TSTP Solution File: SWV080+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : SWV080+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:49:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.66s 2.84s
% Output   : Proof 2.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : SWV080+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 17:43:18 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.66/2.84  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.66/2.84  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 2.66/2.84  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 2.66/2.84  % SZS output start Proof
% 2.66/2.84  1. (gt (succ (pv56)) (n0)) (-. (gt (succ (pv56)) (n0)))   ### Axiom
% 2.66/2.84  2. (-. (leq (n0) (pv56))) (gt (succ (pv56)) (n0))   ### Definition-Pseudo(leq) 1
% 2.66/2.84  3. (gt (succ (minus (n5) (n1))) (pv56)) (-. (gt (succ (minus (n5) (n1))) (pv56)))   ### Axiom
% 2.66/2.84  4. (-. (leq (pv56) (minus (n5) (n1)))) (gt (succ (minus (n5) (n1))) (pv56))   ### Definition-Pseudo(leq) 3
% 2.66/2.84  5. (-. ((leq (n0) (pv56)) /\ (leq (pv56) (minus (n5) (n1))))) (gt (succ (minus (n5) (n1))) (pv56)) (gt (succ (pv56)) (n0))   ### NotAnd 2 4
% 2.66/2.84  6. (leq (pv56) (minus (n5) (n1))) (gt (succ (pv56)) (n0)) (-. ((leq (n0) (pv56)) /\ (leq (pv56) (minus (n5) (n1)))))   ### Definition-Pseudo(leq) 5
% 2.66/2.84  7. (leq (n0) (pv56)) (-. ((leq (n0) (pv56)) /\ (leq (pv56) (minus (n5) (n1))))) (leq (pv56) (minus (n5) (n1)))   ### Definition-Pseudo(leq) 6
% 2.66/2.84  8. (-. (((leq (n0) (pv56)) /\ (leq (pv56) (minus (n5) (n1)))) => ((leq (n0) (pv56)) /\ (leq (pv56) (minus (n5) (n1))))))   ### ConjTree 7
% 2.66/2.84  % SZS output end Proof
% 2.66/2.84  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------