TSTP Solution File: SWV019-1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV019-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.42s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWV019-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 22:27:48 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.42  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.42  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.42  SPASS derived 121 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 60 clauses.
% 0.20/0.42  SPASS allocated 63181 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.42  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.42  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.20/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.42  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 25 :
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.42  1[0:Inp] ||  -> less_than(u,lower_bound) in_array_bounds(array,u)* less_than(upper_bound,u).
% 0.20/0.42  2[0:Inp] || less_than(successor(u),successor(v))* -> less_than(u,v).
% 0.20/0.42  3[0:Inp] || less_than(u,v)* less_than(v,w)* -> less_than(u,w)*.
% 0.20/0.42  4[0:Inp] ||  -> less_than(u,successor(u))*r.
% 0.20/0.42  5[0:Inp] || in_array_bounds(array,index_of_maximal) -> equal(array_value_at(array,index_of_maximal),maximal_value)**.
% 0.20/0.42  6[0:Inp] ||  -> less_than(index_of_maximal,an_index)*r.
% 0.20/0.42  7[0:Inp] || less_than(an_index,lower_bound)*l -> .
% 0.20/0.42  8[0:Inp] || less_than(upper_bound,an_index)*r -> .
% 0.20/0.42  9[0:Inp] || less_than(index_of_maximal,lower_bound)*l -> .
% 0.20/0.42  10[0:Inp] || in_array_bounds(array,an_index) less_than(index_of_maximal,successor(an_index)) in_array_bounds(array,index_of_maximal) equal(array_value_at(array,index_of_maximal),maximal_value)** -> less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound) less_than(successor(upper_bound),successor(an_index)) less_than(index_of_maximal,lower_bound).
% 0.20/0.42  11[0:Rew:5.1,10.3] || in_array_bounds(array,an_index)* less_than(index_of_maximal,successor(an_index)) in_array_bounds(array,index_of_maximal) equal(maximal_value,maximal_value) -> less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound) less_than(successor(upper_bound),successor(an_index)) less_than(index_of_maximal,lower_bound).
% 0.20/0.42  12[0:Obv:11.3] || in_array_bounds(array,an_index)* less_than(index_of_maximal,successor(an_index)) in_array_bounds(array,index_of_maximal) -> less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound) less_than(successor(upper_bound),successor(an_index)) less_than(index_of_maximal,lower_bound).
% 0.20/0.42  13[0:MRR:12.5,9.0] || in_array_bounds(array,index_of_maximal) in_array_bounds(array,an_index)* less_than(index_of_maximal,successor(an_index)) -> less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound) less_than(successor(upper_bound),successor(an_index)).
% 0.20/0.42  14[0:NCh:3.2,3.1,8.0,6.0] || less_than(upper_bound,index_of_maximal)*r -> .
% 0.20/0.42  18[0:NCh:3.2,3.1,2.0,4.0] || less_than(successor(u),v)* -> less_than(u,v).
% 0.20/0.42  36[0:Res:1.1,13.1] || in_array_bounds(array,index_of_maximal)* less_than(index_of_maximal,successor(an_index)) -> less_than(an_index,lower_bound) less_than(upper_bound,an_index) less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound) less_than(successor(upper_bound),successor(an_index)).
% 0.20/0.42  37[0:MRR:36.2,36.3,7.0,8.0] || in_array_bounds(array,index_of_maximal)* less_than(index_of_maximal,successor(an_index)) -> less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound) less_than(successor(upper_bound),successor(an_index)).
% 0.20/0.42  57[0:Res:1.1,37.0] || less_than(index_of_maximal,successor(an_index))*r -> less_than(index_of_maximal,lower_bound) less_than(upper_bound,index_of_maximal) less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound) less_than(successor(upper_bound),successor(an_index)).
% 0.20/0.42  58[0:MRR:57.1,57.2,9.0,14.0] || less_than(index_of_maximal,successor(an_index))*r -> less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound) less_than(successor(upper_bound),successor(an_index)).
% 0.20/0.42  117[0:NCh:3.2,3.1,58.0,4.0] || less_than(index_of_maximal,an_index) -> less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound)*l less_than(successor(upper_bound),successor(an_index)).
% 0.20/0.42  119[0:MRR:117.0,6.0] ||  -> less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound)*l less_than(successor(upper_bound),successor(an_index)).
% 0.20/0.42  121[0:Res:119.0,18.0] ||  -> less_than(successor(upper_bound),successor(an_index))*r less_than(an_index,lower_bound).
% 0.20/0.42  129[0:MRR:121.1,7.0] ||  -> less_than(successor(upper_bound),successor(an_index))*r.
% 0.20/0.42  130[0:Res:129.0,2.0] ||  -> less_than(upper_bound,an_index)*r.
% 0.20/0.42  139[0:MRR:130.0,8.0] ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.42  Formulae used in the proof : in_bounds predecessor_less transitivity_of_less successor_greater this_is_maximal maximal_before_somewhere somewhere_above_lower_bound somewhere_below_upper_bound maximal_above_lower_bound prove_this
% 0.20/0.42  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------