TSTP Solution File: SWV025+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV025+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.53s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWV025+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 08:13:39 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.53  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.53  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.53  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.53  SPASS derived 6 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 185 clauses.
% 0.20/0.53  SPASS allocated 85905 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.53  SPASS spent	0:00:00.17 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.53  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.53  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.53  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.53  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.53  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  Here is a proof with depth 0, length 43 :
% 0.20/0.53  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.53  1[0:Inp] ||  -> SkC0*.
% 0.20/0.53  2[0:Inp] ||  -> SkC1*.
% 0.20/0.53  3[0:Inp] ||  -> SkC2*.
% 0.20/0.53  4[0:Inp] ||  -> SkC3*.
% 0.20/0.53  12[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(init,s_best7_init)**.
% 0.20/0.53  13[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(init,s_sworst7_init)**.
% 0.20/0.53  14[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(init,s_worst7_init)**.
% 0.20/0.53  15[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,s_best7)*r.
% 0.20/0.53  16[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,s_sworst7)*r.
% 0.20/0.53  17[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,s_worst7)*r.
% 0.20/0.53  19[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,pv19)*r.
% 0.20/0.53  20[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,pv20)*r.
% 0.20/0.53  21[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(s_best7,n3)*r.
% 0.20/0.53  22[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(s_sworst7,n3)*r.
% 0.20/0.53  23[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(s_worst7,n3)*r.
% 0.20/0.53  67[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(pv19,minus(n410,n1))*r.
% 0.20/0.53  68[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(pv20,minus(n330,n1))*r.
% 0.20/0.53  93[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(minus(u,n1),pred(u))**.
% 0.20/0.53  95[0:Inp] || gt(loopcounter,n1) -> equal(init,pvar1400_init)**.
% 0.20/0.53  96[0:Inp] || gt(loopcounter,n1) -> equal(init,pvar1401_init)**.
% 0.20/0.53  97[0:Inp] || gt(loopcounter,n1) -> equal(init,pvar1402_init)**.
% 0.20/0.53  181[0:Inp] || equal(init,init) equal(init,s_best7_init) equal(init,s_sworst7_init) equal(init,s_worst7_init) leq(n0,s_best7) leq(n0,s_sworst7) leq(n0,s_worst7) leq(n0,pv19) leq(n0,pv20) leq(s_best7,n3) leq(s_sworst7,n3) leq(s_worst7,n3) leq(pv19,minus(n410,n1)) leq(pv20,minus(n330,n1))*r SkC0 SkC1 SkC2 SkC3 -> gt(loopcounter,n1).
% 0.20/0.53  182[0:Inp] || equal(init,pvar1400_init) equal(init,pvar1401_init) equal(init,pvar1402_init) equal(init,init) equal(init,s_best7_init) equal(init,s_sworst7_init) equal(init,s_worst7_init) leq(n0,s_best7) leq(n0,s_sworst7) leq(n0,s_worst7) leq(n0,pv19) leq(n0,pv20) leq(s_best7,n3) leq(s_sworst7,n3) leq(s_worst7,n3) leq(pv19,minus(n410,n1)) leq(pv20,minus(n330,n1))*r SkC0 SkC1 SkC2 SkC3 -> .
% 0.20/0.53  183[0:Rew:14.0,13.0] ||  -> equal(s_worst7_init,s_sworst7_init)**.
% 0.20/0.53  184[0:Rew:183.0,14.0] ||  -> equal(init,s_sworst7_init)**.
% 0.20/0.53  185[0:Rew:12.0,184.0] ||  -> equal(s_sworst7_init,s_best7_init)**.
% 0.20/0.53  186[0:Rew:185.0,183.0] ||  -> equal(s_worst7_init,s_best7_init)**.
% 0.20/0.53  200[0:Rew:93.0,68.0] ||  -> leq(pv20,pred(n330))*r.
% 0.20/0.53  201[0:Rew:93.0,67.0] ||  -> leq(pv19,pred(n410))*r.
% 0.20/0.53  203[0:Rew:12.0,97.1] || gt(loopcounter,n1) -> equal(pvar1402_init,s_best7_init)**.
% 0.20/0.53  204[0:Rew:12.0,96.1] || gt(loopcounter,n1) -> equal(pvar1401_init,s_best7_init)**.
% 0.20/0.53  205[0:Rew:12.0,95.1] || gt(loopcounter,n1) -> equal(pvar1400_init,s_best7_init)**.
