TSTP Solution File: SWV083+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SWV083+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:55:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.59s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   22 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (   8   ~;   3   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f422,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f421,f312]) ).

fof(f312,plain,
    leq(n0,pv66),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f125]) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    ( ( ~ leq(n0,pv66)
      | ~ leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1)) )
    & leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
    & leq(n0,pv66) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ( ( ~ leq(n0,pv66)
      | ~ leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1)) )
    & leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
    & leq(n0,pv66) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
        & leq(n0,pv66) )
     => ( leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
        & leq(n0,pv66) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    ( ( leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
      & leq(n0,pv66) )
   => ( leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
      & leq(n0,pv66) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_array_0024) ).

fof(f421,plain,
    ~ leq(n0,pv66),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f314,f313]) ).

fof(f313,plain,
    leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f125]) ).

fof(f314,plain,
    ( ~ leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
    | ~ leq(n0,pv66) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f125]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.12  % Problem    : SWV083+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 19:03:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.55  % (32067)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.21/0.55  % (32084)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 0.21/0.55  % (32068)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.21/0.56  % (32083)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.21/0.56  % (32075)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.21/0.56  % (32068)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.56  % (32068)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.56  % (32068)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.56  % (32076)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.21/0.57  % (32068)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.57  % (32068)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.57  % (32068)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.21/0.57  
% 0.21/0.57  % (32068)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.21/0.57  % (32068)Time elapsed: 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.57  % (32068)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.21/0.57  % (32068)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.57  % (32068)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.58  % (32083)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.59  % (32076)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.21/0.59  % (32083)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.59  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.59  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.59  % (32083)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.59  % (32083)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.59  % (32083)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.59  % (32083)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.59  
% 0.21/0.59  % (32083)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.21/0.59  % (32083)Time elapsed: 0.163 s
% 0.21/0.59  % (32083)Instructions burned: 11 (million)
% 0.21/0.59  % (32083)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.59  % (32083)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.59  % (32060)Success in time 0.235 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------