TSTP Solution File: SWC411+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SWC411+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:51:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 24.28s 4.20s
% Output   : Proof 33.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWC411+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 17:51:10 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.64  ________       _____
% 0.18/0.64  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.18/0.64  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.18/0.64  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.18/0.64  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.18/0.64  
% 0.18/0.64  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.18/0.64  (2023-06-19)
% 0.18/0.64  
% 0.18/0.64  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.18/0.64  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.18/0.64                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.18/0.64  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.18/0.64  
% 0.18/0.64  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.18/0.64  
% 0.18/0.64  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.18/0.65  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.18/0.67  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.18/0.67  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.18/0.67  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.18/0.67  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.18/0.67  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.18/0.67  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.18/0.67  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 4.54/1.50  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 4.54/1.51  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 4.54/1.54  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 4.54/1.54  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 4.54/1.54  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 4.54/1.54  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 4.54/1.54  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 17.31/3.19  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 18.17/3.34  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.17/3.36  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.81/3.43  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.37/3.49  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 24.28/4.20  Prover 3: proved (3532ms)
% 24.28/4.20  
% 24.28/4.20  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 24.28/4.20  
% 24.28/4.21  Prover 5: stopped
% 24.28/4.23  Prover 2: stopped
% 24.28/4.24  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 24.28/4.24  Prover 6: stopped
% 24.28/4.24  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 24.28/4.24  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 24.28/4.25  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 26.20/4.48  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 26.20/4.51  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 26.63/4.52  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 26.63/4.56  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 26.99/4.62  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 26.99/4.64  Prover 0: stopped
% 27.64/4.65  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 27.64/4.65  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 28.39/4.78  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 28.39/4.78  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 29.13/4.91  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 29.79/5.08  Prover 10: Found proof (size 5)
% 29.79/5.08  Prover 10: proved (839ms)
% 29.79/5.08  Prover 7: stopped
% 29.79/5.08  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 29.79/5.09  Prover 4: stopped
% 29.79/5.09  Prover 1: stopped
% 29.79/5.10  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 29.79/5.11  Prover 8: stopped
% 30.78/5.14  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 30.78/5.17  Prover 13: stopped
% 33.04/5.69  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 33.04/5.72  Prover 11: stopped
% 33.04/5.72  
% 33.04/5.72  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 33.04/5.72  
% 33.04/5.72  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 33.04/5.73  Assumptions after simplification:
% 33.04/5.73  ---------------------------------
% 33.04/5.73  
% 33.04/5.73    (co1)
% 33.04/5.73     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : ($i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) &
% 33.04/5.73      memberP(v1, v2) & ssList(v1) & ssList(v0) & ssItem(v2) &  ~ memberP(v0, v2)
% 33.04/5.73      &  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) |  ~ memberP(v1, v3) |  ~ ssItem(v3) |
% 33.04/5.73        memberP(v0, v3)))
% 33.04/5.74  
% 33.04/5.74  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 33.04/5.74  --------------------------------------------
% 33.04/5.74  ax1, ax10, ax11, ax12, ax13, ax14, ax15, ax16, ax17, ax18, ax19, ax2, ax20,
% 33.04/5.74  ax21, ax22, ax23, ax24, ax25, ax26, ax27, ax28, ax29, ax3, ax30, ax31, ax32,
% 33.04/5.74  ax33, ax34, ax35, ax36, ax37, ax38, ax39, ax4, ax40, ax41, ax42, ax43, ax44,
% 33.04/5.74  ax45, ax46, ax47, ax48, ax49, ax5, ax50, ax51, ax52, ax53, ax54, ax55, ax56,
% 33.04/5.74  ax57, ax58, ax59, ax6, ax60, ax61, ax62, ax63, ax64, ax65, ax66, ax67, ax68,
% 33.04/5.74  ax69, ax7, ax70, ax71, ax72, ax73, ax74, ax75, ax76, ax77, ax78, ax79, ax8,
% 33.04/5.74  ax80, ax81, ax82, ax83, ax84, ax85, ax86, ax87, ax88, ax89, ax9, ax90, ax91,
% 33.04/5.74  ax92, ax93, ax94, ax95
% 33.04/5.74  
% 33.04/5.74  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 33.04/5.74  ---------------------------------
% 33.04/5.74  
% 33.04/5.74  Begin of proof
% 33.04/5.74  | 
% 33.04/5.74  | DELTA: instantiating (co1) with fresh symbols all_91_0, all_91_1, all_91_2
% 33.04/5.74  |        gives:
% 33.04/5.74  |   (1)  $i(all_91_0) & $i(all_91_1) & $i(all_91_2) & memberP(all_91_1,
% 33.04/5.74  |          all_91_0) & ssList(all_91_1) & ssList(all_91_2) & ssItem(all_91_0) & 
% 33.04/5.74  |        ~ memberP(all_91_2, all_91_0) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 33.04/5.74  |          memberP(all_91_1, v0) |  ~ ssItem(v0) | memberP(all_91_2, v0))
% 33.04/5.74  | 
% 33.04/5.74  | ALPHA: (1) implies:
% 33.04/5.74  |   (2)   ~ memberP(all_91_2, all_91_0)
% 33.04/5.74  |   (3)  ssItem(all_91_0)
% 33.04/5.74  |   (4)  memberP(all_91_1, all_91_0)
% 33.04/5.74  |   (5)  $i(all_91_0)
% 33.04/5.74  |   (6)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) |  ~ memberP(all_91_1, v0) |  ~ ssItem(v0) |
% 33.04/5.74  |          memberP(all_91_2, v0))
% 33.04/5.74  | 
% 33.04/5.74  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_91_0, simplifying with (2), (3), (4),
% 33.04/5.74  |              (5) gives:
% 33.04/5.74  |   (7)  $false
% 33.04/5.75  | 
% 33.04/5.75  | CLOSE: (7) is inconsistent.
% 33.04/5.75  | 
% 33.04/5.75  End of proof
% 33.04/5.75  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 33.04/5.75  
% 33.04/5.75  5107ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------