%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SWV018-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 06:31:11 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.07s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13146/SWV/SWV018-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 150] [nf = 0] [nu = 32] [ut = 37]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 225913] [nf = 24] [nu = 222888] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 67 secs [nr = 6240122] [nf = 658] [nu = 5689222] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 11365912] [nf = 1182] [nu = 9689390] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 126 secs [nr = 11667254] [nf = 1206] [nu = 9987825] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 190 secs [nr = 17649100] [nf = 2014] [nu = 15433459] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 27929960
% 	resolvents: 27927137	factors: 2823
% Number of unit clauses generated: 24426287
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 87.46
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 14	[1] = 23	[2] = 31963	
% Total = 32000
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 24426287	[2] = 3472167	[3] = 31309	[4] = 192	[5] = 5	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] a_key_1		(+)1	(-)3
% [1] a_nonce_1		(+)3	(-)1
% [2] a_stored_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [3] b_holds_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [4] b_stored_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [5] fresh_intruder_nonce_1	(+)12	(-)2481
% [6] fresh_to_b_1	(+)3	(-)0
% [7] intruder_holds_1	(+)15	(-)1
% [8] intruder_message_1	(+)5	(-)28419
% [9] message_1		(+)2	(-)1047
% [10] party_of_protocol_1	(+)3	(-)0
% [11] t_holds_1		(+)2	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)48	(-)31952
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 32000
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 2256549
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 27929960
% Number of unification failures: 255673288
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 173982
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 63201395
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3885674
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 33303890
% Max entries in substitution set: 11
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 2368
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 1
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 23080371
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 29
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 12
% Number of states in UCFA table: 410625
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 812363
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.78
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.51
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 63
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 283603248
% ConstructUnitClause() = 34354
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.14 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 93100
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.01 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------