TSTP Solution File: SWV107+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWV107+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May  1 04:02:33 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.60s 0.81s
% Output   : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   44 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (   4   ~;   0   |;  22   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f221,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f146,f144]) ).

fof(f144,plain,
    ~ true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f106]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    ( ~ true
    & geq(minus(n999,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n3,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n999,n1),n0)
    & geq(n2,n0)
    & geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n3,n1),n0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f105]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ( ~ true
    & geq(minus(n999,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n3,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n999,n1),n0)
    & geq(n2,n0)
    & geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n3,n1),n0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( geq(minus(n3,n1),n0)
     => ( geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
       => ( ( geq(minus(n999,n1),n0)
            & geq(n2,n0) )
         => ( geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
           => ( geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
             => ( geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
               => ( ( geq(minus(n999,n1),n0)
                    & geq(minus(n3,n1),n0) )
                 => true ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    ( geq(minus(n3,n1),n0)
   => ( geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
     => ( ( geq(minus(n999,n1),n0)
          & geq(n2,n0) )
       => ( geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
         => ( geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
           => ( geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
             => ( ( geq(minus(n999,n1),n0)
                  & geq(minus(n3,n1),n0) )
               => true ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4iMXWm84HJ/Vampire---4.8_14983',quaternion_ds1_inuse_0019) ).

fof(f146,plain,
    true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

fof(f51,axiom,
    true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4iMXWm84HJ/Vampire---4.8_14983',ttrue) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SWV107+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 18:51:34 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.15/0.35  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4iMXWm84HJ/Vampire---4.8_14983
% 0.60/0.81  % (15198)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.60/0.81  % (15203)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.60/0.81  % (15196)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.81  % (15198)First to succeed.
% 0.60/0.81  % (15199)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.60/0.81  % (15197)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.60/0.81  % (15200)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.81  % (15201)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.60/0.81  % (15203)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.81  % (15202)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.60/0.81  % (15198)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.60/0.81  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.60/0.81  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.81  % (15198)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.81  % (15198)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.60/0.81  % (15198)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.60/0.81  
% 0.60/0.81  % (15198)Memory used [KB]: 1083
% 0.60/0.81  % (15198)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.60/0.81  % (15198)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.60/0.81  % (15198)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.81  % (15198)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.81  % (15186)Success in time 0.441 s
% 0.60/0.81  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------