TSTP Solution File: SWV078+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWV078+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:45:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.48s 2.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ true
    | ~ leq(n0,pv31)
    | ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-51qveizi/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_166,plain,
    true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-51qveizi/input.p',i_0_166) ).

cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,pv31),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-51qveizi/input.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-51qveizi/input.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(c_0_171,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ true
    | ~ leq(n0,pv31)
    | ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_172,plain,
    true,
    i_0_166 ).

cnf(c_0_173,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,pv31),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_174,negated_conjecture,
    leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_175,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_171,c_0_172]),c_0_173])]) ).

cnf(c_0_176,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_174,c_0_175]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : SWV078+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 05:58:10 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.47  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.21/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.21/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.48/2.40  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 7.48/2.40  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.48/2.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 7.48/2.40  
% 7.48/2.40  # Proof found!
% 7.48/2.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.48/2.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.48/2.40  # Proof object total steps             : 10
% 7.48/2.40  # Proof object clause steps            : 6
% 7.48/2.40  # Proof object formula steps           : 4
% 7.48/2.40  # Proof object conjectures             : 8
% 7.48/2.40  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 5
% 7.48/2.40  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 7.48/2.40  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 7.48/2.40  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 7.48/2.40  # Proof object generating inferences   : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
% 7.48/2.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.48/2.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 190
% 7.48/2.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Initial clauses                      : 190
% 7.48/2.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 190
% 7.48/2.40  # Processed clauses                    : 13
% 7.48/2.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 12
% 7.48/2.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 7.48/2.40  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1
% 7.48/2.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 11
% 7.48/2.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
% 7.48/2.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.48/2.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 7.48/2.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 178
% 7.48/2.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 787
% 7.48/2.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 7.48/2.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 7.48/2.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 7.48/2.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 7.48/2.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6656
% 7.48/2.40  
% 7.48/2.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.48/2.40  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 7.48/2.40  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 7.48/2.40  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 7.48/2.40  # ...preprocessing         : 0.016 s
% 7.48/2.40  # ...main loop             : 0.000 s
% 7.48/2.40  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.48/2.40  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------