TSTP Solution File: SWV007-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWV007-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:48 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 13 unt; 2 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 3 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(anti_symmetry_of_less_than,axiom,
( ~ less_than(X1,X2)
| ~ less_than(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uE8kn1IT48/E---3.1_31646.p',anti_symmetry_of_less_than) ).
cnf(clause_5,negated_conjecture,
less_than(i,m),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uE8kn1IT48/E---3.1_31646.p',clause_5) ).
cnf(clause_11,negated_conjecture,
( less_than(X1,i)
| ~ less_than(X1,successor(n))
| ~ less_than(a(X1),a(k)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uE8kn1IT48/E---3.1_31646.p',clause_11) ).
cnf(clause_8,negated_conjecture,
less_than(a(m),a(k)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uE8kn1IT48/E---3.1_31646.p',clause_8) ).
cnf(transitivity_of_less_than,axiom,
( less_than(X1,X2)
| ~ less_than(X1,X3)
| ~ less_than(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uE8kn1IT48/E---3.1_31646.p',transitivity_of_less_than) ).
cnf(less_than_successor,axiom,
less_than(X1,successor(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uE8kn1IT48/E---3.1_31646.p',less_than_successor) ).
cnf(all_related,axiom,
( less_than(X1,X2)
| less_than(X2,X1)
| X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uE8kn1IT48/E---3.1_31646.p',all_related) ).
cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(n,m),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uE8kn1IT48/E---3.1_31646.p',clause_4) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( ~ less_than(X1,X2)
| ~ less_than(X2,X1) ),
anti_symmetry_of_less_than ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
less_than(i,m),
clause_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( less_than(X1,i)
| ~ less_than(X1,successor(n))
| ~ less_than(a(X1),a(k)) ),
clause_11 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
less_than(a(m),a(k)),
clause_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(m,i),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
( less_than(X1,X2)
| ~ less_than(X1,X3)
| ~ less_than(X3,X2) ),
transitivity_of_less_than ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
less_than(X1,successor(X1)),
less_than_successor ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(m,successor(n)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( less_than(X1,successor(X2))
| ~ less_than(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(m,n),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
( less_than(X1,X2)
| less_than(X2,X1)
| X1 = X2 ),
all_related ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(n,m),
clause_4 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
m = n,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_20]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : SWV007-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.05/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:07:30 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.uE8kn1IT48/E---3.1_31646.p
% 0.17/0.44 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 31726 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.44 # Search class: FGHSM-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 31731 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.44 # Search class: FGHSM-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.44 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.44 # Parsed axioms : 23
% 0.17/0.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Initial clauses : 23
% 0.17/0.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.17/0.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 0.17/0.44 # Processed clauses : 88
% 0.17/0.44 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.17/0.44 # ...subsumed : 13
% 0.17/0.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 72
% 0.17/0.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 0.17/0.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.17/0.44 # Generated clauses : 111
% 0.17/0.44 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 88
% 0.17/0.44 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Paramodulations : 103
% 0.17/0.44 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.17/0.44 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.17/0.44 # Total rewrite steps : 18
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 43
% 0.17/0.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.17/0.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Negative unit clauses : 13
% 0.17/0.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 20
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 39
% 0.17/0.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 105
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 29
% 0.17/0.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 86
% 0.17/0.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 76
% 0.17/0.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.17/0.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41
% 0.17/0.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.17/0.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.17/0.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1265
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.44 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.44 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1640 pages
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.44 # User time : 0.024 s
% 0.17/0.44 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.17/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.17/0.44 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------