TSTP Solution File: SWV065+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SWV065+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AB20depfv6 true

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 00:07:29 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.54s 0.75s
% Output   : Refutation 0.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  14 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   37 (   5 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  129 (   6   ~;   4   |;  14   &; 103   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   5   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   0   ^;   7   !;   0   ?;   7   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(pred_type,type,
    pred: $i > $i ).

thf(pv53_type,type,
    pv53: $i ).

thf(minus_type,type,
    minus: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(n1_type,type,
    n1: $i ).

thf(leq_type,type,
    leq: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(n135300_type,type,
    n135300: $i ).

thf(n5_type,type,
    n5: $i ).

thf(n0_type,type,
    n0: $i ).

thf(pv10_type,type,
    pv10: $i ).

thf(cl5_nebula_array_0006,conjecture,
    ( ( ( leq @ n0 @ pv10 )
      & ( leq @ n0 @ pv53 )
      & ( leq @ pv10 @ ( minus @ n135300 @ n1 ) )
      & ( leq @ pv53 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) ) )
   => ( ( leq @ n0 @ n0 )
      & ( leq @ n0 @ pv10 )
      & ( leq @ n0 @ pv53 )
      & ( leq @ pv10 @ ( minus @ n135300 @ n1 ) )
      & ( leq @ pv53 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) ) ) ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ( leq @ n0 @ pv10 )
        & ( leq @ n0 @ pv53 )
        & ( leq @ pv10 @ ( minus @ n135300 @ n1 ) )
        & ( leq @ pv53 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) ) )
     => ( ( leq @ n0 @ n0 )
        & ( leq @ n0 @ pv10 )
        & ( leq @ n0 @ pv53 )
        & ( leq @ pv10 @ ( minus @ n135300 @ n1 ) )
        & ( leq @ pv53 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) ) ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[cl5_nebula_array_0006]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl74,plain,
    ( ~ ( leq @ n0 @ n0 )
    | ~ ( leq @ n0 @ pv10 )
    | ~ ( leq @ n0 @ pv53 )
    | ~ ( leq @ pv10 @ ( minus @ n135300 @ n1 ) )
    | ~ ( leq @ pv53 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(reflexivity_leq,axiom,
    ! [X: $i] : ( leq @ X @ X ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( leq @ X0 @ X0 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[reflexivity_leq]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl70,plain,
    leq @ n0 @ pv10,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl71,plain,
    leq @ n0 @ pv53,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(pred_minus_1,axiom,
    ! [X: $i] :
      ( ( minus @ X @ n1 )
      = ( pred @ X ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl24,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( minus @ X0 @ n1 )
      = ( pred @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[pred_minus_1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl72,plain,
    leq @ pv10 @ ( minus @ n135300 @ n1 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl24_001,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( minus @ X0 @ n1 )
      = ( pred @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[pred_minus_1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl291,plain,
    leq @ pv10 @ ( pred @ n135300 ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl72,zip_derived_cl24]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl24_002,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( minus @ X0 @ n1 )
      = ( pred @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[pred_minus_1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl73,plain,
    leq @ pv53 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl24_003,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( minus @ X0 @ n1 )
      = ( pred @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[pred_minus_1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl292,plain,
    leq @ pv53 @ ( pred @ n5 ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl73,zip_derived_cl24]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl547,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl74,zip_derived_cl3,zip_derived_cl70,zip_derived_cl71,zip_derived_cl24,zip_derived_cl291,zip_derived_cl24,zip_derived_cl292]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12  % Problem  : SWV065+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AB20depfv6 true
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 06:33:58 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.50/0.63  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.50/0.63  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.50/0.63  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.50/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.50/0.69  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.54/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.54/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.54/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.54/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.54/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.54/0.75  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.54/0.75  % BCE start: 75
% 0.54/0.75  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.54/0.75  % PE start: 75
% 0.54/0.75  logic: eq
% 0.54/0.75  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.54/0.75  % done 114 iterations in 0.044s
% 0.54/0.75  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.54/0.75  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.54/0.75  
% 0.54/0.75  
% 0.54/0.75  % Terminating...
% 0.55/0.84  % Runner terminated.
% 0.55/0.85  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------