TSTP Solution File: SWV021-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SWV021-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:20:44 EDT 2024
% Result : Satisfiable 0.20s 0.48s
% Output : Saturation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_5)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
consistency_of_add_commutative,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
add(s(X1),X2) = s(add(X1,X2)),
definition_add_s,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
add(n0,X1) = X1,
definition_add_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( X1 = X2
| s(X1) != s(X2) ),
c_0_5,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
n0 != s(X1),
c_0_6,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
add(X1,s(X2)) = s(add(X2,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
add(X1,n0) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_9]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV021-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 08:36:52 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 24323 completed with status 1
% 0.20/0.48 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.20/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.48 # Search class: FHUPS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.48 # partial match(1): FHUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S071I with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 24329 completed with status 1
% 0.20/0.48 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.20/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.48 # Search class: FHUPS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.48 # partial match(1): FHUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S071I with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 # No proof found!
% 0.20/0.48 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.20/0.48 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.20/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.20/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.20/0.48 # Processed clauses : 10
% 0.20/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.20/0.48 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.20/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Generated clauses : 12
% 0.20/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.20/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Paramodulations : 11
% 0.20/0.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.20/0.48 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.20/0.48 # ...of those cached : 4
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.20/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.20/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.20/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 143
% 0.20/0.48 # Search garbage collected termcells : 5
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.48 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.48 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.20/0.48 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1664 pages
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.48 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.20/0.48 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.48 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.20/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.20/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------