all_661_3_235 = all_621_3_203
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2459,2280) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2537) all_661_3_235 = all_516_2_118
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2282,2495) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2538) all_666_2_238 = all_651_3_227
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2281,2495) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2539) all_666_2_238 = all_656_2_230
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2534,2495) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2540) all_666_2_238 = 0
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2245,2258) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2541) all_731_3_291 = all_252_3_51
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2541 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2542) all_731_3_291 = all_252_3_51
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2522,2542) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2543) all_641_3_219 = all_252_3_51
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2543 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2544) all_641_3_219 = all_252_3_51
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2218,2528) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2545) all_721_3_283 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2545 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2546) all_721_3_283 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2220,2546) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2547) all_616_2_198 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2547 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2548) all_616_2_198 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2401,2455) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2549) all_631_3_211 = all_272_2_54
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2549 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2550) all_631_3_211 = all_272_2_54
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2520,2455) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2551) all_641_3_219 = all_272_2_54
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2551 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2552) all_641_3_219 = all_272_2_54
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2510,2455) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2553) all_636_2_214 = all_272_2_54
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2553 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2554) all_636_2_214 = all_272_2_54
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2251,2257) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2555) all_646_2_222 = all_252_2_50
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2555 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2556) all_646_2_222 = all_252_2_50
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2226,2227) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2557) all_416_2_90 = all_416_3_91
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2557 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2558) all_416_2_90 = all_416_3_91
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2515,2514) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2559) all_611_2_194 = all_416_2_90
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2513,2514) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2560) all_611_2_194 = all_601_3_187
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2516,2514) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2561) all_611_2_194 = all_606_3_191
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2316,2484) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2562) all_571_3_163 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2562 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2563) all_571_3_163 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2332,2353) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2564) all_656_3_231 = all_546_2_142
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2564 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2565) all_656_3_231 = all_546_2_142
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2331,2352) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2566) all_661_2_234 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2566 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2567) all_661_2_234 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2317,2451) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2568) all_571_3_163 = all_561_3_155
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2568 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2569) all_571_3_163 = all_561_3_155
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2321,2451) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2570) all_561_3_155 = all_536_3_135
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2538,2539) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2571) all_656_2_230 = all_651_3_227
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2540,2539) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2572) all_656_2_230 = 0
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2365,2360) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2573) all_163_2_34 = all_93_2_26
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2362,2360) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2574) all_163_2_34 = all_98_2_30
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2356,2360) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2575) all_491_2_109 = all_163_2_34
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2575 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2576) all_491_2_109 = all_163_2_34
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2364,2360) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2577) all_163_2_34 = all_98_3_31
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2333,2567) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2578) all_651_2_226 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2578 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2579) all_651_2_226 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2536,2537) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2580) all_621_3_203 = all_516_2_118
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2580 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2581) all_621_3_203 = all_516_2_118
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2535,2537) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2582) all_516_2_118 = all_332_2_66
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2571,2572) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2583) all_651_3_227 = 0
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Simplifying 2583 yields:
% 70.79/30.39 | (2584) all_651_3_227 = 0
% 70.79/30.39 |
% 70.79/30.39 | Combining equations (2344,2565) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2585) all_581_2_170 = all_546_2_142
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2585 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2586) all_581_2_170 = all_546_2_142
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2334,2579) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2587) all_646_3_223 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2587 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2588) all_646_3_223 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2283,2584) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2589) all_626_2_206 = 0
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2589 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2590) all_626_2_206 = 0
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2518,2556) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2591) all_641_3_219 = all_252_2_50
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2591 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2592) all_641_3_219 = all_252_2_50
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2335,2588) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2593) all_636_3_215 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2593 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2594) all_636_3_215 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2336,2341) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2595) all_631_2_210 = all_596_3_183
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2595 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2596) all_631_2_210 = all_596_3_183
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2544,2592) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2597) all_252_2_50 = all_252_3_51
