TSTP Solution File: SWV055+1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SWV055+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:27:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 124.83s 16.12s
% Output : Proof 124.83s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
leq(n0,pv10),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0037)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0037)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
( ~ leq(n0,pv10)
| ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
| leq(n0,sK27)
| sP4 ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0037)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ leq(n0,pv10)
| ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
| leq(sK27,minus(n0,n1))
| sP4 ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0037)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( leq(sK29,minus(pv10,n1))
| ~ sP4 ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0037)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( leq(n0,sK29)
| ~ sP4 ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0037)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ sPE(sum(n0,minus(n5,n1),a_select3(q,sK29,sK30)),n1)
| ~ sP4 ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0037)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ leq(sK27,n0)
| ~ leq(n0,sK27)
| sPE(sK27,n0) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',finite_domain_0)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ leq(sK29,minus(pv10,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,sK29)
| sPE(sum(n0,minus(n5,n1),a_select3(q,sK29,sK30)),n1) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0037)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
sPE(minus(n0,n1),pred(n0)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',pred_minus_1)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( ~ sPE(sK27,n0)
| ~ sPE(minus(n0,n1),pred(n0))
| ~ leq(sK27,minus(n0,n1))
| leq(n0,pred(n0)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
( ~ sPE(sK27,sK27)
| ~ sPE(minus(n0,n1),pred(n0))
| ~ leq(sK27,minus(n0,n1))
| leq(sK27,pred(n0)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g12,plain,
( ~ leq(sK27,pred(n0))
| gt(n0,sK27) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',leq_gt_pred)]) ).
cnf(g13,plain,
sPE(sK27,sK27),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g14,plain,
( ~ gt(n0,sK27)
| leq(sK27,n0) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',leq_gt1)]) ).
cnf(g15,plain,
( ~ leq(n0,pred(n0))
| gt(n0,n0) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',leq_gt_pred)]) ).
cnf(g16,plain,
~ gt(n0,n0),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',irreflexivity_gt)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV055+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 10:34:02 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 124.83/16.12 % symbols: 79
% 124.83/16.12 % clauses: 222
% 124.83/16.12 % start clauses: 6
% 124.83/16.12 % iterative deepening steps: 2090
% 124.83/16.12 % maximum path limit: 3
% 124.83/16.12 % literal attempts: 48490907
% 124.83/16.12 % depth failures: 46884979
% 124.83/16.12 % regularity failures: 19831
% 124.83/16.12 % tautology failures: 4912316
% 124.83/16.12 % reductions: 1041424
% 124.83/16.12 % extensions: 47443785
% 124.83/16.12 % SAT variables: 580297
% 124.83/16.12 % SAT clauses: 738637
% 124.83/16.12 % WalkSAT solutions: 738629
% 124.83/16.12 % CDCL solutions: 7
% 124.83/16.12 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 124.83/16.12 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------