TSTP Solution File: SWV083+1 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : SWV083+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:44:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.48s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 21 ( 8 ~; 3 |; 8 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f217,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f216,f140]) ).
fof(f140,plain,
leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f112]) ).
fof(f112,plain,
( ( ~ leq(n0,pv66)
| ~ leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1)) )
& leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv66) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f111]) ).
fof(f111,plain,
( ( ~ leq(n0,pv66)
| ~ leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1)) )
& leq(n0,pv66)
& leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(n0,pv66)
& leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1)) )
=> ( leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv66) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f53,conjecture,
( ( leq(n0,pv66)
& leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1)) )
=> ( leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv66) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_array_0024) ).
fof(f216,plain,
~ leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1)),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f141,f139]) ).
fof(f139,plain,
leq(n0,pv66),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f112]) ).
fof(f141,plain,
( ~ leq(n0,pv66)
| ~ leq(pv66,minus(n5,n1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f112]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV083+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 19:08:49 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 % (24900)lrs+10_1:1_br=off:sos=on:ss=axioms:st=2.0:urr=on:i=33:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/33Mi)
% 0.20/0.48 % (24911)dis+1010_1:1_bs=on:ep=RS:erd=off:newcnf=on:nwc=10.0:s2a=on:sgt=32:ss=axioms:i=30:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/30Mi)
% 0.20/0.48 % (24900)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.48 % (24900)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.48 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.48 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.48 % (24900)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.48 % (24900)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.48 % (24900)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.48 % (24900)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 % (24900)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.20/0.48 % (24900)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.48 % (24900)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.20/0.48 % (24900)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.48 % (24900)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.48 % (24890)Success in time 0.136 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------