TSTP Solution File: SWC367-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SWC367-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:31:27 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 14 unt; 4 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 12 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
~ rearsegP(sk2,sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_11,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk3
| rearsegP(sk4,sk3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).
cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk4
| rearsegP(sk4,sk3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).
cnf(clause81,axiom,
( rearsegP(nil,X1)
| nil != X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause81) ).
cnf(clause8,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ rearsegP(sk2,sk1),
co1_7 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
co1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk3
| rearsegP(sk4,sk3) ),
co1_11 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ rearsegP(sk4,sk3),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
sk3 = nil,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk4
| rearsegP(sk4,sk3) ),
co1_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ rearsegP(sk4,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
sk4 = nil,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
( rearsegP(nil,X1)
| nil != X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
clause81 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
ssList(nil),
clause8 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ rearsegP(nil,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWC367-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.14/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 09:17:36 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.39 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S032N
% 0.21/0.39 # and selection function SelectUnlessUniqMax.
% 0.21/0.39 #
% 0.21/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.39 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.39 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------