TSTP Solution File: SWC422-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWC422-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:40:57 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 12 unt; 1 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 55 ( 16 equ; 29 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
( neq(sk2,nil)
| neq(sk2,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K4CPmzbtNd/E---3.1_25726.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(co1_18,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(sk7)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K4CPmzbtNd/E---3.1_25726.p',co1_18) ).
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K4CPmzbtNd/E---3.1_25726.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(co1_17,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(sk6)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K4CPmzbtNd/E---3.1_25726.p',co1_17) ).
cnf(co1_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != sk2
| app(app(X3,cons(X1,nil)),X2) != sk1
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K4CPmzbtNd/E---3.1_25726.p',co1_15) ).
cnf(co1_20,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(sk7,cons(sk5,nil)),sk6) = sk3
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K4CPmzbtNd/E---3.1_25726.p',co1_20) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K4CPmzbtNd/E---3.1_25726.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_19,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)),sk7) = sk4
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K4CPmzbtNd/E---3.1_25726.p',co1_19) ).
cnf(co1_16,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K4CPmzbtNd/E---3.1_25726.p',co1_16) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(sk7)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
co1_18 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
co1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(sk6)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
co1_17 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X3)
| app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != sk2
| app(app(X3,cons(X1,nil)),X2) != sk1
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
co1_15 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(sk7,cons(sk5,nil)),sk6) = sk3
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
co1_20 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)),sk7) = sk4
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
co1_19 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
co1_16 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(sk7)
| ~ neq(sk2,nil) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ssList(sk6)
| ~ neq(sk2,nil) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(X1,cons(X2,nil)),X3) != sk1
| app(app(X3,cons(X2,nil)),X1) != sk2
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssList(X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_11]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
app(app(sk7,cons(sk5,nil)),sk6) = sk1,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_11]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
app(app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)),sk7) = sk2,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_11]),c_0_11]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(sk5),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_11]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk7),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk6),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14 % Problem : SWC422-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.15/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 02:16:30 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.K4CPmzbtNd/E---3.1_25726.p
% 0.23/0.53 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.23/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # new_bool_3 with pid 25807 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.23/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.53 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.53 # partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 25810 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.23/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.53 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.53 # partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.53 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.53
% 0.23/0.53 # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.53 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.53 # Parsed axioms : 205
% 0.23/0.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 164
% 0.23/0.53 # Initial clauses : 41
% 0.23/0.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 41
% 0.23/0.53 # Processed clauses : 94
% 0.23/0.53 # ...of these trivial : 9
% 0.23/0.53 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 85
% 0.23/0.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 8
% 0.23/0.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.23/0.53 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.23/0.53 # Generated clauses : 122
% 0.23/0.53 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 104
% 0.23/0.53 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Paramodulations : 113
% 0.23/0.53 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Equation resolutions : 10
% 0.23/0.53 # Total rewrite steps : 114
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 44
% 0.23/0.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.23/0.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 32
% 0.23/0.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 78
% 0.23/0.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 319
% 0.23/0.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 38
% 0.23/0.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 207
% 0.23/0.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 102
% 0.23/0.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.23/0.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.23/0.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.23/0.53 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4584
% 0.23/0.53
% 0.23/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.53 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.53 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.53 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.23/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 2024 pages
% 0.23/0.53
% 0.23/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.53 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.23/0.53 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.53 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.23/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1860 pages
% 0.23/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.23/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------