TSTP Solution File: SWV074+1 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : SWV074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:44:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.47s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 57 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 55 ( 17 ~; 12 |; 20 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 5 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f224,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f219,f220,f221,f222,f223]) ).
fof(f223,plain,
spl0_4,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f142,f216]) ).
fof(f216,plain,
( spl0_4
<=> leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).
fof(f142,plain,
leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).
fof(f121,plain,
( leq(n0,pv36)
& leq(n0,pv31)
& ( ~ leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv36)
| ~ leq(n0,pv31) )
& leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f120]) ).
fof(f120,plain,
( ( ~ leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv36)
| ~ leq(n0,pv31) )
& leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv36) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv36) )
=> ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv36) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f53,conjecture,
( ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv36) )
=> ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv36) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_array_0015) ).
fof(f222,plain,
spl0_1,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f141,f204]) ).
fof(f204,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f141,plain,
leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).
fof(f221,plain,
spl0_3,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f145,f212]) ).
fof(f212,plain,
( spl0_3
<=> leq(n0,pv36) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).
fof(f145,plain,
leq(n0,pv36),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).
fof(f220,plain,
spl0_2,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f144,f208]) ).
fof(f208,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> leq(n0,pv31) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f144,plain,
leq(n0,pv31),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).
fof(f219,plain,
( ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_2
| ~ spl0_3
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f143,f216,f212,f208,f204]) ).
fof(f143,plain,
( ~ leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv36)
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SWV074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 18:59:18 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.45 % (30402)lrs+10_1:1_ins=3:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.46 % (30394)dis+1010_1:50_awrs=decay:awrsf=128:nwc=10.0:s2pl=no:sp=frequency:ss=axioms:i=39:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/39Mi)
% 0.15/0.46 % (30402)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.46 % (30402)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.46 % (30402)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.15/0.46 % (30402)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.15/0.46 % (30402)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.46 % (30402)Termination phase: Preprocessing 3
% 0.15/0.46
% 0.15/0.46 % (30402)Memory used [KB]: 1535
% 0.15/0.46 % (30402)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.46 % (30402)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.46 % (30402)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.46 % (30402)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.46 % (30403)lrs+10_1:1_drc=off:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.15/0.46 % (30394)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.47 % (30394)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.47 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.47 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.47 % (30394)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.47 % (30394)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.15/0.47 % (30394)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.15/0.47 % (30394)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.47
% 0.15/0.47 % (30394)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.15/0.47 % (30394)Time elapsed: 0.101 s
% 0.15/0.47 % (30394)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.15/0.47 % (30394)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.47 % (30394)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.47 % (30387)Success in time 0.156 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------