TSTP Solution File: SWV082+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV082+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:43:23 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 0.26s 300.09s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 4 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 7 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 4 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_array_0023,conjecture,
( ( leq(n0,pv58)
& leq(pv58,minus(n5,n1)) )
=> ( leq(n0,pv58)
& leq(pv58,minus(n5,n1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uDUWUcMu6o/E---3.1_24721.p',cl5_nebula_array_0023) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_array_0023])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.10 % Problem : SWV082+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:54:14 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uDUWUcMu6o/E---3.1_24721.p
% 0.26/300.09 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.26/300.09 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/300.09 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/300.09 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/300.09 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.09 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.09 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.09 # new_bool_1 with pid 24801 completed with status 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.26/300.09 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/300.09 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/300.09 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/300.09 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.09 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.09 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/300.09 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/300.09 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/300.09 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.09 # G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with pid 24804 completed with status 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN
% 0.26/300.09 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/300.09 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/300.09 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/300.09 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.09 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.09 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/300.09 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/300.09 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/300.09 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.26/300.09 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.26/300.09 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.26/300.09
% 0.26/300.09 # Proof found!
% 0.26/300.09 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/300.09 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/300.09 # Parsed axioms : 85
% 0.26/300.09 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 24
% 0.26/300.09 # Initial clauses : 64
% 0.26/300.09 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Initial clauses in saturation : 64
% 0.26/300.09 # Processed clauses : 1
% 0.26/300.09 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # NegExts : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/300.09 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/300.09 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/300.09 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/300.09 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/300.09 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/300.09 # Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 63
% 0.26/300.09 # ...number of literals in the above : 108
% 0.26/300.09 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/300.09 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2858
% 0.26/300.09
% 0.26/300.09 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/300.09 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/300.09 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/300.09 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.26/300.09 # Maximum resident set size: 1904 pages
% 0.26/300.09
% 0.26/300.09 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/300.09 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.26/300.09 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.26/300.09 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.26/300.09 # Maximum resident set size: 1788 pages
% 0.26/300.10 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.26/300.10 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------