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2552,2592) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2598) all_272_2_54 = all_252_2_50
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2598 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2599) all_272_2_54 = all_252_2_50
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2554,2532) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2600) all_272_2_54 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2600 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2601) all_272_2_54 = all_272_3_55
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2338,2594) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2602) all_621_2_202 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2602 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2603) all_621_2_202 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2337,2596) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2604) all_626_3_207 = all_596_3_183
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2604 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2605) all_626_3_207 = all_596_3_183
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2550,2399) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2606) all_272_2_54 = 0
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2606 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2607) all_272_2_54 = 0
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2285,2590) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2608) all_621_3_203 = 0
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2608 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2609) all_621_3_203 = 0
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2354,2605) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2610) all_596_3_183 = all_531_3_131
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2347,2605) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2611) all_596_3_183 = all_566_3_159
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2340,2605) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2612) all_601_2_186 = all_596_3_183
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2612 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2613) all_601_2_186 = all_596_3_183
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2349,2605) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2614) all_596_3_183 = all_561_2_154
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2339,2603) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2615) all_606_2_190 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2615 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2616) all_606_2_190 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2581,2609) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2617) all_516_2_118 = 0
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2617 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2618) all_516_2_118 = 0
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2223,2548) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2619) all_606_3_191 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2619 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2620) all_606_3_191 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2363,2366) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2621) all_98_2_30 = all_93_3_27
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2621 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2622) all_98_2_30 = all_93_3_27
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2559,2560) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2623) all_601_3_187 = all_416_2_90
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2561,2560) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2624) all_606_3_191 = all_601_3_187
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2624 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2625) all_606_3_191 = all_601_3_187
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2348,2359) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2626) all_566_3_159 = all_486_3_106
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2626 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2627) all_566_3_159 = all_486_3_106
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2343,2342) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2628) all_591_2_178 = all_586_3_175
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2616,2342) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2629) all_591_2_178 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2625,2620) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2630) all_601_3_187 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2630 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2631) all_601_3_187 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2613,2351) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2632) all_596_3_183 = all_556_2_150
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2632 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2633) all_596_3_183 = all_556_2_150
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2623,2631) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2634) all_416_2_90 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2634 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2635) all_416_2_90 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2611,2633) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2636) all_566_3_159 = all_556_2_150
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2636 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2637) all_566_3_159 = all_556_2_150
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2614,2633) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2638) all_561_2_154 = all_556_2_150
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2638 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2639) all_561_2_154 = all_556_2_150
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2610,2633) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2640) all_556_2_150 = all_531_3_131
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2628,2629) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2641) all_586_3_175 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2641 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2642) all_586_3_175 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2345,2642) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2643) all_576_3_167 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Simplifying 2643 yields:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2644) all_576_3_167 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.40 |
% 70.79/30.40 | Combining equations (2346,2586) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.40 | (2645) all_571_2_162 = all_546_2_142
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2645 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2646) all_571_2_162 = all_546_2_142
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2312,2409) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2647) all_566_2_158 = 0
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2471,2409) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2648) all_566_2_158 = all_521_3_123
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2463,2409) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2649) all_566_2_158 = all_541_2_138
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2322,2409) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2650) all_566_2_158 = all_536_3_135
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2326,2409) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2651) all_566_2_158 = all_342_2_74
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2350,2644) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2652) all_561_2_154 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2652 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2653) all_561_2_154 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2357,2646) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2654) all_546_2_142 = all_491_2_109
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2361,2646) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2655) all_546_2_142 = all_163_3_35
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2569,2563) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2656) all_561_3_155 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2656 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2657) all_561_3_155 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2647,2649) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2658) all_541_2_138 = 0
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2648,2649) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2659) all_541_2_138 = all_521_3_123
