TSTP Solution File: SWV074+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV074+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:33:10 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 12 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 9 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_array_0015,conjecture,
( ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(n0,pv36)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1)) )
=> ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(n0,pv36)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv36,minus(n135300,n1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_array_0015) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_array_0015])]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV074+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 08:48:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.48 # new_bool_3 with pid 10102 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.48 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.48 # G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with pid 10105 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN
% 0.21/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.48 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.48
% 0.21/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.48 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 92
% 0.21/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 24
% 0.21/0.48 # Initial clauses : 71
% 0.21/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 71
% 0.21/0.48 # Processed clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 70
% 0.21/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 115
% 0.21/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3220
% 0.21/0.48 # Search garbage collected termcells : 571
% 0.21/0.48
% 0.21/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.48 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.48 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1908 pages
% 0.21/0.48
% 0.21/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.48 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.48 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1816 pages
% 0.21/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------