TSTP Solution File: SWV092+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV092+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:15 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.97s 1.14s
% Output   : Refutation 0.97s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV092+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 21:03:16 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.97/1.14  
% 0.97/1.14  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.97/1.14  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.97/1.14  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.97/1.14  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.97/1.14  SPASS derived 2745 clauses, backtracked 244 clauses, performed 4 splits and kept 1451 clauses.
% 0.97/1.14  SPASS allocated 88407 KBytes.
% 0.97/1.14  SPASS spent	0:00:00.78 on the problem.
% 0.97/1.14  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.97/1.14  		0:00:00.09 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.97/1.14  		0:00:00.02 for inferences.
% 0.97/1.14  		0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 0.97/1.14  		0:00:00.49 for the reduction.
% 0.97/1.14  
% 0.97/1.14  
% 0.97/1.14  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 70 :
% 0.97/1.14  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.97/1.14  25[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(succ(n0),n1)**.
% 0.97/1.14  26[0:Inp] || gt(u,u)* -> .
% 0.97/1.14  27[0:Inp] ||  -> gt(succ(u),u)*l.
% 0.97/1.14  28[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(succ(tptp_minus_1),n0)**.
% 0.97/1.14  30[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(skc2,minus(n0,n1))*r.
% 0.97/1.14  31[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(rho_defuse,n0),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  32[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(rho_defuse,n1),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  33[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(rho_defuse,n2),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  34[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(sigma_defuse,n0),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  35[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(sigma_defuse,n1),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  36[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(sigma_defuse,n2),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  37[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(sigma_defuse,n3),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  38[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(sigma_defuse,n4),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  39[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(sigma_defuse,n5),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  40[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_defuse,n3),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  41[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_defuse,n4),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  42[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_defuse,n5),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  43[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n0),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  44[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n1),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  45[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n2),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  46[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n3),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  47[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n4),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  48[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n5),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  49[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n0),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  50[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n1),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  51[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n2),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  52[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n3),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  53[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n4),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  54[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n5),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  72[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(pred(succ(u)),u)**.
% 0.97/1.14  73[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(succ(pred(u)),u)**.
% 0.97/1.14  74[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select3(u_defuse,n0,n0),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  75[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select3(u_defuse,n1,n0),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  76[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(a_select3(u_defuse,n2,n0),use)**.
% 0.97/1.14  82[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(minus(u,n1),pred(u))**.
% 0.97/1.14  98[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)*+ -> gt(succ(v),u)*.
% 0.97/1.14  118[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)* -> gt(v,u) equal(u,v).
% 0.97/1.14  123[0:Inp] || gt(u,v)* gt(v,w)* -> gt(u,w)*.
% 0.97/1.14  128[0:Inp] || leq(u,n1)* leq(n0,u) -> equal(u,n1) equal(u,n0).
% 0.97/1.14  163[0:Inp] || equal(a_select2(rho_defuse,n0),use) equal(a_select2(rho_defuse,n1),use) equal(a_select2(rho_defuse,n2),use) equal(a_select2(sigma_defuse,n0),use) equal(a_select2(sigma_defuse,n1),use) equal(a_select2(sigma_defuse,n2),use) equal(a_select2(sigma_defuse,n3),use) equal(a_select2(sigma_defuse,n4),use) equal(a_select2(sigma_defuse,n5),use) equal(a_select3(u_defuse,n0,n0),use) equal(a_select3(u_defuse,n1,n0),use) equal(a_select3(u_defuse,n2,n0),use)** equal(a_select2(xinit_defuse,n3),use) equal(a_select2(xinit_defuse,n4),use) equal(a_select2(xinit_defuse,n5),use) equal(a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n0),use) equal(a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n1),use) equal(a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n2),use) equal(a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n3),use) equal(a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n4),use) equal(a_select2(xinit_mean_defuse,n5),use) equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n0),use) equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n1),use) equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n2),use) equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n3),use) equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n4),use) equal(a_select2(xinit_noise_defuse,n5),use) -> leq(n0,skc2).
% 0.97/1.14  179[0:Rew:82.0,30.0] ||  -> leq(skc2,pred(n0))*r.