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2651,2649) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2660) all_541_2_138 = all_342_2_74
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2650,2649) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2661) all_541_2_138 = all_536_3_135
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2637,2627) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2662) all_556_2_150 = all_486_3_106
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2662 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2663) all_556_2_150 = all_486_3_106
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2639,2653) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2664) all_556_2_150 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2664 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2665) all_556_2_150 = all_551_3_147
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2570,2657) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2666) all_536_3_135 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2666 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2667) all_536_3_135 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2640,2665) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2668) all_551_3_147 = all_531_3_131
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2663,2665) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2669) all_551_3_147 = all_486_3_106
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2668,2669) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2670) all_531_3_131 = all_486_3_106
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2670 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2671) all_531_3_131 = all_486_3_106
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2654,2655) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2672) all_491_2_109 = all_163_3_35
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2672 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2673) all_491_2_109 = all_163_3_35
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2658,2659) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2674) all_521_3_123 = 0
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2661,2659) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2675) all_536_3_135 = all_521_3_123
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2675 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2676) all_536_3_135 = all_521_3_123
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2660,2659) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2677) all_521_3_123 = all_342_2_74
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2676,2667) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2678) all_521_3_123 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2678 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2679) all_521_3_123 = all_377_2_78
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2355,2671) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2680) all_505_0_111 = all_486_3_106
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2680 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2681) all_505_0_111 = all_486_3_106
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2325,2329) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2682) all_377_3_79 = all_337_2_70
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2682 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2683) all_377_3_79 = all_337_2_70
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2674,2679) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2684) all_377_2_78 = 0
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2677,2679) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2685) all_377_2_78 = all_342_2_74
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2582,2618) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2686) all_332_2_66 = 0
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2686 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2687) all_332_2_66 = 0
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2485,2486) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2688) all_327_2_62 = all_327_3_63
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2487,2486) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2689) all_332_3_67 = all_327_2_62
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2689 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2690) all_332_3_67 = all_327_2_62
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2358,2681) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2691) all_491_2_109 = all_486_3_106
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2691 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2692) all_491_2_109 = all_486_3_106
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2576,2692) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2693) all_486_3_106 = all_163_2_34
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2673,2692) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2694) all_486_3_106 = all_163_3_35
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2693,2694) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2695) all_163_2_34 = all_163_3_35
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2695 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2696) all_163_2_34 = all_163_3_35
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2229,2558) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2697) all_416_3_91 = all_244_2_46
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2635,2558) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2698) all_416_3_91 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2697,2698) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2699) all_244_2_46 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2699 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2700) all_244_2_46 = all_244_3_47
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2685,2684) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2701) all_342_2_74 = 0
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Simplifying 2701 yields:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2702) all_342_2_74 = 0
% 70.79/30.41 |
% 70.79/30.41 | Combining equations (2327,2683) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.41 | (2703) all_342_3_75 = all_337_2_70
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Simplifying 2703 yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2704) all_342_3_75 = all_337_2_70
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2328,2702) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2705) all_342_3_75 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Simplifying 2705 yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2706) all_342_3_75 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2706,2704) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2707) all_337_2_70 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2330,2704) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2708) all_337_2_70 = all_337_3_71
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2707,2708) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2709) all_337_3_71 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2290,2687) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2710) all_332_3_67 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Simplifying 2710 yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2711) all_332_3_67 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2690,2711) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2712) all_327_2_62 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Simplifying 2712 yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2713) all_327_2_62 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2688,2713) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2714) all_327_3_63 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Simplifying 2714 yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2715) all_327_3_63 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2715,2293) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2716) all_295_2_58 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2294,2293) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2717) all_295_2_58 = all_295_3_59
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2716,2717) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2718) all_295_3_59 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2599,2601) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2719) all_272_3_55 = all_252_2_50
