TSTP Solution File: SWC375-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SWC375-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:40:41 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   9 unt;   2 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   17 (   7 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    sk4 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JFcCdWWw2o/E---3.1_10740.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JFcCdWWw2o/E---3.1_10740.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JFcCdWWw2o/E---3.1_10740.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( memberP(sk2,sk5)
    | memberP(sk1,sk5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JFcCdWWw2o/E---3.1_10740.p',co1_9) ).

cnf(co1_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ memberP(sk2,sk5)
    | ~ memberP(sk1,sk5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JFcCdWWw2o/E---3.1_10740.p',co1_10) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    sk4 = sk3,
    co1_7 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    co1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    co1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( memberP(sk2,sk5)
    | memberP(sk1,sk5) ),
    co1_9 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ memberP(sk2,sk5)
    | ~ memberP(sk1,sk5) ),
    co1_10 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    memberP(sk1,sk5),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_9]),c_0_11])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : SWC375-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 01:56:04 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JFcCdWWw2o/E---3.1_10740.p
% 0.19/0.48  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # new_bool_3 with pid 10819 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 10822 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing time       : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.48  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.48  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48  # Parsed axioms                        : 195
% 0.19/0.48  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 160
% 0.19/0.48  # Initial clauses                      : 35
% 0.19/0.48  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 35
% 0.19/0.48  # Processed clauses                    : 13
% 0.19/0.48  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.19/0.48  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # ...remaining for further processing  : 9
% 0.19/0.48  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Total rewrite steps                  : 14
% 0.19/0.48  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of processed clauses  : 8
% 0.19/0.48  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 0.19/0.48  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 23
% 0.19/0.48  # ...number of literals in the above   : 100
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2231
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  # User time                : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Maximum resident set size: 2016 pages
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Maximum resident set size: 1848 pages
% 0.19/0.48  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------