TSTP Solution File: SWC414-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC414-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 2.91s 3.11s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SWC414-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 16:15:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 2.12/2.32 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 2.12/2.32 The process was started by sandbox2 on n020.cluster.edu,
% 2.12/2.32 Sun Jun 12 16:15:35 2022
% 2.12/2.32 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 14441.
% 2.12/2.32
% 2.12/2.32 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 2.12/2.32 set(auto).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: set(auto1).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: set(process_input).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 2.12/2.32 clear(print_given).
% 2.12/2.32
% 2.12/2.32 list(usable).
% 2.12/2.32
% 2.12/2.32 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=11.
% 2.12/2.32
% 2.12/2.32 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 2.12/2.32 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 2.12/2.32 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 2.12/2.32 clauses in usable.
% 2.12/2.32
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: set(para_from).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: set(para_into).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 2.12/2.32 dependent: set(factor).
% 2.12/2.32
% 2.12/2.32 ------------> process usable:
% 2.12/2.32 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 2.12/2.32 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 2.12/2.32 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 2.12/2.32 149 back subsumes 148.
% 2.12/2.32 159 back subsumes 153.
% 2.12/2.32
% 2.12/2.32 ------------> process sos:
% 2.12/2.32 Following clause subsumed by 751 during input processing: 0 [copy,751,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 449.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 327.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 326.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 325.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 315.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 302.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 301.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 300.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 226.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 214.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 213.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 212.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 211.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 194.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 191.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 189.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 185.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 182.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 159.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 158.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 157.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 156.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 155.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 147.
% 2.12/2.32 751 back subsumes 146.
% 2.12/2.32
% 2.12/2.32 ======= end of input processing =======
% 2.18/2.40
% 2.18/2.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.18/2.40
% 2.18/2.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.18/2.40
% 2.18/2.40
% 2.18/2.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 2.18/2.40
% 2.18/2.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 2.18/2.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 2.18/2.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 2.18/2.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 374
% 2.18/2.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 712
% 2.18/2.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 52
% 2.18/2.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 2.18/2.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 2.18/2.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 82
% 2.18/2.40 distinct predicate count: 20
% 2.18/2.40 distinct function count: 46
% 2.18/2.40 distinct constant count: 16
% 2.18/2.40
% 2.18/2.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 2.18/2.40
% 2.18/2.40
% 2.18/2.40
% 2.18/2.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.91/3.10 app(app(sk1,nil),sk1)=app(sk1,app(nil,sk1)).
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 2.91/3.10 75 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 2395.0 K.
% 2.91/3.10 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 2.91/3.10 sym_ent ( 304) 196 0 196 0 58.2 K
% 2.91/3.10 term ( 32) 541404 530484 10920 10 341.6 K
% 2.91/3.10 rel ( 40) 451003 438054 12949 8 506.1 K
% 2.91/3.10 term_ptr ( 16) 83630 41064 42566 7605 783.9 K
% 2.91/3.10 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.91/3.10 fpa_head ( 24) 2234 107 2127 5 50.0 K
% 2.91/3.10 fpa_tree ( 56) 12501 12501 0 20 1.1 K
% 2.91/3.10 context (1288) 42956 42956 0 11 13.8 K
% 2.91/3.10 trail ( 24) 13077086 13077086 0 7 0.2 K
% 2.91/3.10 imd_tree ( 32) 30 13 17 8 0.8 K
% 2.91/3.10 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.91/3.10 is_tree ( 24) 1870 244 1626 31 38.8 K
% 2.91/3.10 is_pos (2424) 327500 327500 0 6 14.2 K
% 2.91/3.10 fsub_pos ( 16) 26627 26627 0 1 0.0 K
% 2.91/3.10 literal ( 32) 85943 77702 8241 1 257.6 K
% 2.91/3.10 clause ( 88) 12977 11390 1587 1 136.5 K
% 2.91/3.10 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 2.91/3.10 clash_nd ( 80) 6310 6310 0 9 0.7 K
% 2.91/3.10 clause_ptr ( 16) 1716 354 1362 6 21.4 K
% 2.91/3.10 int_ptr ( 16) 19318 12677 6641 6 103.9 K
% 2.91/3.10 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.91/3.10 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.91/3.10 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.91/3.10 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.91/3.10 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.91/3.10 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.91/3.10 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 2.91/3.10 .00
% 2.91/3.10 hints time 0.00
% 2.91/3.10 print_cl time 0.00
% 2.91/3.10 conflict time 0.00
% 2.91/3.10 new demod time 0.00
% 2.91/3.10 post_process time 0.00
% 2.91/3.10 back demod time 0.00
% 2.91/3.10 back subsume 0.00
% 2.91/3.10 factor time 0.00
% 2.91/3.10 FINDER time 0.00
% 2.91/3.10 unindex time 0.00
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 true clauses given 2 (25.0%)
% 2.91/3.10 false clauses given 6
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 FALSE TRUE
% 2.91/3.10 2 1 3
% 2.91/3.10 3 31 11
% 2.91/3.10 4 11 14
% 2.91/3.10 5 1 0
% 2.91/3.10 7 0 35
% 2.91/3.10 9 5 20
% 2.91/3.10 10 0 2
% 2.91/3.10 11 0 55
% 2.91/3.10 12 15 6
% 2.91/3.10 13 8 37
% 2.91/3.10 14 0 10
% 2.91/3.10 15 0 26
% 2.91/3.10 16 0 17
% 2.91/3.10 17 0 20
% 2.91/3.10 19 0 13
% 2.91/3.10 21 0 21
% 2.91/3.10 22 3 12
% 2.91/3.10 23 0 7
% 2.91/3.10 26 0 3
% 2.91/3.10 28 0 3
% 2.91/3.10 45 0 1
% 2.91/3.10 47 0 14
% 2.91/3.10 49 0 61
% 2.91/3.10 51 0 86
% 2.91/3.10 53 0 50
% 2.91/3.10 55 0 12
% 2.91/3.10 57 0 1
% 2.91/3.10 tot: 75 540 (87.8% true)
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 2.91/3.10 1:0 2:0 3:2 4:0 5:11 6:0 7:4 8:0 9:6 10:47
% 2.91/3.10 11:6 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:1
% 2.91/3.10 21:0 22:0 23:1 24:1 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 2.91/3.10 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 2.91/3.10 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 2.91/3.10 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:1 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:1
% 2.91/3.10 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 2.91/3.10 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 2.91/3.10 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 2.91/3.10 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 2.91/3.10 All others: 2299.
% 2.91/3.10
% 2.91/3.10 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 2.91/3.11
% 2.91/3.11 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------