TSTP Solution File: SWV007-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SWV007-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:18:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.14 % Problem : SWV007-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.15/0.15 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 10:08:22 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.40 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.40 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.15/0.40 #
% 0.15/0.40 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.40 # Number of axioms: 21 Number of unprocessed: 21
% 0.15/0.40 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.15/0.40 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.15/0.40 # Hello from C++
% 0.15/0.40 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.15/0.40 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.15/0.40 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.15/0.40 # 21 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.15/0.40 # Creating start rules for all 11 conjectures.
% 0.15/0.40 # There are 11 start rule candidates:
% 0.15/0.40 # Found 13 unit axioms.
% 0.15/0.40 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.15/0.40 # 11 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.15/0.40 # 8 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.15/0.40 # 13 unit axiom clauses
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.15/0.41 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.41 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.41 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.41 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.41 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.41 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.41 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.41 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.41 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.41 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.41 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # End clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.41 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (successor(predecessor(X1))=X1)).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_38, negated_conjecture, (less_than(i,n))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_40, negated_conjecture, (less_than(i,m))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (predecessor(successor(X1))=X1)).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_43, negated_conjecture, (less_than(a(m),a(k)))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (less_than(X1,successor(X1)))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (less_than(predecessor(X1),X1))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_42, negated_conjecture, (m!=k)).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_36, negated_conjecture, (~less_than(n,k))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_39, negated_conjecture, (~less_than(n,m))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_37, negated_conjecture, (~less_than(k,i))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_41, negated_conjecture, (~less_than(i,one))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (~less_than(X1,X1))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (~less_than(X1,X2)|~less_than(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (X1=X2|successor(X1)!=successor(X2))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (less_than(X1,i)|~less_than(a(X1),a(k))|~less_than(X1,successor(n)))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X1=X2|predecessor(X1)!=predecessor(X2))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (X1=X2|less_than(X1,X2)|less_than(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_44, negated_conjecture, (~less_than(a(X1),a(predecessor(X1)))|~less_than(X1,i)|~less_than(one,X1))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (less_than(X1,X2)|~less_than(X3,X2)|~less_than(X1,X3))).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_45, negated_conjecture, (less_than(n,X1)|less_than(X1,i)|~less_than(a(X1),a(predecessor(i)))|~less_than(one,X1))).
% 0.15/0.41 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.15/0.41 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.15/0.41 # Found 4 steps
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_42, negated_conjecture, (m!=k), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_61, plain, (m!=k), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_27])).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (successor(m)!=successor(k)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.15/0.41 cnf(i_0_72, plain, (predecessor(successor(m))!=predecessor(successor(k))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_72, ...])).
% 0.15/0.41 # End printing tableau
% 0.15/0.41 # SZS output end
% 0.15/0.41 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.15/0.41 # Child (24920) has found a proof.
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # Proof search is over...
% 0.15/0.41 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------