TSTP Solution File: SWC419-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC419-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.78s 1.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWC419-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 18:46:24 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.43 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.43 The process was started by sandbox2 on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.43 Sun Jun 12 18:46:24 2022
% 0.19/0.43 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 2686.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.43 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.43 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.43 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.43 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.43 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.43 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.19/0.43 142 back subsumes 141.
% 0.19/0.43 152 back subsumes 146.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 433 during input processing: 0 [copy,433,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 340.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 284.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 283.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 282.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 272.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 259.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 258.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 257.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 219.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 207.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 206.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 205.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 204.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 187.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 184.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 182.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 178.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 175.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 152.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 151.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 150.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 149.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 148.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 140.
% 0.19/0.43 433 back subsumes 139.
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.49 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.49 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.49 number of clauses in intial UL: 336
% 0.19/0.49 number of clauses initially in problem: 403
% 0.19/0.49 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 83
% 0.19/0.49 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 0.19/0.49 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.49 absolute distinct symbol count: 75
% 0.19/0.49 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.19/0.49 distinct function count: 46
% 0.19/0.49 distinct constant count: 9
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.78/1.01 cons(skac2,app(sk1,nil))=app(cons(skac2,sk1),nil).
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.78/1.01 41 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1309.3 K.
% 0.78/1.01 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.78/1.01 sym_ent ( 304) 184 0 184 0 54.6 K
% 0.78/1.01 term ( 32) 84732 78790 5942 7 185.9 K
% 0.78/1.01 rel ( 40) 61424 54955 6469 3 252.8 K
% 0.78/1.01 term_ptr ( 16) 25017 2597 22420 51 351.1 K
% 0.78/1.01 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.78/1.01 fpa_head ( 24) 2195 90 2105 4 49.4 K
% 0.78/1.01 fpa_tree ( 56) 13458 13458 0 20 1.1 K
% 0.78/1.01 context (1288) 18489 18489 0 11 13.8 K
% 0.78/1.01 trail ( 24) 102977 102977 0 6 0.1 K
% 0.78/1.01 imd_tree ( 32) 75 16 59 7 2.1 K
% 0.78/1.01 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.78/1.01 is_tree ( 24) 1552 138 1414 33 33.9 K
% 0.78/1.01 is_pos (2424) 64744 64744 0 6 14.2 K
% 0.78/1.01 fsub_pos ( 16) 9293 9293 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.78/1.01 literal ( 32) 20028 16101 3927 0 122.7 K
% 0.78/1.01 clause ( 88) 3637 2646 991 0 85.2 K
% 0.78/1.01 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 0.78/1.01 clash_nd ( 80) 7005 7005 0 9 0.7 K
% 0.78/1.01 clause_ptr ( 16) 938 133 805 4 12.6 K
% 0.78/1.01 int_ptr ( 16) 8466 4362 4104 0 64.1 K
% 0.78/1.01 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.78/1.01 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.78/1.01 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.78/1.01 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.78/1.01 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.78/1.01 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.78/1.01 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.78/1.01 me 0.00
% 0.78/1.01 forward subsume 0.00
% 0.78/1.01 delete cl time 0.00
% 0.78/1.01 keep cl time 0.00
% 0.78/1.01 hints time 0.00
% 0.78/1.01 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.78/1.01 conflict time 0.00
% 0.78/1.01 new demod time 0.00
% 0.78/1.01 post_process time 0.00
% 0.78/1.01 back demod time 0.00
% 0.78/1.01 back subsume 0.00
% 0.78/1.01 factor time 0.00
% 0.78/1.01 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.78/1.01 unindex time 0.00
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 true clauses given 2 (25.0%)
% 0.78/1.01 false clauses given 6
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 FALSE TRUE
% 0.78/1.01 2 2 4
% 0.78/1.01 3 36 9
% 0.78/1.01 4 8 7
% 0.78/1.01 5 1 0
% 0.78/1.01 6 2 1
% 0.78/1.01 7 2 29
% 0.78/1.01 9 1 22
% 0.78/1.01 10 0 2
% 0.78/1.01 11 0 44
% 0.78/1.01 12 0 21
% 0.78/1.01 13 0 29
% 0.78/1.01 14 0 8
% 0.78/1.01 15 0 25
% 0.78/1.01 16 0 14
% 0.78/1.01 17 0 13
% 0.78/1.01 19 0 6
% 0.78/1.01 21 0 18
% 0.78/1.01 22 0 11
% 0.78/1.01 23 0 6
% 0.78/1.01 tot: 52 269 (83.8% true)
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.78/1.01 1:0 2:0 3:2 4:0 5:11 6:0 7:4 8:0 9:6 10:47
% 0.78/1.01 11:6 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:1
% 0.78/1.01 21:0 22:0 23:1 24:1 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.78/1.01 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.78/1.01 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.78/1.01 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:1 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:1
% 0.78/1.01 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.78/1.01 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 0.78/1.01 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.78/1.01 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.78/1.01 All others: 610.
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.78/1.01
% 0.78/1.01 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------