TSTP Solution File: SWV011+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : SWV011+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 11:48:28 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 18 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 8 ~; 3 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 sgn 2 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(2,axiom,
a_holds(key(generate_key(an_a_nonce),b)),
file('/tmp/tmppa8O2M/sel_SWV011+1.p_1',ax3) ).
fof(3,axiom,
b_holds(key(generate_key(an_a_nonce),a)),
file('/tmp/tmppa8O2M/sel_SWV011+1.p_1',ax1) ).
fof(17,conjecture,
? [X1] :
( a_holds(key(X1,b))
& b_holds(key(X1,a)) ),
file('/tmp/tmppa8O2M/sel_SWV011+1.p_1',co1) ).
fof(18,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( a_holds(key(X1,b))
& b_holds(key(X1,a)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[17]) ).
cnf(20,plain,
a_holds(key(generate_key(an_a_nonce),b)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
cnf(21,plain,
b_holds(key(generate_key(an_a_nonce),a)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
fof(35,negated_conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ~ a_holds(key(X1,b))
| ~ b_holds(key(X1,a)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
fof(36,negated_conjecture,
! [X2] :
( ~ a_holds(key(X2,b))
| ~ b_holds(key(X2,a)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[35]) ).
cnf(37,negated_conjecture,
( ~ b_holds(key(X1,a))
| ~ a_holds(key(X1,b)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[36]) ).
cnf(38,negated_conjecture,
~ a_holds(key(generate_key(an_a_nonce),b)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[37,21,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(39,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[38,20,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(40,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[39,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(41,negated_conjecture,
$false,
40,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWV/SWV011+1.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmppa8O2M/sel_SWV011+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SWV011+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWV/SWV011+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SWV/SWV011+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------