TSTP Solution File: SWV107+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SWV107+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:55:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   44 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (   4   ~;   0   |;  22   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f444,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f258,f350]) ).

fof(f350,plain,
    ~ true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f153]) ).

fof(f153,plain,
    ( geq(minus(n999,n1),n0)
    & ~ true
    & geq(minus(n3,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n999,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n3,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
    & geq(n2,n0)
    & geq(minus(n6,n1),n0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f152]) ).

fof(f152,plain,
    ( ~ true
    & geq(minus(n999,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n3,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
    & geq(n2,n0)
    & geq(minus(n999,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
    & geq(minus(n3,n1),n0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( geq(minus(n3,n1),n0)
     => ( geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
       => ( ( geq(n2,n0)
            & geq(minus(n999,n1),n0) )
         => ( geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
           => ( geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
             => ( geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
               => ( ( geq(minus(n999,n1),n0)
                    & geq(minus(n3,n1),n0) )
                 => true ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    ( geq(minus(n3,n1),n0)
   => ( geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
     => ( ( geq(n2,n0)
          & geq(minus(n999,n1),n0) )
       => ( geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
         => ( geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
           => ( geq(minus(n6,n1),n0)
             => ( ( geq(minus(n999,n1),n0)
                  & geq(minus(n3,n1),n0) )
               => true ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quaternion_ds1_inuse_0019) ).

fof(f258,plain,
    true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

fof(f51,axiom,
    true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ttrue) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SWV107+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 19:12:51 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.50  % (13513)ott-1_1:6_av=off:cond=on:fsr=off:nwc=3.0:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (13529)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=500:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/500Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (13531)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=177:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/177Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (13518)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (13510)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (13508)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (13521)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:i=59:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/59Mi)
% 0.20/0.52  % (13515)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.20/0.52  % (13516)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.20/0.52  % (13514)ott+2_1:1_fsr=off:gsp=on:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.20/0.52  % (13531)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.52  % (13531)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52  % (13531)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  % (13531)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.52  % (13531)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.52  % (13531)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  % (13531)Memory used [KB]: 1279
% 0.20/0.52  % (13531)Time elapsed: 0.014 s
% 0.20/0.52  % (13531)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.20/0.52  % (13531)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  % (13531)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52  % (13503)Success in time 0.168 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------