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2607,2601) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2720) all_272_3_55 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2719,2720) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2721) all_252_2_50 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Simplifying 2721 yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2722) all_252_2_50 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2597,2722) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2723) all_252_3_51 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Simplifying 2723 yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2724) all_252_3_51 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2700,2228) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2725) all_244_3_47 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Simplifying 2725 yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2726) all_244_3_47 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2574,2696) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2727) all_163_3_35 = all_98_2_30
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2573,2696) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2728) all_163_3_35 = all_93_2_26
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2577,2696) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2729) all_163_3_35 = all_98_3_31
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2727,2729) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2730) all_98_2_30 = all_98_3_31
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Simplifying 2730 yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2731) all_98_2_30 = all_98_3_31
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2728,2729) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2732) all_98_3_31 = all_93_2_26
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2731,2622) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2733) all_98_3_31 = all_93_3_27
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Simplifying 2733 yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2734) all_98_3_31 = all_93_3_27
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2732,2734) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2735) all_93_2_26 = all_93_3_27
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Simplifying 2735 yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2736) all_93_2_26 = all_93_3_27
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2734,2729) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2737) all_163_3_35 = all_93_3_27
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2737,2694) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2738) all_486_3_106 = all_93_3_27
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Combining equations (2738,2681) yields a new equation:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2739) all_505_0_111 = all_93_3_27
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Equations (2739) can reduce 1105 to:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2740) ~ (all_93_3_27 = 0)
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | From (2726) and (684) follows:
% 70.79/30.42 | (164) leq(n0, n4) = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | From (2724) and (703) follows:
% 70.79/30.42 | (167) leq(n0, n3) = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | From (2718) and (792) follows:
% 70.79/30.42 | (170) leq(n0, n2) = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | From (2709) and (886) follows:
% 70.79/30.42 | (172) leq(n0, n1) = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | From (2736) and (386) follows:
% 70.79/30.42 | (388) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_3_27
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Instantiating formula (61) with all_93_3_27, tptp_minus_1, n0, n0 and discharging atoms pred(n0) = tptp_minus_1, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_3_27, yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2746) all_93_3_27 = 0 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & gt(n0, n0) = v0)
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Instantiating formula (52) with all_93_3_27, tptp_minus_1, pv5, n0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, pv5) = 0, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_3_27, yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2747) all_93_3_27 = 0 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(pv5, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Instantiating formula (52) with all_93_3_27, tptp_minus_1, n4, n0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n4) = 0, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_3_27, yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2748) all_93_3_27 = 0 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n4, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Instantiating formula (52) with all_93_3_27, tptp_minus_1, n3, n0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n3) = 0, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_3_27, yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2749) all_93_3_27 = 0 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n3, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Instantiating formula (52) with all_93_3_27, tptp_minus_1, n2, n0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = 0, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_3_27, yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2750) all_93_3_27 = 0 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n2, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Instantiating formula (52) with all_93_3_27, tptp_minus_1, n1, n0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = 0, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_3_27, yields:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2751) all_93_3_27 = 0 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n1, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2748), into two cases.
% 70.79/30.42 |-Branch one:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2752) all_93_3_27 = 0
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 | Equations (2752) can reduce 2740 to:
% 70.79/30.42 | (1049) $false
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.79/30.42 |-Branch two:
% 70.79/30.42 | (2740) ~ (all_93_3_27 = 0)
% 70.79/30.42 | (2755) ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n4, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 70.79/30.42 |
% 70.79/30.42 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2749), into two cases.
% 70.79/30.42 |-Branch one:
% 70.79/30.43 | (2752) all_93_3_27 = 0
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 | Equations (2752) can reduce 2740 to:
% 70.79/30.43 | (1049) $false
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.79/30.43 |-Branch two:
% 70.79/30.43 | (2740) ~ (all_93_3_27 = 0)
% 70.79/30.43 | (2759) ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n3, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2750), into two cases.
% 70.79/30.43 |-Branch one:
% 70.79/30.43 | (2752) all_93_3_27 = 0
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 | Equations (2752) can reduce 2740 to:
% 70.79/30.43 | (1049) $false
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.79/30.43 |-Branch two:
% 70.79/30.43 | (2740) ~ (all_93_3_27 = 0)
% 70.79/30.43 | (2763) ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n2, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2751), into two cases.
% 70.79/30.43 |-Branch one:
% 70.79/30.43 | (2752) all_93_3_27 = 0
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 | Equations (2752) can reduce 2740 to:
% 70.79/30.43 | (1049) $false
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.79/30.43 |-Branch two:
% 70.79/30.43 | (2740) ~ (all_93_3_27 = 0)
% 70.79/30.43 | (2767) ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n1, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2746), into two cases.
% 70.79/30.43 |-Branch one:
% 70.79/30.43 | (2752) all_93_3_27 = 0
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 | Equations (2752) can reduce 2740 to:
% 70.79/30.43 | (1049) $false
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.79/30.43 |-Branch two:
% 70.79/30.43 | (2740) ~ (all_93_3_27 = 0)
% 70.79/30.43 | (2771) ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & gt(n0, n0) = v0)
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2747), into two cases.
% 70.79/30.43 |-Branch one:
% 70.79/30.43 | (2752) all_93_3_27 = 0
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 | Equations (2752) can reduce 2740 to:
% 70.79/30.43 | (1049) $false
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 70.79/30.43 |-Branch two:
% 70.79/30.43 | (2740) ~ (all_93_3_27 = 0)
% 70.79/30.43 | (2775) ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(pv5, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (73), into two cases.
