TSTP Solution File: SWV062+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SWV062+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 10:27:53 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.52s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 13 unt; 1 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 283 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 11 avg)
% Number of connectives : 85 ( 25 ~; 20 |; 32 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 198 ( 198 fml; 0 var)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 2 ( 1 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 17 ( 16 usr; 14 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 1 ( 0 !; 0 ?; 1 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_6,type,
sQ0_eqProxy:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * X0 ) > $o ) ).
tff(f236,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f229,f230,f231,f232,f233,f234,f235]) ).
tff(f235,plain,
spl1_1,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f118,f206]) ).
tff(f206,plain,
( spl1_1
<=> leq(n0,pv10) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])]) ).
tff(f118,plain,
leq(n0,pv10),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
tff(f95,plain,
( ( ~ leq(pv43,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(pv41,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv43)
| ~ leq(n0,pv41)
| ~ leq(n0,pv10) )
& leq(pv43,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv41,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv43)
& leq(n0,pv41)
& leq(n0,pv10) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f94]) ).
tff(f94,plain,
( ( ~ leq(pv43,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(pv41,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv43)
| ~ leq(n0,pv41)
| ~ leq(n0,pv10) )
& leq(pv43,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv41,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv43)
& leq(n0,pv41)
& leq(n0,pv10) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
tff(f54,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(pv43,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv41,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv43)
& leq(n0,pv41)
& leq(n0,pv10) )
=> ( leq(pv43,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv41,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv43)
& leq(n0,pv41)
& leq(n0,pv10) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f53]) ).
tff(f53,conjecture,
( ( leq(pv43,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv41,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv43)
& leq(n0,pv41)
& leq(n0,pv10) )
=> ( leq(pv43,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv41,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(n0,pv43)
& leq(n0,pv41)
& leq(n0,pv10) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fKIQdv22LC/Vampire---4.8_16960',cl5_nebula_array_0003) ).
tff(f234,plain,
spl1_2,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f119,f210]) ).
tff(f210,plain,
( spl1_2
<=> leq(n0,pv41) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_2])]) ).
tff(f119,plain,
leq(n0,pv41),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
tff(f233,plain,
spl1_3,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f120,f214]) ).
tff(f214,plain,
( spl1_3
<=> leq(n0,pv43) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_3])]) ).
tff(f120,plain,
leq(n0,pv43),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
tff(f232,plain,
spl1_4,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f121,f218]) ).
tff(f218,plain,
( spl1_4
<=> leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_4])]) ).
tff(f121,plain,
leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
tff(f231,plain,
spl1_5,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f122,f222]) ).
tff(f222,plain,
( spl1_5
<=> leq(pv41,minus(n5,n1)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_5])]) ).
tff(f122,plain,
leq(pv41,minus(n5,n1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
tff(f230,plain,
spl1_6,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f123,f226]) ).
tff(f226,plain,
( spl1_6
<=> leq(pv43,minus(n5,n1)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_6])]) ).
tff(f123,plain,
leq(pv43,minus(n5,n1)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
tff(f229,plain,
( ~ spl1_1
| ~ spl1_2
| ~ spl1_3
| ~ spl1_4
| ~ spl1_5
| ~ spl1_6 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f124,f226,f222,f218,f214,f210,f206]) ).
tff(f124,plain,
( ~ leq(pv43,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(pv41,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv43)
| ~ leq(n0,pv41)
| ~ leq(n0,pv10) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.12 % Problem : SWV062+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.09/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 21:05:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.13/0.35 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fKIQdv22LC/Vampire---4.8_16960
% 0.52/0.73 % (17070)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.52/0.73 % (17072)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.52/0.73 % (17075)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.52/0.73 % (17073)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.52/0.73 % (17071)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.52/0.73 % (17076)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.52/0.73 % (17074)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.52/0.73 % (17077)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.52/0.74 % (17070)First to succeed.
% 0.52/0.74 % (17070)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-17068"
% 0.52/0.74 % (17073)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.52/0.74 % (17075)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.52/0.74 % (17070)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.52/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.52/0.74 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.52/0.74 % (17070)------------------------------
% 0.52/0.74 % (17070)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.52/0.74 % (17070)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.52/0.74
% 0.52/0.74 % (17070)Memory used [KB]: 1088
% 0.52/0.74 % (17070)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.52/0.74 % (17070)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.52/0.74 % (17068)Success in time 0.375 s
% 0.52/0.74 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------