TSTP Solution File: SWC375-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SWC375-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:43:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    9 (   5   ~;   4   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f241,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f230,f233]) ).

fof(f233,plain,
    memberP(sk4,sk5),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f201]) ).

fof(f201,plain,
    ( memberP(sk4,sk5)
    | memberP(sk4,sk5) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f194,f190,f196]) ).

fof(f196,plain,
    sk1 = sk4,
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f191,f192]) ).

fof(f192,axiom,
    sk3 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

fof(f191,axiom,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

fof(f190,axiom,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

fof(f194,axiom,
    ( memberP(sk2,sk5)
    | memberP(sk1,sk5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).

fof(f230,plain,
    ~ memberP(sk4,sk5),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f199]) ).

fof(f199,plain,
    ( ~ memberP(sk4,sk5)
    | ~ memberP(sk4,sk5) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f195,f196,f190]) ).

fof(f195,axiom,
    ( ~ memberP(sk1,sk5)
    | ~ memberP(sk2,sk5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SWC375-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 18:54:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.48  % (9248)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 0.18/0.49  % (9254)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.18/0.49  % (9262)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.18/0.50  % (9262)First to succeed.
% 0.18/0.50  % (9271)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.18/0.50  % (9263)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.18/0.50  % (9261)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.18/0.50  % (9265)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.18/0.50  TRYING [1]
% 0.18/0.50  % (9255)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.18/0.50  % (9256)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.18/0.50  % (9256)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.18/0.50  % (9256)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.50  % (9256)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.18/0.50  % (9256)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.18/0.50  % (9256)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.18/0.50  % (9256)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.18/0.50  
% 0.18/0.50  % (9256)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.18/0.50  % (9256)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.50  % (9256)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.18/0.50  % (9256)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.50  % (9256)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.50  % (9271)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.18/0.51  % (9262)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.51  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.51  % (9262)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.51  % (9262)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.18/0.51  % (9262)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.18/0.51  % (9262)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  % (9262)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.18/0.51  % (9262)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.51  % (9262)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.18/0.51  % (9262)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.51  % (9262)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.51  % (9246)Success in time 0.162 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------