TSTP Solution File: SWC381-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWC381-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:42:53 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 0.33s 300.11s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 11 unt; 1 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 10 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
( neq(sk2,nil)
| neq(sk2,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2QcypkiD5a/E---3.1_24966.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2QcypkiD5a/E---3.1_24966.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(co1_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssItem(X1)
| cons(X1,nil) != sk1
| ~ memberP(sk2,X1)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2QcypkiD5a/E---3.1_24966.p',co1_13) ).
cnf(co1_15,negated_conjecture,
( cons(sk5,nil) = sk3
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2QcypkiD5a/E---3.1_24966.p',co1_15) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2QcypkiD5a/E---3.1_24966.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_16,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(sk4,sk5)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2QcypkiD5a/E---3.1_24966.p',co1_16) ).
cnf(co1_14,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2QcypkiD5a/E---3.1_24966.p',co1_14) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
co1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssItem(X1)
| cons(X1,nil) != sk1
| ~ memberP(sk2,X1)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
co1_13 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk4,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( cons(sk5,nil) = sk3
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
co1_15 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( memberP(sk4,sk5)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
co1_16 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(sk5)
| ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
co1_14 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( cons(X1,nil) != sk1
| ~ memberP(sk4,X1)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
cons(sk5,nil) = sk1,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
memberP(sk4,sk5),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
ssItem(sk5),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : SWC381-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.05/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 01:45:02 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2QcypkiD5a/E---3.1_24966.p
% 0.33/300.11 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.33/300.11 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/300.11 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/300.11 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/300.11 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.11 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.11 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.11 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 25047 completed with status 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.33/300.11 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/300.11 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/300.11 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/300.11 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.33/300.11 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.33/300.11 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.33/300.11 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2s with 406s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.11 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.11 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.11 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.11 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.11 # G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with pid 25061 completed with status 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Result found by G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S
% 0.33/300.11 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/300.11 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/300.11 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/300.11 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.33/300.11 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.33/300.11 # Scheduled 9 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.33/300.11 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2s with 406s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.11 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.11 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.11 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.11 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.11 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.33/300.11
% 0.33/300.11 # Proof found!
% 0.33/300.11 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.33/300.11 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.33/300.11 # Parsed axioms : 201
% 0.33/300.11 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Initial clauses : 201
% 0.33/300.11 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Initial clauses in saturation : 201
% 0.33/300.11 # Processed clauses : 39
% 0.33/300.11 # ...of these trivial : 6
% 0.33/300.11 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # ...remaining for further processing : 33
% 0.33/300.11 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.33/300.11 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.33/300.11 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # NegExts : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Total rewrite steps : 26
% 0.33/300.11 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.33/300.11 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.33/300.11 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.33/300.11 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.33/300.11 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.33/300.11 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.33/300.11 # Current number of processed clauses : 33
% 0.33/300.11 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 28
% 0.33/300.11 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.33/300.11 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.33/300.11 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 162
% 0.33/300.11 # ...number of literals in the above : 582
% 0.33/300.11 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.33/300.11 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.33/300.11 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3940
% 0.33/300.11
% 0.33/300.11 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/300.11 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.33/300.11 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.33/300.11 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.33/300.11 # Maximum resident set size: 2120 pages
% 0.33/300.11
% 0.33/300.11 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/300.11 # User time : 0.021 s
% 0.33/300.11 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.33/300.11 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 0.33/300.11 # Maximum resident set size: 1852 pages
% 0.33/300.11 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------