TSTP Solution File: SWV021-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV021-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:32:58 EDT 2024
% Result : Satisfiable 0.23s 0.50s
% Output : Saturation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_5)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
consistency_of_add_commutative,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
add(s(X1),X2) = s(add(X1,X2)),
definition_add_s,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
add(n0,X1) = X1,
definition_add_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( X1 = X2
| s(X1) != s(X2) ),
c_0_5,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
n0 != s(X1),
c_0_6,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
add(X1,s(X2)) = s(add(X2,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
add(X1,n0) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_9]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.14 % Problem : SWV021-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.12/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Sun May 19 08:36:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.23/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.50 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.23/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.50 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 19541 completed with status 1
% 0.23/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.23/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.50 # Search class: FHUPS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.50 # partial match(1): FHUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.50 # Starting G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S071I with 811s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.50 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 19546 completed with status 1
% 0.23/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.23/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.50 # Search class: FHUPS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.50 # partial match(1): FHUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.50 # Starting G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S071I with 811s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.50
% 0.23/0.50 # No proof found!
% 0.23/0.50 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.23/0.50 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.23/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.23/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.23/0.50 # Processed clauses : 10
% 0.23/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.23/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.23/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Generated clauses : 12
% 0.23/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.23/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Paramodulations : 11
% 0.23/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.23/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.23/0.50 # ...of those cached : 4
% 0.23/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.23/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.23/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.23/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 143
% 0.23/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 5
% 0.23/0.50
% 0.23/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.50 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.50 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1620 pages
% 0.23/0.50
% 0.23/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.50 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.23/0.50 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.23/0.50 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.23/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.23/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------