TSTP Solution File: SWV022+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWV022+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:14:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 5 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 2 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(gauss_init_0001,conjecture,
init = init,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',gauss_init_0001) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
init != init,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[gauss_init_0001]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
init != init,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWV022+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 22:48:39 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/1.43 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.25/1.43
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object total steps : 5
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object clause steps : 2
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object initial clauses used : 1
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object initial formulas used : 1
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 0.25/1.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.43 # Parsed axioms : 85
% 0.25/1.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 84
% 0.25/1.43 # Initial clauses : 1
% 0.25/1.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.25/1.43 # Processed clauses : 1
% 0.25/1.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1103
% 0.25/1.43
% 0.25/1.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.43 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.25/1.43 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/1.43 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.25/1.43 # Maximum resident set size: 2760 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------