TSTP Solution File: SWV074+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWV074+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 10:27:56 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.63s 0.80s
% Output : Refutation 0.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 9 unt; 1 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 189 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 9 avg)
% Number of connectives : 55 ( 17 ~; 12 |; 20 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 132 ( 132 fml; 0 var)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 2 ( 1 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 14 ( 13 usr; 11 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 1 ( 0 !; 0 ?; 1 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_6,type,
sQ0_eqProxy:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * X0 ) > $o ) ).
tff(f224,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f219,f220,f221,f222,f223]) ).
tff(f223,plain,
spl1_1,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f118,f204]) ).
tff(f204,plain,
( spl1_1
<=> leq(n0,pv31) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])]) ).
tff(f118,plain,
leq(n0,pv31),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
tff(f95,plain,
( ( ~ leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv36)
| ~ leq(n0,pv31) )
& leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv36)
& leq(n0,pv31) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f94]) ).
tff(f94,plain,
( ( ~ leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv36)
| ~ leq(n0,pv31) )
& leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv36)
& leq(n0,pv31) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
tff(f54,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv36)
& leq(n0,pv31) )
=> ( leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv36)
& leq(n0,pv31) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).
tff(f53,conjecture,
( ( leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv36)
& leq(n0,pv31) )
=> ( leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(n0,pv36)
& leq(n0,pv31) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G8mIEvIl3G/Vampire---4.8_14364',cl5_nebula_array_0015) ).
tff(f222,plain,
spl1_2,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f119,f208]) ).
tff(f208,plain,
( spl1_2
<=> leq(n0,pv36) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_2])]) ).
tff(f119,plain,
leq(n0,pv36),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
tff(f221,plain,
spl1_3,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f120,f212]) ).
tff(f212,plain,
( spl1_3
<=> leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_3])]) ).
tff(f120,plain,
leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
tff(f220,plain,
spl1_4,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f121,f216]) ).
tff(f216,plain,
( spl1_4
<=> leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_4])]) ).
tff(f121,plain,
leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
tff(f219,plain,
( ~ spl1_1
| ~ spl1_2
| ~ spl1_3
| ~ spl1_4 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f122,f216,f212,f208,f204]) ).
tff(f122,plain,
( ~ leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv36)
| ~ leq(n0,pv31) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SWV074+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Fri May 3 21:14:38 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.31 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.16/0.31 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G8mIEvIl3G/Vampire---4.8_14364
% 0.63/0.80 % (14479)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.63/0.80 % (14475)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.63/0.80 % (14477)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.63/0.80 % (14478)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.63/0.80 % (14480)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.63/0.80 % (14476)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.63/0.80 % (14481)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.63/0.80 % (14482)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.63/0.80 % (14478)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.63/0.80 % (14475)First to succeed.
% 0.63/0.80 % (14480)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.63/0.80 % (14482)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.63/0.80 % (14477)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.63/0.80 % (14481)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.63/0.80 % (14475)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-14472"
% 0.63/0.80 % (14475)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.63/0.80 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.63/0.80 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.63/0.80 % (14475)------------------------------
% 0.63/0.80 % (14475)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.63/0.80 % (14475)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.63/0.80
% 0.63/0.80 % (14475)Memory used [KB]: 1085
% 0.63/0.80 % (14475)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.63/0.80 % (14475)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.63/0.80 % (14472)Success in time 0.483 s
% 0.63/0.81 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------