TSTP Solution File: SWV062+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWV062+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:15:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 24 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 20 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_array_0003,conjecture,
( ( leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,pv41)
& leq(n0,pv43)
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(pv41,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv43,minus(n5,n1)) )
=> ( leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,pv41)
& leq(n0,pv43)
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(pv41,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv43,minus(n5,n1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',cl5_nebula_array_0003) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,pv41)
& leq(n0,pv43)
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(pv41,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv43,minus(n5,n1)) )
=> ( leq(n0,pv10)
& leq(n0,pv41)
& leq(n0,pv43)
& leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
& leq(pv41,minus(n5,n1))
& leq(pv43,minus(n5,n1)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_array_0003]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWV062+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.14/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 08:26:10 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/1.44 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.25/1.44
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object total steps : 5
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object clause steps : 2
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object initial clauses used : 1
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object initial formulas used : 1
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 0.25/1.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.44 # Parsed axioms : 92
% 0.25/1.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 24
% 0.25/1.44 # Initial clauses : 71
% 0.25/1.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.25/1.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 69
% 0.25/1.44 # Processed clauses : 1
% 0.25/1.44 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 68
% 0.25/1.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 113
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.25/1.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3312
% 0.25/1.44
% 0.25/1.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.44 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.25/1.44 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.25/1.44 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.25/1.44 # Maximum resident set size: 2916 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------