% 70.79/30.43 |-Branch one:
% 70.79/30.43 | (2776) (all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0)
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2776), into two cases.
% 70.79/30.43 |-Branch one:
% 70.79/30.43 | (2777) (all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0)
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2777), into two cases.
% 70.79/30.43 |-Branch one:
% 70.79/30.43 | (2778) all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 70.79/30.43 |
% 70.79/30.43 | Applying alpha-rule on (2778) yields:
% 70.79/30.43 | (2779) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1
% 71.12/30.43 | (2780) leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 71.12/30.43 | (2781) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0
% 71.12/30.43 | (2782) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 71.12/30.43 | (2783) all_0_2_2 = 0
% 71.12/30.43 | (2784) leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 71.12/30.43 | (2785) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 71.12/30.43 | (2786) all_0_5_5 = 0
% 71.12/30.43 | (2787) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 71.12/30.43 | (2788) ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1)
% 71.12/30.43 | (2789) leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 71.12/30.43 |
% 71.12/30.43 | From (173) and (2784) follows:
% 71.12/30.43 | (2790) leq(all_0_6_6, n5) = 0
% 71.12/30.43 |
% 71.12/30.43 | From (173) and (2789) follows:
% 71.12/30.43 | (2791) leq(all_0_7_7, n5) = 0
% 71.12/30.43 |
% 71.12/30.43 | Instantiating formula (89) with all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 yields:
% 71.12/30.43 | (2792) ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v2 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 71.12/30.43 |
% 71.12/30.43 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2792), into two cases.
% 71.12/30.43 |-Branch one:
% 71.12/30.43 | (2793) ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 71.12/30.43 |
% 71.12/30.43 | From (173) and (2793) follows:
% 71.12/30.43 | (2794) ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, n5) = 0)
% 71.12/30.43 |
% 71.12/30.43 | Using (2790) and (2794) yields:
% 71.12/30.43 | (296) $false
% 71.12/30.43 |
% 71.12/30.43 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.43 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.43 | (2784) leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 71.12/30.43 | (2797) ~ (leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v2 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 71.12/30.43 |
% 71.12/30.43 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2797), into two cases.
% 71.12/30.43 |-Branch one:
% 71.12/30.43 | (2798) ~ (leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 71.12/30.43 |
% 71.12/30.43 | From (173) and (2798) follows:
% 71.12/30.43 | (2799) ~ (leq(all_0_7_7, n5) = 0)
% 71.12/30.43 |
% 71.12/30.43 | Using (2791) and (2799) yields:
% 71.12/30.43 | (296) $false
% 71.12/30.43 |
% 71.12/30.43 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.43 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.43 | (2789) leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 71.12/30.43 | (2802) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v3 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v2 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | Instantiating (2802) with all_3848_0_510, all_3848_1_511, all_3848_2_512, all_3848_3_513 yields:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2803) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_0_510 & a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_1_511 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_2_512 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_3_513 & ( ~ (all_3848_2_512 = 0) | ~ (all_3848_3_513 = 0) | all_3848_0_510 = all_3848_1_511)
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | Applying alpha-rule on (2803) yields:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2804) leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_3_513
% 71.12/30.44 | (2805) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_0_510
% 71.12/30.44 | (2806) a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_1_511
% 71.12/30.44 | (2807) ~ (all_3848_2_512 = 0) | ~ (all_3848_3_513 = 0) | all_3848_0_510 = all_3848_1_511
% 71.12/30.44 | (2808) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_2_512
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | Instantiating formula (64) with pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_3848_0_510, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_0_510, a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2809) all_3848_0_510 = all_0_0_0
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | Instantiating formula (64) with pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_3848_1_511, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_1_511, a_select3(pminus_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2810) all_3848_1_511 = all_0_1_1
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, all_0_6_6, all_3848_2_512, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_2_512, leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2811) all_3848_2_512 = 0
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, all_0_7_7, all_3848_3_513, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_3_513, leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0, yields:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2812) all_3848_3_513 = 0
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2807), into two cases.
% 71.12/30.44 |-Branch one:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2813) ~ (all_3848_2_512 = 0)
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | Equations (2811) can reduce 2813 to:
% 71.12/30.44 | (1049) $false
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.44 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2811) all_3848_2_512 = 0
% 71.12/30.44 | (2816) ~ (all_3848_3_513 = 0) | all_3848_0_510 = all_3848_1_511
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2816), into two cases.