% 0.97/1.14  180[0:Rew:54.0,163.26,53.0,163.25,52.0,163.24,51.0,163.23,50.0,163.22,49.0,163.21,48.0,163.20,47.0,163.19,46.0,163.18,45.0,163.17,44.0,163.16,43.0,163.15,42.0,163.14,41.0,163.13,40.0,163.12,76.0,163.11,75.0,163.10,74.0,163.9,39.0,163.8,38.0,163.7,37.0,163.6,36.0,163.5,35.0,163.4,34.0,163.3,33.0,163.2,32.0,163.1,31.0,163.0] || equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* equal(use,use)* -> leq(n0,skc2).
% 0.97/1.14  181[0:Obv:180.26] ||  -> leq(n0,skc2)*r.
% 0.97/1.14  317[0:Res:181.0,128.0] || leq(skc2,n1)*l -> equal(skc2,n1) equal(skc2,n0).
% 0.97/1.14  350[0:Res:181.0,118.0] ||  -> gt(skc2,n0)*l equal(skc2,n0).
% 0.97/1.14  474[1:Spt:317.1] ||  -> equal(skc2,n1)**.
% 0.97/1.14  539[1:Rew:474.0,179.0] ||  -> leq(n1,pred(n0))*r.
% 0.97/1.14  792[0:SpR:28.0,72.0] ||  -> equal(pred(n0),tptp_minus_1)**.
% 0.97/1.14  793[0:SpR:25.0,72.0] ||  -> equal(pred(n1),n0)**.
% 0.97/1.14  799[1:Rew:792.0,539.0] ||  -> leq(n1,tptp_minus_1)*r.
% 0.97/1.14  1106[0:SpR:73.0,27.0] ||  -> gt(u,pred(u))*r.
% 0.97/1.14  1498[0:NCh:123.2,123.1,1106.0,26.0] || gt(pred(u),u)*l -> .
% 0.97/1.14  2012[0:SpL:793.0,1498.0] || gt(n0,n1)*r -> .
% 0.97/1.14  3574[1:Res:799.0,98.0] ||  -> gt(succ(tptp_minus_1),n1)*l.
% 0.97/1.14  3676[1:Rew:28.0,3574.0] ||  -> gt(n0,n1)*r.
% 0.97/1.14  3677[1:MRR:3676.0,2012.0] ||  -> .
% 0.97/1.14  3698[1:Spt:3677.0,317.1,474.0] || equal(skc2,n1)** -> .
% 0.97/1.14  3699[1:Spt:3677.0,317.0,317.2] || leq(skc2,n1)*l -> equal(skc2,n0).
% 0.97/1.14  3700[0:Rew:792.0,179.0] ||  -> leq(skc2,tptp_minus_1)*l.
% 0.97/1.14  3850[2:Spt:350.1] ||  -> equal(skc2,n0)**.
% 0.97/1.14  3854[2:Rew:3850.0,3700.0] ||  -> leq(n0,tptp_minus_1)*r.
% 0.97/1.14  3995[2:Res:3854.0,98.0] ||  -> gt(succ(tptp_minus_1),n0)*l.
% 0.97/1.14  3998[2:Rew:28.0,3995.0] ||  -> gt(n0,n0)*.
% 0.97/1.14  3999[2:MRR:3998.0,26.0] ||  -> .
% 0.97/1.14  4002[2:Spt:3999.0,350.1,3850.0] || equal(skc2,n0)** -> .
% 0.97/1.14  4003[2:Spt:3999.0,350.0] ||  -> gt(skc2,n0)*l.
% 0.97/1.14  4017[0:Res:3700.0,98.0] ||  -> gt(succ(tptp_minus_1),skc2)*l.
% 0.97/1.14  4020[0:Rew:28.0,4017.0] ||  -> gt(n0,skc2)*r.
% 0.97/1.14  4352[0:NCh:123.2,123.1,4020.0,26.0] || gt(skc2,n0)*l -> .
% 0.97/1.14  4361[2:MRR:4352.0,4003.0] ||  -> .
% 0.97/1.14  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.97/1.14  Formulae used in the proof : successor_1 irreflexivity_gt gt_succ succ_tptp_minus_1 quaternion_ds1_inuse_0004 reflexivity_leq leq_succ_succ pred_succ succ_pred pred_minus_1 leq_succ_gt_equiv leq_gt2 transitivity_gt finite_domain_1
% 0.97/1.14  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------