TSTP Solution File: SWV059+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV059+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:43:19 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 0.37s 300.12s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 25 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 29 ( 12 ~; 5 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_norm_0049,conjecture,
( geq(pv72,tptp_float_0_001)
=> ( ( ~ gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1)
=> true )
& ( gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1)
=> true ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nHWsw42NJ2/E---3.1_9648.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0049) ).
fof(ttrue,axiom,
true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nHWsw42NJ2/E---3.1_9648.p',ttrue) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( geq(pv72,tptp_float_0_001)
=> ( ( ~ gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1)
=> true )
& ( gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1)
=> true ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_norm_0049])]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( geq(pv72,tptp_float_0_001)
& ( gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1)
| ~ gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1) )
& ( ~ true
| ~ gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1) )
& ( gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1)
| ~ true )
& ( ~ true
| ~ true ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ true
| ~ true ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ true,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ttrue]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14 % Problem : SWV059+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.15/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:38:31 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.nHWsw42NJ2/E---3.1_9648.p
% 0.37/300.12 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.37/300.12 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/300.12 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/300.12 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/300.12 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.12 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.12 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.12 # sh5l with pid 9729 completed with status 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.37/300.12 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/300.12 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/300.12 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/300.12 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.12 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.12 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.12 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.37/300.12 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/300.12 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.37/300.12 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 127s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.12 # G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with pid 9731 completed with status 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Result found by G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y
% 0.37/300.12 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/300.12 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/300.12 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/300.12 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.12 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.12 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.12 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.37/300.12 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/300.12 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.37/300.12 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 127s (1) cores
% 0.37/300.12 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.37/300.12
% 0.37/300.12 # Proof found!
% 0.37/300.12 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/300.12 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/300.12 # Parsed axioms : 85
% 0.37/300.12 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 25
% 0.37/300.12 # Initial clauses : 67
% 0.37/300.12 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.37/300.12 # Initial clauses in saturation : 66
% 0.37/300.12 # Processed clauses : 2
% 0.37/300.12 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # ...remaining for further processing : 1
% 0.37/300.12 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # NegExts : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.37/300.12 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.37/300.12 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/300.12 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/300.12 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.37/300.12 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/300.12 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/300.12 # Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.37/300.12 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.37/300.12 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 64
% 0.37/300.12 # ...number of literals in the above : 110
% 0.37/300.12 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.37/300.12 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2948
% 0.37/300.12
% 0.37/300.12 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/300.12 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.37/300.12 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.37/300.12 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.37/300.12 # Maximum resident set size: 1908 pages
% 0.37/300.12
% 0.37/300.12 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/300.12 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.37/300.12 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.37/300.12 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.37/300.12 # Maximum resident set size: 1788 pages
% 0.37/300.12 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.37/300.12 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------