TSTP Solution File: SWV074+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SWV074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:55:24 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   47 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   53 (  19   ~;  12   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f433,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f432,f290]) ).

fof(f290,plain,
    leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f140]) ).

fof(f140,plain,
    ( ( ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
      | ~ leq(n0,pv36)
      | ~ leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
      | ~ leq(n0,pv31) )
    & leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
    & leq(n0,pv31)
    & leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
    & leq(n0,pv36) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f139]) ).

fof(f139,plain,
    ( ( ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
      | ~ leq(n0,pv36)
      | ~ leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
      | ~ leq(n0,pv31) )
    & leq(n0,pv31)
    & leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
    & leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
    & leq(n0,pv36) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( leq(n0,pv31)
        & leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
        & leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
        & leq(n0,pv36) )
     => ( leq(n0,pv31)
        & leq(n0,pv36)
        & leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
        & leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    ( ( leq(n0,pv31)
      & leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
      & leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
      & leq(n0,pv36) )
   => ( leq(n0,pv31)
      & leq(n0,pv36)
      & leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
      & leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_array_0015) ).

fof(f432,plain,
    ~ leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1)),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f431,f288]) ).

fof(f288,plain,
    leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f140]) ).

fof(f431,plain,
    ( ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
    | ~ leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1)) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f430,f289]) ).

fof(f289,plain,
    leq(n0,pv31),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f140]) ).

fof(f430,plain,
    ( ~ leq(n0,pv31)
    | ~ leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
    | ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f291,f287]) ).

fof(f287,plain,
    leq(n0,pv36),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f140]) ).

fof(f291,plain,
    ( ~ leq(n0,pv36)
    | ~ leq(n0,pv31)
    | ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
    | ~ leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f140]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SWV074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 19:11:06 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.46  % (11086)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.16/0.47  % (11103)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 0.16/0.47  % (11095)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.16/0.48  % (11102)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.16/0.48  % (11084)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.16/0.49  % (11102)First to succeed.
% 0.16/0.49  % (11085)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/48Mi)
% 0.16/0.49  % (11088)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.16/0.49  % (11094)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.16/0.49  % (11088)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.49  % (11088)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.49  % (11088)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.16/0.49  % (11088)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.16/0.49  % (11088)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.49  % (11088)Termination phase: Preprocessing 2
% 0.16/0.49  
% 0.16/0.49  % (11088)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.16/0.49  % (11088)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.49  % (11088)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.16/0.49  % (11088)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.49  % (11088)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.49  % (11090)ott+2_1:1_fsr=off:gsp=on:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.16/0.49  % (11089)ott-1_1:6_av=off:cond=on:fsr=off:nwc=3.0:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.16/0.49  % (11087)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.16/0.49  % (11081)ott+10_1:32_abs=on:br=off:urr=ec_only:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.16/0.50  % (11087)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.50  % (11087)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.50  % (11087)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.16/0.50  % (11087)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.16/0.50  % (11087)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.50  % (11087)Termination phase: Function definition elimination
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  % (11087)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.16/0.50  % (11087)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.16/0.50  % (11087)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.16/0.50  % (11087)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.50  % (11087)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.50  TRYING [1]
% 0.16/0.51  % (11102)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.16/0.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.51  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.51  % (11102)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.51  % (11102)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.16/0.51  % (11102)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.16/0.51  % (11102)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.16/0.51  
% 0.16/0.51  % (11102)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.16/0.51  % (11102)Time elapsed: 0.114 s
% 0.16/0.51  % (11102)Instructions burned: 10 (million)
% 0.16/0.51  % (11102)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.51  % (11102)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.51  % (11079)Success in time 0.179 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------