TSTP Solution File: SWV065+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV065+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:43:20 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.36s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.36s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 40 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 39 ( 11 ~; 8 |; 18 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn; 2 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_array_0006,conjecture,
( ( leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,pv53)
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1)) )
=> ( leq(n0,n0)
& leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,pv53)
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lTYa7lKkvd/E---3.1_26628.p',cl5_nebula_array_0006) ).
fof(reflexivity_leq,axiom,
! [X1] : leq(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lTYa7lKkvd/E---3.1_26628.p',reflexivity_leq) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,pv53)
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1)) )
=> ( leq(n0,n0)
& leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,pv53)
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_array_0006]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,pv53)
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1))
& ( ~ leq(n0,n0)
| ~ leq(n0,pv10)
| ~ leq(n0,pv53)
| ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
| ~ leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1)) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X28] : leq(X28,X28),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_leq]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ leq(n0,n0)
| ~ leq(n0,pv10)
| ~ leq(n0,pv53)
| ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
| ~ leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
leq(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,pv10),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,pv53),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
leq(pv53,minus(n5,n1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWV065+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:39:20 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lTYa7lKkvd/E---3.1_26628.p
% 0.36/0.52 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.36/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.52 # new_bool_1 with pid 26708 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.36/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.52 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.36/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.52 # G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with pid 26710 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN
% 0.36/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.52 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.52 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.52 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.36/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.36/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.36/0.52
% 0.36/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.36/0.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.36/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.36/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 92
% 0.36/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 24
% 0.36/0.52 # Initial clauses : 75
% 0.36/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 75
% 0.36/0.52 # Processed clauses : 13
% 0.36/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 12
% 0.36/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.36/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.36/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 0.36/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.36/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 62
% 0.36/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 107
% 0.36/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.36/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.36/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3223
% 0.36/0.52
% 0.36/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.52 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.36/0.52 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.36/0.52 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.36/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1900 pages
% 0.36/0.52
% 0.36/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.52 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.36/0.52 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.36/0.52 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.36/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1792 pages
% 0.36/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.36/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------