TSTP Solution File: SWV061+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SWV061+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   29 (  12   ~;   5   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_array_0002,conjecture,
    ( true
   => ( ( ~ gt(loopcounter,n1)
       => true )
      & ( gt(loopcounter,n1)
       => true ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.r34BPA5NIP/E---3.1_331.p',cl5_nebula_array_0002) ).

fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( true
     => ( ( ~ gt(loopcounter,n1)
         => true )
        & ( gt(loopcounter,n1)
         => true ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_array_0002])]) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( true
    & ( gt(loopcounter,n1)
      | ~ gt(loopcounter,n1) )
    & ( ~ true
      | ~ gt(loopcounter,n1) )
    & ( gt(loopcounter,n1)
      | ~ true )
    & ( ~ true
      | ~ true ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ true
    | ~ true ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ true,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    true,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : SWV061+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 03:26:35 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.41  Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.r34BPA5NIP/E---3.1_331.p
% 0.16/0.42  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # new_bool_1 with pid 421 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.16/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.42  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.42  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with pid 424 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN
% 0.16/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.42  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.42  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.42  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.42  
% 0.16/0.42  # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 85
% 0.16/0.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 28
% 0.16/0.42  # Initial clauses                      : 63
% 0.16/0.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.16/0.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 62
% 0.16/0.42  # Processed clauses                    : 2
% 0.16/0.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1
% 0.16/0.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.16/0.42  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/0.42  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/0.42  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.42  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.42  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.42  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/0.42  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1
% 0.16/0.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.16/0.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 60
% 0.16/0.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 104
% 0.16/0.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2810
% 0.16/0.42  
% 0.16/0.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.42  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.42  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.16/0.42  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.42  # Maximum resident set size: 1916 pages
% 0.16/0.42  
% 0.16/0.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.42  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.42  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.42  # Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.16/0.42  # Maximum resident set size: 1784 pages
% 0.16/0.42  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------