TSTP Solution File: SWV075+1 by Drodi---3.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Drodi---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV075+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : drodi -learnfrom(drodi.lrn) -timeout(%d) %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May 31 12:40:36 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 65 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 56 ( 17 ~; 17 |; 16 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 5 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 (; 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f53,conjecture,
( ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(n0,pv37)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv37,minus(n135300,n1)) )
=> ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(n0,pv37)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv37,minus(n135300,n1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).
fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(n0,pv37)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv37,minus(n135300,n1)) )
=> ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(n0,pv37)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv37,minus(n135300,n1)) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f53]) ).
fof(f251,plain,
( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(n0,pv37)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv37,minus(n135300,n1))
& ( ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(n0,pv37)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(pv37,minus(n135300,n1)) ) ),
inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(esa)],[f54]) ).
fof(f252,plain,
leq(n0,pv31),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f251]) ).
fof(f253,plain,
leq(n0,pv37),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f251]) ).
fof(f254,plain,
leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f251]) ).
fof(f255,plain,
leq(pv37,minus(n135300,n1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f251]) ).
fof(f256,plain,
( ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(n0,pv37)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(pv37,minus(n135300,n1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f251]) ).
fof(f329,plain,
( spl0_0
<=> leq(n0,pv31) ),
introduced(split_symbol_definition) ).
fof(f331,plain,
( ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| spl0_0 ),
inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f329]) ).
fof(f332,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> leq(n0,pv37) ),
introduced(split_symbol_definition) ).
fof(f334,plain,
( ~ leq(n0,pv37)
| spl0_1 ),
inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f332]) ).
fof(f335,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ),
introduced(split_symbol_definition) ).
fof(f337,plain,
( ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| spl0_2 ),
inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f335]) ).
fof(f338,plain,
( spl0_3
<=> leq(pv37,minus(n135300,n1)) ),
introduced(split_symbol_definition) ).
fof(f340,plain,
( ~ leq(pv37,minus(n135300,n1))
| spl0_3 ),
inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f338]) ).
fof(f341,plain,
( ~ spl0_0
| ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_2
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f256,f329,f332,f335,f338]) ).
fof(f372,plain,
( $false
| spl0_3 ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f340,f255]) ).
fof(f373,plain,
spl0_3,
inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f372]) ).
fof(f374,plain,
( $false
| spl0_2 ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f337,f254]) ).
fof(f375,plain,
spl0_2,
inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f374]) ).
fof(f376,plain,
( $false
| spl0_0 ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f331,f252]) ).
fof(f377,plain,
spl0_0,
inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f376]) ).
fof(f378,plain,
( $false
| spl0_1 ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f334,f253]) ).
fof(f379,plain,
spl0_1,
inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f378]) ).
fof(f380,plain,
$false,
inference(sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f341,f373,f375,f377,f379]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SWV075+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : drodi -learnfrom(drodi.lrn) -timeout(%d) %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue May 30 12:00:19 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.33 % Drodi V3.5.1
% 0.17/0.56 % Refutation found
% 0.17/0.56 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark: Theorem is valid
% 0.17/0.56 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.56 % Elapsed time: 0.018565 seconds
% 0.17/0.56 % CPU time: 0.018084 seconds
% 0.17/0.56 % Memory used: 4.007 MB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------