% 0.20/0.53  214[0:Obv:181.0] || equal(init,s_best7_init) equal(init,s_sworst7_init) equal(init,s_worst7_init) leq(n0,s_best7) leq(n0,s_sworst7) leq(n0,s_worst7) leq(n0,pv19) leq(n0,pv20) leq(s_best7,n3) leq(s_sworst7,n3) leq(s_worst7,n3) leq(pv19,minus(n410,n1)) leq(pv20,minus(n330,n1))*r SkC0 SkC1 SkC2 SkC3 -> gt(loopcounter,n1).
% 0.20/0.53  215[0:Rew:93.0,214.12,93.0,214.11,12.0,214.2,186.0,214.2,12.0,214.1,185.0,214.1,12.0,214.0] || equal(s_best7_init,s_best7_init) equal(s_best7_init,s_best7_init) equal(s_best7_init,s_best7_init) leq(n0,s_best7) leq(n0,s_sworst7) leq(n0,s_worst7) leq(n0,pv19) leq(n0,pv20) leq(s_best7,n3) leq(s_sworst7,n3) leq(s_worst7,n3) leq(pv19,pred(n410)) leq(pv20,pred(n330))*r SkC0 SkC1 SkC2 SkC3 -> gt(loopcounter,n1).
% 0.20/0.53  216[0:Obv:215.2] || leq(n0,s_best7) leq(n0,s_sworst7) leq(n0,s_worst7) leq(n0,pv19) leq(n0,pv20) leq(s_best7,n3) leq(s_sworst7,n3) leq(s_worst7,n3) leq(pv19,pred(n410)) leq(pv20,pred(n330))*r SkC0 SkC1 SkC2 SkC3 -> gt(loopcounter,n1).
% 0.20/0.53  217[0:MRR:216.0,216.1,216.2,216.3,216.4,216.5,216.6,216.7,216.8,216.9,216.10,216.11,216.12,216.13,15.0,16.0,17.0,19.0,20.0,21.0,22.0,23.0,201.0,200.0,1.0,2.0,3.0,4.0] ||  -> gt(loopcounter,n1)*l.
% 0.20/0.53  218[0:MRR:203.0,217.0] ||  -> equal(pvar1402_init,s_best7_init)**.
% 0.20/0.53  219[0:MRR:204.0,217.0] ||  -> equal(pvar1401_init,s_best7_init)**.
% 0.20/0.53  220[0:MRR:205.0,217.0] ||  -> equal(pvar1400_init,s_best7_init)**.
% 0.20/0.53  221[0:Obv:182.3] || equal(init,pvar1400_init) equal(init,pvar1401_init) equal(init,pvar1402_init) equal(init,s_best7_init) equal(init,s_sworst7_init) equal(init,s_worst7_init) leq(n0,s_best7) leq(n0,s_sworst7) leq(n0,s_worst7) leq(n0,pv19) leq(n0,pv20) leq(s_best7,n3) leq(s_sworst7,n3) leq(s_worst7,n3) leq(pv19,minus(n410,n1)) leq(pv20,minus(n330,n1))*r SkC0 SkC1 SkC2 SkC3 -> .
% 0.20/0.53  222[0:Rew:93.0,221.15,93.0,221.14,12.0,221.5,186.0,221.5,12.0,221.4,185.0,221.4,12.0,221.3,12.0,221.2,218.0,221.2,12.0,221.1,219.0,221.1,12.0,221.0,220.0,221.0] || equal(s_best7_init,s_best7_init) equal(s_best7_init,s_best7_init) equal(s_best7_init,s_best7_init) equal(s_best7_init,s_best7_init) equal(s_best7_init,s_best7_init) equal(s_best7_init,s_best7_init) leq(n0,s_best7) leq(n0,s_sworst7) leq(n0,s_worst7) leq(n0,pv19) leq(n0,pv20) leq(s_best7,n3) leq(s_sworst7,n3) leq(s_worst7,n3) leq(pv19,pred(n410)) leq(pv20,pred(n330))*r SkC0 SkC1 SkC2 SkC3 -> .
% 0.20/0.53  223[0:Obv:222.5] || leq(n0,s_best7) leq(n0,s_sworst7) leq(n0,s_worst7) leq(n0,pv19) leq(n0,pv20) leq(s_best7,n3) leq(s_sworst7,n3) leq(s_worst7,n3) leq(pv19,pred(n410)) leq(pv20,pred(n330))*r SkC0 SkC1 SkC2 SkC3 -> .
% 0.20/0.53  224[0:MRR:223.0,223.1,223.2,223.3,223.4,223.5,223.6,223.7,223.8,223.9,223.10,223.11,223.12,223.13,15.0,16.0,17.0,19.0,20.0,21.0,22.0,23.0,201.0,200.0,1.0,2.0,3.0,4.0] ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.53  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.53  Formulae used in the proof : gauss_init_0013 reflexivity_leq pred_minus_1
% 0.20/0.53  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------