% 71.12/30.44 |-Branch one:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2817) ~ (all_3848_3_513 = 0)
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | Equations (2812) can reduce 2817 to:
% 71.12/30.44 | (1049) $false
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.44 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2812) all_3848_3_513 = 0
% 71.12/30.44 | (2820) all_3848_0_510 = all_3848_1_511
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | Combining equations (2820,2809) yields a new equation:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2821) all_3848_1_511 = all_0_0_0
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | Simplifying 2821 yields:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2822) all_3848_1_511 = all_0_0_0
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | Combining equations (2822,2810) yields a new equation:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2823) all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | Simplifying 2823 yields:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2824) all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | Equations (2824) can reduce 2788 to:
% 71.12/30.44 | (1049) $false
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.44 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2826) all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | Applying alpha-rule on (2826) yields:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2780) leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 71.12/30.44 | (2782) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 71.12/30.44 | (2783) all_0_2_2 = 0
% 71.12/30.44 | (2830) leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.12/30.44 | (2785) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 71.12/30.44 | (2832) leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.12/30.44 | (2786) all_0_5_5 = 0
% 71.12/30.44 | (2787) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 71.12/30.44 | (2788) ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1)
% 71.12/30.44 | (2836) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0
% 71.12/30.44 | (2837) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | From (174) and (2832) follows:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2838) leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | From (174) and (2830) follows:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2839) leq(all_0_7_7, n2) = 0
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | Instantiating formula (71) with all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 yields:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2840) ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ~ (leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v2 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2840), into two cases.
% 71.12/30.44 |-Branch one:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2841) ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | From (174) and (2841) follows:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2842) ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0)
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | Using (2838) and (2842) yields:
% 71.12/30.44 | (296) $false
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.44 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2832) leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.12/30.44 | (2845) ~ (leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v2 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2845), into two cases.
% 71.12/30.44 |-Branch one:
% 71.12/30.44 | (2846) ~ (leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 71.12/30.44 |
% 71.12/30.44 | From (174) and (2846) follows:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2847) ~ (leq(all_0_7_7, n2) = 0)
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Using (2839) and (2847) yields:
% 71.12/30.45 | (296) $false
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.45 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2830) leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.12/30.45 | (2850) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v3 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v2 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Instantiating (2850) with all_3848_0_514, all_3848_1_515, all_3848_2_516, all_3848_3_517 yields:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2851) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_0_514 & a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_1_515 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_2_516 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_3_517 & ( ~ (all_3848_2_516 = 0) | ~ (all_3848_3_517 = 0) | all_3848_0_514 = all_3848_1_515)
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Applying alpha-rule on (2851) yields:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2852) leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_3_517
% 71.12/30.45 | (2853) ~ (all_3848_2_516 = 0) | ~ (all_3848_3_517 = 0) | all_3848_0_514 = all_3848_1_515
% 71.12/30.45 | (2854) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_0_514
% 71.12/30.45 | (2855) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_2_516
% 71.12/30.45 | (2856) a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_1_515
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Instantiating formula (64) with r_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_3848_0_514, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_0_514, a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2857) all_3848_0_514 = all_0_0_0
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Instantiating formula (64) with r_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_3848_1_515, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_1_515, a_select3(r_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2858) all_3848_1_515 = all_0_1_1
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, all_0_6_6, all_3848_2_516, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_2_516, leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2859) all_3848_2_516 = 0
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, all_0_7_7, all_3848_3_517, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_3_517, leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0, yields:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2860) all_3848_3_517 = 0
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2853), into two cases.
% 71.12/30.45 |-Branch one:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2861) ~ (all_3848_2_516 = 0)
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Equations (2859) can reduce 2861 to:
% 71.12/30.45 | (1049) $false
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.45 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2859) all_3848_2_516 = 0
% 71.12/30.45 | (2864) ~ (all_3848_3_517 = 0) | all_3848_0_514 = all_3848_1_515
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2864), into two cases.
