TSTP Solution File: SWV083+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SWV083+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May  1 04:02:27 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.61s 0.80s
% Output   : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   25 (   9   ~;   4   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f128,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f124,f125,f126]) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    spl0_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f104,f117]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> leq(n0,pv66) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    leq(n0,pv66),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ( ( ~ leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
      | ~ leq(n0,pv66) )
    & leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
    & leq(n0,pv66) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f93]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ( ( ~ leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
      | ~ leq(n0,pv66) )
    & leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
    & leq(n0,pv66) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
        & leq(n0,pv66) )
     => ( leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
        & leq(n0,pv66) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    ( ( leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
      & leq(n0,pv66) )
   => ( leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
      & leq(n0,pv66) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K4taDNmflw/Vampire---4.8_3311',cl5_nebula_array_0024) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    spl0_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f105,f121]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1)) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f106,f121,f117]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    ( ~ leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
    | ~ leq(n0,pv66) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SWV083+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 18:18:20 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.15/0.35  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K4taDNmflw/Vampire---4.8_3311
% 0.61/0.79  % (3500)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (3499)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (3501)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (3502)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (3503)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (3505)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (3506)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.61/0.80  % (3502)First to succeed.
% 0.61/0.80  % (3499)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.80  % (3502)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.61/0.80  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.61/0.80  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.80  % (3502)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.80  % (3502)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.61/0.80  % (3502)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80  % (3502)Memory used [KB]: 1066
% 0.61/0.80  % (3502)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.61/0.80  % (3502)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.61/0.80  % (3502)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.80  % (3502)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.80  % (3439)Success in time 0.44 s
% 0.61/0.80  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------