TSTP Solution File: SWC367-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWC367-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:40:39 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 14 unt; 4 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 12 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
~ rearsegP(sk2,sk1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.z0PGWXL0cU/E---3.1_27187.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.z0PGWXL0cU/E---3.1_27187.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.z0PGWXL0cU/E---3.1_27187.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_11,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk3
| rearsegP(sk4,sk3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.z0PGWXL0cU/E---3.1_27187.p',co1_11) ).
cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk4
| rearsegP(sk4,sk3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.z0PGWXL0cU/E---3.1_27187.p',co1_9) ).
cnf(clause81,axiom,
( rearsegP(nil,X1)
| nil != X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.z0PGWXL0cU/E---3.1_27187.p',clause81) ).
cnf(clause8,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.z0PGWXL0cU/E---3.1_27187.p',clause8) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ rearsegP(sk2,sk1),
co1_7 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
co1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk3
| rearsegP(sk4,sk3) ),
co1_11 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ rearsegP(sk4,sk3),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
sk3 = nil,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( nil = sk4
| rearsegP(sk4,sk3) ),
co1_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ rearsegP(sk4,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
sk4 = nil,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
( rearsegP(nil,X1)
| nil != X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
clause81 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
ssList(nil),
clause8 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ rearsegP(nil,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SWC367-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 01:48:15 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.z0PGWXL0cU/E---3.1_27187.p
% 0.15/0.43 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # new_bool_3 with pid 27266 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 27269 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 196
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 156
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses : 40
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 40
% 0.15/0.43 # Processed clauses : 26
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.15/0.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 22
% 0.15/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.15/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.15/0.43 # Generated clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.15/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.15/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 20
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 13
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 20
% 0.15/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 85
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 16
% 0.15/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2313
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 2000 pages
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1848 pages
% 0.15/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.44 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------