% 71.12/30.45 |-Branch one:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2865) ~ (all_3848_3_517 = 0)
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Equations (2860) can reduce 2865 to:
% 71.12/30.45 | (1049) $false
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.45 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2860) all_3848_3_517 = 0
% 71.12/30.45 | (2868) all_3848_0_514 = all_3848_1_515
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Combining equations (2868,2857) yields a new equation:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2869) all_3848_1_515 = all_0_0_0
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Simplifying 2869 yields:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2870) all_3848_1_515 = all_0_0_0
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Combining equations (2870,2858) yields a new equation:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2823) all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Simplifying 2823 yields:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2824) all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Equations (2824) can reduce 2788 to:
% 71.12/30.45 | (1049) $false
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.45 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2874) all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Applying alpha-rule on (2874) yields:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2780) leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 71.12/30.45 | (2782) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 71.12/30.45 | (2783) all_0_2_2 = 0
% 71.12/30.45 | (2784) leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 71.12/30.45 | (2785) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 71.12/30.45 | (2786) all_0_5_5 = 0
% 71.12/30.45 | (2881) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0
% 71.12/30.45 | (2787) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 71.12/30.45 | (2788) ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1)
% 71.12/30.45 | (2789) leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 71.12/30.45 | (2885) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | From (173) and (2784) follows:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2790) leq(all_0_6_6, n5) = 0
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | From (173) and (2789) follows:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2791) leq(all_0_7_7, n5) = 0
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Instantiating formula (132) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 yields:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2888) ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v3 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | Instantiating formula (132) with all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 yields:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2889) ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ~ (leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v2 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2888), into two cases.
% 71.12/30.45 |-Branch one:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2793) ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.45 | From (173) and (2793) follows:
% 71.12/30.45 | (2794) ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, n5) = 0)
% 71.12/30.45 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Using (2790) and (2794) yields:
% 71.12/30.46 | (296) $false
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.46 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2784) leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 71.12/30.46 | (2894) ~ (leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v2 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v3 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | From (173) and (2784) follows:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2790) leq(all_0_6_6, n5) = 0
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2889), into two cases.
% 71.12/30.46 |-Branch one:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2793) ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | From (173) and (2793) follows:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2794) ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, n5) = 0)
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Using (2790) and (2794) yields:
% 71.12/30.46 | (296) $false
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.46 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2784) leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 71.12/30.46 | (2900) ~ (leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0) | ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v2 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2900), into two cases.
% 71.12/30.46 |-Branch one:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2798) ~ (leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | From (173) and (2798) follows:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2799) ~ (leq(all_0_7_7, n5) = 0)
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Using (2791) and (2799) yields:
% 71.12/30.46 | (296) $false
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.46 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2789) leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 71.12/30.46 | (2905) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : ? [v3] : (a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v3 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v2 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = v2))
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Instantiating (2905) with all_3848_0_522, all_3848_1_523, all_3848_2_524, all_3848_3_525 yields:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2906) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_0_522 & a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_1_523 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_2_524 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_3_525 & ( ~ (all_3848_2_524 = 0) | ~ (all_3848_3_525 = 0) | all_3848_0_522 = all_3848_1_523)
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Applying alpha-rule on (2906) yields:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2907) leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_3_525
% 71.12/30.46 | (2908) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_1_523
% 71.12/30.46 | (2909) ~ (all_3848_2_524 = 0) | ~ (all_3848_3_525 = 0) | all_3848_0_522 = all_3848_1_523
% 71.12/30.46 | (2910) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_2_524
% 71.12/30.46 | (2911) a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_0_522
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Instantiating formula (64) with q_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_3848_0_522, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_0_522, a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2912) all_3848_0_522 = all_0_0_0
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Instantiating formula (64) with q_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_3848_1_523, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_1_523, a_select3(q_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2913) all_3848_1_523 = all_0_1_1
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, all_0_6_6, all_3848_2_524, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_3848_2_524, leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2914) all_3848_2_524 = 0
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Instantiating formula (48) with n0, all_0_7_7, all_3848_3_525, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = all_3848_3_525, leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0, yields:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2915) all_3848_3_525 = 0
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2909), into two cases.
% 71.12/30.46 |-Branch one:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2916) ~ (all_3848_2_524 = 0)
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Equations (2914) can reduce 2916 to:
% 71.12/30.46 | (1049) $false
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.46 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2914) all_3848_2_524 = 0
% 71.12/30.46 | (2919) ~ (all_3848_3_525 = 0) | all_3848_0_522 = all_3848_1_523
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2919), into two cases.
