TSTP Solution File: SWV010+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWV010+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:48 EDT 2023
% Result : Satisfiable 0.15s 0.41s
% Output : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_23)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( message(sent(b,t,triple(b,generate_b_nonce(X1),encrypt(triple(X2,X1,generate_expiration_time(X1)),bt))))
| ~ message(sent(X2,b,pair(X2,X1)))
| ~ fresh_to_b(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
message(sent(a,b,pair(a,an_a_nonce))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[a_sent_message_i_to_b]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
fresh_to_b(an_a_nonce),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[nonce_a_is_fresh_to_b]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( message(sent(t,X3,triple(encrypt(quadruple(X1,X4,generate_key(X4),X5),X7),encrypt(triple(X3,generate_key(X4),X5),X6),X2)))
| ~ message(sent(X1,t,triple(X1,X2,encrypt(triple(X3,X4,X5),X6))))
| ~ t_holds(key(X6,X1))
| ~ t_holds(key(X7,X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
message(sent(b,t,triple(b,generate_b_nonce(an_a_nonce),encrypt(triple(a,an_a_nonce,generate_expiration_time(an_a_nonce)),bt)))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
t_holds(key(bt,b)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[t_holds_key_bt_for_b]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( message(sent(a,X1,pair(X2,encrypt(X3,X4))))
| ~ message(sent(t,a,triple(encrypt(quadruple(X1,X5,X4,X6),at),X2,X3)))
| ~ a_stored(pair(X1,X5)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( message(sent(t,a,triple(encrypt(quadruple(b,an_a_nonce,generate_key(an_a_nonce),generate_expiration_time(an_a_nonce)),X1),encrypt(triple(a,generate_key(an_a_nonce),generate_expiration_time(an_a_nonce)),bt),generate_b_nonce(an_a_nonce))))
| ~ t_holds(key(X1,a)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
a_stored(pair(b,an_a_nonce)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[a_stored_message_i]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
t_holds(key(at,a)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[t_holds_key_at_for_a]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( b_stored(pair(X1,X2))
| ~ message(sent(X1,b,pair(X1,X2)))
| ~ fresh_to_b(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( b_holds(key(X2,X1))
| ~ message(sent(X1,b,pair(encrypt(triple(X1,X2,generate_expiration_time(X3)),bt),encrypt(generate_b_nonce(X3),X2))))
| ~ b_stored(pair(X1,X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
message(sent(a,b,pair(encrypt(triple(a,generate_key(an_a_nonce),generate_expiration_time(an_a_nonce)),bt),encrypt(generate_b_nonce(an_a_nonce),generate_key(an_a_nonce))))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_27])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
b_stored(pair(a,an_a_nonce)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( a_holds(key(X1,X2))
| ~ message(sent(t,a,triple(encrypt(quadruple(X2,X3,X1,X4),at),X5,X6)))
| ~ a_stored(pair(X2,X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
b_holds(key(generate_key(an_a_nonce),a)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
a_holds(key(generate_key(an_a_nonce),b)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_27])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
b_holds(key(bt,t)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[b_hold_key_bt_for_t]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
a_holds(key(at,t)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[a_holds_key_at_for_t]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
party_of_protocol(b),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[b_is_party_of_protocol]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
party_of_protocol(a),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[a_is_party_of_protocol]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
party_of_protocol(t),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[t_is_party_of_protocol]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SWV010+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:47:58 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.39 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.dcOj351cuq/E---3.1_24185.p
% 0.15/0.41 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 24262 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.41 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.41 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 # partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 24273 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.41 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.41 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 # partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # No proof found!
% 0.15/0.41 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.15/0.41 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.41 # Parsed axioms : 14
% 0.15/0.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Initial clauses : 16
% 0.15/0.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 16
% 0.15/0.41 # Processed clauses : 38
% 0.15/0.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 38
% 0.15/0.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Generated clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.41 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.15/0.41 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Paramodulations : 6
% 0.15/0.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Total rewrite steps : 8
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 22
% 0.15/0.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.15/0.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 16
% 0.15/0.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.15/0.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.15/0.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.15/0.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.15/0.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1372
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 # User time : 0.017 s
% 0.15/0.41 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.15/0.41 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------