TSTP Solution File: SWV048+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SWV048+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.60s 0.80s
% Output : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : SWV048+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 00:59:41 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.60/0.80 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.60/0.80 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.60/0.80 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.80 SPASS derived 425 clauses, backtracked 233 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 729 clauses.
% 0.60/0.80 SPASS allocated 86422 KBytes.
% 0.60/0.80 SPASS spent 0:00:00.45 on the problem.
% 0.60/0.80 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.60/0.80 0:00:00.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.60/0.80 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.60/0.80 0:00:00.01 for the backtracking.
% 0.60/0.80 0:00:00.24 for the reduction.
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 22 :
% 0.60/0.80 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.60/0.80 1[0:Inp] || -> true__dfg*.
% 0.60/0.80 2[0:Inp] || -> leq(n0,pv35)*r.
% 0.60/0.80 32[0:Inp] || true__dfg SkC0* -> .
% 0.60/0.80 36[0:Inp] || -> equal(succ(tptp_minus_1),n0)**.
% 0.60/0.80 38[0:Inp] || -> leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1))*r.
% 0.60/0.80 58[0:Inp] || -> equal(pred(succ(u)),u)**.
% 0.60/0.80 61[0:Inp] || -> equal(sum__dfg(n0,tptp_minus_1,u),n0)**.
% 0.60/0.80 62[0:Inp] || -> equal(sum__dfg(n0,tptp_minus_1,u),tptp_float_0_0)**.
% 0.60/0.80 65[0:Inp] || -> equal(minus(u,n1),pred(u))**.
% 0.60/0.80 105[0:Inp] || -> equal(sum__dfg(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)),pv78)**.
% 0.60/0.80 135[0:Inp] || equal(sum__dfg(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x__dfg,pv81))),n0)** equal(sum__dfg(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)),pv78) leq(n0,pv35) leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1)) -> SkC0.
% 0.60/0.80 148[0:MRR:32.0,1.0] || SkC0* -> .
% 0.60/0.80 151[0:Rew:62.0,61.0] || -> equal(tptp_float_0_0,n0)**.
% 0.60/0.80 152[0:Rew:151.0,62.0] || -> equal(sum__dfg(n0,tptp_minus_1,u),n0)**.
% 0.60/0.80 163[0:Rew:65.0,38.0] || -> leq(pv35,pred(n5))*r.
% 0.60/0.80 164[0:Rew:65.0,105.0] || -> equal(sum__dfg(n0,pred(n135300),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)),pv78)**.
% 0.60/0.80 165[0:Rew:65.0,135.3,164.0,135.1,65.0,135.1,65.0,135.0] || equal(sum__dfg(n0,pred(n0),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x__dfg,pv81))),n0)** equal(pv78,pv78) leq(n0,pv35) leq(pv35,pred(n5)) -> SkC0.
% 0.60/0.80 166[0:Obv:165.1] || equal(sum__dfg(n0,pred(n0),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x__dfg,pv81))),n0)** leq(n0,pv35) leq(pv35,pred(n5)) -> SkC0.
% 0.60/0.80 167[0:MRR:166.1,166.2,166.3,2.0,163.0,148.0] || equal(sum__dfg(n0,pred(n0),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x__dfg,pv81))),n0)** -> .
% 0.60/0.80 753[0:SpR:36.0,58.0] || -> equal(pred(n0),tptp_minus_1)**.
% 0.60/0.80 839[0:Rew:152.0,167.0,753.0,167.0] || equal(n0,n0)* -> .
% 0.60/0.80 840[0:Obv:839.0] || -> .
% 0.60/0.80 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.60/0.80 Formulae used in the proof : ttrue cl5_nebula_norm_0016 succ_tptp_minus_1 pred_succ sum_plus_base sum_plus_base_float pred_minus_1
% 0.60/0.80
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------