TSTP Solution File: SWV083+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWV083+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May 1 04:02:27 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.61s 0.80s
% Output : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 29 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 25 ( 9 ~; 4 |; 8 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f128,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f124,f125,f126]) ).
fof(f126,plain,
spl0_1,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f104,f117]) ).
fof(f117,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> leq(n0,pv66) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f104,plain,
leq(n0,pv66),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).
fof(f94,plain,
( ( ~ leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv66) )
& leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv66) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f93]) ).
fof(f93,plain,
( ( ~ leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv66) )
& leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv66) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv66) )
=> ( leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv66) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f53,conjecture,
( ( leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv66) )
=> ( leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv66) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K4taDNmflw/Vampire---4.8_3311',cl5_nebula_array_0024) ).
fof(f125,plain,
spl0_2,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f105,f121]) ).
fof(f121,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f105,plain,
leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).
fof(f124,plain,
( ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f106,f121,f117]) ).
fof(f106,plain,
( ~ leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv66) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV083+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 18:18:20 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.15/0.35 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K4taDNmflw/Vampire---4.8_3311
% 0.61/0.79 % (3500)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.61/0.79 % (3499)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.79 % (3501)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.61/0.79 % (3502)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.61/0.79 % (3503)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.79 % (3505)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.61/0.79 % (3506)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.61/0.80 % (3502)First to succeed.
% 0.61/0.80 % (3499)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.80 % (3502)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.61/0.80 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.61/0.80 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.80 % (3502)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.80 % (3502)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.61/0.80 % (3502)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.61/0.80
% 0.61/0.80 % (3502)Memory used [KB]: 1066
% 0.61/0.80 % (3502)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.61/0.80 % (3502)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.61/0.80 % (3502)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.80 % (3502)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.80 % (3439)Success in time 0.44 s
% 0.61/0.80 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------