TSTP Solution File: SWV048+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWV048+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:45:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.98s 2.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.98s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 21 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 31 ( 18 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 11 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_138,plain,
minus(plus(X1,n1),n1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-44dcd30h/lgb.p',i_0_138) ).
cnf(i_0_157,plain,
plus(n1,X1) = plus(X1,n1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-44dcd30h/lgb.p',i_0_157) ).
cnf(i_0_168,plain,
plus(tptp_minus_1,n1) = n0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-44dcd30h/lgb.p',i_0_168) ).
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
( sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)) != pv78
| sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x,pv81))) != n0
| ~ true
| ~ leq(n0,pv35)
| ~ leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-44dcd30h/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)) = pv78,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-44dcd30h/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_174,plain,
true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-44dcd30h/lgb.p',i_0_174) ).
cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,pv35),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-44dcd30h/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-44dcd30h/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_169,plain,
sum(n0,tptp_minus_1,X1) = n0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-44dcd30h/lgb.p',i_0_169) ).
cnf(c_0_184,plain,
minus(plus(X1,n1),n1) = X1,
i_0_138 ).
cnf(c_0_185,plain,
plus(n1,X1) = plus(X1,n1),
i_0_157 ).
cnf(c_0_186,plain,
plus(tptp_minus_1,n1) = n0,
i_0_168 ).
cnf(c_0_187,negated_conjecture,
( sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)) != pv78
| sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x,pv81))) != n0
| ~ true
| ~ leq(n0,pv35)
| ~ leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1)) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_188,negated_conjecture,
sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)) = pv78,
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_189,plain,
true,
i_0_174 ).
cnf(c_0_190,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,pv35),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_191,negated_conjecture,
leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1)),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_192,plain,
minus(plus(n1,X1),n1) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_184,c_0_185]) ).
cnf(c_0_193,plain,
plus(n1,tptp_minus_1) = n0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_186,c_0_185]) ).
cnf(c_0_194,negated_conjecture,
sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x,pv81))) != n0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_187,c_0_188]),c_0_189]),c_0_190]),c_0_191])]) ).
cnf(c_0_195,plain,
minus(n0,n1) = tptp_minus_1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_192,c_0_193]) ).
cnf(c_0_196,plain,
sum(n0,tptp_minus_1,X1) = n0,
i_0_169 ).
cnf(c_0_197,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_194,c_0_195]),c_0_196])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV048+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 01:18:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.98/2.42 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.98/2.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.98/2.42 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.98/2.42 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.98/2.42 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.98/2.42 #
% 7.98/2.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 7.98/2.42 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.98/2.42
% 7.98/2.42 # Proof found!
% 7.98/2.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.98/2.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.98/2.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.98/2.42
% 7.98/2.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.98/2.42 # User time : 0.016 s
% 7.98/2.42 # System time : 0.003 s
% 7.98/2.42 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 7.98/2.42 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.98/2.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------