TSTP Solution File: SWC381-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC381-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.74s 0.95s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWC381-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 05:59:59 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.46 The process was started by sandbox2 on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.46 Sun Jun 12 05:59:59 2022
% 0.20/0.46 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 27192.
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.46 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.46 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 list(usable).
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.46 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.46 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.46 clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.46 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.20/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.20/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.20/0.46 141 back subsumes 140.
% 0.20/0.46 151 back subsumes 145.
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 431 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ssItem(sk5)|neq(sk2,nil).
% 0.20/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 431 during input processing: 0 [demod,429] {-} cons(sk5,nil)=sk1|neq(sk2,nil).
% 0.20/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 431 during input processing: 0 [demod,426] {-} memberP(sk2,sk5)|neq(sk2,nil).
% 0.20/0.46 431 back subsumes 132.
% 0.20/0.46 Following clause subsumed by 432 during input processing: 0 [copy,432,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 338.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 282.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 281.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 280.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 270.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 257.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 256.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 255.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 218.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 206.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 205.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 204.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 203.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 186.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 183.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 181.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 177.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 174.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 151.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 150.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 149.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 148.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 147.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 139.
% 0.20/0.46 432 back subsumes 138.
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.52 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.52 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.52 number of clauses in intial UL: 334
% 0.20/0.52 number of clauses initially in problem: 399
% 0.20/0.52 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 83
% 0.20/0.52 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 93
% 0.20/0.52 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.52 absolute distinct symbol count: 74
% 0.20/0.52 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.20/0.52 distinct function count: 46
% 0.20/0.52 distinct constant count: 8
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.74/0.94
% 0.74/0.94 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.74/0.94 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.74/0.94 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.74/0.94 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.74/0.94
% 0.74/0.94
% 0.74/0.94 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.74/0.94
% 0.74/0.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.74/0.94
% 0.74/0.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.74/0.94
% 0.74/0.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.74/0.94
% 0.74/0.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.74/0.94
% 0.74/0.94 Model 3 [ 2 1 692 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.74/0.94
% 0.74/0.94 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.74/0.94
% 0.74/0.94 true clauses given 1 (25.0%)
% 0.74/0.94 false clauses given 3
% 0.74/0.94
% 0.74/0.94 FALSE TRUE
% 0.74/0.94 2 6 3
% 0.74/0.94 3 42 4
% 0.74/0.94 4 11 4
% 0.74/0.94 5 1 1
% 0.74/0.94 6 0 2
% 0.74/0.94 7 0 11
% 0.74/0.94 9 2 9
% 0.74/0.94 10 1 0
% 0.74/0.94 11 0 19
% 0.74/0.94 12 3 13
% 0.74/0.94 13 0 14
% 0.74/0.94 14 0 4
% 0.74/0.94 15 0 13
% 0.74/0.94 16 0 7
% 0.74/0.94 17 0 7
% 0.74/0.94 19 0 3
% 0.74/0.94 21 0 9
% 0.74/0.94 22 0 5
% 0.74/0.94 23 0 3
% 0.74/0.94 tot: 66 131 (66.5% true)
% 0.74/0.94
% 0.74/0.94
% 0.74/0.94 Model 3 [ 2 1 692 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.74/0.94
% 0.74/0.94 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.74/0.94 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.74/0.94 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.74/0.94 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.74/0.94
% 0.74/0.94
% 0.74/0.94 The job finished Sun Jun 12 05:59:59 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------