TSTP Solution File: SWV106+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWV106+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:15:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.25s 1.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   26 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   55 (   3   ~;   0   |;  35   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;  14 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn  18   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(quaternion_ds1_inuse_0018,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [X14] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X14)
            & leq(X14,minus(m_measvars,n1)) )
         => a_select2(rho_defuse,X14) = use )
      & ! [X18] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X18)
            & leq(X18,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
         => a_select2(sigma_defuse,X18) = use )
      & ! [X4,X20] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X4)
            & leq(n0,X20)
            & leq(X4,n2)
            & leq(X20,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
         => a_select3(u_defuse,X4,X20) = use )
      & ! [X21] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X21)
            & leq(X21,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
         => a_select2(xinit_defuse,X21) = use )
      & ! [X22] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X22)
            & leq(X22,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
         => a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X22) = use )
      & ! [X28] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X28)
            & leq(X28,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
         => a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,X28) = use )
      & ! [X29,X5] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X29)
            & leq(n0,X5)
            & leq(X29,minus(m_measvars,n1))
            & leq(X5,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
         => a_select3(z_defuse,X29,X5) = use ) )
   => true ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',quaternion_ds1_inuse_0018) ).

fof(ttrue,axiom,
    true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',ttrue) ).

fof(c_0_2,plain,
    ( epred1_0
  <=> ( ! [X14] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X14)
            & leq(X14,minus(m_measvars,n1)) )
         => a_select2(rho_defuse,X14) = use )
      & ! [X18] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X18)
            & leq(X18,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
         => a_select2(sigma_defuse,X18) = use )
      & ! [X4,X20] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X4)
            & leq(n0,X20)
            & leq(X4,n2)
            & leq(X20,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
         => a_select3(u_defuse,X4,X20) = use )
      & ! [X21] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X21)
            & leq(X21,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
         => a_select2(xinit_defuse,X21) = use )
      & ! [X22] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X22)
            & leq(X22,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
         => a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,X22) = use )
      & ! [X28] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X28)
            & leq(X28,minus(n_statevars,n1)) )
         => a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,X28) = use )
      & ! [X29,X5] :
          ( ( leq(n0,X29)
            & leq(n0,X5)
            & leq(X29,minus(m_measvars,n1))
            & leq(X5,minus(n_steps,n1)) )
         => a_select3(z_defuse,X29,X5) = use ) ) ),
    introduced(definition) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( epred1_0
     => true ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[quaternion_ds1_inuse_0018]),c_0_2]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred1_0
    & ~ true ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    true,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ttrue]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ true,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV106+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 20:07:13 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.25/1.43  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.43  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.43  # Preprocessing time       : 0.018 s
% 0.25/1.43  
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.43  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.43  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object total steps             : 8
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object clause steps            : 3
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object formula steps           : 5
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 2
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 2
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object generating inferences   : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 1
% 0.25/1.43  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 85
% 0.25/1.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 23
% 0.25/1.43  # Initial clauses                      : 73
% 0.25/1.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.25/1.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 71
% 0.25/1.43  # Processed clauses                    : 2
% 0.25/1.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1
% 0.25/1.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1
% 0.25/1.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.25/1.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.25/1.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 69
% 0.25/1.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 139
% 0.25/1.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.25/1.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 4014
% 0.25/1.43  
% 0.25/1.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.43  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.25/1.43  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.25/1.43  # Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.25/1.43  # Maximum resident set size: 2940 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------