% 71.12/30.46 |-Branch one:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2920) ~ (all_3848_3_525 = 0)
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Equations (2915) can reduce 2920 to:
% 71.12/30.46 | (1049) $false
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.46 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2915) all_3848_3_525 = 0
% 71.12/30.46 | (2923) all_3848_0_522 = all_3848_1_523
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Combining equations (2923,2912) yields a new equation:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2924) all_3848_1_523 = all_0_0_0
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Simplifying 2924 yields:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2925) all_3848_1_523 = all_0_0_0
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Combining equations (2925,2913) yields a new equation:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2823) all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Simplifying 2823 yields:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2824) all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Equations (2824) can reduce 2788 to:
% 71.12/30.46 | (1049) $false
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.46 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2929) all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 & all_0_6_6 = 0 & ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1) & a_select3(id_ds1_filter, all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0 & a_select3(id_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1 & leq(all_0_4_4, all_0_10_10) = 0 & leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_4_4) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 71.12/30.46 |
% 71.12/30.46 | Applying alpha-rule on (2929) yields:
% 71.12/30.46 | (2780) leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 71.12/30.46 | (2931) all_0_6_6 = 0
% 71.12/30.46 | (2782) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 71.12/30.46 | (2933) leq(n0, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 71.12/30.47 | (2783) all_0_2_2 = 0
% 71.12/30.47 | (2786) all_0_5_5 = 0
% 71.12/30.47 | (2936) a_select3(id_ds1_filter, all_0_7_7, all_0_4_4) = all_0_1_1
% 71.12/30.47 | (2937) leq(all_0_4_4, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 71.12/30.47 | (2788) ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_1_1)
% 71.12/30.47 | (2939) leq(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 71.12/30.47 | (2940) a_select3(id_ds1_filter, all_0_4_4, all_0_7_7) = all_0_0_0
% 71.12/30.47 |
% 71.12/30.47 | From (175) and (2939) follows:
% 71.12/30.47 | (2941) leq(all_0_7_7, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 71.12/30.47 |
% 71.12/30.47 | Instantiating formula (52) with all_93_3_27, tptp_minus_1, all_0_7_7, n0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_7_7) = 0, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_93_3_27, yields:
% 71.12/30.47 | (2942) all_93_3_27 = 0 | ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(all_0_7_7, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 71.12/30.47 |
% 71.12/30.47 +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2942), into two cases.
% 71.12/30.47 |-Branch one:
% 71.12/30.47 | (2752) all_93_3_27 = 0
% 71.12/30.47 |
% 71.12/30.47 | Equations (2752) can reduce 2740 to:
% 71.12/30.47 | (1049) $false
% 71.12/30.47 |
% 71.12/30.47 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.47 |-Branch two:
% 71.12/30.47 | (2740) ~ (all_93_3_27 = 0)
% 71.12/30.47 | (2946) ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(all_0_7_7, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 71.12/30.47 |
% 71.12/30.47 | Instantiating (2946) with all_3892_0_532 yields:
% 71.12/30.47 | (2947) ~ (all_3892_0_532 = 0) & leq(all_0_7_7, tptp_minus_1) = all_3892_0_532
% 71.12/30.47 |
% 71.12/30.47 | Applying alpha-rule on (2947) yields:
% 71.12/30.47 | (2948) ~ (all_3892_0_532 = 0)
% 71.12/30.47 | (2949) leq(all_0_7_7, tptp_minus_1) = all_3892_0_532
% 71.12/30.47 |
% 71.12/30.47 | Instantiating formula (48) with all_0_7_7, tptp_minus_1, all_3892_0_532, 0 and discharging atoms leq(all_0_7_7, tptp_minus_1) = all_3892_0_532, leq(all_0_7_7, tptp_minus_1) = 0, yields:
% 71.12/30.47 | (2950) all_3892_0_532 = 0
% 71.12/30.47 |
% 71.12/30.47 | Equations (2950) can reduce 2948 to:
% 71.12/30.47 | (1049) $false
% 71.12/30.47 |
% 71.12/30.47 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.12/30.47 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 71.12/30.48
% 71.12/30.48 29869ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------